comp.lang.c

Liste des GroupesPages :1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132
Date Sujet#  Auteur
3 May 26 i     ii  i i`* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'92Keith Thompson
4 May 26 i     ii  i i `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'91Bart
4 May 26 i     ii  i i  +- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1Keith Thompson
4 May 26 i     ii  i i  +* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'13Waldek Hebisch
4 May 26 i     ii  i i  i`* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'12Bart
4 May 26 i     ii  i i  i +* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'10David Brown
5 May 26 i     ii  i i  i i`* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'9Janis Papanagnou
5 May 26 i     ii  i i  i i +* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'7Keith Thompson
5 May 26 i     ii  i i  i i i`* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'6Janis Papanagnou
5 May 26 i     ii  i i  i i i +* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'2David Brown
6 May 26 i     ii  i i  i i i i`- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1Janis Papanagnou
5 May 26 i     ii  i i  i i i `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'3Tim Rentsch
6 May 26 i     ii  i i  i i i  `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'2Janis Papanagnou
8 May 26 i     ii  i i  i i i   `- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1Tim Rentsch
5 May 26 i     ii  i i  i i `- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1David Brown
5 May 26 i     ii  i i  i `- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1Waldek Hebisch
4 May 26 i     ii  i i  +- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1tTh
4 May 26 i     ii  i i  +* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'4Janis Papanagnou
4 May 26 i     ii  i i  i`* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'3Keith Thompson
4 May 26 i     ii  i i  i +- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1Chris M. Thomasson
5 May 26 i     ii  i i  i `- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1David Brown
4 May 26 i     ii  i i  +- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1David Brown
4 May 26 i     ii  i i  `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'70James Kuyper
4 May 26 i     ii  i i   `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'69Bart
4 May 26 i     ii  i i    +- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1Bart
4 May 26 i     ii  i i    +- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1Keith Thompson
4 May 26 i     ii  i i    +* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'3James Kuyper
5 May 26 i     ii  i i    i`* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'2Keith Thompson
5 May 26 i     ii  i i    i `- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1James Kuyper
5 May 26 i     ii  i i    +* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'2Waldek Hebisch
5 May 26 i     ii  i i    i`- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1Janis Papanagnou
5 May 26 i     ii  i i    `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'61Dan Cross
5 May 26 i     ii  i i     +* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'55David Brown
5 May 26 i     ii  i i     i+* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'27Janis Papanagnou
5 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii`* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'26David Brown
5 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii +* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'3Richard Harnden
5 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii i+- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1David Brown
5 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii i`- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1James Kuyper
5 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'22Bart
5 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii  `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'21David Brown
5 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii   `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'20Bart
5 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii    +* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'7David Brown
5 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii    i+* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'2Bart
5 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii    ii`- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1David Brown
5 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii    i+* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'2Keith Thompson
6 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii    ii`- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1David Brown
6 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii    i`* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'2Keith Thompson
6 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii    i `- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1David Brown
5 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii    `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'12Keith Thompson
6 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii     +* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'3David Brown
6 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii     i`* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'2Keith Thompson
6 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii     i `- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1David Brown
6 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii     +* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'6Bart
6 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii     i+- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1David Brown
6 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii     i`* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'4Keith Thompson
6 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii     i `* [meta] Optimizing posting and communication (was: something about UB)3Janis Papanagnou
6 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii     i  `* Re: [meta] Optimizing posting and communication (was: something about UB)2Dan Cross
7 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii     i   `- Re: [meta] Optimizing posting and communication1Keith Thompson
6 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii     `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'2Bart
6 May 26 i     ii  i i     ii      `- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1David Brown
5 May 26 i     ii  i i     i`* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'27Dan Cross
5 May 26 i     ii  i i     i +- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1David Brown
6 May 26 i     ii  i i     i `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'25Keith Thompson
7 May 26 i     ii  i i     i  `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'24Dan Cross
7 May 26 i     ii  i i     i   +* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'3Tim Rentsch
8 May 26 i     ii  i i     i   i`* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'2Dan Cross
8 May 26 i     ii  i i     i   i `- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1Tim Rentsch
7 May 26 i     ii  i i     i   +* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'11Keith Thompson
8 May 26 i     ii  i i     i   i`* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'10Dan Cross
8 May 26 i     ii  i i     i   i +* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'2Chris M. Thomasson
8 May 26 i     ii  i i     i   i i`- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1Chris M. Thomasson
13 May 26 i     ii  i i     i   i `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'7Tim Rentsch
13 May 26 i     ii  i i     i   i  `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'6Dan Cross
13 May 26 i     ii  i i     i   i   +* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'3Keith Thompson
13 May 26 i     ii  i i     i   i   i+- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1Dan Cross
13 May 26 i     ii  i i     i   i   i`- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1Tim Rentsch
13 May 26 i     ii  i i     i   i   `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'2Tim Rentsch
14 May 26 i     ii  i i     i   i    `- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1Dan Cross
7 May 26 i     ii  i i     i   +- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1David Brown
7 May 26 i     ii  i i     i   `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'8James Kuyper
8 May 26 i     ii  i i     i    `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'7Dan Cross
8 May 26 i     ii  i i     i     +* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'3Lew Pitcher
8 May 26 i     ii  i i     i     i`* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'2James Kuyper
9 May 26 i     ii  i i     i     i `- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1Dan Cross
9 May 26 i     ii  i i     i     `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'3Tim Rentsch
9 May 26 i     ii  i i     i      `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'2Dan Cross
10 May 26 i     ii  i i     i       `- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1Keith Thompson
5 May 26 i     ii  i i     `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'5Tim Rentsch
5 May 26 i     ii  i i      `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'4Dan Cross
6 May 26 i     ii  i i       +- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1Keith Thompson
8 May 26 i     ii  i i       `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'2Tim Rentsch
9 May 26 i     ii  i i        `- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1Dan Cross
3 May 26 i     ii  i +* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'24Bart
3 May 26 i     ii  i i+* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'7Michael S
3 May 26 i     ii  i ii`* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'6Bart
3 May 26 i     ii  i ii +* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'4David Brown
3 May 26 i     ii  i ii i`* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'3Bart
4 May 26 i     ii  i ii i +- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1Janis Papanagnou
4 May 26 i     ii  i ii i `- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1David Brown
4 May 26 i     ii  i ii `- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1Michael S
3 May 26 i     ii  i i+* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'3Waldek Hebisch
3 May 26 i     ii  i ii`* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'2Bart
4 May 26 i     ii  i ii `- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1Janis Papanagnou
4 May 26 i     ii  i i+* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'12Janis Papanagnou
4 May 26 i     ii  i ii`* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'11Keith Thompson
4 May 26 i     ii  i ii +* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'3David Brown
4 May 26 i     ii  i ii i`* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'2Keith Thompson
4 May 26 i     ii  i ii i `- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1David Brown
4 May 26 i     ii  i ii `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'7Janis Papanagnou
4 May 26 i     ii  i ii  +* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'3David Brown
4 May 26 i     ii  i ii  i`* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'2Janis Papanagnou
4 May 26 i     ii  i ii  i `- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1David Brown
4 May 26 i     ii  i ii  `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'3Keith Thompson
4 May 26 i     ii  i ii   `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'2Janis Papanagnou
4 May 26 i     ii  i ii    `- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1David Brown
4 May 26 i     ii  i i`- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1James Kuyper
4 May 26 i     ii  i `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'7David Brown
4 May 26 i     ii  i  `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'6Janis Papanagnou
4 May 26 i     ii  i   `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'5David Brown
4 May 26 i     ii  i    `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'4Janis Papanagnou
4 May 26 i     ii  i     `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'3David Brown
4 May 26 i     ii  i      `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'2Janis Papanagnou
5 May 26 i     ii  i       `- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1David Brown
6 Jun 26 i     ii  `- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1dave thompson 2
2 May 26 i     i`* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'6Keith Thompson
3 May 26 i     i `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'5Bart
3 May 26 i     i  `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'4Keith Thompson
3 May 26 i     i   `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'3wij
3 May 26 i     i    `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'2Keith Thompson
3 May 26 i     i     `- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1wij
2 May 26 i     `- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1Janis Papanagnou
10 May 26 `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'4Bonita Montero
10 May 26  `* Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'3Kalevi Kolttonen
11 May 26   +- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1Keith Thompson
11 May 26   `- Re: Safety of casting from 'long' to 'int'1Bonita Montero
8 May 26 * Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch between Microsoft and IBM organizational structures” by Raymond Chen7Lawrence D’Oliveiro
3 Jun 26 `* Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch between Microsoft and IBM organizational structures” by Raymond Chen6BGB
3 Jun 26  +* Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch between Microsoft and IBM organizational structures” by Raymond Chen2Chris M. Thomasson
3 Jun 26  i`- Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch between Microsoft and IBM organizational structures” by Raymond Chen1BGB
7 Jun 26  `* Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch between Microsoft and IBM organizational structures” by Raymond Chen3Lawrence D’Oliveiro
7 Jun 26   `* Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch between Microsoft and IBM organizational structures” by Raymond Chen2Bart
7 Jun 26    `- Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch between Microsoft and IBM organizational structures” by Raymond Chen1Richard Harnden
5 Jun 26 * Is this a joke hello world or the serious business?2Anonymous Legion
5 Jun 26 `- Re: Is this a joke hello world or the serious business?1Paul
2 Jun 26 * Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch between Microsoft and IBM organizational structures” by Raymond Chen17Mario Rosell
2 Jun 26 +* Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch between Microsoft and IBM organizational structures” by Raymond Chen11Chris M. Thomasson
2 Jun 26 i`* Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch between Microsoft and IBM organizational structures” by Raymond Chen10Richard Harnden
2 Jun 26 i +- Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch between Microsoft and IBM organizational structures” by Raymond Chen1Chris M. Thomasson
2 Jun 26 i +* Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch between Microsoft and IBM organizational structures” by Raymond Chen4Chris M. Thomasson
2 Jun 26 i i`* Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch between Microsoft and IBM organizational structures” by Raymond Chen3Bart
3 Jun 26 i i +- Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch between Microsoft and IBM organizational structures” by Raymond Chen1Lawrence D’Oliveiro
3 Jun 26 i i `- Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch between Microsoft and IBM organizational structures” by Raymond Chen1Chris M. Thomasson
2 Jun 26 i +* Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch between Microsoft and IBM organizational structures” by Raymond Chen3Lynn McGuire
4 Jun 26 i i`* Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch between Microsoft and IBM organizational structures” by Raymond Chen2Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester
4 Jun 26 i i `- Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch between Microsoft and IBM organizational structures” by Raymond Chen1Lynn McGuire
3 Jun 26 i `- Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch between Microsoft and IBM organizational structures” by Raymond Chen1Lawrence D’Oliveiro
3 Jun 26 `* Are TABs a topic? ( was Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch [...])5Janis Papanagnou
3 Jun 26  `* Re: Are TABs a topic? ( was Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch [...])4Paul
3 Jun 26   +- Re: Are TABs a topic? ( was Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch [...])1Janis Papanagnou
3 Jun 26   +- Re: Are TABs a topic? ( was Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch [...])1Janis Papanagnou
4 Jun 26   `- Re: Are TABs a topic? ( was Re: “A dispute over the TAB key highlights a mismatch [...])1Lawrence D’Oliveiro
25 May 26 * Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?40Kenny McCormack
25 May 26 +- Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?1Janis Papanagnou
25 May 26 +* Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?3Bart
25 May 26 i+- The C23 thing (Was: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get) deallocated?1Kenny McCormack
25 May 26 i`- Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?1Janis Papanagnou
25 May 26 +* Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?5Andrew Smallshaw
25 May 26 i`* The whole point of this NG is worrying about "UB" (Was: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get) deallocated?4Kenny McCormack
25 May 26 i `* Re: The whole point of this NG is worrying about "UB" (Was: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get) deallocated?3Janis Papanagnou
25 May 26 i  `* Re: The whole point of this NG is worrying about "UB" (Was: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get) deallocated?2Kenny McCormack
25 May 26 i   `- Re: The whole point of this NG is worrying about "UB" (Was: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get) deallocated?1Bart
25 May 26 +* Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?6Dan Cross
25 May 26 i+- Variables in inner blocks (was: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?)1Pierre Asselin
26 May 26 i`* Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?4Dan Cross
26 May 26 i +- Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?1David Brown
1 Jun 26 i `* Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?2Tim Rentsch
1 Jun 26 i  `- Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?1Keith Thompson
25 May 26 +- Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?1David Brown
26 May 26 +* Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?13Lynn McGuire
27 May 26 i`* Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?12Dan Cross
27 May 26 i +- Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?1Kenny McCormack
27 May 26 i `* Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?10Lynn McGuire
27 May 26 i  +* Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?2Lawrence D’Oliveiro
27 May 26 i  i`- Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?1David Brown
27 May 26 i  +* Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?6Dan Cross
27 May 26 i  i+* Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?3Chris M. Thomasson
28 May 26 i  ii`* Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?2Keith Thompson
28 May 26 i  ii `- Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?1Chris M. Thomasson
28 May 26 i  i`* Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?2Waldek Hebisch
29 May 26 i  i `- Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?1Mike Terry
27 May 26 i  `- Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?1Chris M. Thomasson
27 May 26 `* Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?10fir
27 May 26  +* Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?3Bart
27 May 26  i`* Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?2fir
27 May 26  i `- Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?1fir
27 May 26  `* Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?6Lawrence D’Oliveiro
28 May 26   `* Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?5fir
28 May 26    `* Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?4Lawrence D’Oliveiro
28 May 26     `* Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?3fir
28 May 26      `* Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?2Bart
28 May 26       `- Re: Using gotos with local variables in "extra" blocks: Does it get deallocated?1fir
25 May 26 * C language podcasts, newsletters, etc Any out there?7David Ayodele
25 May 26 +- Re: C language podcasts, newsletters, etc Any out there?1🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱
25 May 26 +* Re: C language podcasts, newsletters, etc Any out there?3Lawrence D’Oliveiro
25 May 26 i+- Re: C language podcasts, newsletters, etc Any out there?1Janis Papanagnou
25 May 26 i`- hypot() looks good, but they didn't go far enough (Was: C language podcasts, newsletters, etc Any out there?)1Kenny McCormack
25 May 26 `* Re: C language podcasts, newsletters, etc Any out there?2David Brown
25 May 26  `- Re: C language podcasts, newsletters, etc Any out there?1David Ayodele
23 May 26 * tmpfile()12Paul Edwards
23 May 26 +- Re: tmpfile()1Janis Papanagnou
23 May 26 +* Re: tmpfile()4Stefan Ram
23 May 26 i`* Re: tmpfile()3Stefan Ram
25 May 26 i `* Re: tmpfile()2Paul Edwards
25 May 26 i  `- Re: tmpfile()1Lawrence D’Oliveiro
23 May 26 +* Re: tmpfile()2Pierre Asselin
24 May 26 i`- Re: tmpfile()1Lawrence D’Oliveiro
23 May 26 +* Re: tmpfile()2James Kuyper
24 May 26 i`- Re: tmpfile()1Keith Thompson
23 May 26 +- Re: tmpfile()1James Kuyper
23 May 26 `- Re: tmpfile()1James Kuyper
24 May 26 * Is this idiomatic C? (Declare where needed vs. up front)4Chris M. Thomasson
24 May 26 +- Re: Is this idiomatic C? (Declare where needed vs. up front)1makendo
24 May 26 +- Re: Is this idiomatic C? (Declare where needed vs. up front)1David Brown
25 May 26 `- Re: Is this idiomatic C? (Declare where needed vs. up front)1Lawrence D’Oliveiro
24 May 26 o offsetof for alignment....1Chris M. Thomasson
21 May 26 * Namespaces and quick abstraction in C...19Chris M. Thomasson
21 May 26 `* Re: Namespaces and quick abstraction in C...18Dan Cross
22 May 26  +* Re: Namespaces and quick abstraction in C...12Chris M. Thomasson
22 May 26  i`* Re: Namespaces and quick abstraction in C...11Keith Thompson
22 May 26  i `* Re: Namespaces and quick abstraction in C...10Chris M. Thomasson
22 May 26  i  `* Re: Namespaces and quick abstraction in C...9Dan Cross
22 May 26  i   `* Re: Namespaces and quick abstraction in C...8Chris M. Thomasson
22 May 26  i    `* Re: Namespaces and quick abstraction in C...7Dan Cross
23 May 26  i     +* Re: Namespaces and quick abstraction in C...4Chris M. Thomasson
24 May 26  i     i`* Re: Namespaces and quick abstraction in C...3Keith Thompson
24 May 26  i     i `* Re: Namespaces and quick abstraction in C...2Chris M. Thomasson
24 May 26  i     i  `- Re: Namespaces and quick abstraction in C...1David Brown
23 May 26  i     +- Re: Namespaces and quick abstraction in C...1Chris M. Thomasson
23 May 26  i     `- Re: Namespaces and quick abstraction in C...1Chris M. Thomasson
23 May 26  `* Re: Namespaces and quick abstraction in C...5Tim Rentsch
23 May 26   +- Re: Namespaces and quick abstraction in C...1Dan Cross
23 May 26   +- Re: Namespaces and quick abstraction in C...1Chris M. Thomasson
24 May 26   `* Re: Namespaces and quick abstraction in C...2Chris M. Thomasson
24 May 26    `- Re: Namespaces and quick abstraction in C...1Chris M. Thomasson
22 May 26 o public domain C compiler for i3861Paul Edwards
20 May 26 * on "non real" pointers9fir
20 May 26 +* Re: on "non real" pointers4fir
20 May 26 i`* Re: on "non real" pointers3fir
20 May 26 i `* Re: on "non real" pointers2fir
20 May 26 i  `- Re: on "non real" pointers1fir

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal