sci.physics.relativity

Liste des Groupes Pages :123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930
Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 Dec 24 i      i`- Re: Relativistic synchronisation method1Python
17 Dec 24 i      +* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method2Richard Hachel
17 Dec 24 i      i`- Re: Relativistic synchronisation method1Python
18 Dec 24 i      `- Re: Relativistic synchronisation method1Richard Hachel
17 Dec 24 `* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method4Mikko
17 Dec 24  `* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method3Richard Hachel
19 Dec 24   `* Re: Relativistic synchronisation method2Mikko
19 Dec 24    `- Re: Relativistic synchronisation method1Richard Hachel
2 Jan 25 o About the new, better definition of second1Maciej Wozniak
30 Dec 24 * Re: Newton, Galileo4Bertietaylor
30 Dec 24 `* Re: Newton, Galileo3Bertietaylor
31 Dec 24  `* Re: Newton, Galileo2Bertietaylor
1 Jan 25   `- Re: Newton, Galileo1Bertietaylor
31 Dec 24 o Yes!1Richard Hachel
17 Dec 24 * Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years58rhertz
17 Dec 24 +* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years7Ross Finlayson
20 Dec 24 i`* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years6LaurenceClarkCrossen
21 Dec 24 i `* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years5J. J. Lodder
21 Dec 24 i  +- Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years1Richard Hachel
27 Dec 24 i  `* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years3LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 Dec 24 i   +- Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years1J. J. Lodder
29 Dec 24 i   `- Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years1J. J. Lodder
17 Dec 24 `* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years50rhertz
18 Dec 24  `* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years49rhertz
18 Dec 24   `* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years48J. J. Lodder
18 Dec 24    +- Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years1Maciej Wozniak
19 Dec 24    `* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years46rhertz
19 Dec 24     +- Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years1Ross Finlayson
19 Dec 24     `* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years44J. J. Lodder
20 Dec 24      +* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years24rhertz
20 Dec 24      i`* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years23Ross Finlayson
20 Dec 24      i `* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years22rhertz
20 Dec 24      i  +* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years20rhertz
20 Dec 24      i  i`* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years19J. J. Lodder
20 Dec 24      i  i `* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years18rhertz
20 Dec 24      i  i  `* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years17J. J. Lodder
21 Dec 24      i  i   `* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years16rhertz
21 Dec 24      i  i    +* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years7Ross Finlayson
21 Dec 24      i  i    i+* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years2Ross Finlayson
24 Dec 24      i  i    ii`- Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years1Ross Finlayson
21 Dec 24      i  i    i`* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years4J. J. Lodder
27 Dec 24      i  i    i `* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years3Physfitfreak
27 Dec 24      i  i    i  +- Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years1Maciej Wozniak
29 Dec 24      i  i    i  `- Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years1J. J. Lodder
21 Dec 24      i  i    `* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years8J. J. Lodder
21 Dec 24      i  i     `* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years7rhertz
22 Dec 24      i  i      `* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years6Paul.B.Andersen
22 Dec 24      i  i       +* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years2rhertz
28 Dec 24      i  i       i`- Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years1LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Dec 24      i  i       `* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years3Thomas Heger
23 Dec 24      i  i        `* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years2Athel Cornish-Bowden
23 Dec 24      i  i         `- Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years1J. J. Lodder
20 Dec 24      i  `- Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years1Ross Finlayson
27 Dec 24      `* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years19LaurenceClarkCrossen
27 Dec 24       +* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years17Richard Hachel
28 Dec 24       i+- Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years1LaurenceClarkCrossen
28 Dec 24       i+* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years11LaurenceClarkCrossen
28 Dec 24       ii`* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years10Richard Hachel
28 Dec 24       ii `* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years9LaurenceClarkCrossen
28 Dec 24       ii  `* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years8Richard Hachel
28 Dec 24       ii   `* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years7Python
28 Dec 24       ii    +* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years5Richard Hachel
29 Dec 24       ii    i`* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years4Paul.B.Andersen
29 Dec 24       ii    i `* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years3Richard Hachel
30 Dec 24       ii    i  +- Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years1Paul.B.Andersen
31 Dec 24       ii    i  `- Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years1Paul.B.Andersen
29 Dec 24       ii    `- Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years1Thomas Heger
28 Dec 24       i`* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years4LaurenceClarkCrossen
28 Dec 24       i +- Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years1Richard Hachel
28 Dec 24       i `* Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years2Ross Finlayson
28 Dec 24       i  `- Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years1LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 Dec 24       `- Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years1J. J. Lodder
20 Dec 24 * The cause of gravity4bertietaylor
20 Dec 24 +- Re: The cause of gravity1Jim Pennino
30 Dec 24 `* Re: The cause of gravity2Bertietaylor
30 Dec 24  `- Re: The cause of gravity1Bertietaylor
24 Dec 24 * The physics aphorisms of Arindam4bertietaylor
29 Dec 24 `* Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam3Bertietaylor
29 Dec 24  +- Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam1Jim Pennino
30 Dec 24  `- Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam1Bertietaylor
29 Dec 24 * Re: Is Gravity and Electricity the same thing?3Bertietaylor
29 Dec 24 +- Re: Is Gravity and Electricity the same thing?1Jim Pennino
30 Dec 24 `- Re: Is Gravity and Electricity the same thing?1Bertietaylor
29 Dec 24 o Re: Newton, Galileo1Ross Finlayson
29 Dec 24 * about the new, better definition of second8Maciej Wozniak
29 Dec 24 `* Re: about the new, better definition of second7Python
29 Dec 24  +* Re: about the new, better definition of second3Maciej Wozniak
29 Dec 24  i`* Re: about the new, better definition of second2Python
29 Dec 24  i `- Re: about the new, better definition of second1Maciej Wozniak
29 Dec 24  `* Re: about the new, better definition of second3Richard Hachel
29 Dec 24   `* Re: about the new, better definition of second2Maciej Wozniak
29 Dec 24    `- Re: about the new, better definition of second1Python
29 Dec 24 o Re: Newton, Galileo1Ross Finlayson
22 Dec 24 * Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru4Thomas Heger
23 Dec 24 `* Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru3J. J. Lodder
28 Dec 24  `* Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru2Thomas Heger
29 Dec 24   `- Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru1J. J. Lodder
22 Dec 24 * "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.201727LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Dec 24 +- Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20171LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Dec 24 +- Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20171Richard Hachel
22 Dec 24 `* Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.201724Paul.B.Andersen
22 Dec 24  +- Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20171LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Dec 24  +- Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20171LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Dec 24  +- Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20171LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Dec 24  +* Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.201711LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Dec 24  i`* Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.201710Ross Finlayson
23 Dec 24  i +- Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20171LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Dec 24  i `* Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20178LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Dec 24  i  `* Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20177Ross Finlayson
23 Dec 24  i   +* Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20174LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Dec 24  i   i`* Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20173Ross Finlayson
23 Dec 24  i   i `* Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20172LaurenceClarkCrossen
24 Dec 24  i   i  `- Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20171Ross Finlayson
23 Dec 24  i   `* Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20172LaurenceClarkCrossen
24 Dec 24  i    `- Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20171Ross Finlayson
23 Dec 24  +- Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20171LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Dec 24  +* Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20172LaurenceClarkCrossen
28 Dec 24  i`- Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20171Ross Finlayson
24 Dec 24  `* Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20176J. J. Lodder
24 Dec 24   +* Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20172Ross Finlayson
24 Dec 24   i`- Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20171Ross Finlayson
28 Dec 24   `* Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20173LaurenceClarkCrossen
28 Dec 24    +- Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20171Ross Finlayson
29 Dec 24    `- Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.20171J. J. Lodder
29 Dec 24 o Re: Einstein's father1J. J. Lodder
29 Dec 24 * Re: Is Gravity and Electricity the same thing?2Sabbir Rahman
29 Dec 24 `- Re: Is Gravity and Electricity the same thing?1Ross Finlayson
28 Dec 24 o Re: Is Gravity and Electricity the same thing?1Ross Finlayson
25 Dec 24 * Relativity and truth3Richard Hachel
25 Dec 24 +- Re: Relativity and truth1Ross Finlayson
28 Dec 24 `- Re: Relativity and truth1Ross Finlayson
28 Dec 24 o Re: Is Gravity and Electricity the same thing?1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Dec 24 * E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.71rhertz
1 Dec 24 +* Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.2Ross Finlayson
1 Dec 24 i`- Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1Ross Finlayson
1 Dec 24 +* Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.2Mikko
6 Dec 24 i`- Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1J. J. Lodder
1 Dec 24 +- Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1Paul.B.Andersen
1 Dec 24 +* Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.3Richard Hachel
1 Dec 24 i`* Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.2Ross Finlayson
2 Dec 24 i `- Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1Richard Hachel
2 Dec 24 `* Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.62rhertz
2 Dec 24  +* Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.60rhertz
2 Dec 24  i`* Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.59ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
2 Dec 24  i +- Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1Ross Finlayson
2 Dec 24  i `* Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.57ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
3 Dec 24  i  +* Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.5Ross Finlayson
3 Dec 24  i  i`* Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.4ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
3 Dec 24  i  i `* Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.3Ross Finlayson
3 Dec 24  i  i  `* Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.2Ross Finlayson
4 Dec 24  i  i   `- Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1Ross Finlayson
3 Dec 24  i  `* Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.51rhertz
3 Dec 24  i   +- Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1Paul.B.Andersen
3 Dec 24  i   `* Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.49ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
3 Dec 24  i    `* Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.48rhertz
3 Dec 24  i     `* Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.47rhertz
4 Dec 24  i      `* Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.46ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
4 Dec 24  i       +* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.44J. J. Lodder
4 Dec 24  i       i`* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.43ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
4 Dec 24  i       i `* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.42J. J. Lodder
4 Dec 24  i       i  +- Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1Ross Finlayson
4 Dec 24  i       i  +* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.4ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
5 Dec 24  i       i  i+- Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1Ross Finlayson
5 Dec 24  i       i  i`* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.2J. J. Lodder
5 Dec 24  i       i  i `- Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
5 Dec 24  i       i  `* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.36J. J. Lodder
6 Dec 24  i       i   +* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.6Ross Finlayson
6 Dec 24  i       i   i`* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.5rhertz
6 Dec 24  i       i   i +* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.2J. J. Lodder
6 Dec 24  i       i   i i`- Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1Ross Finlayson
6 Dec 24  i       i   i +- Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1J. J. Lodder
7 Dec 24  i       i   i `- Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
6 Dec 24  i       i   +* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.28J. J. Lodder
6 Dec 24  i       i   i+- Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1Ross Finlayson
7 Dec 24  i       i   i+* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.17ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
7 Dec 24  i       i   ii+- Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1Ross Finlayson
7 Dec 24  i       i   ii`* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.15J. J. Lodder
7 Dec 24  i       i   ii `* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.14ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
7 Dec 24  i       i   ii  `* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.13Ross Finlayson
7 Dec 24  i       i   ii   +* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.8J. J. Lodder
8 Dec 24  i       i   ii   i`* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.7ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
8 Dec 24  i       i   ii   i +* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.5ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
8 Dec 24  i       i   ii   i i`* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.4J. J. Lodder
10 Dec 24  i       i   ii   i i `* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.3Ross Finlayson
10 Dec 24  i       i   ii   i i  `* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.2J. J. Lodder
11 Dec 24  i       i   ii   i i   `- Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1Ross Finlayson
8 Dec 24  i       i   ii   i `- Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1J. J. Lodder
7 Dec 24  i       i   ii   `* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.4J. J. Lodder
7 Dec 24  i       i   ii    +- Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1Ross Finlayson
8 Dec 24  i       i   ii    `* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.2Athel Cornish-Bowden
8 Dec 24  i       i   ii     `- Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1J. J. Lodder
7 Dec 24  i       i   i+- Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
8 Dec 24  i       i   i+- Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1J. J. Lodder
8 Dec 24  i       i   i+* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.5J. J. Lodder
9 Dec 24  i       i   ii+* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.2J. J. Lodder
27 Dec 24  i       i   iii`- Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1Physfitfreak
9 Dec 24  i       i   ii`* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.2rhertz
10 Dec 24  i       i   ii `- Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1rhertz
8 Dec 24  i       i   i`* Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
8 Dec 24  i       i   i `- Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1J. J. Lodder
7 Dec 24  i       i   `- Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
4 Dec 24  i       `- Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1rhertz
11 Dec 24  `- Re: E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
24 Dec 24 * A new look towards the principles of motion5bertietaylor
27 Dec 24 `* Re: A new look towards the principles of motion4Bertietaylor
27 Dec 24  +* Re: A new look towards the principles of motion2Jim Pennino
27 Dec 24  i`- Re: A new look towards the principles of motion1Athel Cornish-Bowden
27 Dec 24  `- Re: A new look towards the principles of motion1Bertietaylor
26 Dec 24 * Pound-Rebka: ChatGPT is TRAINED to obey, sucking asses of relativists at any cost.10rhertz
26 Dec 24 +- Re: Pound-Rebka: ChatGPT is TRAINED to obey, sucking asses of relativists at any cost.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
26 Dec 24 +- Re: Pound-Rebka: ChatGPT is TRAINED to obey, sucking asses of relativists at any cost.1rhertz
26 Dec 24 +- Re: Pound-Rebka: ChatGPT is TRAINED to obey, sucking asses of relativists at any cost.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
26 Dec 24 +* Re: Pound-Rebka: ChatGPT is TRAINED to obey, sucking asses of relativists at any cost.2rhertz
27 Dec 24 i`- Re: Pound-Rebka: ChatGPT is TRAINED to obey, sucking asses of relativists at any cost.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
26 Dec 24 `* Re: Pound-Rebka: ChatGPT is TRAINED to obey, sucking asses of relativists at any cost.4rhertz
26 Dec 24  `* Re: Pound-Rebka: ChatGPT is TRAINED to obey, sucking asses of relativists at any cost.3rhertz
27 Dec 24   +- Re: Pound-Rebka: ChatGPT is TRAINED to obey, sucking asses of relativists at any cost.1rhertz
27 Dec 24   `- Re: Pound-Rebka: ChatGPT is TRAINED to obey, sucking asses of relativists at any cost.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
25 Dec 24 * Re: Anti-relativist2Ross Finlayson
25 Dec 24 `- Re: Anti-relativist1Ross Finlayson
25 Dec 24 o Re: Scalar waves1Ross Finlayson
17 Dec 24 * Criticism of the basis of the general relativity theory6rhertz
18 Dec 24 `* Re: Criticism of the basis of the general relativity theory5rhertz
19 Dec 24  +* Re: Criticism of the basis of the general relativity theory2J. J. Lodder
20 Dec 24  i`- Re: Criticism of the basis of the general relativity theory1rhertz
20 Dec 24  +- Re: Criticism of the basis of the general relativity theory1LaurenceClarkCrossen
20 Dec 24  `- Re: Criticism of the basis of the general relativity theory1LaurenceClarkCrossen
28 Nov 24 * The Relativity Mafia28LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 Nov 24 `* Re: The Relativity Mafia27Bertietaylor
29 Nov 24  `* Re: The Relativity Mafia26LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 Nov 24   `* Re: The Relativity Mafia25Bertietaylor
29 Nov 24    +* Re: The Relativity Mafia14Ross Finlayson
29 Nov 24    i+* Re: The Relativity Mafia9LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 Nov 24    ii`* Re: The Relativity Mafia8Ross Finlayson
29 Nov 24    ii `* Re: The Relativity Mafia7LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 Nov 24    ii  +* Re: The Relativity Mafia5Ross Finlayson
30 Nov 24    ii  i`* Re: The Relativity Mafia4LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 Nov 24    ii  i `* Re: The Relativity Mafia3Ross Finlayson
30 Nov 24    ii  i  `* Re: The Relativity Mafia2Ross Finlayson
30 Nov 24    ii  i   `- Re: The Relativity Mafia1Ross Finlayson
1 Dec 24    ii  `- Re: The Relativity Mafia1LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Dec 24    i`* Re: The Relativity Mafia4LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Dec 24    i `* Re: The Relativity Mafia3Ross Finlayson
1 Dec 24    i  +- Re: The Relativity Mafia1LaurenceClarkCrossen
20 Dec 24    i  `- Re: The Relativity Mafia1LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 Nov 24    +* Re: The Relativity Mafia3LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Dec 24    i`* Re: The Relativity Mafia2Bertietaylor
1 Dec 24    i `- Re: The Relativity Mafia1LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 Nov 24    `* Re: The Relativity Mafia7LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Dec 24     `* Re: The Relativity Mafia6Bertietaylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal