comp.unix.programmer

Liste des Groupes Pages :1234
Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Nov 24       ii  ii      `* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages144Dan Cross
23 Nov 24       ii  ii       `* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages143James Kuyper
23 Nov 24       ii  ii        `* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages142Dan Cross
27 Dec 24       ii  ii         `* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages141Kalevi Kolttonen
27 Dec 24       ii  ii          +* Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able (Was: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages)134Kenny McCormack
27 Dec 24       ii  ii          i`* Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able133Richard Kettlewell
27 Dec 24       ii  ii          i +* Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able131Kenny McCormack
27 Dec 24       ii  ii          i i+* Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able129Salvador Mirzo
28 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii+- Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii`* Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able127Kalevi Kolttonen
28 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii `* Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able126Janis Papanagnou
28 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  +* Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able110Kalevi Kolttonen
28 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  i+* Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able107Kalevi Kolttonen
28 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  ii+- Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able1Salvador Mirzo
28 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  ii`* Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able105Kalevi Kolttonen
28 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  ii +* Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able11Kalevi Kolttonen
28 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  ii i+- Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able1Kalevi Kolttonen
29 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  ii i`* Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able9Muttley
29 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  ii i +* Why TF? (Was: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able)5Kenny McCormack
29 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  ii i i`* Re: Why TF? (Was: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able)4Muttley
29 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  ii i i `* Re: Why TF? (Was: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able)3Janis Papanagnou
30 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  ii i i  +- Re: Why TF?1Richard Kettlewell
30 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  ii i i  `- Re: Why TF? (Was: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able)1Muttley
29 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  ii i `* Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able3Kalevi Kolttonen
29 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  ii i  +- Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able1Kalevi Kolttonen
29 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  ii i  `- Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able1James Kuyper
29 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  ii `* Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able93Eric Pozharski
29 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  ii  `* Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able92Kalevi Kolttonen
30 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  ii   +* Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able4Salvador Mirzo
30 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  ii   i`* Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able3Kalevi Kolttonen
30 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  ii   i `* Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able2Salvador Mirzo
31 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  ii   i  `- Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able1Kalevi Kolttonen
2 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii   `* Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able87Paul
3 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii    `* Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able86Paul
3 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii     +- Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii     `* Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able84Muttley
4 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii      `* OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able)83Salvador Mirzo
4 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii       +- Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able)1Muttley
4 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii       `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able)81Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii        +* Re: OT: Windows3Salvador Mirzo
5 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii        i`* Re: OT: Windows2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
10 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii        i `- Re: OT: Windows1Salvador Mirzo
5 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii        `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily77Muttley
5 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii         `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily76Dan Cross
6 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii          `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily75Muttley
6 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii           `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily74Dan Cross
6 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii            `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily73Muttley
6 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             +* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily31Dan Cross
6 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i`* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily30Muttley
6 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i +* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily28Dan Cross
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i`* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily27Muttley
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily26Dan Cross
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i  +* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily22Muttley
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i  i`* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily21Dan Cross
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i  i `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily20Muttley
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i  i  `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily19Dan Cross
8 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i  i   `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily18Muttley
8 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i  i    `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily17Dan Cross
8 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i  i     `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily16Muttley
8 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i  i      +- Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily1Tim Rentsch
8 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i  i      +- Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily1Dan Cross
8 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i  i      +* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily9Kaz Kylheku
15 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i  i      i`* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily8Muttley
15 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i  i      i `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily7Kaz Kylheku
15 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i  i      i  +- Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily1Dan Cross
16 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i  i      i  `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily5Muttley
16 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i  i      i   `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily4Dan Cross
16 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i  i      i    +* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily2Muttley
16 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i  i      i    i`- Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily1Kaz Kylheku
16 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i  i      i    `- Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily1Dan Cross
15 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i  i      `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily4Muttley
15 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i  i       `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily3Kaz Kylheku
16 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i  i        `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily2Muttley
16 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i  i         `- Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily1Nicolas George
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i  `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily3Dan Cross
8 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i   `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily2Muttley
9 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i i    `- Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i `- Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             +* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily40Muttley
6 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i+* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily3James Kuyper
6 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             ii+- Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily1Dan Cross
6 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             ii`- Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily1Rainer Weikusat
6 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i+* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily21Kalevi Kolttonen
6 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             ii+* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             iii`- Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily1Kenny McCormack
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             ii+* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily17Nicolas George
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             iii+* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             iiii`* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily7Nicolas George
8 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             iiii `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             iiii  `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily5Nicolas George
8 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             iiii   `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily4Dan Cross
8 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             iiii    `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily3Nicolas George
8 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             iiii     +- Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily1Dan Cross
8 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             iiii     `- Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily1Muttley
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             iii`* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily8Dan Cross
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             iii +* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily5Nicolas George
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             iii i+* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily3Muttley
8 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             iii ii`* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             iii ii `- Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily1Muttley
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             iii i`- Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily1Dan Cross
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             iii `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily2Rainer Weikusat
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             iii  `- Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily1Dan Cross
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             ii`- Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily1Muttley
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i`* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily15Muttley
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily14Dan Cross
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i  `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily13Muttley
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i   `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily12Dan Cross
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i    `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily11Muttley
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i     `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily10Dan Cross
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i      `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily9Muttley
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i       `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily8Dan Cross
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i        +* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily5Muttley
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i        i`* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily4Dan Cross
8 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i        i `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily3Muttley
8 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i        i  `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily2Dan Cross
8 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i        i   `- Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily1Muttley
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i        `* Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily2Kenny McCormack
7 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             i         `- Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily1Dan Cross
6 Jan 25       ii  ii          i ii  ii             `- Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  i`* Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able2Janis Papanagnou
29 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  i `- Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  +* Re: Open Source does mean easily re-compile-able13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  i`* Re: Open Source does mean easily re-compile-able12Janis Papanagnou
29 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  i `* Re: Open Source does mean easily re-compile-able11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  i  `* Re: Open Source does mean easily re-compile-able10Kalevi Kolttonen
29 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  i   +- Re: Open Source does mean easily re-compile-able1Grant Taylor
29 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  i   +- Re: Open Source does mean easily re-compile-able1Paul
29 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  i   `* Re: Open Source does mean easily re-compile-able7Muttley
29 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  i    `* Re: Open Source does mean easily re-compile-able6Paul
29 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  i     +* A herd of elephants (Was: Open Source does mean easily re-compile-able)3Kenny McCormack
29 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  i     i+- Re: A herd of elephants (Was: Open Source does mean easily re-compile-able)1Janis Papanagnou
30 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  i     i`- Re: A herd of elephants (Was: Open Source does mean easily re-compile-able)1Paul
29 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  i     `* Re: Open Source does mean easily re-compile-able2Janis Papanagnou
29 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  i      `- Re: Open Source does mean easily re-compile-able1Janis Papanagnou
28 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii  `* Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able2James Kuyper
29 Dec 24       ii  ii          i ii   `- Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able1Janis Papanagnou
27 Dec 24       ii  ii          i i`- Re: Open Source does not mean easily re-compile-able1Paul
28 Dec 24       ii  ii          i `- Re: Open Source does mean easily re-compile-able1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Dec 24       ii  ii          +* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages2Richard Kettlewell
28 Dec 24       ii  ii          i`- Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages1Kalevi Kolttonen
27 Dec 24       ii  ii          +* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages2John Ames
27 Dec 24       ii  ii          i`- Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages1Paul
27 Dec 24       ii  ii          `* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages2Kaz Kylheku
28 Dec 24       ii  ii           `- Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages1Janis Papanagnou
21 Nov 24       ii  i+- Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages1Rainer Weikusat
21 Nov 24       ii  i`- Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages1Nicolas George
22 Nov 24       ii  `* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages3Janis Papanagnou
22 Nov 24       ii   `* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages2Rainer Weikusat
22 Nov 24       ii    `- Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages1Janis Papanagnou
21 Nov 24       i`* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages7Kaz Kylheku
22 Nov 24       i +* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages3Muttley
22 Nov 24       i i`* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages2Kaz Kylheku
23 Nov 24       i i `- Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages1Muttley
22 Nov 24       i `* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages3Janis Papanagnou
22 Nov 24       i  `* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages2Kaz Kylheku
22 Nov 24       i   `- Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages1Janis Papanagnou
20 Nov 24       +* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages9Ed Morton
20 Nov 24       i+* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages6Muttley
20 Nov 24       ii`* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Nov 24       ii `* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages4Muttley
21 Nov 24       ii  `* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Nov 24       ii   `* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages2Janis Papanagnou
22 Nov 24       ii    `- Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 Nov 24       i`* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages2Janis Papanagnou
24 Nov 24       i `- Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages1Ed Morton
20 Nov 24       `* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages3Rainer Weikusat
21 Nov 24        `* Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages2Randal L. Schwartz
21 Nov 24         `- Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages1Rainer Weikusat
16 Nov 24 * Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair95Muttley
16 Nov 24 +* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair5Kenny McCormack
17 Nov 24 i`* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair4Muttley
17 Nov 24 i +- Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair1Wolfgang Agnes
17 Nov 24 i `* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair2Kenny McCormack
17 Nov 24 i  `- Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair1Muttley
17 Nov 24 +* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair5Kaz Kylheku
17 Nov 24 i+- Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair1Muttley
18 Nov 24 i`* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair3Eric Pozharski
18 Nov 24 i `* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair2Kaz Kylheku
19 Nov 24 i  `- Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair1Eric Pozharski
18 Nov 24 +* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair4Janis Papanagnou
18 Nov 24 i+- Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair1Muttley
18 Nov 24 i`* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair2Richard Kettlewell
18 Nov 24 i `- Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair1Muttley
3 Dec 24 +* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair79Muttley
3 Dec 24 i`* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair78Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Dec 24 i +* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair75Muttley
5 Dec 24 i i`* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair74Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Dec 24 i i +* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair4Kenny McCormack
5 Dec 24 i i i`* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair3Dan Cross
5 Dec 24 i i i `* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair2Kenny McCormack
5 Dec 24 i i i  `- Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair1Muttley
5 Dec 24 i i +- Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair1Nicolas George
5 Dec 24 i i `* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair68Muttley
5 Dec 24 i i  `* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair67Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Dec 24 i i   +* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair10Muttley
6 Dec 24 i i   i`* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair9Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Dec 24 i i   i +- Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair1John Ames
7 Dec 24 i i   i `* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair7Muttley
7 Dec 24 i i   i  +* Windows-think and systemd (Was: Something completely unrelated to what we're yapping about now)5Kenny McCormack
7 Dec 24 i i   i  i+* Re: Windows-think and systemd (Was: Something completely unrelated to what we're yapping about now)2Muttley
14 Dec 24 i i   i  ii`- AIX (was Re: Windows-think and systemd)1Janis Papanagnou
8 Dec 24 i i   i  i+- Re: Windows-think and systemd (Was: Something completely unrelated to what we're yapping about now)1Kaz Kylheku
9 Dec 24 i i   i  i`- Re: Windows-think and systemd (Was: Something completely unrelated to what we're yapping about now)1Jim Jackson
9 Dec 24 i i   i  `- Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair1Rainer Weikusat
6 Dec 24 i i   +- Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair1Rainer Weikusat
9 Dec 24 i i   +* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair53Jim Jackson
10 Dec 24 i i   i+* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
10 Dec 24 i i   ii`- Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair1Rainer Weikusat
10 Dec 24 i i   i`* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair50Richard Kettlewell
10 Dec 24 i i   i `* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair49Muttley
10 Dec 24 i i   i  +- Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair1Jim Jackson
10 Dec 24 i i   i  `* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair47Lawrence D'Oliveiro
10 Dec 24 i i   i   +- Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair1Rainer Weikusat
11 Dec 24 i i   i   `* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair45Muttley
11 Dec 24 i i   i    `* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair44Lawrence D'Oliveiro
11 Dec 24 i i   i     +* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair15Jim Jackson
12 Dec 24 i i   i     i`* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair14Nicolas George
12 Dec 24 i i   i     i +* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair2Alexis
12 Dec 24 i i   i     i i`- Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair1Nicolas George
12 Dec 24 i i   i     i +* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
12 Dec 24 i i   i     i i`* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair2Muttley
12 Dec 24 i i   i     i i `- Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
13 Dec 24 i i   i     i `* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair8Jim Jackson
13 Dec 24 i i   i     i  `* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Dec 24 i i   i     i   `* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair6Jim Jackson
14 Dec 24 i i   i     i    `* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Dec 24 i i   i     i     `* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair4Jim Jackson
17 Dec 24 i i   i     i      `* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Dec 24 i i   i     i       `* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair2Jim Jackson
18 Dec 24 i i   i     i        `- Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair1Jim Jackson
12 Dec 24 i i   i     `* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair28Muttley
12 Dec 24 i i   i      `* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair27Lawrence D'Oliveiro
13 Dec 24 i i   i       +* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair24Muttley
13 Dec 24 i i   i       i`* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair23John Ames
14 Dec 24 i i   i       i +* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair21Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Dec 24 i i   i       i i+* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair8Rainer Weikusat
15 Dec 24 i i   i       i ii`* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair7Muttley
15 Dec 24 i i   i       i ii `* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair6Rainer Weikusat
16 Dec 24 i i   i       i ii  `* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair5Muttley
16 Dec 24 i i   i       i ii   `* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Dec 24 i i   i       i ii    +* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair2Muttley
17 Dec 24 i i   i       i ii    i`- Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Dec 24 i i   i       i ii    `- Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair1Rainer Weikusat
16 Dec 24 i i   i       i i`* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair12John Ames
16 Dec 24 i i   i       i i `* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Dec 24 i i   i       i i  +- Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair1John Ames
17 Dec 24 i i   i       i i  +* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair8Jim Jackson
17 Dec 24 i i   i       i i  i+* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Dec 24 i i   i       i i  ii`* Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair2Muttley
17 Dec 24 i i   i       i i  ii `- Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal