Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic
Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic Correcting the AI hallucination of LLM systems Re: Correcting the AI hallucination of LLM systems
test server V3 test Re: test Re: test Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...
Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... DDD will HALT if HHH answers Ben's agreement that D must be aborted by H --- Better words now. Re: Ben's agreement that D must be aborted by H --- Better words now. Hypothetical possibilities V2 Re: Hypothetical possibilities V2 Re: Hypothetical possibilities V2 Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Who here understands that the last paragraph is Necessarily True? --- AKA a Tautology Re: Who here understands that the last paragraph is Necessarily True? --- AKA a Tautology DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INcorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is *IN*Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is *IN*Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is *IN*Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters Why examine the halting problem using the x86 language? People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language