sci.math

Liste des Groupes Pages :12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334
Date Sujet#  Auteur
3 Apr 25 i  `* Re: Arindam's Assistance is Needed :-)6Physfitfreak
3 Apr 25 i   +- Re: Arindam's Assistance is Needed :-)1Chris M. Thomasson
3 Apr 25 i   +* Re: Arindam's Assistance is Needed :-)3Bertitaylor
4 Apr 25 i   i`* Re: Arindam's Assistance is Needed :-)2Physfitfreak
4 Apr 25 i   i `- Re: Arindam's Assistance is Needed :-)1Bertitaylor
4 Apr 25 i   `- Re: Arindam's Assistance is Needed :-)1Chris M. Thomasson
4 Apr 25 `- Re: Arindam's Assistance is Needed :-)1Bertitaylor
2 Apr 25 * How? ? ?23Richard Hachel
2 Apr 25 +* Re: How? ? ?16efji
2 Apr 25 i+* Re: How? ? ?6Richard Hachel
2 Apr 25 ii+* Re: How? ? ?4efji
2 Apr 25 iii`* Re: How? ? ?3sobriquet
2 Apr 25 iii `* Re: How? ? ?2efji
2 Apr 25 iii  `- Re: How? ? ?1Richard Hachel
2 Apr 25 ii`- Re: How? ? ?1Python
2 Apr 25 i+* Re: How? ? ?2Python
2 Apr 25 ii`- Re: How? ? ?1efji
2 Apr 25 i`* Re: How? ? ?7Chris M. Thomasson
2 Apr 25 i +- Re: How? ? ?1Chris M. Thomasson
2 Apr 25 i `* Re: How? ? ?5efji
2 Apr 25 i  +* Re: How? ? ?2Chris M. Thomasson
2 Apr 25 i  i`- Re: How? ? ?1Chris M. Thomasson
3 Apr 25 i  `* Re: How? ? ?2Moebius
3 Apr 25 i   `- Re: How? ? ?1Chris M. Thomasson
2 Apr 25 +* Re: How? ? ?4Python
2 Apr 25 i`* Re: How? ? ?3Richard Hachel
2 Apr 25 i `* Re: How? ? ?2Python
2 Apr 25 i  `- Re: How? ? ?1Richard Hachel
2 Apr 25 `* Re: How? ? ?2Python
3 Apr 25  `- Re: How? ? ?1Moebius
2 Apr 25 * Proving the consistency of the body of knowledge expressed in language4olcott
2 Apr 25 `* Re: Proving the consistency of the body of knowledge expressed in language3Richard Damon
2 Apr 25  `* Re: Proving the consistency of the body of knowledge expressed in language2olcott
2 Apr 25   `- Re: Proving the consistency of the body of knowledge expressed in language1Richard Damon
29 Mar 25 * Re: Another "Engineer"s Idea of Fitness :-)6Physfitfreak
30 Mar 25 +* Re: Another "Engineer"s Idea of Fitness :-)4Physfitfreak
30 Mar 25 i`* Re: Another "Engineer"s Idea of Fitness :-)3Physfitfreak
2 Apr 25 i `* Re: Another "Engineer"s Idea of Fitness :-)2Physfitfreak
2 Apr 25 i  `- Re: Another "Engineer"s Idea of Fitness :-)1Physfitfreak
30 Mar 25 `- Re: Another "Engineer"s Idea of Fitness :-)1Thomas Heger
1 Apr 25 o Re: Muon paradox1Edilberto Gayazov
1 Apr 25 * Re: Muon paradox2Kent Bazhukov
1 Apr 25 `- Re: Muon paradox1LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 Mar 25 * Re: Bitcoin says thank you! (Re: How to persuade Woman to smoke?)2Buell Babutsky
29 Mar 25 `- Re: Bitcoin says thank you! (Re: How to persuade Woman to smoke?)1bertitaylor
28 Mar 25 * Today's curve.3Richard Hachel
28 Mar 25 `* Re: Today's curve.2Jim Burns
28 Mar 25  `- Re: Today's curve.1Richard Hachel
25 Mar 25 * The Reimann "Zeta" function: How can it ever converge?5Kenny McCormack
25 Mar 25 +* Re: The Reimann "Zeta" function: How can it ever converge?3efji
26 Mar 25 i`* Thanks! (Was: The Reimann "Zeta" function: How can it ever converge?)2Kenny McCormack
26 Mar 25 i `- Re: Thanks! (Was: The Reimann "Zeta" function: How can it ever converge?)1FromTheRafters
25 Mar 25 `- Re: The Reimann "Zeta" function: How can it ever converge?1FromTheRafters
23 Mar 25 * Collatz conjecture question37vallor
23 Mar 25 `* Re: Collatz conjecture question36efji
23 Mar 25  `* Re: Collatz conjecture question35vallor
23 Mar 25   +* Re: Collatz conjecture question2efji
23 Mar 25   i`- Re: Collatz conjecture question1Moebius
23 Mar 25   `* Re: Collatz conjecture question32Ross Finlayson
23 Mar 25    +* Re: Collatz conjecture question2Ross Finlayson
24 Mar 25    i`- Re: Collatz conjecture question1Ross Finlayson
24 Mar 25    `* Re: Collatz conjecture question29efji
24 Mar 25     `* Re: Collatz conjecture question28Ross Finlayson
24 Mar 25      `* Re: Collatz conjecture question27efji
24 Mar 25       +* Re: Collatz conjecture question23Richard Hachel
24 Mar 25       i+* Re: Collatz conjecture question13Python
24 Mar 25       ii+* Re: Collatz conjecture question2Moebius
24 Mar 25       iii`- Re: Collatz conjecture question1Chris M. Thomasson
24 Mar 25       ii+* Re: Collatz conjecture question6Richard Hachel
24 Mar 25       iii+- Re: Collatz conjecture question1Jim Burns
24 Mar 25       iii+* Re: Collatz conjecture question2Python
24 Mar 25       iiii`- Re: Collatz conjecture question1Moebius
24 Mar 25       iii+- Re: Collatz conjecture question1Chris M. Thomasson
24 Mar 25       iii`- Re: Collatz conjecture question1Chris M. Thomasson
24 Mar 25       ii`* Re: Collatz conjecture question4Moebius
24 Mar 25       ii `* Re: Collatz conjecture question3Moebius
25 Mar 25       ii  `* Re: Collatz conjecture question2Ross Finlayson
25 Mar 25       ii   `- Re: Collatz conjecture question1Ross Finlayson
24 Mar 25       i+* Re: Collatz conjecture question5efji
24 Mar 25       ii`* Re: Collatz conjecture question4Richard Hachel
24 Mar 25       ii `* Re: Collatz conjecture question3Python
24 Mar 25       ii  `* Re: Collatz conjecture question2Moebius
24 Mar 25       ii   `- Re: Collatz conjecture question1Chris M. Thomasson
24 Mar 25       i`* Re: Collatz conjecture question4Jim Burns
24 Mar 25       i `* Re: Collatz conjecture question3Ross Finlayson
24 Mar 25       i  +- Re: Collatz conjecture question1Ross Finlayson
24 Mar 25       i  `- Re: Collatz conjecture question1Jim Burns
24 Mar 25       `* Re: Collatz conjecture question3Ross Finlayson
24 Mar 25        +- Re: Collatz conjecture question1Ross Finlayson
24 Mar 25        `- Re: Collatz conjecture question1Chris M. Thomasson
24 Mar 25 o Re: Farewell To COLA :-)1Physfitfreak
24 Mar 25 o Expanded...1Chris M. Thomasson
22 Mar 25 * Quine's "Word & Object"8Ross Finlayson
23 Mar 25 `* Re: Quine's "Word & Object"7Ross Finlayson
23 Mar 25  `* There is no logic here (Was: Quine's "Word & Object")6Julio Di Egidio
23 Mar 25   `* Re: There is no logic here (Was: Quine's "Word & Object")5Ross Finlayson
23 Mar 25    `* Re: There is no logic here (Was: Quine's "Word & Object")4Julio Di Egidio
23 Mar 25     +- Re: There is no logic here (Was: Quine's "Word & Object")1Julio Di Egidio
23 Mar 25     `* Re: There is no logic here (Was: Quine's "Word & Object")2Ross Finlayson
23 Mar 25      `- Re: There is no logic here (Was: Quine's "Word & Object")1Ross Finlayson
22 Feb 25 * Prolog totally missed the AI Boom9Mild Shock
22 Feb 25 +* Auto-Encoders as Prolog Fact Stores (Re: Prolog totally missed the AI Boom)4Mild Shock
23 Feb 25 i+- Ignorance in ILP circles confirmed (Re: Auto-Encoders as Prolog Fact Stores)1Mild Shock
19 Mar 25 i+- Re: Auto-Encoders as Prolog Fact Stores (Re: Prolog totally missed the AI Boom)1Mild Shock
19 Mar 25 i`- Neuro infused logic programming [NILP] (Re: Auto-Encoders as Prolog Fact Stores)1Mild Shock
20 Mar 25 `* Re: Prolog totally missed the AI Boom4sobriquet
20 Mar 25  +- Another beautiful day doing math that has no real world applications (Re: Prolog totally missed the AI Boom)1Mild Shock
20 Mar 25  `* Re: Another beautiful day doing math that has no real world applications (Re: Prolog totally missed the AI Boom)2Mild Shock
21 Mar 25   `- Re: Another beautiful day doing math that has no real world applications (Re: Prolog totally missed the AI Boom)1sobriquet
20 Mar 25 * Complex roots7Richard Hachel
20 Mar 25 +- Re: Complex roots1Python
20 Mar 25 +* Re: Complex roots4efji
20 Mar 25 i`* Re: Complex roots3Python
20 Mar 25 i +- Re: Complex roots1Moebius
20 Mar 25 i `- Re: Complex roots1Richard Hachel
20 Mar 25 `- Re: Complex roots1Chris M. Thomasson
17 Mar 25 * Fun with spirals...4Chris M. Thomasson
17 Mar 25 +* Re: Fun with spirals...2FromTheRafters
17 Mar 25 i`- Re: Fun with spirals...1Chris M. Thomasson
17 Mar 25 `- Re: Fun with spirals...1Chris M. Thomasson
15 Mar 25 * Higher Order Logic Programming and Autograd7Mild Shock
15 Mar 25 +* Re: Higher Order Logic Programming and Autograd4Mild Shock
15 Mar 25 i`* Re: Higher Order Logic Programming and Autograd3Mild Shock
15 Mar 25 i `* Neural Networks cover Rule Based in Zero Order Logic (Re: Higher Order Logic Programming and Autograd)2Mild Shock
15 Mar 25 i  `- Will we ever have Real Quantum Neurons? (Re: Neural Networks cover Rule Based in Zero Order Logic)1Mild Shock
16 Mar 25 `* Progress via library(linear) (Was: Re: Higher Order Logic Programming and Autograd)2Mild Shock
16 Mar 25  `- Credits go to Rolf Pfeiffer (Re: Progress via library(linear))1Mild Shock
14 Mar 25 * Complex root of (x+1)/(x+2)4Richard Hachel
14 Mar 25 +* Re: Complex root of (x+1)/(x+2)2Python
14 Mar 25 i`- Re: Complex root of (x+1)/(x+2)1Richard Hachel
14 Mar 25 `- Re: Complex root of (x+1)/(x+2)1Python
6 Dec 24 * Prolog Tribute to Hao Wang4Mild Shock
7 Dec 24 `* imogen, intuitRIL and SuperL (Re: Prolog Tribute to Hao Wang)3Mild Shock
14 Mar 25  `* Not only $TSLA is on fire sale! [The Decline of Prolog] (Was: imogen, intuitRIL and SuperL)2Mild Shock
14 Mar 25   `- Re: Not only $TSLA is on fire sale! [The Decline of Prolog] (Was: imogen, intuitRIL and SuperL)1Mild Shock
13 Mar 25 o Re: Zwei Mengen // TH7 Definitionen1WM
13 Mar 25 * MandelField Experiment, with some of my music...2Chris M. Thomasson
13 Mar 25 `- Re: MandelField Experiment, with some of my music...1Chris M. Thomasson
9 Mar 25 * The splendor of true50Richard Hachel
9 Mar 25 +* Re: The splendor of true2efji
9 Mar 25 i`- Re: The splendor of true1Richard Hachel
9 Mar 25 +* Re: The splendor of true2Python
9 Mar 25 i`- Re: The splendor of true1Moebius
9 Mar 25 +* Re: The splendor of true3sobriquet
9 Mar 25 i`* Re: The splendor of true2Moebius
9 Mar 25 i `- Re: The splendor of true1Moebius
9 Mar 25 +* Re: The splendor of true5Python
9 Mar 25 i+* Re: The splendor of true2Richard Hachel
9 Mar 25 ii`- Re: The splendor of true1Python
9 Mar 25 i`* Re: The splendor of true2Moebius
9 Mar 25 i `- Re: The splendor of true1Moebius
9 Mar 25 +* Re: The splendor of true25Chris M. Thomasson
9 Mar 25 i+- Re: The splendor of true1Richard Hachel
9 Mar 25 i`* Re: The splendor of true23efji
9 Mar 25 i +- Re: The splendor of true1Moebius
10 Mar 25 i `* Re: The splendor of true21Chris M. Thomasson
10 Mar 25 i  +* Re: The splendor of true19efji
10 Mar 25 i  i+* Re: The splendor of true4Chris M. Thomasson
10 Mar 25 i  ii`* Re: The splendor of true3efji
10 Mar 25 i  ii `* Re: The splendor of true2Chris M. Thomasson
10 Mar 25 i  ii  `- Re: The splendor of true1Chris M. Thomasson
10 Mar 25 i  i+* Re: The splendor of true4Chris M. Thomasson
10 Mar 25 i  ii+- Re: The splendor of true1Chris M. Thomasson
10 Mar 25 i  ii`* Re: The splendor of true2efji
10 Mar 25 i  ii `- Re: The splendor of true1Chris M. Thomasson
10 Mar 25 i  i`* Re: The splendor of true10Richard Hachel
10 Mar 25 i  i `* Re: The splendor of true9efji
10 Mar 25 i  i  `* Re: The splendor of true8Richard Hachel
10 Mar 25 i  i   `* Re: The splendor of true7Python
10 Mar 25 i  i    `* Re: The splendor of true6Moebius
10 Mar 25 i  i     +* Re: The splendor of true3Chris M. Thomasson
10 Mar 25 i  i     i`* Re: The splendor of true2Python
11 Mar 25 i  i     i `- Re: The splendor of true1Moebius
10 Mar 25 i  i     `* Re: The splendor of true2Python
11 Mar 25 i  i      `- Re: The splendor of true1Moebius
10 Mar 25 i  `- Re: The splendor of true1Richard Hachel
10 Mar 25 `* Re: The splendor of true12Chris M. Thomasson
10 Mar 25  +* Re: The splendor of true4Chris M. Thomasson
10 Mar 25  i`* Re: The splendor of true3Chris M. Thomasson
10 Mar 25  i `* Re: The splendor of true2FromTheRafters
12 Mar 25  i  `- Re: The splendor of true1Chris M. Thomasson
11 Mar 25  `* Re: The splendor of true7Richard Hachel
11 Mar 25   +* Re: The splendor of true5Python
11 Mar 25   i+* Re: The splendor of true2Python
11 Mar 25   ii`- Re: The splendor of true1Moebius
11 Mar 25   i`* Re: The splendor of true2Chris M. Thomasson
11 Mar 25   i `- Re: The splendor of true1Chris M. Thomasson
11 Mar 25   `- Re: The splendor of true1Chris M. Thomasson
7 Mar 25 * New way of dealing with complex numbers56Richard Hachel
7 Mar 25 `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers55Alan Mackenzie
7 Mar 25  +* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers53Richard Hachel
7 Mar 25  i+* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers8Python
7 Mar 25  ii+* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers6Richard Hachel
8 Mar 25  iii+* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers4Python
8 Mar 25  iiii`* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers3Richard Hachel
8 Mar 25  iiii `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers2Python
8 Mar 25  iiii  `- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Moebius
8 Mar 25  iii`- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Python
7 Mar 25  ii`- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Moebius
7 Mar 25  i+* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers2Alan Mackenzie
7 Mar 25  ii`- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Richard Hachel
7 Mar 25  i+* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers (roots of zero)2Ross Finlayson
7 Mar 25  ii`- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers (roots of zero)1Ross Finlayson
7 Mar 25  i+* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers2efji
7 Mar 25  ii`- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Jim Burns
7 Mar 25  i`* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers38Chris M. Thomasson
8 Mar 25  i +* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers4Richard Hachel
8 Mar 25  i i+- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Chris M. Thomasson
8 Mar 25  i i`* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers2Chris M. Thomasson
8 Mar 25  i i `- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Chris M. Thomasson
8 Mar 25  i `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers33Python
8 Mar 25  i  +* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers31efji
8 Mar 25  i  i`* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers30Richard Hachel
8 Mar 25  i  i +* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers28efji
8 Mar 25  i  i i+- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Richard Hachel
8 Mar 25  i  i i+* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers14Richard Hachel
8 Mar 25  i  i ii`* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers13Python
8 Mar 25  i  i ii `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers12Richard Hachel
8 Mar 25  i  i ii  +* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers2efji
8 Mar 25  i  i ii  i`- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Richard Hachel
8 Mar 25  i  i ii  `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers9Python
8 Mar 25  i  i ii   +* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers5Richard Hachel
8 Mar 25  i  i ii   i`* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers4Python
8 Mar 25  i  i ii   i `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers3Richard Hachel
8 Mar 25  i  i ii   i  +- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Python
8 Mar 25  i  i ii   i  `- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Chris M. Thomasson
8 Mar 25  i  i ii   `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers3Moebius
8 Mar 25  i  i ii    `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers2Python
8 Mar 25  i  i ii     `- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Moebius
8 Mar 25  i  i i`* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers12Moebius
8 Mar 25  i  i i `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers11Moebius
9 Mar 25  i  i i  `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers10efji
9 Mar 25  i  i i   `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers9Moebius
9 Mar 25  i  i i    `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers8efji
9 Mar 25  i  i i     +- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Moebius
9 Mar 25  i  i i     `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers6Richard Hachel
9 Mar 25  i  i i      +* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers2Chris M. Thomasson
9 Mar 25  i  i i      i`- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Richard Hachel
9 Mar 25  i  i i      `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers3Python
9 Mar 25  i  i i       `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers2Moebius
9 Mar 25  i  i i        `- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Richard Hachel
8 Mar 25  i  i `- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Python
8 Mar 25  i  `- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Chris M. Thomasson
7 Mar 25  `- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Moebius
9 Mar 25 * Resolve2Richard Hachel
9 Mar 25 `- Re: Resolve1Jim Burns
2 Mar 25 * color logic6sobriquet
2 Mar 25 `* Re: color logic5Chris M. Thomasson
3 Mar 25  `* Re: color logic4sobriquet
8 Mar 25   `* Re: color logic3sobriquet

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal