comp.theory

Liste des Groupes Pages :1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132
Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 May 25       i       i    i  `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met30olcott
21 May 25       i       i    i   +* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met10Fred. Zwarts
21 May 25       i       i    i   i`* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met9olcott
23 May 25       i       i    i   i `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met8Fred. Zwarts
23 May 25       i       i    i   i  `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met7olcott
23 May 25       i       i    i   i   +* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met5Fred. Zwarts
23 May 25       i       i    i   i   i`* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met4olcott
23 May 25       i       i    i   i   i `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met3Fred. Zwarts
23 May 25       i       i    i   i   i  `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met2olcott
23 May 25       i       i    i   i   i   `- Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1Fred. Zwarts
23 May 25       i       i    i   i   `- Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1Richard Damon
22 May 25       i       i    i   +- Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1Richard Damon
22 May 25       i       i    i   `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met18Mikko
22 May 25       i       i    i    `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met17olcott
23 May 25       i       i    i     +- Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1Richard Damon
23 May 25       i       i    i     `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met15Mikko
23 May 25       i       i    i      `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met14olcott
23 May 25       i       i    i       +* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met9Fred. Zwarts
23 May 25       i       i    i       i`* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met8olcott
23 May 25       i       i    i       i `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met7Fred. Zwarts
23 May 25       i       i    i       i  `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met6olcott
23 May 25       i       i    i       i   `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met5Fred. Zwarts
23 May 25       i       i    i       i    `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met4olcott
23 May 25       i       i    i       i     +* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met2Fred. Zwarts
23 May 25       i       i    i       i     i`- Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1olcott
24 May 25       i       i    i       i     `- Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1Richard Damon
24 May 25       i       i    i       `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met4Mikko
24 May 25       i       i    i        `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met3olcott
24 May 25       i       i    i         +- Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1Richard Damon
25 May 25       i       i    i         `- Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1Mikko
20 May 25       i       i    `- Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1Richard Damon
19 May 25       i       `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met39Mikko
20 May 25       i        +* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met31olcott
20 May 25       i        i+* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met29Mikko
20 May 25       i        ii`* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met28olcott
20 May 25       i        ii +* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met19Richard Heathfield
20 May 25       i        ii i`* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met18olcott
20 May 25       i        ii i `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met17Richard Heathfield
20 May 25       i        ii i  `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met16olcott
20 May 25       i        ii i   +* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met14Richard Heathfield
20 May 25       i        ii i   i`* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met13olcott
20 May 25       i        ii i   i +* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met4Richard Heathfield
20 May 25       i        ii i   i i`* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met3olcott
21 May 25       i        ii i   i i +- Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1Richard Damon
22 May 25       i        ii i   i i `- Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1Mikko
22 May 25       i        ii i   i `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met8Mikko
22 May 25       i        ii i   i  `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met7olcott
23 May 25       i        ii i   i   +- Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1Richard Damon
23 May 25       i        ii i   i   `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met5Mikko
23 May 25       i        ii i   i    `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met4olcott
24 May 25       i        ii i   i     `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met3Mikko
24 May 25       i        ii i   i      `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met2olcott
25 May 25       i        ii i   i       `- Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1Mikko
22 May 25       i        ii i   `- Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1Mikko
21 May 25       i        ii +- Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1Richard Damon
21 May 25       i        ii +* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met6Mikko
21 May 25       i        ii i`* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met5Richard Heathfield
21 May 25       i        ii i +* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met3olcott
21 May 25       i        ii i i`* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met2Fred. Zwarts
21 May 25       i        ii i i `- Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1olcott
22 May 25       i        ii i `- Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1Mikko
22 May 25       i        ii `- Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1Mikko
20 May 25       i        i`- Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1Richard Damon
22 May 25       i        +* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met5olcott
23 May 25       i        i+- Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1Richard Damon
23 May 25       i        i`* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met3Mikko
23 May 25       i        i `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met2olcott
24 May 25       i        i  `- Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1Mikko
24 May 25       i        `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met2olcott
25 May 25       i         `- Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1Mikko
18 May 25       `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met6olcott
18 May 25        `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met5Richard Damon
18 May 25         +* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met2olcott
18 May 25         i`- Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1Richard Damon
18 May 25         `* Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met2olcott
18 May 25          `- Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1Richard Damon
24 May 25 * Re: Bad faith and dishonesty3Mikko
24 May 25 `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty2olcott
25 May 25  `- Re: Bad faith and dishonesty1Mikko
24 May 25 o Re: Position Paper: Why Simulating Halt Deciders (SHDs) Require a Reframing of the Halting Problem1Richard Damon
24 May 25 * Re: Analysis of Richard Damon's Response to Flibble's Position on the Halting Problem2olcott
24 May 25 `- Re: Analysis of Richard Damon's Response to Flibble's Position on the Halting Problem1Richard Damon
24 May 25 o Re: Analysis of Richard Damon's Response to Flibble's Position on the Halting Problem1Richard Damon
22 May 25 * Re: Analysis of Richard Damon's Response to Flibble – 2025-05-21 (Well, let me retort)7olcott
23 May 25 `* Re: Analysis of Richard Damon's Response to Flibble – 2025-05-21 (Well, let me retort)6Mikko
23 May 25  `* Re: Analysis of Richard Damon's Response to Flibble – 2025-05-21 (Well, let me retort)5olcott
23 May 25   +- Re: Analysis of Richard Damon's Response to Flibble – 2025-05-21 (Well, let me retort)1Richard Damon
24 May 25   `* Re: Analysis of Richard Damon's Response to Flibble – 2025-05-21 (Well, let me retort)3Mikko
24 May 25    `* Re: Analysis of Richard Damon's Response to Flibble – 2025-05-21 (Well, let me retort)2olcott
24 May 25     `- Re: Analysis of Richard Damon's Response to Flibble – 2025-05-21 (Well, let me retort)1Richard Damon
24 May 25 * Re: Bad faith and dishonesty4olcott
24 May 25 `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty3Richard Damon
24 May 25  `* Re: Bad faith and dishonesty2olcott
24 May 25   `- Re: Bad faith and dishonesty1Richard Damon
1 Jul 24 * Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH4Fred. Zwarts
1 Jul 24 `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH3olcott
24 May 25  `* Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH2Richard Damon
24 May 25   `- Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH1Richard Damon
24 May 25 o Re: Focused Critique of Richard Damon’s Responses1olcott
24 May 25 o Re: Richard Damon's latest reply1Richard Damon
24 May 25 o Re: Can Flibble’s neos-based solution still be Turing Complete?1Richard Damon
24 May 25 o Re: Position Paper: Why the Halting Problem Is Uninteresting Due to Infinite Tape Assumption1Richard Damon
24 May 25 o Re: Analysis of Richard Damon's Response to Flibble's Typed SHD / Neos Proposal1Mikko
24 May 25 o Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Response – 2025-05-231Richard Damon
23 May 25 o Re: Analysis of Richard Damon's Response to Flibble's Typed SHD / Neos Proposal1Richard Damon
14 May 25 * How to write a self-referencial TM?112wij
14 May 25 +- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Richard Heathfield
14 May 25 +* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?109olcott
14 May 25 i`* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?108wij
14 May 25 i +* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?21Richard Heathfield
14 May 25 i i`* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?20wij
14 May 25 i i `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?19Richard Heathfield
14 May 25 i i  `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?18wij
14 May 25 i i   `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?17Richard Heathfield
14 May 25 i i    `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?16Keith Thompson
14 May 25 i i     +* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?2olcott
14 May 25 i i     i`- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Richard Heathfield
14 May 25 i i     +* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?11Richard Heathfield
14 May 25 i i     i+* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?5Keith Thompson
14 May 25 i i     ii+* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?3Richard Heathfield
14 May 25 i i     iii`* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?2Keith Thompson
14 May 25 i i     iii `- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Richard Heathfield
15 May 25 i i     ii`- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Mikko
15 May 25 i i     i`* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?5Andy Walker
15 May 25 i i     i `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?4Keith Thompson
15 May 25 i i     i  `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?3wij
15 May 25 i i     i   `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?2wij
15 May 25 i i     i    `- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1wij
15 May 25 i i     +- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Ben Bacarisse
15 May 25 i i     `- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Mikko
14 May 25 i `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?86olcott
14 May 25 i  +* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?3wij
14 May 25 i  i`* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?2olcott
14 May 25 i  i `- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1wij
14 May 25 i  +* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?80wij
15 May 25 i  i`* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?79Mike Terry
15 May 25 i  i +* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?14olcott
15 May 25 i  i i+* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?6wij
15 May 25 i  i ii`* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?5olcott
16 May 25 i  i ii `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?4Mikko
16 May 25 i  i ii  `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?3olcott
16 May 25 i  i ii   +- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Richard Damon
17 May 25 i  i ii   `- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Mikko
16 May 25 i  i i`* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?7Mikko
16 May 25 i  i i `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?6olcott
19 May 25 i  i i  +- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Fred. Zwarts
19 May 25 i  i i  `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?4Mikko
21 May 25 i  i i   `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?3olcott
21 May 25 i  i i    +- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Mikko
21 May 25 i  i i    `- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Richard Damon
15 May 25 i  i `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?64wij
15 May 25 i  i  +* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?8olcott
15 May 25 i  i  i+* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?4wij
16 May 25 i  i  ii`* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?3Mikko
16 May 25 i  i  ii `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?2olcott
16 May 25 i  i  ii  `- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Fred. Zwarts
16 May 25 i  i  i`* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?3Mikko
16 May 25 i  i  i `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?2olcott
17 May 25 i  i  i  `- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Mikko
16 May 25 i  i  `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?55Mike Terry
16 May 25 i  i   +- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Richard Heathfield
16 May 25 i  i   +* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?46wij
16 May 25 i  i   i`* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?45Mike Terry
16 May 25 i  i   i `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?44wij
16 May 25 i  i   i  `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?43Mike Terry
16 May 25 i  i   i   `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?42wij
16 May 25 i  i   i    `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?41Mike Terry
17 May 25 i  i   i     `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?40wij
17 May 25 i  i   i      +* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?6olcott
17 May 25 i  i   i      i+* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?4wij
17 May 25 i  i   i      ii`* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?3olcott
17 May 25 i  i   i      ii `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?2wij
17 May 25 i  i   i      ii  `- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1olcott
17 May 25 i  i   i      i`- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Richard Damon
17 May 25 i  i   i      `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?33Mike Terry
17 May 25 i  i   i       `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?32wij
17 May 25 i  i   i        +* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?28olcott
18 May 25 i  i   i        i+- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Mikko
18 May 25 i  i   i        i`* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?26wij
18 May 25 i  i   i        i +* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?24olcott
18 May 25 i  i   i        i i+- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Richard Damon
18 May 25 i  i   i        i i+* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?8wij
18 May 25 i  i   i        i ii`* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?7olcott
18 May 25 i  i   i        i ii +- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1wij
19 May 25 i  i   i        i ii +* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?2wij
19 May 25 i  i   i        i ii i`- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Mikko
19 May 25 i  i   i        i ii `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?3Mikko
21 May 25 i  i   i        i ii  `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?2olcott
21 May 25 i  i   i        i ii   `- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Mikko
18 May 25 i  i   i        i i+* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?13André G. Isaak
18 May 25 i  i   i        i ii`* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?12olcott
19 May 25 i  i   i        i ii +- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Richard Damon
19 May 25 i  i   i        i ii `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?10André G. Isaak
19 May 25 i  i   i        i ii  `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?9olcott
19 May 25 i  i   i        i ii   +- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Fred. Zwarts
19 May 25 i  i   i        i ii   `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?7Mikko
21 May 25 i  i   i        i ii    `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?6olcott
21 May 25 i  i   i        i ii     +- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Mikko
21 May 25 i  i   i        i ii     +- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Richard Damon
21 May 25 i  i   i        i ii     `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?3Fred. Zwarts
21 May 25 i  i   i        i ii      `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?2olcott
23 May 25 i  i   i        i ii       `- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Fred. Zwarts
19 May 25 i  i   i        i i`- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Mikko
19 May 25 i  i   i        i `- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Mikko
17 May 25 i  i   i        `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?3Mike Terry
17 May 25 i  i   i         `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?2olcott
17 May 25 i  i   i          `- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Richard Damon
16 May 25 i  i   `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?7Andy Walker
16 May 25 i  i    `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?6Mike Terry
16 May 25 i  i     `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?5Andy Walker
16 May 25 i  i      `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?4olcott
16 May 25 i  i       `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?3wij
16 May 25 i  i        `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?2olcott
17 May 25 i  i         `- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Richard Damon
16 May 25 i  `* Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?2Mikko
16 May 25 i   `- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1olcott
15 May 25 `- Re: How to write a self-referencial TM?1Mikko
23 May 25 o Re: Universal Compiler and Typed SHDs1Mikko
23 May 25 o Re: Analysis of Richard Damon's Response to Flibble – 2025-05-21 (Well, let me retort)1Richard Damon
23 May 25 o Re: Analysis of Flibble’s Proposal: Typed SHD via neos Framework1Richard Damon
22 May 25 o It's a small world1Richard Heathfield
22 May 25 o Re: Analysis of Richard Damon's Responses to Flibble's Detection Argument1Mikko
22 May 25 o Re: Analysis of Richard Damon's Responses to Flibble's Detection Argument1Richard Damon
21 May 25 o Re: Analysis of Flibble’s Latest: Detecting vs. Simulating Infinite Recursion1Mikko
19 May 25 * Re: Analysis of Flibble’s New Take on Simulating Halt Deciders and Pathological Input6Mikko
20 May 25 `* Re: Analysis of Flibble’s New Take on Simulating Halt Deciders and Pathological Input5Mikko
20 May 25  `* Re: Analysis of Flibble’s New Take on Simulating Halt Deciders and Pathological Input4Richard Heathfield
20 May 25   `* Re: Analysis of Flibble’s New Take on Simulating Halt Deciders and Pathological Input3olcott
21 May 25    +- Re: Analysis of Flibble’s New Take on Simulating Halt Deciders and Pathological Input1Richard Damon
21 May 25    `- Re: Analysis of Flibble’s New Take on Simulating Halt Deciders and Pathological Input1Mikko
21 May 25 o Re: On infinite recursion, SHDs and the halting problem1Mikko
20 May 25 o Re: We'd like to welcome you back1Keith Thompson
20 May 25 o Re: Analysis of Flibble’s Latest: Detecting vs. Simulating Infinite Recursion1olcott
18 May 25 * Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble12Richard Damon
18 May 25 `* Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble11Richard Damon
18 May 25  `* Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble10Richard Damon
18 May 25   +* Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble5Richard Damon
18 May 25   i`* Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble4Richard Damon
18 May 25   i `* Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble3Richard Damon
20 May 25   i  +- Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble1Richard Damon
20 May 25   i  `- Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble1Mikko
18 May 25   +- Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble1Richard Damon
19 May 25   `* Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble3Mikko
19 May 25    `* Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble2Andy Walker
19 May 25     `- Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble1Richard Heathfield
18 May 25 * Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble5Alan Mackenzie
18 May 25 +* Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble3olcott
18 May 25 i`* Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble2olcott
19 May 25 i `- Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble1Mikko
18 May 25 `- Re: Analysis of Richard Damon’s Responses to Flibble1Richard Damon

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal