sci.physics.relativity

Liste des Groupes Pages :1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132
Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 Feb 25  i ii   `- Re: Relativity Derives Zero Deflection of Light By Gravity.1Ross Finlayson
23 Feb 25  i i`- Re: Relativity Derives Zero Deflection of Light By Gravity.1Richard Hachel
22 Feb 25  i `* Re: Relativity Derives Zero Deflection of Light By Gravity.3LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Feb 25  i  `* Re: Relativity Derives Zero Deflection of Light By Gravity.2Thomas Heger
23 Feb 25  i   `- Re: Relativity Derives Zero Deflection of Light By Gravity.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
21 Feb 25  `- Re: Relativity Derives Zero Deflection of Light By Gravity.1Maciej Wozniak
25 Feb 25 * Re: Bitcoin sinking call the FBI2rhertz
25 Feb 25 `- Re: Bitcoin sinking call the FBI1Physfitfreak
25 Feb 25 o Re: History doesn't repeat itself: Röhm Putsch1Thomas Heger
12 Feb 25 * Challenge for Paul; Probe that with Mercury ds^2>0 and the solution is spacelike12rhertz
12 Feb 25 `* Re: Challenge for Paul; Probe that with Mercury ds^2>0 and the solution is spacelike11Richard Hachel
13 Feb 25  `* Re: Challenge for Paul; Probe that with Mercury ds^2>0 and the solution is spacelike10rhertz
13 Feb 25   `* Re: Challenge for Paul; Probe that with Mercury ds^2>0 and the solution is spacelike9rhertz
15 Feb 25    +* Re: Challenge for Paul; Probe that with Mercury ds^2>0 and the solution is spacelike6rhertz
17 Feb 25    i`* Re: Challenge for Paul; Probe that with Mercury ds^2>0 and the solution is spacelike5rhertz
18 Feb 25    i `* Re: Challenge for Paul; Probe that with Mercury ds^2>0 and the solution is spacelike4Maciej Wozniak
21 Feb 25    i  `* Re: Challenge for Paul; Probe that with Mercury ds^2>0 and the solution is spacelike3rhertz
22 Feb 25    i   `* Re: Challenge for Paul; Probe that with Mercury ds^2>0 and the solution is spacelike2rhertz
24 Feb 25    i    `- Re: Challenge for Paul; Probe that with Mercury ds^2>0 and the solution is spacelike1rhertz
19 Feb 25    `* Re: Challenge for Paul; Probe that with Mercury ds^2>0 and the solution is spacelike2J. J. Lodder
19 Feb 25     `- Re: Challenge for Paul; Probe that with Mercury ds^2>0 and the solution is spacelike1Maciej Wozniak
3 Feb 25 * Re: S paceTime21Maciej Wozniak
3 Feb 25 `* Re: S paceTime20Maciej Wozniak
3 Feb 25  +* Re: S paceTime18Maciej Wozniak
3 Feb 25  i`* Re: S paceTime17Maciej Wozniak
3 Feb 25  i `* Re: S paceTime16Maciej Wozniak
4 Feb 25  i  +- Re: S paceTime1Maciej Wozniak
14 Feb 25  i  +* Re: S paceTime3Physfitfreak
14 Feb 25  i  i`* Re: S paceTime2Richard Hachel
15 Feb 25  i  i `- Re: S paceTime1Physfitfreak
15 Feb 25  i  `* Re: S paceTime11Physfitfreak
16 Feb 25  i   +* Re: S paceTime2Thomas Heger
16 Feb 25  i   i`- Re: S paceTime1Physfitfreak
16 Feb 25  i   +* Re: S paceTime2Physfitfreak
16 Feb 25  i   i`- Re: Fickfuck <physfitfreak@gmail.com> 404 brain not found (Was: S paceTime)1Physfitfreak
17 Feb 25  i   `* Re: S paceTime6Physfitfreak
17 Feb 25  i    `* Re: S paceTime5Physfitfreak
17 Feb 25  i     +* Re: S paceTime2Physfitfreak
19 Feb 25  i     i`- Re: S paceTime1Thomas Heger
23 Feb 25  i     `* Re: S paceTime2Physfitfreak
24 Feb 25  i      `- Re: S paceTime1Physfitfreak
4 Feb 25  `- Re: S paceTime1Bertietaylor
23 Feb 25 o Re: Cyberwarefare will grind down DOGE, FBI and Bitcoin1Physfitfreak
23 Feb 25 o K$H stripped by rogue Agentic AI (Re: Cyberwarefare will grind down DOGE, FBI and Bitcoin)1Mild Shock
23 Feb 25 o I have explained, for a long time already...1Richard Hachel
3 Feb 25 * Re: My Hate List (Revised)61Physfitfreak
4 Feb 25 +- Re: My Hate List (Revised)1Bertietaylor
5 Feb 25 +- Re: My Hate List (Revised)1pothead
5 Feb 25 +* Re: My Hate List (Revised)55Physfitfreak
5 Feb 25 i+* Re: My Hate List (Revised)53Physfitfreak
5 Feb 25 ii+* Re: My Hate List (Revised)4Physfitfreak
5 Feb 25 iii`* Re: My Hate List (Revised)3Physfitfreak
5 Feb 25 iii `* Re: My Hate List (Revised)2Physfitfreak
5 Feb 25 iii  `- Re: My Hate List (Revised)1Physfitfreak
5 Feb 25 ii+- Re: My Hate List (Revised)1Physfitfreak
6 Feb 25 ii+* Re: My Hate List (Revised)3Thomas Heger
6 Feb 25 iii`* Re: My Hate List (Revised)2Physfitfreak
7 Feb 25 iii `- Re: My Hate List (Revised)1Thomas Heger
6 Feb 25 ii+* Re: My Hate List (Revised)10Thomas Heger
7 Feb 25 iii+* Re: My Hate List (Revised)3Physfitfreak
7 Feb 25 iiii`* Re: My Hate List (Revised)2Physfitfreak
7 Feb 25 iiii `- Re: My Hate List (Revised)1Physfitfreak
7 Feb 25 iii`* Re: My Hate List (Revised)6pothead
7 Feb 25 iii `* (OT) John 1:1 (was: Re: My Hate List (Revised))5vallor
7 Feb 25 iii  `* Re: (OT) John 1:14%
7 Feb 25 iii   `* Re: (OT) John 1:13vallor
7 Feb 25 iii    `* Re: (OT) John 1:12%
7 Feb 25 iii     `- Re: (OT) John 1:11Ross Finlayson
6 Feb 25 ii+* Re: My Hate List (Revised)28Bertietaylor
6 Feb 25 iii+- Re: My Hate List (Revised)1Bertietaylor
7 Feb 25 iii`* Re: My Hate List (Revised)26Thomas Heger
7 Feb 25 iii +- Re: My Hate List (Revised)1Bertietaylor
7 Feb 25 iii `* Re: My Hate List (Revised)24Physfitfreak
7 Feb 25 iii  +* Re: My Hate List (Revised)2%
12 Feb 25 iii  i`- Re: My Hate List (Revised)1Physfitfreak
9 Feb 25 iii  `* Re: My Hate List (Revised)21Thomas Heger
9 Feb 25 iii   +* Re: My Hate List (Revised)10Bertietaylor
10 Feb 25 iii   i+* Re: My Hate List (Revised)7Physfitfreak
10 Feb 25 iii   ii+* Re: My Hate List (Revised)5Bertietaylor
11 Feb 25 iii   iii`* Re: My Hate List (Revised)4Physfitfreak
11 Feb 25 iii   iii `* Re: My Hate List (Revised)3Bertietaylor
12 Feb 25 iii   iii  `* Re: My Hate List (Revised)2Physfitfreak
13 Feb 25 iii   iii   `- Re: My Hate List (Revised)1Bertietaylor
10 Feb 25 iii   ii`- Re: My Hate List (Revised)1Thomas Heger
10 Feb 25 iii   i`* Re: My Hate List (Revised)2Thomas Heger
10 Feb 25 iii   i `- Re: My Hate List (Revised)1Bertietaylor
10 Feb 25 iii   +* Re: My Hate List (Revised)9Physfitfreak
10 Feb 25 iii   i`* Re: My Hate List (Revised)8Thomas Heger
10 Feb 25 iii   i `* Re: My Hate List (Revised)7Physfitfreak
11 Feb 25 iii   i  `* Re: My Hate List (Revised)6Thomas Heger
11 Feb 25 iii   i   +* Re: My Hate List (Revised)4Physfitfreak
12 Feb 25 iii   i   i`* Re: My Hate List (Revised)3Thomas Heger
12 Feb 25 iii   i   i +- Re: My Hate List (Revised)1Physfitfreak
13 Feb 25 iii   i   i `- Re: My Hate List (Revised)1Thomas Heger
12 Feb 25 iii   i   `- Re: My Hate List (Revised)1Thomas Heger
10 Feb 25 iii   `- Re: My Hate List (Revised)1Thomas Heger
7 Feb 25 ii`* Re: My Hate List (Revised)6x
8 Feb 25 ii +* Re: My Hate List (Revised)3pothead
8 Feb 25 ii i+- Re: My Hate List (Revised)1-hh
18 Feb 25 ii i`- Putin doesn't want to meet fartmaster Trump (Was: My Hate List (Revised))1Mild Shock
8 Feb 25 ii `* Re: My Hate List (Revised)2pothead
8 Feb 25 ii  `- Re: My Hate List (Revised)1%
5 Feb 25 i`- Re: My Hate List (Revised)1Bertietaylor
7 Feb 25 +- Re: My Hate List (Revised)1Physfitfreak
15 Feb 25 +- Re: My Hate List (Revised)1Physfitfreak
22 Feb 25 `- Re: My Hate List (Revised)1Physfitfreak
22 Feb 25 * Re: "Jim Pennino" Died In 2020!14bertietaylor
22 Feb 25 +* Re: "Jim Pennino" Died In 2020!5LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Feb 25 i`* Re: "Jim Pennino" Died In 2020!4Bertietaylor
22 Feb 25 i +* Re: "Jim Pennino" Died In 2020!2Jim Pennino
22 Feb 25 i i`- Re: "Jim Pennino" Died In 2020!1LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Feb 25 i `- Re: "Jim Pennino" Died In 2020!1LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Feb 25 +* Re: "Jim Pennino" Died In 2020!3LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Feb 25 i`* Re: "Jim Pennino" Died In 2020!2Bertietaylor
22 Feb 25 i `- Re: "Jim Pennino" Died In 2020!1Physfitfreak
22 Feb 25 +- Re: "Jim Pennino" Died In 2020!1Physfitfreak
22 Feb 25 +* Re: "Jim Pennino" Died In 2020!2Jim Pennino
22 Feb 25 i`- Re: "Jim Pennino" Died In 2020!1Bertietaylor
22 Feb 25 `* Re: "Jim Pennino" Died In 2020!2LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Feb 25  `- Re: "Jim Pennino" Died In 2020!1Physfitfreak
4 Feb 25 * Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms44rhertz
4 Feb 25 +* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms18rhertz
5 Feb 25 i+* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms2rhertz
5 Feb 25 ii`- Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms1rhertz
5 Feb 25 i+- Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms1Thomas Heger
5 Feb 25 i`* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms14Paul.B.Andersen
5 Feb 25 i +- Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms1Richard Hachel
5 Feb 25 i +- Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms1Maciej Wozniak
5 Feb 25 i +* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms10rhertz
6 Feb 25 i i+* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms2Thomas Heger
6 Feb 25 i ii`- Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms1rhertz
6 Feb 25 i i`* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms7Paul.B.Andersen
6 Feb 25 i i +* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms4rhertz
12 Feb 25 i i i`* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms3Paul.B.Andersen
12 Feb 25 i i i `* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms2rhertz
19 Feb 25 i i i  `- Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms1LaurenceClarkCrossen
7 Feb 25 i i `* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms2Thomas Heger
7 Feb 25 i i  `- Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms1rhertz
6 Feb 25 i `- Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms1Thomas Heger
5 Feb 25 +- Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms1rhertz
6 Feb 25 +* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms17rhertz
6 Feb 25 i`* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms16Paul.B.Andersen
6 Feb 25 i `* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms15rhertz
7 Feb 25 i  `* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms14Paul.B.Andersen
7 Feb 25 i   +* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms8rhertz
8 Feb 25 i   i`* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms7Paul.B.Andersen
8 Feb 25 i   i `* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms6rhertz
9 Feb 25 i   i  +- Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms1Richard Hachel
9 Feb 25 i   i  +* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms2Paul.B.Andersen
10 Feb 25 i   i  i`- Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms1rhertz
10 Feb 25 i   i  `* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms2Thomas Heger
10 Feb 25 i   i   `- Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms1rhertz
7 Feb 25 i   +- Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms1Maciej Wozniak
7 Feb 25 i   +* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms3Richard Hachel
8 Feb 25 i   i`* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms2rhertz
9 Feb 25 i   i `- Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms1Thomas Heger
8 Feb 25 i   `- Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms1J. J. Lodder
8 Feb 25 +* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms3rhertz
8 Feb 25 i`* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms2Python
9 Feb 25 i `- Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms1rhertz
18 Feb 25 `* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms4JanPB
19 Feb 25  `* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms3Maciej Wozniak
20 Feb 25   `* Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms2JanPB
21 Feb 25    `- Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms1Maciej Wozniak
21 Feb 25 o Re: 19051bertietaylor
17 Feb 25 * Einstein's derivation of a doubling of Newtonian deflection.10LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Feb 25 +* Re: Einstein's derivation of a doubling of Newtonian deflection.6LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Feb 25 i+* Re: Einstein's derivation of a doubling of Newtonian deflection.3Ross Finlayson
17 Feb 25 ii`* Re: Einstein's derivation of a doubling of Newtonian deflection.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
21 Feb 25 ii `- Re: Einstein's derivation of a doubling of Newtonian deflection.1Ross Finlayson
17 Feb 25 i`* Re: Einstein's derivation of a doubling of Newtonian deflection.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
18 Feb 25 i `- Re: Einstein's derivation of a doubling of Newtonian deflection.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Feb 25 +- Re: Einstein's derivation of a doubling of Newtonian deflection.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Feb 25 `* Re: Einstein's derivation of a doubling of Newtonian deflection.2JanPB
19 Feb 25  `- Re: Einstein's derivation of a doubling of Newtonian deflection.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Feb 25 * Division by zero28Thomas Heger
1 Feb 25 +* Re: Division by zero24Mikko
2 Feb 25 i+* Re: Division by zero5Ross Finlayson
2 Feb 25 ii`* Re: Division by zero4Thomas Heger
2 Feb 25 ii +* Re: Division by zero2Mikko
3 Feb 25 ii i`- Re: Division by zero1Paul.B.Andersen
2 Feb 25 ii `- Re: Division by zero (0, 1, infinity)1Ross Finlayson
2 Feb 25 i`* Re: Division by zero18Thomas Heger
2 Feb 25 i +* Re: Division by zero7Thomas Heger
2 Feb 25 i i`* Re: Division by zero6Mikko
3 Feb 25 i i `* Re: Division by zero5Thomas Heger
3 Feb 25 i i  `* Re: Division by zero4Mikko
4 Feb 25 i i   `* Re: Division by zero3Thomas Heger
5 Feb 25 i i    `* Re: Division by zero2Mikko
5 Feb 25 i i     `- Re: Division by zero1Thomas Heger
2 Feb 25 i `* Re: Division by zero10Mikko
3 Feb 25 i  `* Re: Division by zero9Thomas Heger
3 Feb 25 i   +* Re: Division by zero2Athel Cornish-Bowden
3 Feb 25 i   i`- Re: Division by zero1Thomas Heger
3 Feb 25 i   `* Re: Division by zero6Mikko
3 Feb 25 i    +- Re: Division by zero1Maciej Wozniak
4 Feb 25 i    `* Re: Division by zero4Thomas Heger
4 Feb 25 i     `* Re: Division by zero3Mikko
4 Feb 25 i      +- Re: Division by zero1Maciej Wozniak
5 Feb 25 i      `- Re: Division by zero1Thomas Heger
1 Feb 25 +* Re: Division by zero2J. J. Lodder
2 Feb 25 i`- Re: Division by zero1Ross Finlayson
20 Feb 25 `- Re: Division by zero1JanPB
19 Feb 25 * A phone call to Mars in 2050 (Re: Trump farts smell like mumies: Sweet and spicy)2Mild Shock
20 Feb 25 `- The Baby Pill problem solved by Putin (Re: A phone call to Mars in 2050)1Mild Shock
18 Feb 25 o Thats a lot of butt phantasie ~~> you need DeepSex (Was: Trump farts smell like mumies: Sweet and spicy)1Mild Shock
18 Feb 25 * Silicon Valley is the new Detroit (Re: Texas belongs to Mexico [Aftermath of DOGE])2Mild Shock
18 Feb 25 `- Re: Silicon Valley is the new Detroit (Re: Texas belongs to Mexico [Aftermath of DOGE])1Mild Shock
16 Feb 25 * America's not a country. It's just a business. (Was: Texas belongs to Mexico [Aftermath of DOGE])4Mild Shock
17 Feb 25 `* Re: America's not a country. It's just a business.3Bertietaylor
17 Feb 25  `* Expert in global strategy in 5 minutes (Re: America's not a country. It's just a business.)2Mild Shock
18 Feb 25   `- Re: Expert in global strategy in 5 minutes (Re: America's not a country. It's just a business.)1Bertietaylor
15 Feb 25 o Re: Gyroscopes and Relativity1Sylvia Else
10 Feb 25 * Re: Why is there Something rather than Nothing?5Physfitfreak
11 Feb 25 `* Re: Why is there Something rather than Nothing?4Physfitfreak
11 Feb 25  `* Re: Why is there Something rather than Nothing?3Physfitfreak
12 Feb 25   `* Re: Why is there Something rather than Nothing?2Physfitfreak
12 Feb 25    `- Re: Why is there Something rather than Nothing?1Physfitfreak
12 Feb 25 o About new definition of second1Maciej Wozniak
11 Feb 25 * Weekly AI Top Ten List (Re: Divide, Conquer and Loose [Limitations of AI])4Mild Shock
12 Feb 25 `* The Baby Pill killed the USA (Re: Weekly AI Top Ten List)3Mild Shock
12 Feb 25  +- Re: The Baby Pill killed the USA (Re: Weekly AI Top Ten List)1Mild Shock
12 Feb 25  `- Look at the data (Re: The Baby Pill killed the USA)1Mild Shock
11 Feb 25 o Re: Why is there Something rather than Nothing?1x
24 Jan 25 * Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.28rhertz
25 Jan 25 +* Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.26rhertz
25 Jan 25 i+* Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.5Paul.B.Andersen
26 Jan 25 ii`* Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.4rhertz
26 Jan 25 ii `* Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.3Paul.B.Andersen
26 Jan 25 ii  +- Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.1Maciej Wozniak
27 Jan 25 ii  `- Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.1J. J. Lodder
28 Jan 25 i`* Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.20Bertietaylor
28 Jan 25 i +* Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.18rhertz
28 Jan 25 i i+* Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.7J. J. Lodder
10 Feb 25 i ii`* Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.6Tom Roberts
10 Feb 25 i ii +- Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.1Maciej Wozniak
10 Feb 25 i ii `* Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.4J. J. Lodder
11 Feb 25 i ii  `* Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.3Tom Roberts
11 Feb 25 i ii   +- Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.1Maciej Wozniak
11 Feb 25 i ii   `- Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.1J. J. Lodder
29 Jan 25 i i+- Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.1Bertietaylor
29 Jan 25 i i`* Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.9Thomas Heger
29 Jan 25 i i +* Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.2Python
29 Jan 25 i i i`- Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.1Physfitfreak
29 Jan 25 i i `* Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.6Bertietaylor
30 Jan 25 i i  `* Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.5Thomas Heger
30 Jan 25 i i   `* Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails at atomiic level.4Bertietaylor
31 Jan 25 i i    `* Re: Einstein divided by zero3Thomas Heger
31 Jan 25 i i     +- Re: Einstein divided by zero1Bertietaylor
31 Jan 25 i i     `- Re: Einstein divided by zero1Bertietaylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal