comp.os.linux.advocacy

Liste des Groupes Pages :123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233
Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 Feb 25 ii    `- Re: New WiFi adapter1rbowman
22 Feb 25 i`* Re: New WiFi adapter4Chris Ahlstrom
22 Feb 25 i +* Re: New WiFi adapter2The Natural Philosopher
22 Feb 25 i i`- Re: New WiFi adapter1Chris Ahlstrom
22 Feb 25 i `- Re: New WiFi adapter1DFS
22 Feb 25 `* Re: New WiFi adapter3c186282
22 Feb 25  +- Re: New WiFi adapter1The Natural Philosopher
22 Feb 25  `- Re: New WiFi adapter1Chris Ahlstrom
21 Feb 25 * Huge Image! GNU/Linux Passes. Microslop???20Farley Flud
21 Feb 25 +* Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.15DFS
21 Feb 25 i+* Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.10Tyrone
21 Feb 25 ii`* Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.9Farley Flud
22 Feb 25 ii +- Useless newsgroup (was(?): Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.)1vallor
22 Feb 25 ii `* Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.7Tyrone
23 Feb 25 ii  +- Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.1DFS
23 Feb 25 ii  `* Re: Average Image! Feeb FAILS. Everyone for the WIN. (was: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.)5Tyrone
23 Feb 25 ii   +- Re: Average Image! Feeb FAILS. Everyone for the WIN.1Physfitfreak
24 Feb 25 ii   `* Re: Average Image! Feeb FAILS. Everyone for the WIN. (was: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.)3pothead
24 Feb 25 ii    +- Re: Average Image! Feeb FAILS. Everyone for the WIN. (was: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.)1pothead
24 Feb 25 ii    `- Re: Average Image! Feeb FAILS. Everyone for the WIN.1pothead
22 Feb 25 i`* Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.4-hh
22 Feb 25 i +- Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.1Farley Flud
23 Feb 25 i `* Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.2Farley Flud
23 Feb 25 i  `- Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.1-hh
21 Feb 25 +* Re: Huge Image! GNU/Linux Passes. Microslop???3Farley Flud
22 Feb 25 i`* Re: Huge Image! Larry and GuhNoo mediocrity on display2DFS
22 Feb 25 i `- Re: Huge Image! Larry and GuhNoo mediocrity on display1-hh
25 Feb 25 `- Re: Huge Image! GNU/Linux Passes. Microslop???1c186282
24 Feb 25 * Re: Rust in Linux3Farley Flud
24 Feb 25 +- Re: Rust in Linux1Physfitfreak
25 Feb 25 `- Re: Rust in Linux1DFS
22 Feb 25 * Re: 24H24candycanearter07
23 Feb 25 `* Re: 24H23rbowman
24 Feb 25  `* Re: 24H22candycanearter07
25 Feb 25   `- Re: 24H21Paul
22 Feb 25 * Re: Science Question for the Dumb Fucks4Physfitfreak
24 Feb 25 `* Re: Science Question for the Dumb Fucks3Physfitfreak
24 Feb 25  `* Re: Science Question for the Dumb Fucks2Farley Flud
25 Feb 25   `- Re: Science Question for the Dumb Fucks1Physfitfreak
24 Feb 25 o Re: All Done! Xeon W-1270P is Now Officially Complete1candycanearter07
24 Feb 25 o Re: All Done! Xeon W-1270P is Now Officially Complete1pothead
23 Feb 25 o Re: All Done! Xeon W-1270P is Now Officially Complete1Physfitfreak
23 Feb 25 o Re: Rust in Linux1rbowman
23 Feb 25 o Re: 'Diversity trumped skill '; Delta Air Lines under fire for championing DEI amid spectacular crash1Physfitfreak
23 Feb 25 * Re: "Took It Did You? You're Boned"2MummyChunk
23 Feb 25 `- Re: "Took It Did You? You're Boned"1%
22 Feb 25 o Linux 6.13.41vallor
22 Feb 25 o Re: New WiFi adapter1Joel W. Crump
22 Feb 25 o Re: As per Lunduke, Devuan is another non-woke choice1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Feb 25 * M$ Keyboard -- Are They Fucking Kidding?2Farley Flud
21 Feb 25 `- Re: M$ Keyboard -- Are They Fucking Kidding?1Physfitfreak
21 Feb 25 * Feeb, you crazed idiot, is this your Amazon review?2DFS
21 Feb 25 `- Re: Feeb, you crazed idiot, is this your Amazon review?1Physfitfreak
21 Feb 25 * Re: Science Question for the Dumb Fucks2vallor
21 Feb 25 `- Re: Science Question for the Dumb Fucks1Farley Flud
21 Feb 25 o Re: Microsoft Introduces New-Principle Quantum Computer Chip (was: Micro$oft Introduces New-Principle Quantum Computer Chip)1Tyrone
21 Feb 25 o Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Andy Burns
20 Feb 25 o Re: Tampons Now Offered To Republicans Because They Have No Balls1tye syding
19 Feb 25 * Re: Microsoft just put this controversial Notepad feature behind a paywall4Paul
19 Feb 25 `* Re: Microsoft just put this controversial Notepad feature behind a paywall3Andy Burns
19 Feb 25  `* Re: Microsoft just put this controversial Notepad feature behind a paywall2Andy Burns
19 Feb 25   `- Re: Microsoft just put this controversial Notepad feature behind a paywall1Paul
19 Feb 25 o Re: Microsoft just put this controversial Notepad feature behind a paywall1%
16 Feb 25 * Re: I am amazed with Windows 11's....3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Feb 25 `* Re: I am amazed with Windows 11's....2MummyChunk
19 Feb 25  `- Re: I am amazed with Windows 11's....1RonB
13 Feb 25 * Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored71WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
13 Feb 25 `* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored70rbowman
13 Feb 25  +* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored60WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
13 Feb 25  i+* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored45D
14 Feb 25  ii`* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored44WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
14 Feb 25  ii +* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored42D
14 Feb 25  ii i+- Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored1vallor
14 Feb 25  ii i`* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored40The Natural Philosopher
14 Feb 25  ii i `* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored39D
15 Feb 25  ii i  +* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored3c186282
15 Feb 25  ii i  i`* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored2D
15 Feb 25  ii i  i `- Motivation of High Performing People1Lars Poulsen
15 Feb 25  ii i  `* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored35The Natural Philosopher
15 Feb 25  ii i   +* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored4D
16 Feb 25  ii i   i`* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored3c186282
16 Feb 25  ii i   i `* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored2D
16 Feb 25  ii i   i  `- Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored1rbowman
15 Feb 25  ii i   `* Musk et al.30Lars Poulsen
15 Feb 25  ii i    `* Re: Musk et al.29The Natural Philosopher
15 Feb 25  ii i     +* Re: Musk et al.3Chris Ahlstrom
16 Feb 25  ii i     i+- Re: Musk et al.1pothead
16 Feb 25  ii i     i`- Re: Musk et al.1The Natural Philosopher
15 Feb 25  ii i     +* Re: Musk et al.3Lars Poulsen
15 Feb 25  ii i     i`* Re: Musk et al.2Computer Nerd Kev
16 Feb 25  ii i     i `- Re: Musk et al.1The Natural Philosopher
15 Feb 25  ii i     `* Re: Musk et al.22Computer Nerd Kev
16 Feb 25  ii i      `* Re: Musk et al.21D
16 Feb 25  ii i       +* Re: Musk et al.14Sn!pe
16 Feb 25  ii i       i`* Re: Musk et al.13D
16 Feb 25  ii i       i `* Re: Musk et al.12Computer Nerd Kev
17 Feb 25  ii i       i  +* Re: Musk et al.9D
17 Feb 25  ii i       i  i`* Re: Musk et al.8Lars Poulsen
17 Feb 25  ii i       i  i `* Re: Musk et al.7D
17 Feb 25  ii i       i  i  +* Re: Musk et al.5Sn!pe
18 Feb 25  ii i       i  i  i`* Re: Musk et al.4D
18 Feb 25  ii i       i  i  i `* [OT] dual nationality and marriage (was: Re: Musk et al.)3Sn!pe
18 Feb 25  ii i       i  i  i  `* Re: [OT] dual nationality and marriage (was: Re: Musk et al.)2D
18 Feb 25  ii i       i  i  i   `- Re: [OT] dual nationality and marriage1%
17 Feb 25  ii i       i  i  `- Re: Musk et al.1Lars Poulsen
17 Feb 25  ii i       i  +- Re: Musk et al.1Andreas Eder
17 Feb 25  ii i       i  `- Re: Musk et al.1Physfitfreak
16 Feb 25  ii i       `* Re: Musk et al.6Computer Nerd Kev
17 Feb 25  ii i        `* Re: Musk et al.5D
17 Feb 25  ii i         +* Re: Musk et al.2The Natural Philosopher
17 Feb 25  ii i         i`- Re: Musk et al.1D
17 Feb 25  ii i         `* Re: Musk et al.2Computer Nerd Kev
18 Feb 25  ii i          `- Re: Musk et al.1D
14 Feb 25  ii `- Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored1The Natural Philosopher
13 Feb 25  i`* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored14rbowman
14 Feb 25  i +* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored12The Natural Philosopher
14 Feb 25  i i+* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored4WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
14 Feb 25  i ii+* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored2D
14 Feb 25  i iii`- Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored1The Natural Philosopher
14 Feb 25  i ii`- Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored1The Natural Philosopher
14 Feb 25  i i`* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored7D
14 Feb 25  i i `* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored6The Natural Philosopher
14 Feb 25  i i  +* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored2Physfitfreak
15 Feb 25  i i  i`- Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored1The Natural Philosopher
14 Feb 25  i i  `* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored3D
15 Feb 25  i i   `* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored2The Natural Philosopher
15 Feb 25  i i    `- Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored1D
14 Feb 25  i `- Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored1D
13 Feb 25  +* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored2DFS
13 Feb 25  i`- Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored1rbowman
13 Feb 25  +* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored6D
13 Feb 25  i+* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored2rbowman
14 Feb 25  ii`- Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored1D
14 Feb 25  i`* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored3WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
14 Feb 25  i `* Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored2D
16 Feb 25  i  `- Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored1Usuario Tres ESware
14 Feb 25  `- Re: Paris : In Rush For Profits, AI Safety Issues Are Ignored1-hh
18 Feb 25 o Re: Porsche Is Cutting a Bunch of Jobs Over Weak EV Demand1-hh
18 Feb 25 o fastfetch1rbowman
18 Feb 25 o Linux 6.13.31vallor
16 Feb 25 * Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms2rbowman
17 Feb 25 `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1rbowman
17 Feb 25 o Linux 6.14-rc31vallor
16 Feb 25 * Re: Leftist extremists leave Linux kernel, demand conservatives be banned2RonB
16 Feb 25 `- Re: Leftist extremists leave Linux kernel, demand conservatives be banned1rbowman
16 Feb 25 o Re: I am amazed with Windows 11's....1rbowman
16 Feb 25 o Re: I am amazed with Windows 11's....1pothead
16 Feb 25 o Re: Leftist extremists leave Linux kernel, demand conservatives be banned1pothead
13 Feb 25 * Re: Codeberg announces fight against the right5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
13 Feb 25 `* Re: Codeberg announces fight against the right4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Feb 25  +- Re: Codeberg announces fight against the right1RonB
14 Feb 25  `* Re: Codeberg announces fight against the right2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Feb 25   `- Re: Codeberg announces fight against the right1RonB
15 Feb 25 o ooch1c186282
3 Feb 25 * ATTENTION! NEW GROUP FOR SERIOUS POSTERS ONLY!21Farley Flud
3 Feb 25 +* Re: ATTENTION! NEW GROUP FOR SERIOUS POSTERS ONLY!3%
3 Feb 25 i+- Re: ATTENTION! NEW GROUP FOR SERIOUS POSTERS ONLY!1-hh
4 Feb 25 i`- Re: ATTENTION! NEW GROUP FOR SERIOUS POSTERS ONLY!1RonB
3 Feb 25 +- Re: ATTENTION! NEW GROUP FOR SERIOUS POSTERS ONLY!1Chris Ahlstrom
3 Feb 25 +* Re: ATTENTION! NEW GROUP FOR SERIOUS POSTERS ONLY!2Physfitfreak
6 Feb 25 i`- Re: ATTENTION! NEW GROUP FOR SERIOUS POSTERS ONLY!1DFS
4 Feb 25 +* Re: TRANSLATION (AGAIN!) (was: ATTENTION! NEW GROUP FOR SERIOUS POSTERS ONLY!)12Tyrone
4 Feb 25 i+* Re: TRANSLATION (AGAIN!) (was: ATTENTION! NEW GROUP FOR SERIOUS POSTERS ONLY!)7Farley Flud
4 Feb 25 ii`* Re: TRANSLATION (AGAIN!)6Tyrone
4 Feb 25 ii `* Re: TRANSLATION (AGAIN!)5Farley Flud
4 Feb 25 ii  `* Re: TRANSLATION (AGAIN!)4Physfitfreak
4 Feb 25 ii   `* Re: TRANSLATION (AGAIN!)3Physfitfreak
4 Feb 25 ii    `* Re: TRANSLATION (AGAIN!)2Farley Flud
14 Feb 25 ii     `- Re: TRANSLATION (AGAIN!)1Physfitfreak
6 Feb 25 i`* Re: TRANSLATION (AGAIN!)4DFS
6 Feb 25 i `* Re: TRANSLATION (AGAIN!)3vallor
7 Feb 25 i  `* Re: TRANSLATION (AGAIN!)2RonB
7 Feb 25 i   `- Re: TRANSLATION (AGAIN!)1RonB
4 Feb 25 +- Re: ATTENTION! NEW GROUP FOR SERIOUS POSTERS ONLY!1MummyChunk
7 Feb 25 `- Re: ATTENTION! NEW GROUP FOR SERIOUS POSTERS ONLY!1Stéphane CARPENTIER
14 Feb 25 o (OT) Do as Soros says, not as he does1RonB
13 Feb 25 * Re: Codeberg announces fight against the right3RonB
14 Feb 25 +- Re: Codeberg announces fight against the right1RonB
14 Feb 25 `- Re: Codeberg announces fight against the right1RonB
13 Feb 25 * Got In My Pi5 SATA Hat - Testing Proceeds Tomorrow4WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
13 Feb 25 +- Re: Got In My Pi5 SATA Hat - Testing Proceeds Tomorrow1rbowman
13 Feb 25 `* Re: Got In My Pi5 SATA Hat - Testing Proceeds Tomorrow2rbowman
14 Feb 25  `- Re: Got In My Pi5 SATA Hat - Testing Proceeds Tomorrow1WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
14 Feb 25 o Re: The thanks you get for buying Windows1candycanearter07
13 Feb 25 * new NAS2vallor
13 Feb 25 `- Re: new NAS1-hh
10 Feb 25 * Report on "comp.os.linux.hardawe"9vallor
10 Feb 25 +* Re: Report on "comp.os.linux.hardawe"2Tyrone
11 Feb 25 i`- Re: Report on "comp.os.linux.hardawe"1Physfitfreak
11 Feb 25 +- Re: Report on "comp.os.linux.hardawe"1Mikey
11 Feb 25 +* Re: Report on "comp.os.linux.hardawe"2Physfitfreak
12 Feb 25 i`- Re: Report on "comp.os.linux.hardawe"1Physfitfreak
12 Feb 25 `* Re: Report on "comp.os.linux.hardawe"3MummyChunk
12 Feb 25  +- Re: Report on "comp.os.linux.hardawe"1%
13 Feb 25  `- Re: Report on "comp.os.linux.hardawe"1vallor
11 Feb 25 o Re: 10% Of Americans Believe Trump Is Fulfilling Campaign Promises1Physfitfreak
11 Feb 25 * NOT running Linux 6.14-rc22vallor
11 Feb 25 `- Linux 6.14-rc2 (was: Re: NOT running Linux 6.14-rc2)1vallor
24 Jan 25 * Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account17DFS
26 Jan 25 `* Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account16Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Jan 25  `* Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account15DFS
27 Jan 25   `* Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account14Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Jan 25    +* Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account11DFS
6 Feb 25    i+* Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Feb 25    ii`- Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account1DFS
7 Feb 25    i`* Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account8DFS
7 Feb 25    i `* Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account7RonB
8 Feb 25    i  `* Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account6RonB
8 Feb 25    i   +- Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account1RonB
8 Feb 25    i   `* Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account4RonB
8 Feb 25    i    `* Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account3RonB
10 Feb 25    i     +- Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account1RonB
10 Feb 25    i     `- Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account1candycanearter07
30 Jan 25    `* Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account2Physfitfreak
30 Jan 25     `- Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account1Physfitfreak
10 Feb 25 o Re: If you want to torture yourself1MummyChunk
10 Feb 25 o Linux 6.13.21vallor
21 Oct 24 * Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security115Lester Thorpe
22 Oct 24 +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1John McCue
23 Oct 24 +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security110186282@ud0s4.net
23 Oct 24 i+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security105Richard Kettlewell
24 Oct 24 ii+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security101Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Oct 24 iii`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security100Richard Kettlewell
24 Oct 24 iii `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security99Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 iii  +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security96candycanearter07
25 Oct 24 iii  i+- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
25 Oct 24 iii  i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security94Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 iii  i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security93John Ames
26 Oct 24 iii  i  +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security20Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security19candycanearter07
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security8The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i i+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security5candycanearter07
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i ii+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Chris Ahlstrom
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i iii`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1candycanearter07
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i ii`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i ii `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i i+- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1D
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i i`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1D
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security9rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i  `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2rbowman
4 Nov 24 iii  i  i   i`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Physfitfreak
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security3The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i    +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Pancho
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i    `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 iii  i  `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security72The Natural Philosopher
26 Oct 24 iii  i   `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security71Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal