sci.logic

Liste des Groupes Pages :123456789101112131415161718192021222324
Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Jun 24 i   i        `- Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply1olcott
22 Jun 24 i   `* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply21Fred. Zwarts
22 Jun 24 i    `* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply20olcott
22 Jun 24 i     +- Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply1Richard Damon
22 Jun 24 i     +* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply2joes
22 Jun 24 i     i`- Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply1Richard Damon
22 Jun 24 i     `* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply16Fred. Zwarts
22 Jun 24 i      `* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply15olcott
22 Jun 24 i       +* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply9Richard Damon
22 Jun 24 i       i`* DDD correctly emulated by H08olcott
22 Jun 24 i       i `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H07Richard Damon
23 Jun 24 i       i  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H06olcott
23 Jun 24 i       i   `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H05Richard Damon
23 Jun 24 i       i    `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H04olcott
23 Jun 24 i       i     `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H03Richard Damon
23 Jun 24 i       i      `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H02olcott
23 Jun 24 i       i       `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H01Richard Damon
23 Jun 24 i       `* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply5Fred. Zwarts
23 Jun 24 i        `* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply4olcott
24 Jun 24 i         `* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply3Fred. Zwarts
24 Jun 24 i          `* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply2olcott
25 Jun 24 i           `- Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply1Richard Damon
24 Jun 24 `* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH064olcott
25 Jun 24  +- Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH01Richard Damon
25 Jun 24  +* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH060Fred. Zwarts
25 Jun 24  i`* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH059olcott
25 Jun 24  i +* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH055Fred. Zwarts
25 Jun 24  i i`* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH054olcott
25 Jun 24  i i +* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH047Fred. Zwarts
25 Jun 24  i i i`* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH046olcott
25 Jun 24  i i i `* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH045Fred. Zwarts
25 Jun 24  i i i  `* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH044olcott
25 Jun 24  i i i   `* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH043Fred. Zwarts
25 Jun 24  i i i    `* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH042olcott
26 Jun 24  i i i     `* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH041Fred. Zwarts
26 Jun 24  i i i      +* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH08olcott
27 Jun 24  i i i      i`* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH07Fred. Zwarts
27 Jun 24  i i i      i `* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH06olcott
28 Jun 24  i i i      i  `* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH05Fred. Zwarts
28 Jun 24  i i i      i   `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH4olcott
28 Jun 24  i i i      i    `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH3Fred. Zwarts
28 Jun 24  i i i      i     `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH2olcott
28 Jun 24  i i i      i      `- Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH1Fred. Zwarts
26 Jun 24  i i i      `* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH032olcott
27 Jun 24  i i i       `* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH031Fred. Zwarts
27 Jun 24  i i i        `* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH030olcott
28 Jun 24  i i i         +* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH015Fred. Zwarts
28 Jun 24  i i i         i`* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH14olcott
28 Jun 24  i i i         i `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH13Fred. Zwarts
28 Jun 24  i i i         i  `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH12olcott
28 Jun 24  i i i         i   `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH11Fred. Zwarts
28 Jun 24  i i i         i    `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH10olcott
28 Jun 24  i i i         i     `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH9Fred. Zwarts
28 Jun 24  i i i         i      `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH8olcott
28 Jun 24  i i i         i       `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH7Fred. Zwarts
28 Jun 24  i i i         i        `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH6olcott
28 Jun 24  i i i         i         `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH5Fred. Zwarts
28 Jun 24  i i i         i          `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH4olcott
29 Jun 24  i i i         i           `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH3Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun 24  i i i         i            `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH2olcott
30 Jun 24  i i i         i             `- Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH1Richard Damon
28 Jun 24  i i i         `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH14olcott
3 Jul 24  i i i          `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH13olcott
3 Jul 24  i i i           `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH12Richard Damon
3 Jul 24  i i i            `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH11olcott
3 Jul 24  i i i             `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH10Richard Damon
3 Jul 24  i i i              `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH --- clueless9olcott
3 Jul 24  i i i               `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH --- clueless8Richard Damon
3 Jul 24  i i i                `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH --- Richard proves that he is clueless7olcott
3 Jul 24  i i i                 `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH --- Richard proves that he is clueless6Richard Damon
3 Jul 24  i i i                  `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH --- Richard proves that he is clueless5olcott
3 Jul 24  i i i                   `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH --- Richard proves that he is clueless4Richard Damon
3 Jul 24  i i i                    `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH --- Richard proves that he is clueless3olcott
3 Jul 24  i i i                     +- Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH --- Richard proves that he is clueless1Richard Damon
3 Jul 24  i i i                     `- Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH --- Richard proves that he is clueless1Richard Damon
26 Jun 24  i i `* DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure6olcott
26 Jun 24  i i  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure5Alan Mackenzie
26 Jun 24  i i   `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure4olcott
26 Jun 24  i i    +- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure --- addendum1olcott
26 Jun 24  i i    `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure2joes
26 Jun 24  i i     `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure1olcott
26 Jun 24  i `* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH03Richard Damon
26 Jun 24  i  `* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH02olcott
26 Jun 24  i   `- Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH01Richard Damon
25 Jun 24  `* Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH02joes
25 Jun 24   `- Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH01olcott
10 Jun 24 * Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS ---270olcott
10 Jun 24 +* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS ---267Richard Damon
11 Jun 24 i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- Richard admits his error266olcott
11 Jun 24 i `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- Richard admits his error265Richard Damon
11 Jun 24 i  `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- Richard admits his error264olcott
11 Jun 24 i   `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- Richard admits his error263Richard Damon
11 Jun 24 i    `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten262olcott
12 Jun 24 i     +* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten260Richard Damon
12 Jun 24 i     i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten259olcott
12 Jun 24 i     i +* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten223Python
12 Jun 24 i     i i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten222olcott
12 Jun 24 i     i i `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten221Richard Damon
12 Jun 24 i     i i  `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten220olcott
12 Jun 24 i     i i   `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten219Richard Damon
12 Jun 24 i     i i    `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules218olcott
13 Jun 24 i     i i     `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules217Richard Damon
13 Jun 24 i     i i      `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules216olcott
13 Jun 24 i     i i       `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules215Richard Damon
13 Jun 24 i     i i        `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules214olcott
13 Jun 24 i     i i         `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules213Richard Damon
13 Jun 24 i     i i          `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules212olcott
13 Jun 24 i     i i           `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules211Richard Damon
13 Jun 24 i     i i            `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules210olcott
13 Jun 24 i     i i             `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules209Richard Damon
13 Jun 24 i     i i              `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules208olcott
13 Jun 24 i     i i               `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules207Richard Damon
13 Jun 24 i     i i                `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules206olcott
13 Jun 24 i     i i                 `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules205Richard Damon
13 Jun 24 i     i i                  `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules204olcott
13 Jun 24 i     i i                   `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules203Richard Damon
13 Jun 24 i     i i                    `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules202olcott
14 Jun 24 i     i i                     `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules201Richard Damon
14 Jun 24 i     i i                      +* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules172olcott
14 Jun 24 i     i i                      i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules171Richard Damon
14 Jun 24 i     i i                      i `* H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)170olcott
14 Jun 24 i     i i                      i  `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)169Richard Damon
14 Jun 24 i     i i                      i   `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)168olcott
14 Jun 24 i     i i                      i    `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)167Richard Damon
14 Jun 24 i     i i                      i     `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)166olcott
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      +* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)58Richard Damon
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i`* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)57olcott
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)56Richard Damon
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i  +* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)6olcott
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i  i`* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)5Richard Damon
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i  i `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)4olcott
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i  i  `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)3Richard Damon
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i  i   `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)2olcott
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i  i    `- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)1Richard Damon
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i  `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)49olcott
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i   `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)48Richard Damon
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i    `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.47olcott
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     +* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.39Richard Damon
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i`* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.38olcott
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.37Richard Damon
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i  `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.36olcott
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i   `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.35Richard Damon
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i    `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.34olcott
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i     `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.33Richard Damon
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i      `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.32olcott
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i       `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.31Richard Damon
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i        `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.30olcott
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i         `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.29Richard Damon
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i          `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.28olcott
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i           `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.27Richard Damon
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i            `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.26olcott
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i             `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.25Richard Damon
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i              `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.24olcott
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i               `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.23Richard Damon
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i                `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.22olcott
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i                 `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.21Richard Damon
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i                  `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.20olcott
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i                   `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.19Richard Damon
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i                    `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.18olcott
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i                     `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.17Richard Damon
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i                      `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.16olcott
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i                       `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.15Richard Damon
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i                        `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.14olcott
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i                         `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.13Richard Damon
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i                          `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.12olcott
16 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i                           `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.11Richard Damon
16 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i                            `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.10olcott
16 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i                             `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.9Richard Damon
16 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i                              `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.8olcott
16 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i                               `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.7Richard Damon
16 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i                                `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.6olcott
16 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i                                 `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.5Richard Damon
16 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i                                  `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.4olcott
16 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i                                   `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.3Richard Damon
16 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i                                    `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.2olcott
16 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     i                                     `- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.1Richard Damon
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i     `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.7joes
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i      `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.6olcott
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i       `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. (Just misunderstood)5Richard Damon
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i        +* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. (Just misunderstood)2olcott
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i        i`- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. (Just misunderstood)1Richard Damon
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i        `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. (Just misunderstood)2olcott
15 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i         `- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. (Just misunderstood)1Richard Damon
21 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      +* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply48olcott
21 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i`* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply47Richard Damon
21 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i +* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply44olcott
21 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i`* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply43Richard Damon
21 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply42olcott
21 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i  `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply41Richard Damon
21 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i   `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply40olcott
21 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i    `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply39Richard Damon
21 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i     `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply38olcott
21 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i      `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply37Richard Damon
21 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i       `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply36olcott
21 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i        `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply35Richard Damon
21 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i         `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply34olcott
21 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i          `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply33Richard Damon
21 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i           `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply32olcott
21 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i            `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply31Richard Damon
21 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i             `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply30olcott
21 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i              `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply29Richard Damon
21 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i               `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply28olcott
21 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                +* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply19Richard Damon
21 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                i`* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply18olcott
21 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                i `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply17Richard Damon
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                i  +* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply4olcott
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                i  i`* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply3Richard Damon
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                i  i `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply2olcott
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                i  i  `- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply1Richard Damon
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                i  `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Dogma12olcott
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                i   `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Dogma11Richard Damon
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                i    `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Dogma10olcott
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                i     +* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Dogma6joes
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                i     i`* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Dogma5olcott
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                i     i +- Re: Dogma -- other deciders1joes
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                i     i `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Dogma3Richard Damon
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                i     i  `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Dogma2olcott
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                i     i   `- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Dogma1Richard Damon
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                i     `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Dogma3Richard Damon
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                i      `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Dogma2olcott
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                i       `- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Dogma1Richard Damon
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply8joes
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                 `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply7olcott
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                  +* Re: Boilerplate Reply -- different simulation3joes
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                  i`* Re: Boilerplate Reply -- different simulation2olcott
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                  i `- Re: Boilerplate Reply -- different simulation1joes
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                  `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply3Richard Damon
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                   `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply2olcott
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i i                    `- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply1Richard Damon
21 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply2olcott
21 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      i  `- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply1Richard Damon
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i      `* DDD correctly emulated by H059olcott
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i       +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H03Fred. Zwarts
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i       i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H02olcott
22 Jun 24 i     i i                      i       i `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H01Richard Damon
25 Jun 24 i     i i                      i       `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H055joes
25 Jun 24 i     i i                      i        `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H054olcott
25 Jun 24 i     i i                      i         `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H053Alan Mackenzie
25 Jun 24 i     i i                      i          +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H05olcott
25 Jun 24 i     i i                      i          i+- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H01Alan Mackenzie
25 Jun 24 i     i i                      i          i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H03joes
25 Jun 24 i     i i                      i          i `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H02olcott
25 Jun 24 i     i i                      i          i  `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H01joes
25 Jun 24 i     i i                      i          +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Ben fails to understand computable functions2olcott
26 Jun 24 i     i i                      i          i`- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Ben fails to understand computable functions1Richard Damon
25 Jun 24 i     i i                      i          +- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H01olcott
25 Jun 24 i     i i                      i          `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met44olcott
26 Jun 24 i     i i                      i           `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met43Richard Damon
26 Jun 24 i     i i                      i            `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met42olcott
26 Jun 24 i     i i                      i             `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met41Richard Damon

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal