Re: Liar detector: Peter OLCOTT YES!
Richard seems to continue to blatantly lie -- I hope I am wrong about this Re: Richard seems to continue to blatantly lie -- I hope I am wrong about this Re: Richard seems to continue to blatantly lie -- I hope I am wrong about this Re: Richard seems to continue to blatantly lie -- I hope I am wrong about this Re: Richard seems to continue to blatantly lie -- I hope I am wrong about this
Re: Richard seems to continue to blatantly lie -- I hope I am wrong about this Re: Peter Olcott seems to continue to blatantly lie Re: Richard seems to continue to blatantly lie -- I hope I am wrong about this
Re: Richard seems to continue to blatantly lie -- A clearer explanation for Ben Re: Richard seems to continue to blatantly lie -- I hope I am wrong about this --- RICHARD DAMON BANNED --- Fuch off (Was: --- RICHARD DAMON BANNED ---) Richard Damon is worse than Pete Olcott (Was: Fuch off (Was: --- RICHARD DAMON BANNED ---)) Re: Fuch off (Was: --- RICHARD DAMON BANNED ---) Re: --- RICHARD DAMON BANNED --- Re: --- RICHARD DAMON BANNED --- --- OLCOTT BANNED --- I am Mild Shocked Re: I am Mildly Shocked --- typo --- OLCOTT BANNED --- I am Mildly Shocked that this guy does not know about cycles in directed graphs --- OLCOTT BANNED --- I am mildly shocked Re: --- OLCOTT BANNED --- Re: --- OLCOTT BANNED --- Please quit disrespecting me --- OLCOTT BANNED --- Try this online Prolog (Was: --- OLCOTT BANNED ---) PROLOG AND INFINITE TREES (Was: --- OLCOTT BANNED ---) Re: PROLOG AND INFINITE TREES Re: PROLOG AND INFINITE TREES (Was: --- OLCOTT BANNED ---) --- OLCOTT BANNED --- Re: --- OLCOTT BANNED --- Re: --- OLCOTT BANNED --- Re: --- OLCOTT BANNED --- Re: --- OLCOTT BANNED --- Re: --- OLCOTT BANNED --- DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt ---Eternal-September-Failure Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt ---Eternal-September-Failure
Why examine the halting problem using the x86 language? Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben fails to understand Re: Ben fails to understand Re: Ben fails to understand Re: Ben fails to understand Re: Ben fails to understand Re: Ben fails to understand Re: Ben fails to understand Re: Ben fails to understand Re: Ben fails to understand Re: Ben fails to understand Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Olcott seems to be willfully ignorant Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Olcott seems to be willfully ignorant Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Olcott seems to be willfully ignorant Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Olcott seems to be willfully ignorant Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Yes to both for Peter Olcott Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Can ADD be this severe? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Can ADD be this severe? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? For Olcott: YES to both. Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Maybe... Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Maybe... Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Maybe... Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Maybe... Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Maybe... Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Maybe... Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Maybe... Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Ben thinks processor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks processor Sipser is wrong Ben fails to understand --- supersedes the rest Re: Ben fails to understand --- supersedes the rest People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language --- repeat until acknowledged Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language --- repeat until acknowledged Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language --- repeat until acknowledged Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language --- repeat until acknowledged Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that can possibly exist DOES NOT HALT Re: DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that can possibly exist DOES NOT HALT Re: DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that can possibly exist DOES NOT HALT Re: DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that can possibly exist DOES NOT HALT Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language The Tarski Undefinability Theorem failed to understand truthmaker theory Re: The Tarski Undefinability Theorem failed to understand truthmaker theory Re: The Tarski Undefinability Theorem failed to understand truthmaker theory Re: The Tarski Undefinability Theorem failed to understand truthmaker theory, because Olcott doesn't undestand Re: The Tarski Undefinability Theorem failed to understand truthmaker theory, because Olcott doesn't undestand Re: The Tarski Undefinability Theorem failed to understand truthmaker theory, because Olcott doesn't undestand 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply