sci.math

Liste des Groupes Pages :12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334
Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 Jun 25     +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis9Richard Damon
25 Jun 25     i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis8olcott
25 Jun 25     i +- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1olcott
26 Jun 25     i +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis5Richard Damon
26 Jun 25     i i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis4olcott
26 Jun 25     i i +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis2olcott
26 Jun 25     i i i`- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
26 Jun 25     i i `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
26 Jun 25     i `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
25 Jun 25     `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
25 Jun 25 o Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still"1Jim Pennino
21 Jun 25 * ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique15olcott
22 Jun 25 +* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique3Keith Thompson
22 Jun 25 i`* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique2olcott
22 Jun 25 i `- Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique1Richard Damon
22 Jun 25 +* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique5Richard Damon
22 Jun 25 i`* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique4olcott
22 Jun 25 i `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique3Richard Damon
22 Jun 25 i  `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique2olcott
23 Jun 25 i   `- Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique1Richard Damon
23 Jun 25 +- Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique1olcott
23 Jun 25 `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique5olcott
24 Jun 25  `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique4olcott
24 Jun 25   `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique3Alan Mackenzie
24 Jun 25    `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique2olcott
24 Jun 25     `- Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique1Chris M. Thomasson
24 Jun 25 o Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Otte Baigushev
24 Jun 25 o Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Jefforey Yoshimatsu
17 Jun 25 * Fun with circles, again... ;^)7Chris M. Thomasson
18 Jun 25 `* Re: Fun with circles, again... ;^)6sobriquet
18 Jun 25  +- Re: Fun with circles, again... ;^)1Chris M. Thomasson
22 Jun 25  `* Re: Fun with circles, again... ;^)4sobriquet
23 Jun 25   `* Re: Fun with circles, again... ;^)3sobriquet
23 Jun 25    +- Re: Fun with circles, again... ;^)1Chris M. Thomasson
23 Jun 25    `- Re: Fun with circles, again... ;^)1Chris M. Thomasson
23 Jun 25 o Re: LaTeX for AI prompting?1efji
22 Jun 25 o Repeated digits in Pi -- the Feynman point1HenHanna
22 Jun 25 o Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Walid Paradjanov
22 Jun 25 o Re: The first postulate is a truism.1Jerald Warszawski
21 Jun 25 * Re: OK, .. Let's See :-)3Bertitaylor
21 Jun 25 `* Re: OK, .. Let's See :-)2David Canzi
22 Jun 25  `- Re: OK, .. Let's See :-)1Bertitaylor
20 Jun 25 o Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)1Patric Wojewódzki
20 Jun 25 o Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still"1Brent Baidukov
20 Jun 25 o Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still"1Franz Makhrov
20 Jun 25 o Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1Jonatan Babanov
18 Jun 25 * Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still"2Michele Balabuha
19 Jun 25 `- Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still"1Thomas Heger
18 Jun 25 * Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still"2Jim Pennino
18 Jun 25 `- Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still"1Bob Tulakov
18 Jun 25 o Re: OK, .. Let's See :-)1Rufat Bahanoff
18 Jun 25 * Re: OK, .. Let's See :-)2Hipolito Mokretsov
18 Jun 25 `- Re: OK, .. Let's See :-)1Chris M. Thomasson
18 Jun 25 o Field Spider Rider...1Chris M. Thomasson
17 Jun 25 * Java and OpenJFX or JavaScript and WHATWG?3Mild Shock
17 Jun 25 `* Why do IDEs have Power Save mode? (Re: Java and OpenJFX or JavaScript and WHATWG?)2Mild Shock
17 Jun 25  `- Dog Shit: Call my name "jan.ai" (Re: Why do IDEs have Power Save mode?)1Mild Shock
15 Jun 25 o Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still"1Alph Dmitrovsky
8 Jun 25 * Re: The Apollo moon landings6Powell Speech-language pathologists Ban
9 Jun 25 `* Re: The Apollo moon landings5rhertz
9 Jun 25  +* Re: The Apollo moon landings2Thomas Heger
10 Jun 25  i`- Re: The Apollo moon landings1Bertitaylor
14 Jun 25  `* Re: The Apollo moon landings2LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25   `- Re: The Apollo moon landings1Thomas Heger
24 May 25 * Log i = 049Richard Hachel
25 May 25 +* Re: Log i = 02Ross Finlayson
25 May 25 i`- Re: Log i = 01Richard Hachel
25 May 25 `* Re: Log i = 046sobriquet
25 May 25  `* Re: Log i = 045Richard Hachel
25 May 25   `* Re: Log i = 044sobriquet
25 May 25    +* Re: Log i = 042efji
25 May 25    i+* Re: Log i = 039sobriquet
25 May 25    ii`* Re: Log i = 038efji
25 May 25    ii `* Re: Log i = 037sobriquet
25 May 25    ii  `* Re: Log i = 036efji
25 May 25    ii   +* Re: Log i = 07sobriquet
25 May 25    ii   i+- Re: Log i = 01Ross Finlayson
25 May 25    ii   i`* Re: Log i = 05efji
26 May 25    ii   i `* Re: Log i = 04sobriquet
26 May 25    ii   i  +- Re: Log i = 01Ross Finlayson
26 May 25    ii   i  `* Re: Log i = 02efji
26 May 25    ii   i   `- Re: Log i = 01Ross Finlayson
26 May 25    ii   `* Re: Log i = 028WM
26 May 25    ii    +* Re: Log i = 03FromTheRafters
26 May 25    ii    i+- Re: Log i = 01WM
26 May 25    ii    i`- Re: Log i = 01Chris M. Thomasson
26 May 25    ii    `* Re: Log i = 024efji
26 May 25    ii     +- Re: Log i = 01Python
27 May 25    ii     `* Re: Log i = 022WM
27 May 25    ii      `* Re: Log i = 021FromTheRafters
27 May 25    ii       +* Re: Log i = 015WM
27 May 25    ii       i`* Re: Log i = 014Chris M. Thomasson
27 May 25    ii       i `* Re: Log i = 013WM
29 May 25    ii       i  +* Re: Log i = 02Chris M. Thomasson
29 May 25    ii       i  i`- Re: Log i = 01WM
29 May 25    ii       i  `* Re: Log i = 010Chris M. Thomasson
29 May 25    ii       i   +- Re: Log i = 01WM
29 May 25    ii       i   `* Re: Log i = 08Ross Finlayson
29 May 25    ii       i    +* Re: Log i = 06WM
30 May 25    ii       i    i`* Re: Log i = 05Ross Finlayson
6 Jun 25    ii       i    i `* Re: Log i = 04Julio Di Egidio
10 Jun 25    ii       i    i  `* Re: Log i = 03Ross Finlayson
10 Jun 25    ii       i    i   `* Re: Log i = 02Julio Di Egidio
10 Jun 25    ii       i    i    `- Re: Log i = 01Ross Finlayson
29 May 25    ii       i    `- Re: Log i = 01Chris M. Thomasson
27 May 25    ii       +- Re: Log i = 01WM
27 May 25    ii       +* Re: Log i = 03Alan Mackenzie
27 May 25    ii       i+- Re: Log i = 01WM
14 Jun 25    ii       i`- Re: Log i = 01Moebius
27 May 25    ii       `- Re: Log i = 01Ross Finlayson
26 May 25    i`* Re: Log i = 02WM
26 May 25    i `- Re: Log i = 01efji
25 May 25    `- Re: Log i = 01Ross Finlayson
13 Jun 25 o Re: OK, .. Let's See :-)1Emmet Batskaev
12 Jun 25 o Re: The Apollo moon landings1Bobauk Pechkurov
11 Jun 25 o Re: The Apollo moon landings1Shay Bagaev
10 Jun 25 o Any accounting nerds in here?1aruns
10 Jun 25 o Re: The Apollo moon landings1Yanko Habov
10 Jun 25 o A test of a fly through...1Chris M. Thomasson
9 Jun 25 o Re: The Apollo moon landings1Manley Zhitkov
9 Jun 25 * Compactified Minkowski?3Julio Di Egidio
9 Jun 25 +- Re: Compactified Minkowski?1sobriquet
9 Jun 25 `- Re: Compactified Minkowski?1Julio Di Egidio
7 Jun 25 * Re: Einstein versus Poincaré2Coby Schrijnemakers
9 Jun 25 `- Re: Einstein versus Poincaré1Thomas Heger
8 Jun 25 o Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Darin Patrianakos
8 Jun 25 o Re: The Apollo moon landings1Jonny Veselov
7 Jun 25 o Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Osmani Babakhanov
5 Jun 25 o Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Emory Batsanov
3 Jun 25 * The bungle in MIchelson Morley Interferometry experiment11Bertitaylor
3 Jun 25 +- Re: The bungle in MIchelson Morley Interferometry experiment1Bertietaylor
3 Jun 25 +- Re: The bungle in MIchelson Morley Interferometry experiment1Jim Pennino
3 Jun 25 +* Re: The bungle in MIchelson Morley Interferometry experiment5Richard Hachel
4 Jun 25 i+* Re: The bungle in MIchelson Morley Interferometry experiment3bertitaylor
4 Jun 25 ii`* Re: The bungle in MIchelson Morley Interferometry experiment2Richard Hachel
5 Jun 25 ii `- Re: The bungle in MIchelson Morley Interferometry experiment1Bertitaylor
4 Jun 25 i`- Re: The bungle in MIchelson Morley Interferometry experiment1bertitaylor
3 Jun 25 +- Re: The bungle in MIchelson Morley Interferometry experiment1Maciej Woźniak
4 Jun 25 `* Re: The bungle in MIchelson Morley Interferometry experiment2Bertietaylor
4 Jun 25  `- Re: The bungle in MIchelson Morley Interferometry experiment1Jim Pennino
4 Jun 25 o Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Elick Tulaev
4 Jun 25 o Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Jhon Dobrenkov
4 Jun 25 * Energy is always created and destroyed3bertitaylor
4 Jun 25 `* Re: Energy is always created and destroyed2Chris M. Thomasson
4 Jun 25  `- Re: Energy is always created and destroyed1Bertitaylor
4 Jun 25 * long live DGCs: Prolog systems before Stargate LLC in 2025 (Re: DCGs are dead: ROKs transformation from FGCS 1982)2Mild Shock
4 Jun 25 `- Stargate LLC is a "shovel" project [Great Ocean Road?] (Re: long live DGCs: Prolog systems before Stargate LLC in 2025)1Mild Shock
4 Jun 25 o Re: Einstein versus Poincaré1Valentin Bakinoff
4 Jun 25 o Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Raikhlin Balabanov
2 Jun 25 * Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still"4William Hyde
3 Jun 25 `* Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still"3Thomas Heger
3 Jun 25  `* Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still"2William Hyde
4 Jun 25   `- Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still"1Thomas Heger
3 Jun 25 * Doppler effect with light speed variant2Bertitaylor
3 Jun 25 `- Re: Doppler effect with light speed variant1Jim Pennino
3 Jun 25 o Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Bobauk Bakharev
1 Jun 25 o Re: The Orange One1Brandy Babak
1 Jun 25 o Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Jerrold Kalistratov
1 Jun 25 o Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Carlis Bakurov
1 Jun 25 o Re: The experiment1Kelly Dubatolov
1 Jun 25 o Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still"1Lloyal Balagurov
31 May 25 o Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Baldemar Pokhojaev
31 May 25 o Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still"1Coy Shahbanov
31 May 25 o Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Walmo Belorussov
29 May 25 * Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still"2Laron Todorovsky
31 May 25 `- Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still"1Thomas Heger
30 May 25 o Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Ezekiel Beklemishev
30 May 25 o Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Wilder Molostov
30 May 25 o Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Felierix Babaev
29 May 25 o Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Hollis Molotkov
29 May 25 o Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Kennon Babashov
29 May 25 o Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century1Hermis Makhanov
27 May 25 o creepy music...1Chris M. Thomasson
27 May 25 o Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Leolin Baboshkin
26 May 25 * Question to Euler.7Richard Hachel
26 May 25 +* Re: Question to Euler.4Python
27 May 25 i+* Re: Question to Euler.2Chris M. Thomasson
27 May 25 ii`- Re: Question to Euler.1Chris M. Thomasson
27 May 25 i`- Re: Question to Euler.1sobriquet
27 May 25 `* Re: Question to Euler.2sobriquet
27 May 25  `- Re: Question to Euler.1FromTheRafters
25 May 25 o Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Bladimir Rudawski
25 May 25 * Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.13Delman Vamvakidis
25 May 25 `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Maciej Woźniak
25 May 25  `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Arden Vassilopulos
25 May 25 o Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Walton Molnár
17 May 25 * Re: Simple enough for every reader?17Alan Mackenzie
17 May 25 `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?16WM
17 May 25  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?15Chris M. Thomasson
17 May 25   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?14FromTheRafters
18 May 25    +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2Chris M. Thomasson
19 May 25    i`- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1FromTheRafters
18 May 25    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?11Chris M. Thomasson
18 May 25     `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?10Chris M. Thomasson
18 May 25      `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?9WM
19 May 25       `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?8Chris M. Thomasson
19 May 25        `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?7WM
23 May 25         `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?6Chris M. Thomasson
23 May 25          `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?5WM
23 May 25           `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?4Chris M. Thomasson
24 May 25            `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3WM
24 May 25             `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2Ross Finlayson
25 May 25              `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
24 May 25 o Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Otniel Abuhov
24 May 25 o Re: Proof of P and NP1Ross Finlayson
24 May 25 o Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century1Andrews Baharev
24 May 25 o Re: Proof of P and NP1Ben Bacarisse
23 May 25 o Re: AI: Choose your favorite McDonald, Burger King, etc..1Chris M. Thomasson
23 May 25 o Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century1Matsievich J Kalashnikov
23 May 25 o Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century1Addy Lapaev
20 May 25 o Re: "The Day The Earth Stood Still"1Harlie Kabanov
20 May 25 o Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century1Emil Balabolkin
19 May 25 o Re: Call to Repeal the Physical Theories of the 20th Century1Tharon Swatchak
3 May 25 * Re: Cro_Magnon Fitness Ideas :-)2Physfitfreak
19 May 25 `- Re: Cro_Magnon Fitness Ideas :-)1Aether Regained
13 May 25 * Re: Indians place physics kinetics above Gandhian non violence14Physfitfreak
13 May 25 +- Re: Indians place physics kinetics above Gandhian non violence1Bertitaylor
14 May 25 +* Re: Indians place physics kinetics above Gandhian non violence11Bertitaylor
14 May 25 i`* Re: Indians place physics kinetics above Gandhian non violence10Dmitriy Mészáros
15 May 25 i `* Re: Indians place physics kinetics above Gandhian non violence9Bertitaylor
16 May 25 i  `* Re: Indians place physics kinetics above Gandhian non violence8Mayron Piskovoy
17 May 25 i   `* Re: Indians place physics kinetics above Gandhian non violence7Bertitaylor
17 May 25 i    +* Re: Indians place physics kinetics above Gandhian non violence5Heber Matsakov
18 May 25 i    i+* Re: Indians place physics kinetics above Gandhian non violence2Thomas Heger
19 May 25 i    ii`- Re: Indians place physics kinetics above Gandhian non violence1Thomas Heger
19 May 25 i    i+- Re: Indians place physics kinetics above Gandhian non violence1Bertitaylor
19 May 25 i    i`- Re: Indians place physics kinetics above Gandhian non violence1Bertitaylor
17 May 25 i    `- Re: Indians place physics kinetics above Gandhian non violence1Jarod Balabudkin
15 May 25 `- Re: Indians place physics kinetics above Gandhian non violence1Bertitaylor
17 May 25 * Logos 2000: rulial foundations4Ross Finlayson
17 May 25 +- Re: Logos 2000: rulial foundations1Ross Finlayson
17 May 25 +- Re: Logos 2000: rulial foundations1Ross Finlayson
17 May 25 `- Re: Logos 2000: rulial foundations1Ross Finlayson
17 May 25 * ct_grid(v:0.0.1)...3Chris M. Thomasson
17 May 25 `* Re: ct_grid(v:0.0.1)...2Chris M. Thomasson
17 May 25  `- Re: ct_grid(v:0.0.1)...1Brenden Zavodskoi
16 May 25 o Re: Help! Mitosis is just a Neural-Cellular-Automata1Vikhrov Bibishev
15 May 25 o Improved version: New proof of dark numbers by means of the thinned, out harmonic series1WM
15 May 25 o Improved version: New proof of dark numbers by means of the thinned out harmonic series1WM
14 May 25 o Re: Cro_Magnon Fitness Ideas :-)1Physfitfreak
14 May 25 o Re: Help! Mitosis is just a Neural-Cellular-Automata1Richard Makhmutov
14 May 25 o How to write a self-referencial TM?1wij
25 Mar 25 * The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)88Physfitfreak
25 Mar 25 +- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
25 Mar 25 +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)3Ross Finlayson
26 Mar 25 i`* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)2Ross Finlayson
26 Mar 25 i `- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
26 Mar 25 +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)2Jim Burns
26 Mar 25 i`- Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)1Ross Finlayson
26 Mar 25 +* Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)14Physfitfreak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal