comp.lang.c

Liste des GroupesPages :1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132
Date Sujet#  Auteur
19 Mar 25 +- Re: IOCCC 28th has started1anthk
19 Mar 25 `* Re: IOCCC 28th has started2DFS
19 Mar 25  `- Re: IOCCC 28th has started1yeti
15 Mar 25 * __func__ is not a keyword15Thiago Adams
15 Mar 25 `* Re: __func__ is not a keyword14Keith Thompson
15 Mar 25  +* Re: __func__ is not a keyword3Thiago Adams
15 Mar 25  i`* Re: __func__ is not a keyword2Keith Thompson
15 Mar 25  i `- Re: __func__ is not a keyword1Keith Thompson
16 Mar 25  +* Re: __func__ is not a keyword3Kaz Kylheku
16 Mar 25  i`* Re: __func__ is not a keyword2Keith Thompson
18 Mar 25  i `- Re: __func__ is not a keyword1Tim Rentsch
16 Mar 25  `* Re: __func__ is not a keyword7Keith Thompson
16 Mar 25   `* Re: __func__ is not a keyword6Kaz Kylheku
16 Mar 25    +* Re: __func__ is not a keyword4Keith Thompson
17 Mar 25    i`* Re: __func__ is not a keyword3Kaz Kylheku
17 Mar 25    i `* Re: __func__ is not a keyword2Keith Thompson
17 Mar 25    i  `- Re: __func__ is not a keyword1Kaz Kylheku
16 Mar 25    `- Re: __func__ is not a keyword1James Kuyper
11 Mar 25 * Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows10olcott
11 Mar 25 +- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Stupid Mistake?1olcott
11 Mar 25 +- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Counter-Factual ERROR1olcott
12 Mar 25 +* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Very Stupid Mistake2olcott
12 Mar 25 i`- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Very Stupid Mistake and Liars1olcott
12 Mar 25 +- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Mike's very stupid mistake1olcott
13 Mar 25 +- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Very Stupid Mistake or Liars1olcott
15 Mar 25 +* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Paraphrase of Sipser's agreement2olcott
16 Mar 25 i`- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Paraphrase of Sipser's agreement1olcott
16 Mar 25 `- Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- original post appended at end1olcott
13 Mar 25 * Concatenated if and preprocessor26pozz
13 Mar 25 +- Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor1David Brown
13 Mar 25 +- Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor1James Kuyper
13 Mar 25 +- Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor1Kaz Kylheku
13 Mar 25 +- Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor1bart
13 Mar 25 +* Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor3Tim Rentsch
14 Mar 25 i`* Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor2Lynn McGuire
14 Mar 25 i `- Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor1Tim Rentsch
13 Mar 25 +- Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor1James Kuyper
14 Mar 25 `* Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor17pozz
14 Mar 25  +- Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor1David Brown
14 Mar 25  +- Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor1Dan Purgert
14 Mar 25  +* Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor12Tim Rentsch
14 Mar 25  i`* Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor11Richard Harnden
14 Mar 25  i +* Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor9Tim Rentsch
14 Mar 25  i i`* Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor8Keith Thompson
14 Mar 25  i i +* Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor3Richard Harnden
14 Mar 25  i i i`* Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor2Tim Rentsch
15 Mar 25  i i i `- Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor1David Brown
14 Mar 25  i i +* Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor3Tim Rentsch
15 Mar 25  i i i`* Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor2Keith Thompson
15 Mar 25  i i i `- Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor1Tim Rentsch
15 Mar 25  i i `- Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor1David Brown
15 Mar 25  i `- Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Mar 25  +- Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor1Keith Thompson
15 Mar 25  `- Re: Concatenated if and preprocessor1James Kuyper
14 Mar 25 * What is your opinion about init_malloc?14Thiago Adams
14 Mar 25 +* Re: What is your opinion about init_malloc?9Bonita Montero
14 Mar 25 i+* Re: What is your opinion about init_malloc?7wij
14 Mar 25 ii`* Re: What is your opinion about init_malloc?6Bonita Montero
14 Mar 25 ii +* Re: What is your opinion about init_malloc?2Thiago Adams
14 Mar 25 ii i`- Re: What is your opinion about init_malloc?1Bonita Montero
14 Mar 25 ii `* Re: What is your opinion about init_malloc?3wij
14 Mar 25 ii  +- Re: What is your opinion about init_malloc?1Richard Heathfield
14 Mar 25 ii  `- Re: What is your opinion about init_malloc?1Bonita Montero
15 Mar 25 i`- Bonita (Was: What is your opinion about init_malloc?)1Kenny McCormack
14 Mar 25 +* Re: What is your opinion about init_malloc?3Kaz Kylheku
15 Mar 25 i+- Re: What is your opinion about init_malloc?1Thiago Adams
15 Mar 25 i`- Re: What is your opinion about init_malloc?1Tim Rentsch
15 Mar 25 `- Re: What is your opinion about init_malloc?1Tim Rentsch
10 Mar 25 * Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?23Dan Cross
10 Mar 25 +* Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?17Kenny McCormack
10 Mar 25 i`* Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?16Dan Cross
10 Mar 25 i +* Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?2Richard Heathfield
10 Mar 25 i i`- Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?1Dan Cross
10 Mar 25 i `* Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)13Kenny McCormack
10 Mar 25 i  `* Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)12Dan Cross
10 Mar 25 i   +- Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)1Michael S
10 Mar 25 i   +* Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)2Tim Rentsch
10 Mar 25 i   i`- Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)1Dan Cross
10 Mar 25 i   +* Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)2David Brown
10 Mar 25 i   i`- Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)1Dan Cross
10 Mar 25 i   +* Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)4Richard Heathfield
10 Mar 25 i   i`* Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)3Dan Cross
10 Mar 25 i   i `* Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)2Richard Heathfield
10 Mar 25 i   i  `- Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)1Dan Cross
10 Mar 25 i   +- Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)1Kenny McCormack
11 Mar 25 i   `- Re: Topicality1Keith Thompson
10 Mar 25 +- Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?1Kaz Kylheku
11 Mar 25 `* Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?4Lynn McGuire
11 Mar 25  `* Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?3Dan Cross
12 Mar 25   `* Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?2Lynn McGuire
12 Mar 25    `- Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?1Dan Cross
11 Mar 25 * Everyone makes sure to avoid addressing this exact point3olcott
11 Mar 25 +- Re: Everyone makes sure to avoid addressing this exact point1dbush
11 Mar 25 `- Re: Everyone makes sure to avoid addressing this exact point1Richard Damon
11 Mar 25 o 3rd RfD: Mass-deletion of moderated groups without a moderator1Usenet Big-8 Management Board
27 Feb 25 * [OSDev] How to switch to long mode in x86 CPUs?29Ar Rakin
27 Feb 25 +* Re: [OSDev] How to switch to long mode in x86 CPUs?14Keith Thompson
28 Feb 25 i`* Re: [OSDev] How to switch to long mode in x86 CPUs?13Ar Rakin
28 Feb 25 i +- Re: [OSDev] How to switch to long mode in x86 CPUs?1Waldek Hebisch
28 Feb 25 i `* OT: (Was: How to switch to long mode in x86 CPUs?)11Salvador Mirzo
28 Feb 25 i  +* Re: OT: USENET9Salvador Mirzo
1 Mar 25 i  i+* Re: OT: USENET7Richard Harnden
1 Mar 25 i  ii+* Re: OT: USENET2Ar Rakin
5 Mar 25 i  iii`- Re: OT: USENET1candycanearter07
2 Mar 25 i  ii`* Re: OT: USENET4Salvador Mirzo
2 Mar 25 i  ii `* Re: OT: USENET3Ar Rakin
2 Mar 25 i  ii  +- Re: OT: USENET1yeti
9 Mar 25 i  ii  `- Re: OT: USENET1Salvador Mirzo
1 Mar 25 i  i`- Re: OT: USENET1Ar Rakin
1 Mar 25 i  `- Re: OT:1Ar Rakin
28 Feb 25 +* Re: [OSDev] How to switch to long mode in x86 CPUs?12David Brown
28 Feb 25 i+* Re: [OSDev] How to switch to long mode in x86 CPUs?2Ar Rakin
1 Mar 25 ii`- Re: [OSDev] How to switch to long mode in x86 CPUs?1Dan Cross
1 Mar 25 i`* Re: [OSDev] How to switch to long mode in x86 CPUs?9Paul Edwards
2 Mar 25 i +* Re: [OSDev] How to switch to long mode in x86 CPUs?3Salvador Mirzo
2 Mar 25 i i+- Re: PC BIOS (was [OSDev] How to switch to long mode in x86 CPUs?)1Dan Cross
2 Mar 25 i i`- Re: [OSDev] How to switch to long mode in x86 CPUs?1Dan Cross
2 Mar 25 i `* Re: [OSDev] How to switch to long mode in x86 CPUs?5Paul Edwards
2 Mar 25 i  `* Re: [OSDev] How to switch to long mode in x86 CPUs?4bart
4 Mar 25 i   `* Re: [OSDev] How to switch to long mode in x86 CPUs?3Paul Edwards
4 Mar 25 i    `* Re: [OSDev] How to switch to long mode in x86 CPUs?2bart
5 Mar 25 i     `- Re: [OSDev] How to switch to long mode in x86 CPUs?1Paul Edwards
1 Mar 25 +- Re: [OSDev] How to switch to long mode in x86 CPUs?1Dan Cross
2 Mar 25 `- Re: [OSDev] How to switch to long mode in x86 CPUs?1Andy Valencia
4 Mar 25 * DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals16olcott
4 Mar 25 +* Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals2dbush
4 Mar 25 i`- Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals1olcott
4 Mar 25 +* Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals6Bonita Montero
4 Mar 25 i+- Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals1Richard Heathfield
4 Mar 25 i`* Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals4olcott
4 Mar 25 i `* Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid3Muttley
4 Mar 25 i  `* Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid2olcott
5 Mar 25 i   `- Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid1Fred. Zwarts
4 Mar 25 +* Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals5Richard Damon
4 Mar 25 i`* Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals4olcott
4 Mar 25 i +- Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals1Richard Heathfield
5 Mar 25 i `* Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals2Richard Damon
5 Mar 25 i  `- Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals1olcott
4 Mar 25 +- Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals1Richard Damon
4 Mar 25 `- Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals ---PSR---1olcott
4 Mar 25 o Re: Python recompile1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Mar 25 * Re: Python recompile9Waldek Hebisch
2 Mar 25 +- Re: Python recompile1Richard Heathfield
2 Mar 25 `* Re: Python recompile7James Kuyper
3 Mar 25  +- Re: Python recompile1James Kuyper
3 Mar 25  `* Re: Python recompile5Waldek Hebisch
3 Mar 25   +- Re: Python recompile1Richard Heathfield
3 Mar 25   +- Re: Python recompile1James Kuyper
3 Mar 25   +- Re: Python recompile1bart
4 Mar 25   `- Re: Python recompile1Tim Rentsch
7 Jan 25 * Opinions on `defer`?31Alexis
7 Jan 25 +* Re: Opinions on `defer`?2Kaz Kylheku
8 Jan 25 i`- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1Thiago Adams
7 Jan 25 +* Re: Opinions on `defer`?2David Brown
7 Jan 25 i`- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1Phillip
7 Jan 25 +- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1John McCue
7 Jan 25 +* Re: Opinions on `defer`?4Bonita Montero
8 Jan 25 i`* Re: Opinions on `defer`?3Chris M. Thomasson
9 Jan 25 i `* Re: Opinions on `defer`?2Bonita Montero
11 Jan 25 i  `- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1Bonita Montero
8 Jan 25 +* Re: Opinions on `defer`?3Janis Papanagnou
8 Jan 25 i+- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1Kaz Kylheku
28 Feb 25 i`- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Jan 25 +- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1BlueManedHawk
8 Jan 25 `* Re: Opinions on `defer`?17Tim Rentsch
8 Jan 25  +* Re: Opinions on `defer`?3Thiago Adams
8 Jan 25  i+- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1Thiago Adams
19 Feb 25  i`- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1Tim Rentsch
9 Jan 25  +* Re: Opinions on `defer`?4David Brown
9 Jan 25  i`* Re: Opinions on `defer`?3Kaz Kylheku
9 Jan 25  i `* Re: Opinions on `defer`?2David Brown
9 Jan 25  i  `- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1Michael S
9 Jan 25  `* Re: Opinions on `defer`?9Bonita Montero
9 Jan 25   `* Re: Opinions on `defer`?8Bonita Montero
10 Jan 25    +* Re: Opinions on `defer`?2Bonita Montero
11 Jan 25    i`- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1Bonita Montero
10 Jan 25    +- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1David Brown
13 Jan 25    +* Re: Opinions on `defer`?2Tim Rentsch
13 Jan 25    i`- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1Bonita Montero
24 Feb 25    `* Re: Opinions on `defer`?2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Mar 25     `- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1Bonita Montero
2 Mar 25 o DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Kicking the straw-man deception out on its ass1olcott
2 Mar 25 * Failure to meet this challenge proves that all of my reviewers are wrong2olcott
2 Mar 25 `- Re: Failure to meet this challenge proves that all of my reviewers are wrong1olcott
2 Mar 25 o Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1olcott
2 Mar 25 o Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years1olcott
21 Feb 25 * Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-165pozz
21 Feb 25 +* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-129Richard Damon
21 Feb 25 i`* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-128pozz
21 Feb 25 i +* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-116Janis Papanagnou
21 Feb 25 i i+- Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-11Janis Papanagnou
21 Feb 25 i i`* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-114Keith Thompson
21 Feb 25 i i `* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-113Janis Papanagnou
22 Feb 25 i i  `* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-112David Brown
22 Feb 25 i i   +* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-15Janis Papanagnou
22 Feb 25 i i   i+- Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-11David Brown
22 Feb 25 i i   i`* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Feb 25 i i   i `* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-12Janis Papanagnou
24 Feb 25 i i   i  `- Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Feb 25 i i   `* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-16Richard Damon
22 Feb 25 i i    +- Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-11David Brown
22 Feb 25 i i    +* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-12Janis Papanagnou
23 Feb 25 i i    i`- Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-11Richard Damon
22 Feb 25 i i    +- Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Feb 25 i i    `- Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-11Waldek Hebisch
22 Feb 25 i +- Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-11Richard Damon
22 Feb 25 i `* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-110Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Feb 25 i  `* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-19Janis Papanagnou
22 Feb 25 i   +* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Feb 25 i   i`* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-12Janis Papanagnou
22 Feb 25 i   i `- Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Feb 25 i   +- Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-11James Kuyper
23 Feb 25 i   +- Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Feb 25 i   `* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-13Kaz Kylheku
24 Feb 25 i    `* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-12Janis Papanagnou
24 Feb 25 i     `- Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Feb 25 +* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-12David Brown
21 Feb 25 i`- Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-11pozz
21 Feb 25 +* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-130Keith Thompson
22 Feb 25 i`* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-129David Brown
24 Feb 25 i `* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-128pozz
24 Feb 25 i  `* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-127Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Feb 25 i   +* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-12pozz
25 Feb 25 i   i`- Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Feb 25 i   `* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-124pozz
25 Feb 25 i    `* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-123Richard Damon
25 Feb 25 i     `* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-122pozz
25 Feb 25 i      +* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-115David Brown
26 Feb 25 i      i`* [OT] Standards (was Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-1)14Janis Papanagnou
26 Feb 25 i      i +* Re: [OT] Standards (was Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-1)2David Brown
26 Feb 25 i      i i`- Re: [OT] Standards (was Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-1)1Janis Papanagnou
26 Feb 25 i      i `* Re: Standards (was Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-1)11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Feb 25 i      i  `* Re: Standards (was Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-1)10Janis Papanagnou
27 Feb 25 i      i   `* Re: Standards (was Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-1)9David Brown
27 Feb 25 i      i    +- Re: Standards (was Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-1)1Richard Heathfield
27 Feb 25 i      i    +* Re: Standards (was Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-1)5bart
28 Feb 25 i      i    i+* Re: Standards (was Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-1)2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Feb 25 i      i    ii`- Re: Standards (was Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-1)1Janis Papanagnou
28 Feb 25 i      i    i+- Re: Standards (was Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-1)1James Kuyper
28 Feb 25 i      i    i`- Re: Standards (was Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-1)1David Brown
28 Feb 25 i      i    `* Re: Standards (was Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-1)2Janis Papanagnou
28 Feb 25 i      i     `- Re: Standards (was Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-1)1David Brown
25 Feb 25 i      +* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Feb 25 i      i+- Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-11pozz
26 Feb 25 i      i`- Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-11Richard Damon
26 Feb 25 i      `* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Feb 25 i       `* Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-12Keith Thompson
26 Feb 25 i        `- Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-11David Brown
22 Feb 25 +- Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-11Kaz Kylheku
25 Feb 25 +- Re: Simple string conversion from UCS2 to ISO8859-11Richard Harnden

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal