sci.logic

Liste des Groupes Pages :123456789101112131415161718192021222324
Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Jun 24 i    i i i                             `* Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and undecidable decision problems4Richard Damon
14 Jun 24 i    i i i                              `* Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and undecidable decision problems3olcott
14 Jun 24 i    i i i                               `* Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and undecidable decision problems2Richard Damon
14 Jun 24 i    i i i                                `- Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and undecidable decision problems1olcott
10 Jun 24 i    i i `- Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and undecidable decision problems1olcott
10 Jun 24 i    i `- Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and undecidable decision problems1Richard Damon
11 Jun 24 i    `* Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and undecidable decision problems --- the way truth really works10olcott
12 Jun 24 i     `* Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and undecidable decision problems --- the way truth really works9Richard Damon
12 Jun 24 i      `* Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and undecidable decision problems --- the way truth really works8olcott
12 Jun 24 i       `* Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and undecidable decision problems --- the way truth really works7Richard Damon
12 Jun 24 i        `* Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and undecidable decision problems --- the way truth really works6olcott
12 Jun 24 i         `* Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and undecidable decision problems --- the way truth really works5Richard Damon
12 Jun 24 i          `* Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and undecidable decision problems --- the way truth really works4olcott
13 Jun 24 i           `* Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and undecidable decision problems --- the way truth really works3Richard Damon
13 Jun 24 i            `* Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and undecidable decision problems --- the way truth really works2olcott
13 Jun 24 i             `- Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and undecidable decision problems --- the way truth really works1Richard Damon
9 Jun 24 +* Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and undecidable decision problems2joes
9 Jun 24 i`- Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and undecidable decision problems1olcott
9 Jun 24 `* Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and undecidable decision problems5Richard Damon
9 Jun 24  `* Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and undecidable decision problems4olcott
9 Jun 24   `* Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and undecidable decision problems3Richard Damon
9 Jun 24    `* Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and undecidable decision problems2olcott
9 Jun 24     `- Re: Truthmaker Maximalism and undecidable decision problems1Richard Damon
12 Jun 24 * Some Error in Dag Prawitz 1970 Paper4Mild Shock
12 Jun 24 `* Re: Some Error in Dag Prawitz 1970 Paper3Mild Shock
12 Jun 24  `* Drinker Paradox again (Re: Some Error in Dag Prawitz 1970 Paper)2Mild Shock
12 Jun 24   `- Re: Drinker Paradox again (Re: Some Error in Dag Prawitz 1970 Paper)1Mild Shock
9 Jun 24 * Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt11olcott
9 Jun 24 `* Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt10olcott
10 Jun 24  `* D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case9olcott
10 Jun 24   +* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case7Richard Damon
10 Jun 24   i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case6olcott
10 Jun 24   i `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case5Richard Damon
10 Jun 24   i  `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case4olcott
10 Jun 24   i   `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case3Richard Damon
10 Jun 24   i    `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case2olcott
10 Jun 24   i     `- Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case1Richard Damon
10 Jun 24   `- Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case1Alan Mackenzie
3 Jun 24 * Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?172immibis
3 Jun 24 +* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?2Richard Damon
3 Jun 24 i`- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?1wij
3 Jun 24 +* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?149Mike Terry
3 Jun 24 i+* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review19olcott
3 Jun 24 ii+- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review1Richard Damon
3 Jun 24 ii+- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review1immibis
3 Jun 24 ii`* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review16Mike Terry
3 Jun 24 ii `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review15olcott
4 Jun 24 ii  +- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review1Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 ii  `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review13Mike Terry
4 Jun 24 ii   `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review12olcott
4 Jun 24 ii    `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review11Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 ii     `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review10olcott
4 Jun 24 ii      +* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review3Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 ii      i`* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review2olcott
5 Jun 24 ii      i `- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review1Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 ii      `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review6Mike Terry
4 Jun 24 ii       `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review5olcott
4 Jun 24 ii        +* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review3Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 ii        i`* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review2olcott
5 Jun 24 ii        i `- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review1Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 ii        `- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review1immibis
3 Jun 24 i+- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?1wij
3 Jun 24 i+- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?1wij
3 Jun 24 i`* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?127Ben Bacarisse
3 Jun 24 i +* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review125olcott
3 Jun 24 i i+- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review1immibis
3 Jun 24 i i+* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review85Fred. Zwarts
3 Jun 24 i ii`* Mike Terry Reply to Fred Zwarts84olcott
4 Jun 24 i ii +* Re: Mike Terry Reply to Fred Zwarts82Fred. Zwarts
4 Jun 24 i ii i`* Re: Mike Terry Reply to Fred Zwarts81Fred. Zwarts
4 Jun 24 i ii i `* Re: Mike Terry Reply to Fred Zwarts80Mike Terry
4 Jun 24 i ii i  `* How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error79olcott
5 Jun 24 i ii i   +* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error28John Smith
5 Jun 24 i ii i   i`* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error27olcott
5 Jun 24 i ii i   i `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error26John Smith
5 Jun 24 i ii i   i  `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error25olcott
5 Jun 24 i ii i   i   `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error24John Smith
5 Jun 24 i ii i   i    +* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error5olcott
5 Jun 24 i ii i   i    i`* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error4John Smith
5 Jun 24 i ii i   i    i `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error3olcott
5 Jun 24 i ii i   i    i  +- Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error1joes
6 Jun 24 i ii i   i    i  `- Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error1Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i ii i   i    `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error18Ben Bacarisse
5 Jun 24 i ii i   i     +* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting --- Ben's strawman deception2olcott
7 Jun 24 i ii i   i     i`- Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting --- Ben's strawman deception1olcon'tt
5 Jun 24 i ii i   i     `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error15Mike Terry
5 Jun 24 i ii i   i      `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error14olcott
5 Jun 24 i ii i   i       +* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error6John Smith
5 Jun 24 i ii i   i       i+* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error2olcott
5 Jun 24 i ii i   i       ii`- Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error1joes
6 Jun 24 i ii i   i       i`* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error3Mike Terry
6 Jun 24 i ii i   i       i `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error !!!2olcott
6 Jun 24 i ii i   i       i  `- Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error !!!1Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i ii i   i       `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error7Mike Terry
6 Jun 24 i ii i   i        `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error6olcott
6 Jun 24 i ii i   i         `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error5Mike Terry
7 Jun 24 i ii i   i          `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error4olcott
7 Jun 24 i ii i   i           +- Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i ii i   i           `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error2olcott
7 Jun 24 i ii i   i            `- Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error1Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i ii i   +- Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error1Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i ii i   `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error49olcott
6 Jun 24 i ii i    +- Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error1Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i ii i    `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error47olcott
7 Jun 24 i ii i     +* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis45olcott
7 Jun 24 i ii i     i+* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis13Python
7 Jun 24 i ii i     ii`* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis12olcott
7 Jun 24 i ii i     ii +* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis7Python
7 Jun 24 i ii i     ii i`* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis6olcott
7 Jun 24 i ii i     ii i +- Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i ii i     ii i `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis4olcott
7 Jun 24 i ii i     ii i  +- Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i ii i     ii i  `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis ---2olcott
8 Jun 24 i ii i     ii i   `- Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis ---1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i ii i     ii +- Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i ii i     ii `* Re: How Partial Simulations incorrectly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis3olcott
7 Jun 24 i ii i     ii  +- Re: How Partial Simulations incorrectly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis1news2
7 Jun 24 i ii i     ii  `- Re: How Partial Simulations incorrectly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i ii i     i+- Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i ii i     i+* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis24olcott
7 Jun 24 i ii i     ii+- Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i ii i     ii`* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point?22olcott
8 Jun 24 i ii i     ii `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point?21Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i ii i     ii  `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point?20olcott
8 Jun 24 i ii i     ii   `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point?19Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i ii i     ii    `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point?18olcott
8 Jun 24 i ii i     ii     `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point?17Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i ii i     ii      `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point?16olcott
8 Jun 24 i ii i     ii       `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point?15Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i ii i     ii        `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point?14olcott
8 Jun 24 i ii i     ii         `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point?13Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i ii i     ii          `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point?12olcott
8 Jun 24 i ii i     ii           `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point?11Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i ii i     ii            `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point?10olcott
8 Jun 24 i ii i     ii             `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point?9Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i ii i     ii              `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point?8olcott
9 Jun 24 i ii i     ii               `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point?7Richard Damon
9 Jun 24 i ii i     ii                `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point?6olcott
9 Jun 24 i ii i     ii                 `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point?5Richard Damon
9 Jun 24 i ii i     ii                  `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point?4olcott
9 Jun 24 i ii i     ii                   `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point?3Richard Damon
9 Jun 24 i ii i     ii                    `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point?2olcott
9 Jun 24 i ii i     ii                     `- Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Should I quit Richard at this point?1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i ii i     i`* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis6joes
8 Jun 24 i ii i     i `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis5olcott
8 Jun 24 i ii i     i  +- Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i ii i     i  `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis3Python
8 Jun 24 i ii i     i   `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis2olcott
8 Jun 24 i ii i     i    `- Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i ii i     `- Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error1Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 i ii `- Re: Mike Terry Reply to Fred Zwarts1Fred. Zwarts
4 Jun 24 i i+- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review1Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 i i`* Halting Problem is wrong two different ways37olcott
4 Jun 24 i i +- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1immibis
5 Jun 24 i i +* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways29Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i i i`* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways28olcott
5 Jun 24 i i i +* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways16John Smith
5 Jun 24 i i i i`* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways15olcott
5 Jun 24 i i i i +- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i i i i `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways13John Smith
5 Jun 24 i i i i  `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways12olcott
5 Jun 24 i i i i   +* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways3John Smith
5 Jun 24 i i i i   i+- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1olcott
5 Jun 24 i i i i   i`- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1joes
5 Jun 24 i i i i   +* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways5joes
6 Jun 24 i i i i   i`* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways --very stupid4olcott
6 Jun 24 i i i i   i +- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways --very stupid1Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i i i i   i `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways --very stupid2olcott
7 Jun 24 i i i i   i  `- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways --very stupid1Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i i i i   +- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i i i i   `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways2olcott
7 Jun 24 i i i i    `- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i i i +- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i i i `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways10Fred. Zwarts
5 Jun 24 i i i  `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways9olcott
5 Jun 24 i i i   +* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways7Fred. Zwarts
6 Jun 24 i i i   i`* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways6olcott
6 Jun 24 i i i   i `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways5Fred. Zwarts
6 Jun 24 i i i   i  `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways4olcott
6 Jun 24 i i i   i   `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways3Fred. Zwarts
6 Jun 24 i i i   i    +- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1olcott
6 Jun 24 i i i   i    `- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1immibis
6 Jun 24 i i i   `- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i i `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways6olcott
5 Jun 24 i i  +- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1joes
6 Jun 24 i i  +- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i i  +* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways2olcott
7 Jun 24 i i  i`- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i i  `- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1immibis
3 Jun 24 i `- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?1Mike Terry
3 Jun 24 `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?20Fred. Zwarts
3 Jun 24  `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?19Mike Terry
3 Jun 24   `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?18olcott
3 Jun 24    `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?17Mike Terry
3 Jun 24     +- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- woeful ignorance1olcott
4 Jun 24     `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?15olcott
4 Jun 24      +* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?13Richard Damon
4 Jun 24      i`* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?12olcott
4 Jun 24      i `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?11Richard Damon
4 Jun 24      i  `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?10olcott
4 Jun 24      i   `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?9Richard Damon
4 Jun 24      i    `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?8olcott
4 Jun 24      i     `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?7Richard Damon
4 Jun 24      i      `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?6olcott
4 Jun 24      i       `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?5Richard Damon
4 Jun 24      i        `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?4olcott
5 Jun 24      i         +- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?1Richard Damon
5 Jun 24      i         `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?2Fred. Zwarts
5 Jun 24      i          `- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?1olcott
4 Jun 24      `- Re: Why is Olcott so ignorant, anyway?1immibis
7 Jun 24 * Proof that DD correctly simulated by HH provides the correct halt status criteria7olcott
7 Jun 24 +* Re: Proof that DD correctly simulated by HH provides the correct halt status criteria2Python
8 Jun 24 i`- Re: Proof that DD correctly simulated by HH provides the correct halt status criteria1olcott
8 Jun 24 +- Re: Proof that DD correctly simulated by HH provides the correct halt status criteria1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 `* Re: Proof that DD correctly simulated by HH provides the correct halt status criteria3Fred. Zwarts
8 Jun 24  `* Re: Proof that DD correctly simulated by HH provides the correct halt status criteria2olcott
8 Jun 24   `- Re: Proof that DD correctly simulated by HH provides the correct halt status criteria1Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 * At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact100olcott
5 Jun 24 +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact95Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact94olcott
5 Jun 24 i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact93Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact92olcott
5 Jun 24 i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact91Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i    `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact90olcott
5 Jun 24 i     +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact85Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i     i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact84olcott
5 Jun 24 i     i +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1Mikko
5 Jun 24 i     i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact82Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i     i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact81olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact79Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact78olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact76Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact75olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact74Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact73olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact72Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i    `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact71olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i     `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact70Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i      `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact69olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i       `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact68Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i        `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact67olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i         `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact66Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i          `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact65olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i           `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact64Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i            +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact57olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i+- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1wij
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact55Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact54olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact53Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard52olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal