Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth
Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth
Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth --- V4 Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth --- V4 Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth --- V4 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth V4 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth V4 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth V4 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---V2 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---V2 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---V2 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---V2 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---V2 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---V2 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---V2 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V3 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V3 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V3 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V3 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V3 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V3 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V3 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V3 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V3 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V3 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---- V4 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---- V4 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---- V4 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---- V4 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---- V4 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---- V4 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---- V4 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---- V4 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---- V4 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---- V4 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---- V4 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---- V4 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---- V4 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---- V4 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---- V4 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---- V4 Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth ---- V4 Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: point by point --- in our head Re: point by point --- in our head Re: point by point --- in our head Re: point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point --- in our head Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes and thus Fred too Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes and thus Fred too Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes and thus Fred too Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes and thus Fred too Mike's correction of Joes correct Fred too Re: Mike's correction of Joes correct Fred too Re: Mike's correction of Joes correct Fred too Re: Mike's correction of Joes correct Fred too Re: Mike's correction of Joes correct Fred too Re: Mike's correction of Joes correct Fred too Re: Mike's correction of Joes correct Fred too Re: Mike's correction of Joes correct Fred too Re: Mike's correction of Joes correct Fred too Re: Mike's correction of Joes correct Fred too Re: Mike's correction of Joes correct Fred too Re: Mike's correction of Joes correct Fred too Re: Mike's correction of Joes correct Fred too Re: Mike's correction of Joes correct Fred too Re: Mike's correction of Joes correct Fred too Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes and thus Fred too Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- reviewers disagree with basic facts Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- reviewers disagree with basic facts Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- reviewers disagree with basic facts Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- reviewers disagree with basic facts Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- reviewers disagree with basic facts Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- reviewers disagree with basic facts Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- reviewers disagree with basic facts Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- reviewers disagree with basic facts Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- reviewers disagree with basic facts Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- reviewers disagree with basic facts Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- reviewers disagree with basic facts Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- reviewers disagree with basic facts Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- reviewers disagree with basic facts Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- reviewers disagree with basic facts Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- reviewers disagree with basic facts Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- reviewers disagree with basic facts Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes and thus Fred too Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes and thus Fred too Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes and thus Fred too Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes and thus Fred too Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes and thus Fred too Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes and thus Fred too Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike is not paying attention Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike is not paying attention Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike is not paying attention Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike is not paying attention Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike is not paying attention Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike is not paying attention Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike is not paying attention Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike is not paying attention Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike is not paying attention Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike is not paying attention Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike is not paying attention Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike is not paying attention Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike is not paying attention Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike is not paying attention Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike is not paying attention Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike is not paying attention Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike is not paying attention Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike is not paying attention Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike is not paying attention Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike is not paying attention Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes and thus Fred too Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes and thus Fred too Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes and thus Fred too Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes and thus Fred too Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes and thus Fred too Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes and thus Fred too Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike correcting Joes Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Olcott is too stupid to know that only the DDD correctly simulated by onlly the HHH that doesn't abort cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated,by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated,by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state?