comp.os.linux.advocacy

Liste des Groupes Pages :1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435
Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Mar 25 `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)25Physfitfreak
11 Mar 25  +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)16Physfitfreak
11 Mar 25  i+- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Jim Pennino
11 Mar 25  i+- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25  i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)13Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25  i +* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)9%
12 Mar 25  i i+* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25  i ii`- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1%
12 Mar 25  i i`* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Jim Pennino
12 Mar 25  i i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Physfitfreak
13 Mar 25  i i  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4%
13 Mar 25  i i   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Jim Pennino
13 Mar 25  i i    +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
13 Mar 25  i i    `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
14 Mar 25  i `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Physfitfreak
14 Mar 25  i  +- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1%
14 Mar 25  i  `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25  `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)8Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25   `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)7bertitaylor
16 Mar 25    `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)6Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25     `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)5Bertitaylor
16 Mar 25      `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)4Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25       `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)3Bertitaylor
16 Mar 25        `* Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)2Physfitfreak
16 Mar 25         `- Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)1Bertitaylor
13 Mar 25 * Linux 6.13.717vallor
13 Mar 25 +* Re: Linux 6.13.72rbowman
13 Mar 25 i`- Re: Linux 6.13.71vallor
13 Mar 25 `* Re: Linux 6.13.714Farley Flud
14 Mar 25  +* Re: Linux 6.13.711vallor
14 Mar 25  i+* Re: Linux 6.13.73Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Mar 25  ii`* Re: Linux 6.13.72vallor
16 Mar 25  ii `- Re: Linux 6.13.71Andy Gerald
14 Mar 25  i+* Re: Linux 6.13.72vallor
15 Mar 25  ii`- Re: Linux 6.13.71vallor
14 Mar 25  i+* Re: Linux 6.13.72Stéphane CARPENTIER
14 Mar 25  ii`- Re: Linux 6.13.71Stéphane CARPENTIER
14 Mar 25  i`* Re: Linux 6.13.73Physfitfreak
15 Mar 25  i +- Re: Linux 6.13.71vallor
15 Mar 25  i `- Re: Linux 6.13.71-hh
14 Mar 25  `* Re: Linux 6.13.72Stéphane CARPENTIER
14 Mar 25   `- Re: Linux 6.13.71Stéphane CARPENTIER
13 Mar 25 * Death By Auto-Immune Disease7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Mar 25 +- Re: Death By Auto-Immune Disease1Paul
14 Mar 25 +* Re: Death By Auto-Immune Disease2Alan K.
14 Mar 25 i`- Re: Death By Auto-Immune Disease1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Mar 25 `* Re: Death By Auto-Immune Disease3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Mar 25  +- Re: Death By Auto-Immune Disease1Paul
15 Mar 25  `- Re: Death By Auto-Immune Disease1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Mar 25 * Test post4x
15 Mar 25 +* Re: Test post2vallor
15 Mar 25 i`- Re: Test post1%
15 Mar 25 `- Re: Test post1RonB
14 Mar 25 o Re: Insurance Money Is Proof Of Vaccine Effectiveness1Physfitfreak
14 Mar 25 o Re: Wiley's Poison Squad (Re: Tariffs should go to Desease control [Wuhan virus coming])1Physfitfreak
14 Mar 25 * Re: Tariffs should go to Desease control [Wuhan virus coming]2Physfitfreak
14 Mar 25 `- Re: Tariffs should go to Desease control [Wuhan virus coming]1%
13 Mar 25 * Re: #BoycottUSA eat more Cordon Bleu (Re: How to persuade Woman to smoke?)2Physfitfreak
13 Mar 25 `- Re: #BoycottUSA eat more Cordon Bleu (Re: How to persuade Woman to smoke?)1%
13 Mar 25 * Re: Join The REAL Advocacy2vallor
13 Mar 25 `- Re: Join The REAL Advocacy1%
12 Mar 25 o Re: RIP London1Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25 * Re: Join The REAL Advocacy2Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25 `- Re: Join The REAL Advocacy1Physfitfreak
12 Mar 25 o Re: Join The REAL Advocacy1Physfitfreak
11 Mar 25 * Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2Physfitfreak
11 Mar 25 `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
11 Mar 25 o Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Physfitfreak
11 Mar 25 o While you're all talking about OT T's...1vallor
2 Mar 25 * Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 201446Adison Vohn Caterson
2 Mar 25 +* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 201444rbowman
2 Mar 25 i`* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 201443Adison Vohn Caterson
3 Mar 25 i +* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20142pothead
3 Mar 25 i i`- Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20141rbowman
3 Mar 25 i +- Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20141rbowman
3 Mar 25 i +- Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20141rbowman
3 Mar 25 i `* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 201438RonB
3 Mar 25 i  +* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20144rbowman
4 Mar 25 i  i`* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20143RonB
7 Mar 25 i  i `* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20142Stéphane CARPENTIER
8 Mar 25 i  i  `- Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20141rbowman
4 Mar 25 i  `* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 201433RonB
4 Mar 25 i   `* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 201432rbowman
5 Mar 25 i    +- Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20141rbowman
5 Mar 25 i    +* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20142vallor
6 Mar 25 i    i`- Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20141candycanearter07
6 Mar 25 i    +* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20142RonB
6 Mar 25 i    i`- Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20141rbowman
6 Mar 25 i    `* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 201426RonB
6 Mar 25 i     +* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20146Sn!pe
6 Mar 25 i     i`* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20145Sn!pe
7 Mar 25 i     i +- Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20141%
7 Mar 25 i     i +- Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20141RonB
7 Mar 25 i     i `* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20142RonB
7 Mar 25 i     i  `- Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20141rbowman
6 Mar 25 i     `* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 201419rbowman
7 Mar 25 i      `* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 201418RonB
7 Mar 25 i       `* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 201417RonB
7 Mar 25 i        `* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 201416rbowman
7 Mar 25 i         `* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 201415RonB
8 Mar 25 i          +- Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20141rbowman
8 Mar 25 i          +* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 201412RonB
8 Mar 25 i          i+* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20147vallor
8 Mar 25 i          ii`* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20146Chris Ahlstrom
8 Mar 25 i          ii `* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20145rbowman
9 Mar 25 i          ii  `* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20144RonB
9 Mar 25 i          ii   `* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20143rbowman
10 Mar 25 i          ii    `* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20142RonB
10 Mar 25 i          ii     `- Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20141rbowman
8 Mar 25 i          i+* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20142rbowman
10 Mar 25 i          ii`- Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20141RonB
9 Mar 25 i          i`* Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20142RonB
10 Mar 25 i          i `- Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20141RonB
8 Mar 25 i          `- Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20141RonB
5 Mar 25 `- Re: A quick search on _noticeable_ Linux improvements since 20141c186282
21 Feb 25 * Who Knows X?3Farley Flud
21 Feb 25 `* Re: Who Knows X?2Physfitfreak
10 Mar 25  `- Re: Who Knows X?1candycanearter07
16 Feb 25 * Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms43Johnny LaRue
16 Feb 25 +- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Adison Vohn Caterson
16 Feb 25 +* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms17rbowman
17 Feb 25 i+- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1rbowman
17 Feb 25 i+* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms14Anton Shepelev
17 Feb 25 ii+* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms8rbowman
20 Feb 25 iii`* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms7Anton Shepelev
20 Feb 25 iii +- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Kerr-Mudd, John
20 Feb 25 iii `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms5rbowman
20 Feb 25 iii  `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms4Frank Slootweg
21 Feb 25 iii   `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms3Daniel70
21 Feb 25 iii    +- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Frank Slootweg
24 Feb 25 iii    `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Daniel70
17 Feb 25 ii`* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms5Kerr-Mudd, John
20 Feb 25 ii +* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms3Anton Shepelev
20 Feb 25 ii i`* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms2Kerr-Mudd, John
20 Feb 25 ii i `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Anton Shepelev
20 Feb 25 ii `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Anton Shepelev
18 Feb 25 i`- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Daniel70
17 Feb 25 +* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms14Chris
17 Feb 25 i+* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms8Chris
21 Feb 25 ii`* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Feb 25 ii `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Feb 25 ii  `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms5Paul
21 Feb 25 ii   +* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms2Frank Slootweg
21 Feb 25 ii   i`- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Paul
21 Feb 25 ii   `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Feb 25 ii    `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Paul
20 Feb 25 i+* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Feb 25 ii+* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms2Mark Lloyd
21 Feb 25 iii`- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1DFS
10 Mar 25 ii`- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1candycanearter07
21 Feb 25 i`- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Paul
17 Feb 25 +* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms9Anton Shepelev
17 Feb 25 i+* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms3Kerr-Mudd, John
20 Feb 25 ii`* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms2Anton Shepelev
20 Feb 25 ii `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Chris Ahlstrom
20 Feb 25 i`* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Feb 25 i `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms4rbowman
21 Feb 25 i  `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms3Kerr-Mudd, John
21 Feb 25 i   `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Feb 25 i    `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Paul
20 Feb 25 `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Feb 25 * Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again98RonB
8 Feb 25 `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again97RonB
8 Feb 25  +* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again95RonB
9 Feb 25  i+- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1rbowman
10 Feb 25  i`* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again93RonB
11 Feb 25  i `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again92RonB
11 Feb 25  i  +* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again12rbowman
12 Feb 25  i  i+* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again9rbowman
12 Feb 25  i  ii`* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again8rbowman
13 Feb 25  i  ii +* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again3RonB
13 Feb 25  i  ii i+- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1vallor
14 Feb 25  i  ii i`- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1RonB
14 Feb 25  i  ii `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Feb 25  i  ii  `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Feb 25  i  ii   `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Feb 25  i  ii    `- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
12 Feb 25  i  i`* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again2RonB
12 Feb 25  i  i `- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1rbowman
12 Feb 25  i  +* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again63Lawrence D'Oliveiro
12 Feb 25  i  i+- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1DFS
12 Feb 25  i  i+- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
12 Feb 25  i  i+- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1vallor
12 Feb 25  i  i+- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1RonB
15 Feb 25  i  i`* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again58Stéphane CARPENTIER
15 Feb 25  i  i +* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again9rbowman
15 Feb 25  i  i i+* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again6Stéphane CARPENTIER
16 Feb 25  i  i ii+* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again3vallor
16 Feb 25  i  i iii+- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1rbowman
16 Feb 25  i  i iii`- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1Stéphane CARPENTIER
16 Feb 25  i  i ii`* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again2rbowman
16 Feb 25  i  i ii `- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1Stéphane CARPENTIER
16 Feb 25  i  i i`* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again2rbowman
16 Feb 25  i  i i `- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1Stéphane CARPENTIER
15 Feb 25  i  i `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again48Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Feb 25  i  i  +* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again3Stéphane CARPENTIER
16 Feb 25  i  i  i`* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Feb 25  i  i  i `- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1Stéphane CARPENTIER
16 Feb 25  i  i  `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again44vallor
16 Feb 25  i  i   +* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Feb 25  i  i   i`- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1vallor
16 Feb 25  i  i   `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again41pothead
16 Feb 25  i  i    +* Pan (was: Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again)3vallor
16 Feb 25  i  i    i+- Re: Pan (was: Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again)1pothead
16 Feb 25  i  i    i`- Re: Pan (was: Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again)1rbowman
16 Feb 25  i  i    +* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again6vallor
17 Feb 25  i  i    i`* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Feb 25  i  i    i +* (more on) Pan (was: Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again)3vallor
17 Feb 25  i  i    i i`* Re: (more on) Pan (was: Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again)2rbowman
17 Feb 25  i  i    i i `- Re: (more on) Pan1Sn!pe
17 Feb 25  i  i    i `- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Feb 25  i  i    `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again31rbowman
16 Feb 25  i  i     `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again30vallor
16 Feb 25  i  i      +* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again20rbowman
16 Feb 25  i  i      i`* Agent isn't open source.19vallor
16 Feb 25  i  i      i +* Re: Agent isn't open source.6%
16 Feb 25  i  i      i i+* Re: Agent isn't open source.4Stéphane CARPENTIER
16 Feb 25  i  i      i ii+* Re: Agent isn't open source.2%
17 Feb 25  i  i      i iii`- Re: Agent isn't open source.1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Feb 25  i  i      i ii`- Re: Agent isn't open source.1Stéphane CARPENTIER
16 Feb 25  i  i      i i`- Linux and Pan are open source (was: Re: Agent isn't open source.)1vallor
16 Feb 25  i  i      i +* Re: Agent isn't open source.2Chris Ahlstrom
10 Mar 25  i  i      i i`- Re: Agent isn't open source.1candycanearter07
16 Feb 25  i  i      i +* Re: Agent isn't open source.9Sn!pe
16 Feb 25  i  i      i i`* Re: Agent isn't open source.8vallor
16 Feb 25  i  i      i i +- Re: Agent isn't open source.1%
16 Feb 25  i  i      i i `* [OT] Ice cream (was: Re: Agent isn't open source.)6Sn!pe
16 Feb 25  i  i      i i  +- Re: [OT] Ice cream1%
16 Feb 25  i  i      i i  `* Re: [OT] Ice cream (was: Re: Agent isn't open source.)4vallor
16 Feb 25  i  i      i i   +- Re: [OT] Ice cream1Sn!pe
17 Feb 25  i  i      i i   `* Re: [OT] Ice cream (was: Re: Agent isn't open source.)2rbowman
17 Feb 25  i  i      i i    `- Re: [OT] Ice cream1Physfitfreak
16 Feb 25  i  i      i `- Re: Agent isn't open source.1Physfitfreak
16 Feb 25  i  i      +* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again8Chris Ahlstrom
16 Feb 25  i  i      i+* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again6vallor
16 Feb 25  i  i      ii+* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again4%
16 Feb 25  i  i      iii`* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again3Adison Vohn Caterson
16 Feb 25  i  i      iii `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again2%
16 Feb 25  i  i      iii  `- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1Adison Vohn Caterson
16 Feb 25  i  i      ii`- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1Stéphane CARPENTIER
16 Feb 25  i  i      i`- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1rbowman
10 Mar 25  i  i      `- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1candycanearter07
12 Feb 25  i  `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again16RonB
12 Feb 25  i   +- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1rbowman
13 Feb 25  i   `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again14RonB
13 Feb 25  i    +- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1rbowman
14 Feb 25  i    `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again12RonB
14 Feb 25  i     +* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again4rbowman
14 Feb 25  i     i`* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again3vallor
15 Feb 25  i     i `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again2rbowman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal