sci.physics.relativity

Liste des Groupes Pages :123456789101112131415161718192021222324
Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 Sep 24         `* Re: A definition of "when"2Python
20 Sep 24          `- Re: A definition of "when"1Richard Hachel
13 Sep 24 * Re: No evidence39LaurenceClarkCrossen
13 Sep 24 +* Re: No evidence2gharnagel
14 Sep 24 i`- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
14 Sep 24 `* Re: No evidence36Mikko
15 Sep 24  +* Re: No evidence5LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24  i+- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24  i`* Re: No evidence3Mikko
15 Sep 24  i +- Re: No evidence1Maciej Wozniak
15 Sep 24  i `- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24  `* Re: No evidence30LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24   +* Re: No evidence11gharnagel
15 Sep 24   i+* Re: No evidence9LaurenceClarkCrossen
16 Sep 24   ii`* Re: No evidence8gharnagel
16 Sep 24   ii +- Re: No evidence (rotating frames)1Ross Finlayson
16 Sep 24   ii `* Re: No evidence6gharnagel
18 Sep 24   ii  `* Re: No evidence5gharnagel
18 Sep 24   ii   `* Re: No evidence4gharnagel
18 Sep 24   ii    `* Re: No evidence3gharnagel
20 Sep 24   ii     `* Re: No evidence2gharnagel
20 Sep 24   ii      `- Re: No evidence1Maciej Wozniak
16 Sep 24   i`- Re: No evidence1gharnagel
15 Sep 24   `* Re: No evidence18Mikko
15 Sep 24    +- Re: No evidence1Maciej Wozniak
15 Sep 24    +* Re: No evidence4LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Sep 24    i`* Re: No evidence3Mikko
17 Sep 24    i +- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
20 Sep 24    i `- Re: No evidence1Thomas Heger
15 Sep 24    +* Re: No evidence5LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Sep 24    i`* Re: No evidence4Mikko
17 Sep 24    i `* Re: No evidence3Richard Hachel
19 Sep 24    i  `* Re: No evidence2Mikko
19 Sep 24    i   `- Re: No evidence1Richard Hachel
15 Sep 24    `* Re: No evidence7LaurenceClarkCrossen
16 Sep 24     +- Re: No evidence1gharnagel
16 Sep 24     +- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Sep 24     `* Re: No evidence4Mikko
17 Sep 24      `* Re: No evidence3LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Sep 24       `* Re: No evidence2Mikko
19 Sep 24        `- Re: No evidence1Maciej Wozniak
19 Sep 24 o Ether1Richard Hachel
18 Sep 24 * Another Mainstream "Science" Long Ago Thoroughly Refuted4LaurenceClarkCrossen
18 Sep 24 +* Re: Another Mainstream "Science" Long Ago Thoroughly Refuted2LaurenceClarkCrossen
18 Sep 24 i`- Re: Another Mainstream "Science" Long Ago Thoroughly Refuted1Python
19 Sep 24 `- Re: Another Mainstream "Science" Long Ago Thoroughly Refuted1Mikko
18 Sep 24 o Re: Mars is a dead planet1Chris M. Thomasson
15 Sep 24 * Where the 20th century lost its way. Time is not a dimension4LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24 `* Re: Where the 20th century lost its way. Time is not a dimension3LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Sep 24  +- Re: Where the 20th century lost its way. Time is not a dimension1LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Sep 24  `- Re: Where the 20th century lost its way. Time is not a dimension1LaurenceClarkCrossen
14 Sep 24 * In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,27rhertz
14 Sep 24 +* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,6LaurenceClarkCrossen
14 Sep 24 i`* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,5rhertz
14 Sep 24 i +- Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,1Ross Finlayson
14 Sep 24 i +* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,2Richard Hachel
14 Sep 24 i i`- Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,1Ross Finlayson
15 Sep 24 i `- Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,1Thomas Heger
14 Sep 24 +* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,11Paul.B.Andersen
14 Sep 24 i+- Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,1Paul.B.Andersen
15 Sep 24 i`* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,9rhertz
15 Sep 24 i +* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,7rhertz
15 Sep 24 i i`* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,6Ross Finlayson
15 Sep 24 i i `* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,5rhertz
15 Sep 24 i i  `* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,4LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24 i i   `* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,3Ross Finlayson
15 Sep 24 i i    `* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,2Ross Finlayson
15 Sep 24 i i     `- Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,1Ross Finlayson
15 Sep 24 i `- Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,1Paul.B.Andersen
16 Sep 24 `* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,9Mikko
16 Sep 24  `* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,8rhertz
16 Sep 24   +* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,5Paul.B.Andersen
16 Sep 24   i+- Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,1Maciej Wozniak
16 Sep 24   i`* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,3rhertz
17 Sep 24   i `* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,2Paul.B.Andersen
17 Sep 24   i  `- Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,1LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Sep 24   +- Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,1Mikko
17 Sep 24   `- Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,1Mikko
16 Sep 24 * Relativistic synchronization3Richard Hachel
16 Sep 24 `* Re: Relativistic synchronization2Paul.B.Andersen
16 Sep 24  `- Re: Relativistic synchronization1Richard Hachel
4 Sep 24 * Yes, t'=t in GPS.60Maciej Wozniak
4 Sep 24 `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.59Python
4 Sep 24  `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.58Maciej Wozniak
4 Sep 24   `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.57gharnagel
4 Sep 24    `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.56Maciej Wozniak
4 Sep 24     +* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.14Python
4 Sep 24     i`* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.13Maciej Wozniak
4 Sep 24     i `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.12Python
5 Sep 24     i  +- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Maciej Wozniak
5 Sep 24     i  `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.10Thomas Heger
5 Sep 24     i   `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.9Maciej Wozniak
6 Sep 24     i    `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.8Thomas Heger
6 Sep 24     i     `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.7Maciej Wozniak
7 Sep 24     i      `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.6Thomas Heger
13 Sep 24     i       `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.5Thomas Heger
13 Sep 24     i        +- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Athel Cornish-Bowden
13 Sep 24     i        `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.3Maciej Wozniak
14 Sep 24     i         `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.2Thomas Heger
14 Sep 24     i          `- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Maciej Wozniak
5 Sep 24     `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.41gharnagel
5 Sep 24      +- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Python
5 Sep 24      `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.39gharnagel
5 Sep 24       `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.38Maciej Wozniak
6 Sep 24        `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.37gharnagel
6 Sep 24         `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.36Maciej Wozniak
7 Sep 24          `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.35gharnagel
7 Sep 24           `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.34Maciej Wozniak
8 Sep 24            `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.33gharnagel
8 Sep 24             `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.32Maciej Wozniak
9 Sep 24              `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.31gharnagel
10 Sep 24               `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.30gharnagel
10 Sep 24                `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.29gharnagel
10 Sep 24                 `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.28Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                  +* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.8Python
10 Sep 24                  i`* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.7Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                  i `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.6Python
10 Sep 24                  i  `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.5Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                  i   `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.4Python
10 Sep 24                  i    `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.3Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                  i     `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.2Python
11 Sep 24                  i      `- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                  `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.19gharnagel
10 Sep 24                   `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.18Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                    +* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.7Python
10 Sep 24                    i`* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.6Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                    i +* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.4Python
10 Sep 24                    i i+- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Maciej Wozniak
11 Sep 24                    i i`* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.2Richard Hachel
11 Sep 24                    i i `- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Python
10 Sep 24                    i `- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Python
11 Sep 24                    `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.10gharnagel
11 Sep 24                     `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.9Maciej Wozniak
12 Sep 24                      `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.8gharnagel
12 Sep 24                       `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.7Maciej Wozniak
13 Sep 24                        `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.6gharnagel
13 Sep 24                         `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.5Maciej Wozniak
14 Sep 24                          `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.4gharnagel
14 Sep 24                           `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.3Maciej Wozniak
14 Sep 24                            +- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Richard Hachel
15 Sep 24                            `- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1gharnagel
8 Sep 24 * Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.56LaurenceClarkCrossen
9 Sep 24 `* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.55rhertz
9 Sep 24  +* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.5Ross Finlayson
9 Sep 24  i`* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.4rhertz
9 Sep 24  i `* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.3Ross Finlayson
9 Sep 24  i  `* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.2Ross Finlayson
9 Sep 24  i   `- Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.1Ross Finlayson
9 Sep 24  +* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.47LaurenceClarkCrossen
9 Sep 24  i`* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.46Richard Hachel
9 Sep 24  i +- Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.1Ross Finlayson
9 Sep 24  i +* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.43Paul.B.Andersen
9 Sep 24  i i+- Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
9 Sep 24  i i+* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.14LaurenceClarkCrossen
11 Sep 24  i ii+- Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.1Ross Finlayson
10 Sep 24  i ii+- Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.1Ross Finlayson
13 Sep 24  i ii`* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.11Ross Finlayson
13 Sep 24  i ii `* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.10rhertz
13 Sep 24  i ii  +* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.4Paul.B.Andersen
13 Sep 24  i ii  i+* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.2rhertz
14 Sep 24  i ii  ii`- Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.1Paul.B.Andersen
13 Sep 24  i ii  i`- Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
13 Sep 24  i ii  +- Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.1Ross Finlayson
14 Sep 24  i ii  `* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.4Volney
14 Sep 24  i ii   `* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.3Ross Finlayson
14 Sep 24  i ii    `* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.2Ross Finlayson
14 Sep 24  i ii     `- Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.1Ross Finlayson
9 Sep 24  i i+- Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
10 Sep 24  i i+* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.2rhertz
10 Sep 24  i ii`- Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.1Paul.B.Andersen
10 Sep 24  i i`* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.24LaurenceClarkCrossen
10 Sep 24  i i `* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.23Richard Hachel
10 Sep 24  i i  +* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.7gharnagel
10 Sep 24  i i  i`* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.6LaurenceClarkCrossen
11 Sep 24  i i  i +* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.4gharnagel
11 Sep 24  i i  i i`* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.3LaurenceClarkCrossen
11 Sep 24  i i  i i `* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.2Richard Hachel
11 Sep 24  i i  i i  `- Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.1gharnagel
11 Sep 24  i i  i `- Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.1Richard Hachel
10 Sep 24  i i  `* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.15LaurenceClarkCrossen
10 Sep 24  i i   +* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.11Python
10 Sep 24  i i   i+* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.8LaurenceClarkCrossen
10 Sep 24  i i   ii+* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.3Python
11 Sep 24  i i   iii`* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
11 Sep 24  i i   iii `- Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.1Python
11 Sep 24  i i   ii`* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.4Richard Hachel
11 Sep 24  i i   ii `* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.3Python
11 Sep 24  i i   ii  `* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.2Richard Hachel
11 Sep 24  i i   ii   `- Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.1Python
10 Sep 24  i i   i`* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
10 Sep 24  i i   i `- Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.1Python
10 Sep 24  i i   `* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.3Richard Hachel
10 Sep 24  i i    `* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.2Python
11 Sep 24  i i     `- Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.1Maciej Wozniak
9 Sep 24  i `- Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
13 Sep 24  `* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.2Thomas Heger
13 Sep 24   `- Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
13 Sep 24 o Re: The definition of "when"1Maciej Wozniak
5 Sep 24 * Langevin and Doppler effects...25Richard Hachel
6 Sep 24 +* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...2Python
6 Sep 24 i`- Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...1Richard Hachel
6 Sep 24 +* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...18Paul.B.Andersen
6 Sep 24 i`* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...17Richard Hachel
7 Sep 24 i `* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...16Paul.B.Andersen
7 Sep 24 i  `* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...15Richard Hachel
7 Sep 24 i   +- Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...1Richard Hachel
9 Sep 24 i   `* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...13Paul.B.Andersen
9 Sep 24 i    `* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...12Richard Hachel
11 Sep 24 i     `* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...11Paul.B.Andersen
11 Sep 24 i      +* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...2Python
11 Sep 24 i      i`- Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...1Richard Hachel
11 Sep 24 i      +- Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...1Richard Hachel
11 Sep 24 i      `* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...7Richard Hachel
12 Sep 24 i       `* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...6Paul.B.Andersen
12 Sep 24 i        `* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...5Richard Hachel
12 Sep 24 i         +* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...3Python
12 Sep 24 i         i`* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...2Richard Hachel
12 Sep 24 i         i `- Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...1Python
12 Sep 24 i         `- Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...1Paul.B.Andersen
7 Sep 24 `* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...4ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
7 Sep 24  `* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...3Richard Hachel
7 Sep 24   `* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
7 Sep 24    `- Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...1Richard Hachel
10 Sep 24 * Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.14rhertz
10 Sep 24 +* Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.12Paul.B.Andersen
10 Sep 24 i+* Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.3gharnagel
10 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.2rhertz
11 Sep 24 ii `- Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
10 Sep 24 i`* Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.8LaurenceClarkCrossen
11 Sep 24 i `* Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.7rhertz
11 Sep 24 i  +- Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.1Python
11 Sep 24 i  +* Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
11 Sep 24 i  i`- Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.1Richard Hachel
11 Sep 24 i  +- Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.1Richard Hachel
11 Sep 24 i  +- Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.1Richard Hachel
11 Sep 24 i  `- Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.1Richard Hachel
10 Sep 24 `- Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
10 Sep 24 * The Tau Ceti traveler3Richard Hachel
11 Sep 24 `* Re: The Tau Ceti traveler2Mikko
11 Sep 24  `- Re: The Tau Ceti traveler1Richard Hachel
4 Sep 24 * A Web app showing Einstein-Poincaré Synchronization procedure12Python
4 Sep 24 +* Re: A Web app showing Einstein-Poincaré Synchronization procedure8Python
4 Sep 24 i+* Re: A Web app showing Einstein-Poincaré Synchronization procedure3Python
4 Sep 24 ii`* Re: A Web app showing Einstein-Poincaré Synchronization procedure2Maciej Wozniak
4 Sep 24 ii `- Re: A Web app showing Einstein-Poincaré Synchronization procedure1Python
7 Sep 24 i`* Re: A Web app showing Einstein-Poincaré Synchronization procedure4ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
7 Sep 24 i `* Re: A Web app showing Einstein-Poincaré Synchronization procedure3Python
7 Sep 24 i  `* Re: A Web app showing Einstein-Poincaré Synchronization procedure2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
8 Sep 24 i   `- Re: A Web app showing Einstein-Poincaré Synchronization procedure1Python
5 Sep 24 `* Re: A Web app showing Einstein-Poincaré Synchronization procedure3ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal