sci.math

Liste des Groupes Pages :1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132
Date Sujet#  Auteur
18 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)673Jim Burns
18 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)672WM
18 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)671Jim Burns
18 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)670WM
18 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)669Jim Burns
19 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)668WM
19 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)667Jim Burns
19 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i      +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Jim Burns
19 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)665WM
20 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)664Jim Burns
21 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)663WM
21 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)662Jim Burns
21 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)660WM
22 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)656Jim Burns
22 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)655WM
22 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)18Jim Burns
22 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)17WM
23 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8FromTheRafters
23 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7WM
23 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6Richard Damon
24 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii i i  +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
24 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii i i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4WM
26 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii i i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3joes
27 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii i i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
27 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii i i     `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
23 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8Jim Burns
23 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7WM
23 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6Jim Burns
24 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
24 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii i     +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Richard Damon
26 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii i     i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
24 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Jim Burns
26 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii i      `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
26 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)636Jim Burns
27 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)635WM
27 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii   +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
27 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)633Jim Burns
27 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)148Ross Finlayson
28 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)147Jim Burns
28 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)146WM
28 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)110joes
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)109WM
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Richard Damon
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)107joes
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)106WM
30 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)98Richard Damon
30 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)97WM
30 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)96Richard Damon
30 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)95WM
31 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)94Richard Damon
31 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)23FromTheRafters
31 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i    i+- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Ross Finlayson
1 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)21Richard Damon
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)20WM
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i    i  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)7Richard Damon
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i    i  i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)6WM
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i    i  i +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Richard Damon
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i    i  i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2Chris M. Thomasson
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i    i  i i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Moebius
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i    i  i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2joes
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i    i  i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1FromTheRafters
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i    i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)12FromTheRafters
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i    i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)11WM
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i    i    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)9Richard Damon
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i    i    i+- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1FromTheRafters
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i    i    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)7WM
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i    i    i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)3joes
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i    i    i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2joes
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i    i    i i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1WM
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i    i    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)3Richard Damon
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i    i    i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2WM
4 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i    i    i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Richard Damon
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i    i    `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1FromTheRafters
31 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)70WM
31 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Chris M. Thomasson
1 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)4Jim Burns
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)3WM
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2Jim Burns
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1WM
1 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)20Richard Damon
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)19WM
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)18Richard Damon
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)17WM
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)16Richard Damon
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     i    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)14Chris M. Thomasson
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     i    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)13Moebius
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     i    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)12WM
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     i    i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)11Richard Damon
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     i    i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2WM
4 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     i    i   i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Richard Damon
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     i    i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)8Chris M. Thomasson
4 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     i    i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)7Moebius
4 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     i    i     +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Chris M. Thomasson
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     i    i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)5WM
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     i    i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)4FromTheRafters
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     i    i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)3WM
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     i    i        +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1FromTheRafters
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     i    i        `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Richard Damon
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     i    `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1WM
1 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)44joes
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)43WM
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)42FromTheRafters
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)41WM
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)29Richard Damon
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)28WM
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)27Richard Damon
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)26WM
4 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)25Richard Damon
4 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)24WM
4 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i     +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)16joes
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i     i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)15WM
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i     i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2joes
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i     i i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1WM
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i     i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)12Richard Damon
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i     i  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)10WM
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i     i  i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)9Richard Damon
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i     i  i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)8WM
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i     i  i  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)4Chris M. Thomasson
6 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i     i  i  i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)3Moebius
6 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i     i  i  i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2WM
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i     i  i  i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Richard Damon
6 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i     i  i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)3Richard Damon
6 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i     i  i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2WM
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i     i  i    `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Richard Damon
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i     i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Chris M. Thomasson
4 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)7Richard Damon
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)6WM
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i       +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2joes
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i       i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1WM
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)3Richard Damon
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2WM
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i         `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Richard Damon
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)3FromTheRafters
4 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2Chris M. Thomasson
4 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Moebius
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)5Chris M. Thomasson
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)4Moebius
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)3Chris M. Thomasson
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2Moebius
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Moebius
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)3joes
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2WM
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   i           `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Chris M. Thomasson
30 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)7joes
30 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)6WM
31 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)5Richard Damon
31 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)4WM
1 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i       +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Richard Damon
1 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2joes
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i        `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1WM
28 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1FromTheRafters
28 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)5Jim Burns
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)4WM
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)3Richard Damon
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2WM
30 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Richard Damon
28 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)29Richard Damon
28 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)17Ross Finlayson
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)8Jim Burns
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   ii`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)7Ross Finlayson
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   ii +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Ross Finlayson
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   ii `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)5Jim Burns
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   ii  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)4Ross Finlayson
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   ii   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)3Jim Burns
30 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   ii    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2Ross Finlayson
30 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   ii     `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Jim Burns
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)8Chris M. Thomasson
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   i +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Moebius
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)5Moebius
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   i i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)3Chris M. Thomasson
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   i ii`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2Moebius
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   i ii `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Moebius
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   i i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1FromTheRafters
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Moebius
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)11WM
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)10Richard Damon
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i     +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)8WM
30 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i     i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)7Richard Damon
30 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i     i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)6WM
30 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i     i  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2joes
30 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i     i  i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1WM
30 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i     i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)3Richard Damon
30 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i     i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2WM
31 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i     i    `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Richard Damon
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i     `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively, super-standard)1Ross Finlayson
28 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)484WM
28 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii     +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3joes
28 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii     i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
28 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii     i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
28 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)480Jim Burns
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)479WM
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)478Jim Burns
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)477WM
31 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)476Jim Burns
31 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)475WM
31 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii           `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)474Jim Burns
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii            `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)473WM
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii             `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)472Jim Burns
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii              `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)471WM
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)421joes
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)420WM
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)419Chris M. Thomasson
4 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)418WM
4 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)388Chris M. Thomasson
4 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Moebius
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   ii`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)385WM
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)384joes
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)383WM
6 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i   +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
6 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)381Jim Burns
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)15Ross Finlayson
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Ross Finlayson
10 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    ii`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)12WM
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8Richard Damon
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7WM
8 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6Richard Damon
8 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
8 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4Richard Damon
8 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Chris M. Thomasson
9 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Richard Damon
9 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i i      `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3FromTheRafters
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1FromTheRafters
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)365WM
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7FromTheRafters
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     ii`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Richard Damon
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     ii `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1FromTheRafters
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Ross Finlayson
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2FromTheRafters
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
8 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)233Jim Burns
8 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)232WM
8 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)231Jim Burns
8 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)230WM
8 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
9 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)190joes
9 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)189WM
9 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)185Richard Damon
9 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)184WM
10 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)183Richard Damon
10 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)182WM
10 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)175Jim Burns
10 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)174WM
11 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)46Richard Damon
11 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)45WM
11 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)43joes

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal