sci.logic

Liste des Groupes Pages :1234567891011121314151617
Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i        i           i     +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Richard Damon
15 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i        i           i     i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
15 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i        i           i     i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
16 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i        i           i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Mikko
16 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i        i           i      `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
15 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i        i           `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6Mikko
15 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i        i            `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
16 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i        i             `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4Mikko
16 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i        i              `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
17 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i        i               +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Mikko
18 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i        i               `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Jim Burns
16 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)158Jim Burns
16 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)157WM
16 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)156Jim Burns
17 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i           `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)155WM
18 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i            `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)154Jim Burns
19 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i             `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)153WM
19 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i              `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)152Jim Burns
20 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i               `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)151WM
21 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)150Mikko
21 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                 `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)149WM
21 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)117Mikko
21 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)116WM
22 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)115Mikko
22 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)114WM
23 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)113Mikko
23 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)112WM
24 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)111Mikko
24 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)110WM
25 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)109Mikko
25 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)108WM
26 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)107Mikko
26 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)106WM
26 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)36Richard Damon
26 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)35WM
26 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)34Richard Damon
26 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)33WM
26 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)32Richard Damon
26 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)31WM
26 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)30Richard Damon
27 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)29WM
27 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)28Richard Damon
27 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)27WM
27 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)26Richard Damon
28 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)25WM
28 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i           `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)24Richard Damon
28 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i            `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)23WM
28 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i             `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)22Richard Damon
28 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i              `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)21WM
28 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i               `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)20Richard Damon
28 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i                `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)19WM
28 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i                 +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
29 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i                 `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)17Richard Damon
29 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i                  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)16WM
29 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i                   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)15Richard Damon
29 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i                    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)12WM
29 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i                    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)11Richard Damon
29 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i                    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)10WM
29 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i                    i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)9Richard Damon
29 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i                    i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8WM
29 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i                    i    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5Richard Damon
29 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i                    i    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4WM
29 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i                    i    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Richard Damon
30 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i                    i    i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
30 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i                    i    i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
8 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i                    i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
9 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i                    i     `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
29 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i                    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
29 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           i                     `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
27 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i           `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)69Mikko
27 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i            `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)68WM
27 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i             +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
1 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i             `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)66Mikko
1 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i              `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)65WM
1 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i               +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8Richard Damon
1 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i               i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7WM
1 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i               i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6Richard Damon
2 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i               i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
2 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i               i   +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
8 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i               i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3joes
9 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i               i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
10 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i               i     `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
2 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i               `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)56Mikko
2 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)55WM
3 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                 `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)54Mikko
3 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)53WM
3 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Richard Damon
3 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                   i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, fundamental)1Ross Finlayson
8 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)50joes
9 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)49WM
10 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)48Richard Damon
10 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)47WM
11 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)39Richard Damon
11 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)38WM
12 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7Richard Damon
12 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6WM
12 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5Richard Damon
12 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4WM
13 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Richard Damon
13 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
13 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i i     `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
12 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)30Mikko
12 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)29WM
13 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)11Richard Damon
13 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i   i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)10WM
14 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i   i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6Richard Damon
14 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i   i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
14 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i   i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4Richard Damon
14 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i   i i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
14 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i   i i   +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
18 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i   i i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
15 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i   i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Richard Damon
15 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i   i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
15 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i   i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
14 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)17Mikko
14 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)16WM
15 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)15Mikko
15 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)14WM
15 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i       +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)9Richard Damon
15 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i       i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8WM
15 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i       i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7Richard Damon
16 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i       i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6WM
17 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i       i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5Richard Damon
17 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i       i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4WM
17 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i       i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Richard Damon
17 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i       i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
19 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i       i       `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
16 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4Mikko
16 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
17 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i         +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
17 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       i         `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Mikko
12 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7joes
12 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                        +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Jeff Barnett
12 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                        i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
12 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4WM
13 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Richard Damon
13 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
13 Dec 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  i                           `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
21 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)31Jim Burns
21 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)30WM
21 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)29Jim Burns
21 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)28WM
21 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)27Jim Burns
21 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)26WM
22 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)25Jim Burns
22 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)24WM
22 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)23Jim Burns
23 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                           `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)22WM
23 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                            `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)21Jim Burns
23 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                             `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)20WM
23 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                              `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)19Jim Burns
23 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                               `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)18WM
23 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                                `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)17Jim Burns
24 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                                 `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)16WM
24 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                                  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)15Jim Burns
24 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                                   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)14WM
24 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                                    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)13Jim Burns
24 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                                     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)12WM
24 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                                      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)11Jim Burns
25 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                                       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)10WM
26 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                                        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)9Jim Burns
26 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                                         +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7WM
26 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                                         i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6Jim Burns
26 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                                         i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
26 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                                         i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4Jim Burns
27 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                                         i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
27 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                                         i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Jim Burns
27 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                                         i     `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
26 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i i                                         `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
11 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
10 Nov 24 i  i    i   i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
11 Nov 24 i  i    i   i      `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Mikko
7 Nov 24 i  i    i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
6 Nov 24 i  i    `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
4 Nov 24 i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers34WM
21 Nov 24 i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers33Mikko
21 Nov 24 i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers32WM
21 Nov 24 i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers31Mikko
21 Nov 24 i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers30WM
22 Nov 24 i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers29Mikko
22 Nov 24 i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers28WM
24 Nov 24 i         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers27Mikko
24 Nov 24 i          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers26WM
25 Nov 24 i           `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers25Mikko
25 Nov 24 i            `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers24WM
26 Nov 24 i             `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers23Mikko
26 Nov 24 i              `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers22WM
26 Nov 24 i               +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers5Richard Damon
26 Nov 24 i               i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers4WM
26 Nov 24 i               i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers3Richard Damon
26 Nov 24 i               i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2WM
26 Nov 24 i               i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1Richard Damon
27 Nov 24 i               `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers16Mikko
27 Nov 24 i                `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers15WM
27 Nov 24 i                 +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers5Richard Damon
27 Nov 24 i                 i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers4WM
27 Nov 24 i                 i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers3Richard Damon
28 Nov 24 i                 i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2WM
28 Nov 24 i                 i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1Richard Damon
28 Nov 24 i                 `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers9Mikko
28 Nov 24 i                  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers8WM
29 Nov 24 i                   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers7Mikko
29 Nov 24 i                    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers6WM
29 Nov 24 i                     +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1Richard Damon
30 Nov 24 i                     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers4Mikko
30 Nov 24 i                      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers3WM
30 Nov 24 i                       +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1Richard Damon
1 Dec 24 i                       `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1Mikko
12 Dec 24 `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
21 Dec 24 * An Affine Logic Example: Łukasiewicz Logic3Mild Shock
22 Dec 24 `* Re: An Affine Logic Example: Łukasiewicz Logic2Ross Finlayson
22 Dec 24  `- 4-valued Counter Example (Was: An Affine Logic Example: Łukasiewicz Logic)1Mild Shock
22 Dec 24 o What does Pluto in Aquarius mean? [2023–2044]1Mild Shock
18 Dec 24 * Ilya Sutskever: The Next Oppenheimer2Mild Shock
19 Dec 24 `- What does "o1" mean in recent Models (Was: Ilya Sutskever: The Next Oppenheimer)1Mild Shock
1 Dec 24 * trustpilot review of stack overflow [Jekejeke Phishing]4Mild Shock
1 Dec 24 `* Prime SO weed smokers: journeym, Shadow, who else? (Re: trustpilot review of stack overflow [Jekejeke Phishing]3Mild Shock
1 Dec 24  +- Top ten film list for the SO titanic sinking (Was: Prime SO weed smokers: journeym, Shadow, who else?)1Mild Shock
14 Dec 24  `- Weed Smokers are also Assisnation Killers (Was: Prime SO weed smokers: journeym, Shadow, who else?)1Mild Shock
5 Dec 24 * This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)29olcott
5 Dec 24 +- Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)1Chris M. Thomasson
5 Dec 24 +- Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)1Richard Damon
5 Dec 24 +* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)16Bonita Montero
7 Dec 24 i`* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)15olcott
7 Dec 24 i `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)14Richard Damon
7 Dec 24 i  +* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)12olcott
7 Dec 24 i  i`* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)11Richard Damon
7 Dec 24 i  i `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)10olcott
7 Dec 24 i  i  `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)9Richard Damon
7 Dec 24 i  i   `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)8olcott
7 Dec 24 i  i    `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)7Richard Damon
7 Dec 24 i  i     `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)6olcott
7 Dec 24 i  i      `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)5Richard Damon
7 Dec 24 i  i       `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)4olcott
8 Dec 24 i  i        `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)3Richard Damon
8 Dec 24 i  i         `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)2olcott
8 Dec 24 i  i          `- Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)1Richard Damon
7 Dec 24 i  `- Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)1olcott
8 Dec 24 `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)10olcott
8 Dec 24  +* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)7Richard Damon
9 Dec 24  i`* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)6olcott
9 Dec 24  i `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)5Richard Damon
9 Dec 24  i  `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)4olcott
9 Dec 24  i   `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)3Richard Damon
9 Dec 24  i    `* Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)2olcott
9 Dec 24  i     `- Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)1Richard Damon
11 Dec 24  `* The essence of my halting problem work2olcott
11 Dec 24   `- Re: The essence of my halting problem work1Richard Damon
9 Dec 24 o A Timeless Confluence [Term Rewriting]1Mild Shock
1 Dec 24 * Still on negative translation for substructural logics54Julio Di Egidio

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal