sci.math

Liste des Groupes Pages :123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233
Date Sujet#  Auteur
12 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)32Richard Damon
12 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)31WM
12 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)11FromTheRafters
12 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)10WM
12 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
13 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
12 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2FromTheRafters
13 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
12 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5Chris M. Thomasson
13 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4Moebius
13 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
13 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
13 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i     `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
12 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)16Richard Damon
12 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)15WM
12 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6FromTheRafters
12 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i i+- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
13 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4WM
13 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Richard Damon
13 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
14 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
13 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6Richard Damon
13 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
13 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Chris M. Thomasson
13 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i i i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Moebius
14 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
14 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
14 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
14 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
12 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3joes
12 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
13 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i           `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
9 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)79Jim Burns
9 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)78WM
9 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
9 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)76Jim Burns
9 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)75WM
9 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)15FromTheRafters
9 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i   i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)14WM
10 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i   i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)13FromTheRafters
10 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i   i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)12WM
10 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i   i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)11Chris M. Thomasson
10 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i   i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)10Moebius
10 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i   i     +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
10 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i   i     +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Python
10 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i   i     i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Moebius
10 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i   i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6Chris M. Thomasson
10 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i   i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5Chris M. Thomasson
10 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i   i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4Moebius
13 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i   i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Chris M. Thomasson
13 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i   i         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Moebius
14 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i   i          `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
11 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)59Jim Burns
11 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)58WM
11 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)57Jim Burns
11 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)56WM
11 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)55Jim Burns
11 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)54WM
12 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)53Jim Burns
12 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)52WM
12 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i           `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)51Jim Burns
12 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i            `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)50WM
12 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i             +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5Chris M. Thomasson
12 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i             i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Chris M. Thomasson
13 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i             ii`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Moebius
13 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i             i+- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
13 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i             i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
13 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i             `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)44Jim Burns
13 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i              `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)43WM
13 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i               `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)42Jim Burns
13 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)41WM
14 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                 `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)40Jim Burns
14 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)39WM
14 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Jim Burns
14 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                   i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
14 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)36Jim Burns
15 Dec13:00  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)35WM
15 Dec13:52  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                     +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6Richard Damon
15 Dec19:57  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                     i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
15 Dec22:13  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                     i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4Richard Damon
16 Dec09:50  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                     i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
16 Dec12:49  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                     i   +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
16 Dec13:30  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                     i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
15 Dec19:53  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)28Jim Burns
15 Dec20:16  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)27WM
15 Dec21:20  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                       +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7joes
16 Dec09:27  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                       i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6WM
16 Dec12:56  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                       i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4joes
17 Dec01:16  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                       i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, naturals)3Ross Finlayson
17 Dec11:03  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                       i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, naturals)2FromTheRafters
17 Dec18:43  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                       i i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, naturals)1Ross Finlayson
16 Dec13:30  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                       i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
16 Dec18:08  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)19Jim Burns
17 Dec10:00  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)18WM
17 Dec19:52  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)17Jim Burns
17 Dec23:12  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)16WM
18 Dec02:16  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)14Jim Burns
18 Dec13:40  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)13WM
18 Dec19:22  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)12Jim Burns
18 Dec20:14  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)11WM
18 Dec21:21  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)10Jim Burns
19 Dec15:50  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)9WM
19 Dec19:29  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8Jim Burns
19 Dec20:18  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i      +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Jim Burns
19 Dec22:37  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6WM
20 Dec19:48  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5Jim Burns
21 Dec12:34  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4WM
21 Dec20:32  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Jim Burns
21 Dec22:58  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
22 Dec00:29  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
18 Dec11:42  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1FromTheRafters
9 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)9joes
9 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i  +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Python
9 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i  +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
9 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6WM
11 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5joes
11 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2FromTheRafters
11 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i    i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (not extra-ordinary, fragments)1Ross Finlayson
11 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
14 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i     `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
9 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
8 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          i+- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
8 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3joes
8 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
9 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
10 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (not extra-ordinary, fragments)2Ross Finlayson
10 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii           `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (not extra-ordinary, fragments)1Ross Finlayson
4 Dec 24  ii    i        i    ii`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2FromTheRafters
5 Dec 24  ii    i        i    ii `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
4 Dec 24  ii    i        i    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8Ross Finlayson
4 Dec 24  ii    i        i    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7FromTheRafters
4 Dec 24  ii    i        i    i  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5Chris M. Thomasson
5 Dec 24  ii    i        i    i  i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4FromTheRafters
5 Dec 24  ii    i        i    i  i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Ross Finlayson
5 Dec 24  ii    i        i    i  i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Chris M. Thomasson
5 Dec 24  ii    i        i    i  i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
5 Dec 24  ii    i        i    i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
4 Dec 24  ii    i        i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4joes
4 Dec 24  ii    i        i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
4 Dec 24  ii    i        i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
5 Dec 24  ii    i        i       `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
2 Dec 24  ii    i        +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Jim Burns
3 Dec 24  ii    i        `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
29 Nov 24  ii    `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
29 Nov 24  i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7Jim Burns
29 Nov 24  i +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, ordinary 'cardinoids')1Ross Finlayson
29 Nov 24  i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
29 Nov 24  i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4Jim Burns
29 Nov 24  i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
29 Nov 24  i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Jim Burns
29 Nov 24  i     `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
28 Nov 24  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
15 Dec12:15 * Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)44joes
15 Dec16:25 `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)43WM
15 Dec21:21  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)42joes
16 Dec09:30   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)41WM
16 Dec12:55    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)13joes
16 Dec14:59    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)12WM
16 Dec16:40    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)11joes
16 Dec17:49    i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)10WM
16 Dec18:25    i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)9joes
17 Dec10:05    i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8WM
17 Dec13:34    i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7Richard Damon
17 Dec22:49    i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6WM
18 Dec10:35    i       +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4joes
18 Dec20:07    i       i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
18 Dec21:15    i       i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
19 Dec15:36    i       i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
18 Dec13:23    i       `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
17 Dec00:52    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)27Richard Damon
17 Dec05:32     +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
17 Dec10:13     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)25WM
17 Dec11:07      +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3FromTheRafters
17 Dec11:37      i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
17 Dec18:04      i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
17 Dec13:34      +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Richard Damon
17 Dec22:51      i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
18 Dec13:25      i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
17 Dec18:07      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)18joes
17 Dec22:57       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)17WM
18 Dec13:29        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)16Richard Damon
18 Dec20:06         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)15WM
18 Dec21:15          +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
19 Dec15:38          i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
19 Dec04:29          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)12Richard Damon
19 Dec15:58           `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)11WM
19 Dec22:25            +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
20 Dec03:52            `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)9Richard Damon
20 Dec11:13             `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8WM
20 Dec12:55              `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7Chris M. Thomasson
20 Dec15:38               `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6WM
20 Dec21:18                `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5Chris M. Thomasson
21 Dec04:37                 `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4Richard Damon
21 Dec10:23                  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Chris M. Thomasson
21 Dec10:36                  i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Moebius
21 Dec18:46                  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
24 Mar 24 * V1414WM
24 Mar 24 +* Re: V20Chris M. Thomasson
24 Mar 24 i`* Re: V19WM
24 Mar 24 i `* Re: V18Chris M. Thomasson
24 Mar 24 i  `* Re: V17WM
24 Mar 24 i   +* Re: V15Chris M. Thomasson
25 Mar 24 i   i`* Re: V14WM
26 Mar 24 i   i +* Re: V11Chris M. Thomasson
26 Mar 24 i   i i`* Re: V10WM
26 Mar 24 i   i i +* Re: V6Chris M. Thomasson
27 Mar 24 i   i i i`* Re: V5WM
27 Mar 24 i   i i i `* Re: V4Chris M. Thomasson
28 Mar 24 i   i i i  `* Re: V3WM
28 Mar 24 i   i i i   `* Re: V2Chris M. Thomasson
28 Mar 24 i   i i i    `- Re: V1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Mar 24 i   i i +- Re: V1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Mar 24 i   i i `* Re: V2Chris M. Thomasson
26 Mar 24 i   i i  `- Re: V1Chris M. Thomasson
11 Jun 24 i   i `* Re: V2Chris M. Thomasson
11 Jun 24 i   i  `- Re: V1Moebius
24 Mar 24 i   `- Re: V1Chris M. Thomasson
24 Mar 24 +* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1383WM
24 Mar 24 i+* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1301Dieter Heidorn
25 Mar 24 ii`* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1300WM
25 Mar 24 ii +* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets2Richard Damon
25 Mar 24 ii i`- Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1WM
25 Mar 24 ii `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1297Jim Burns
26 Mar 24 ii  `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1296WM
26 Mar 24 ii   `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1295Jim Burns
26 Mar 24 ii    +* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1283Chris M. Thomasson
26 Mar 24 ii    i`* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1282Jim Burns
27 Mar 24 ii    i `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1281WM
27 Mar 24 ii    i  +* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1279Jim Burns
28 Mar 24 ii    i  i`* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1278WM
28 Mar 24 ii    i  i +- Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1Chris M. Thomasson
29 Mar 24 ii    i  i `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1276Richard Damon
30 Mar 24 ii    i  i  `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1275WM
30 Mar 24 ii    i  i   `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1274Richard Damon
31 Mar 24 ii    i  i    `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1273WM
31 Mar 24 ii    i  i     +* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1271Richard Damon
1 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i`* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1270WM
1 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i +- Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1FromTheRafters
2 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1268Richard Damon
2 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i  `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1267WM
2 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i   `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1266Jim Burns
2 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i    +* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets9Moebius
2 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i    i`* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets8Jim Burns
3 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i    i +- Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1Moebius
3 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i    i `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets6Jim Burns
3 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i    i  `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets5Jim Burns
4 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i    i   `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets4Ross Finlayson
4 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i    i    `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets3Jim Burns
5 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i    i     `* Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets2Jim Burns
6 Apr 24 ii    i  i     i    i      `- Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets1Jim Burns

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal