sci.electronics.design

Liste des Groupes Pages :12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334
Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Feb 25 * A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components32Bill Sloman
12 Feb 25 +* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components10Bill Sloman
13 Feb 25 i`* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components9Edward Rawde
13 Feb 25 i `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components8Bill Sloman
13 Feb 25 i  `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components7Edward Rawde
14 Feb 25 i   `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components6Bill Sloman
14 Feb 25 i    `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components5Edward Rawde
14 Feb 25 i     +- Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components1Edward Rawde
14 Feb 25 i     `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components3JM
14 Feb 25 i      `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components2Edward Rawde
15 Feb 25 i       `- Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components1Bill Sloman
14 Feb 25 `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components21JM
15 Feb 25  +* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components2Bill Sloman
16 Feb 25  i`- Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components1Bill Sloman
16 Feb 25  `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components18Edward Rawde
16 Feb 25   +* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components15Bill Sloman
16 Feb 25   i`* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components14Edward Rawde
17 Feb 25   i `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components13Bill Sloman
17 Feb 25   i  `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components12Edward Rawde
17 Feb 25   i   +- Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components1Bill Sloman
17 Feb 25   i   `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components10Edward Rawde
18 Feb 25   i    `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components9Bill Sloman
18 Feb 25   i     `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components8Edward Rawde
18 Feb 25   i      `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components7Bill Sloman
18 Feb 25   i       `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components6Edward Rawde
19 Feb 25   i        `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components5Bill Sloman
19 Feb 25   i         `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components4Edward Rawde
19 Feb 25   i          `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components3Bill Sloman
19 Feb 25   i           `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components2Edward Rawde
19 Feb 25   i            `- Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components1Bill Sloman
16 Feb 25   `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components2JM
21 Feb 25    `- Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components1JM
11 Feb 25 * Re: Product idea38Don Y
11 Feb 25 `* Re: Product idea37bp
11 Feb 25  `* Re: Product idea36Don Y
12 Feb 25   +- Re: Product idea1john larkin
12 Feb 25   +* Re: Product idea31Carlos E.R.
12 Feb 25   i+* Re: Product idea16john larkin
12 Feb 25   ii`* Re: Product idea15Carlos E.R.
12 Feb 25   ii +* Re: Product idea8Liz Tuddenham
13 Feb 25   ii i`* Re: Product idea7Carlos E.R.
13 Feb 25   ii i `* Re: Product idea6Phil Hobbs
17 Feb 25   ii i  `* Re: Product idea5Carlos E.R.
18 Feb 25   ii i   `* Re: Product idea4Phil Hobbs
18 Feb 25   ii i    `* Re: Product idea3Carlos E.R.
18 Feb 25   ii i     `* Re: Product idea2Phil Hobbs
18 Feb 25   ii i      `- Re: Product idea1Carlos E.R.
12 Feb 25   ii `* Re: Product idea6bp
12 Feb 25   ii  +* Re: Product idea2john larkin
12 Feb 25   ii  i`- Re: Product idea1bp
12 Feb 25   ii  +* Re: Product idea2Dennis
12 Feb 25   ii  i`- Re: Product idea1john larkin
12 Feb 25   ii  `- Re: Product idea1Don Y
12 Feb 25   i`* Re: Product idea14Don Y
12 Feb 25   i `* Re: Product idea13john larkin
13 Feb 25   i  `* Re: Product idea12bitrex
13 Feb 25   i   +* Re: Product idea3Don Y
13 Feb 25   i   i`* Re: Product idea2Martin Brown
13 Feb 25   i   i `- Re: Product idea1Don Y
17 Feb 25   i   `* Re: Product idea8Carlos E.R.
17 Feb 25   i    `* Re: Product idea7Don Y
17 Feb 25   i     +- Re: Product idea1Don Y
18 Feb 25   i     `* Re: Product idea5Carlos E.R.
18 Feb 25   i      `* Re: Product idea4Don Y
18 Feb 25   i       `* Re: Product idea3Carlos E.R.
18 Feb 25   i        `* Re: Product idea2Don Y
18 Feb 25   i         `- Re: Product idea1Don Y
13 Feb 25   `* Re: Product idea3Lasse Langwadt
13 Feb 25    `* Re: Product idea2Don Y
13 Feb 25     `- Re: Product idea1john larkin
17 Feb 25 o Phase Locked Loop1UFO
14 Feb 25 o OT: A Quiet Night In...1Cursitor Doom
10 Feb 25 * SPLD output current protection10bitrex
11 Feb 25 +* Re: SPLD output current protection4piglet
11 Feb 25 i+* Re: SPLD output current protection2bitrex
11 Feb 25 ii`- Re: SPLD output current protection1piglet
11 Feb 25 i`- Re: SPLD output current protection1bitrex
11 Feb 25 `* Re: SPLD output current protection5john larkin
11 Feb 25  +* Re: SPLD output current protection3bitrex
11 Feb 25  i`* Re: SPLD output current protection2john larkin
11 Feb 25  i `- Re: SPLD output current protection1bitrex
11 Feb 25  `- Re: SPLD output current protection1piglet
31 Jan 25 * Valve frequency multipliers52Liz Tuddenham
31 Jan 25 +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers3john larkin
31 Jan 25 i+- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Liz Tuddenham
1 Feb 25 i`- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Cursitor Doom
1 Feb 25 +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers29Cursitor Doom
1 Feb 25 i`* Re: Valve frequency multipliers28john larkin
1 Feb 25 i +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers3Cursitor Doom
1 Feb 25 i i`* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2john larkin
1 Feb 25 i i `- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Cursitor Doom
1 Feb 25 i `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers24Liz Tuddenham
1 Feb 25 i  +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2Martin Brown
1 Feb 25 i  i`- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Liz Tuddenham
1 Feb 25 i  +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2legg
1 Feb 25 i  i`- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Liz Tuddenham
1 Feb 25 i  `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers19john larkin
1 Feb 25 i   +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers12Liz Tuddenham
1 Feb 25 i   i+- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1john larkin
1 Feb 25 i   i`* Re: Valve frequency multipliers10Martin Brown
1 Feb 25 i   i `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers9john larkin
1 Feb 25 i   i  `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers8Liz Tuddenham
2 Feb 25 i   i   `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers7john larkin
2 Feb 25 i   i    `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers6Liz Tuddenham
2 Feb 25 i   i     `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers5Cursitor Doom
2 Feb 25 i   i      `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers4Phil Hobbs
2 Feb 25 i   i       +- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Cursitor Doom
3 Feb 25 i   i       `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2John S
4 Feb 25 i   i        `- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1john larkin
4 Feb 25 i   `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers6legg
4 Feb 25 i    +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers3john larkin
4 Feb 25 i    i`* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2Phil Hobbs
5 Feb 25 i    i `- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1john larkin
4 Feb 25 i    `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2Tauno Voipio
5 Feb 25 i     `- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1legg
1 Feb 25 `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers19legg
1 Feb 25  +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers13Liz Tuddenham
2 Feb 25  i+* Re: Valve frequency multipliers5Tauno Voipio
2 Feb 25  ii`* Re: Valve frequency multipliers4Liz Tuddenham
3 Feb 25  ii `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers3Tauno Voipio
3 Feb 25  ii  `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2Liz Tuddenham
3 Feb 25  ii   `- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Tauno Voipio
4 Feb 25  i`* Re: Valve frequency multipliers7legg
4 Feb 25  i +- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1john larkin
4 Feb 25  i `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers5Liz Tuddenham
5 Feb 25  i  `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers4john larkin
5 Feb 25  i   `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers3John S
5 Feb 25  i    `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2Liz Tuddenham
5 Feb 25  i     `- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1john larkin
9 Feb 25  `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers5Liz Tuddenham
9 Feb 25   +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2Tauno Voipio
9 Feb 25   i`- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Liz Tuddenham
10 Feb 25   `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2legg
10 Feb 25    `- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Liz Tuddenham
9 Feb 25 * Re: XBLW variants of MCP6001/2 opamps4legg
9 Feb 25 +- Re: XBLW variants of MCP6001/2 opamps1piglet
10 Feb 25 +- Re: XBLW variants of MCP6001/2 opamps1legg
10 Feb 25 `- Re: XBLW variants of MCP6001/2 opamps1Martin Rid
2 Feb 25 * OT: Twitter/X22Cursitor Doom
2 Feb 25 +* Re: OT: Twitter/X5john larkin
2 Feb 25 i+- Re: OT: Twitter/X1Cursitor Doom
2 Feb 25 i`* Re: OT: Twitter/X3Liz Tuddenham
3 Feb 25 i `* Re: OT: Twitter/X2john larkin
4 Feb 25 i  `- Re: OT: Twitter/X1Liz Tuddenham
2 Feb 25 +* Re: OT: Twitter/X6bitrex
3 Feb 25 i+* Re: OT: Twitter/X2john larkin
4 Feb 25 ii`- Re: OT: Twitter/X1Bill Sloman
4 Feb 25 i`* Re: OT: Twitter/X3Cursitor Doom
4 Feb 25 i +- Re: OT: Twitter/X1Bill Sloman
4 Feb 25 i `- Re: OT: Twitter/X1bitrex
2 Feb 25 +* Re: Twitter/X5Edward Rawde
3 Feb 25 i`* Re: Twitter/X4john larkin
4 Feb 25 i +- Re: Twitter/X1Bill Sloman
4 Feb 25 i `* Re: Twitter/X2Liz Tuddenham
4 Feb 25 i  `- Re: Twitter/X1john larkin
9 Feb 25 `* Re: OT: Twitter/X5Cursitor Doom
9 Feb 25  +- Re: OT: Twitter/X1Bill Sloman
9 Feb 25  `* Re: OT: Twitter/X3john larkin
9 Feb 25   `* Re: OT: Twitter/X2Cursitor Doom
10 Feb 25    `- Re: OT: Twitter/X1Cursitor Doom
9 Feb 25 o Re: XBLW variants of MCP6001/2 opamps1john larkin
5 Feb 25 * Experiences with rack mounted kit mounted *vertically*8Don Y
5 Feb 25 +* Re: Experiences with rack mounted kit mounted *vertically*2Martin Brown
5 Feb 25 i`- Re: Experiences with rack mounted kit mounted *vertically*1Don Y
5 Feb 25 +* Re: Experiences with rack mounted kit mounted *vertically*4Liz Tuddenham
5 Feb 25 i`* Re: Experiences with rack mounted kit mounted *vertically*3Don Y
5 Feb 25 i `* Re: Experiences with rack mounted kit mounted *vertically*2John R Walliker
5 Feb 25 i  `- Re: Experiences with rack mounted kit mounted *vertically*1Don Y
9 Feb 25 `- Re: Experiences with rack mounted kit mounted *vertically*1Don Y
4 Feb 25 * Curve Tracer25Cursitor Doom
4 Feb 25 `* Re: Curve Tracer24john larkin
5 Feb 25  `* Re: Curve Tracer23Cursitor Doom
5 Feb 25   `* Re: Curve Tracer22john larkin
5 Feb 25    `* Re: Curve Tracer21Ian
5 Feb 25     `* Re: Curve Tracer20Cursitor Doom
5 Feb 25      `* Re: Curve Tracer19john larkin
5 Feb 25       +- Re: Curve Tracer1Bill Sloman
6 Feb 25       `* Re: Curve Tracer17Cursitor Doom
6 Feb 25        `* Re: Curve Tracer16john larkin
6 Feb 25         +* Re: Curve Tracer11Bill Sloman
6 Feb 25         i`* Re: Curve Tracer10john larkin
7 Feb 25         i `* Re: Curve Tracer9Bill Sloman
7 Feb 25         i  `* Re: Curve Tracer8piglet
7 Feb 25         i   +* Re: Curve Tracer6Phil Hobbs
7 Feb 25         i   i+- Re: Curve Tracer1Bill Sloman
7 Feb 25         i   i`* Re: Curve Tracer4john larkin
7 Feb 25         i   i +- Re: Curve Tracer1Phil Hobbs
8 Feb 25         i   i +- Re: Curve Tracer1Bill Sloman
8 Feb 25         i   i `- Re: Curve Tracer1Bill Sloman
7 Feb 25         i   `- Re: Curve Tracer1john larkin
6 Feb 25         +- Re: Curve Tracer1Liz Tuddenham
7 Feb 25         `* Re: Curve Tracer3Bill Sloman
8 Feb 25          `* Re: Curve Tracer2john larkin
9 Feb 25           `- Re: Curve Tracer1Bill Sloman
5 Feb 25 * The low distortion oscillator problem14Bill Sloman
6 Feb 25 +* Re: The low distortion oscillator problem12JM
6 Feb 25 i+* Re: The low distortion oscillator problem6john larkin
7 Feb 25 ii`* Re: The low distortion oscillator problem5Phil Hobbs
7 Feb 25 ii `* Re: The low distortion oscillator problem4john larkin
8 Feb 25 ii  `* Re: The low distortion oscillator problem3Phil Hobbs
8 Feb 25 ii   `* Re: The low distortion oscillator problem2john larkin
8 Feb 25 ii    `- Re: The low distortion oscillator problem1Phil Hobbs
6 Feb 25 i+* Re: The low distortion oscillator problem3Bill Sloman
6 Feb 25 ii`* Re: The low distortion oscillator problem2JM
7 Feb 25 ii `- Re: The low distortion oscillator problem1Bill Sloman
6 Feb 25 i`* Re: The low distortion oscillator problem2Edward Rawde
7 Feb 25 i `- Re: The low distortion oscillator problem1Bill Sloman
7 Feb 25 `- Re: The low distortion oscillator problem1bitrex
6 Feb 25 * OT: How the MSM Tried to Fiddle the Election in Favor of Harris12Cursitor Doom
6 Feb 25 +* Re: OT: How the MSM Tried to Fiddle the Election in Favor of Harris4Brian Gregory
6 Feb 25 i`* Re: OT: How the MSM Tried to Fiddle the Election in Favor of Harris3Cursitor Doom
6 Feb 25 i +- Re: OT: How the MSM Tried to Fiddle the Election in Favor of Harris1Bill Sloman
6 Feb 25 i `- Re: OT: How the MSM Tried to Fiddle the Election in Favor of Harris1Dan Green
6 Feb 25 +- Re: OT: How the MSM Tried to Fiddle the Election in Favor of Harris1Bill Sloman
7 Feb 25 +* Re: OT: How the MSM Tried to Fiddle the Election in Favor of Harris4bitrex
7 Feb 25 i+- Re: OT: How the MSM Tried to Fiddle the Election in Favor of Harris1Bill Sloman
7 Feb 25 i`* Re: OT: How the MSM Tried to Fiddle the Election in Favor of Harris2Cursitor Doom
8 Feb 25 i `- Re: OT: How the MSM Tried to Fiddle the Election in Favor of Harris1Bill Sloman
8 Feb 25 `* Re: OT: How the MSM Tried to Fiddle the Election in Favor of Harris2john larkin
8 Feb 25  `- Re: OT: How the MSM Tried to Fiddle the Election in Favor of Harris1Bill Sloman
1 Feb 25 * Very simple 1kHz sinewave circuit is more than 133dB down on harmonics10Edward Rawde
5 Feb 25 `* Re: Very simple 1kHz sinewave circuit is more than 133dB down on harmonics9Edward Rawde
5 Feb 25  `* Re: Very simple 1kHz sinewave circuit is more than 133dB down on harmonics8John R Walliker
5 Feb 25   `* Re: Very simple 1kHz sinewave circuit is more than 133dB down on harmonics7john larkin
6 Feb 25    +* Re: Very simple 1kHz sinewave circuit is more than 133dB down on harmonics2John R Walliker
6 Feb 25    i`- Re: Very simple 1kHz sinewave circuit is more than 133dB down on harmonics1John R Walliker
6 Feb 25    `* Re: Very simple 1kHz sinewave circuit is more than 133dB down on harmonics4Joe Gwinn
6 Feb 25     `* Re: Very simple 1kHz sinewave circuit is more than 133dB down on harmonics3john larkin
6 Feb 25      `* Re: Very simple 1kHz sinewave circuit is more than 133dB down on harmonics2Joe Gwinn
7 Feb 25       `- Re: Very simple 1kHz sinewave circuit is more than 133dB down on harmonics1john larkin
7 Feb 25 o AI application1Don Y
15 Dec 24 * Datasheets and probability10John S
15 Dec 24 +- Re: Datasheets and probability1Bill Sloman
15 Dec 24 +- Re: Datasheets and probability1Don Y
15 Dec 24 +* Re: Datasheets and probability2Uwe Bonnes
15 Dec 24 i`- Re: Datasheets and probability1John R Walliker
15 Dec 24 +* Re: Datasheets and probability3Martin Brown
15 Dec 24 i+- Re: Datasheets and probability1Phil Hobbs
15 Dec 24 i`- Re: Datasheets and probability1john larkin
30 Dec 24 `* Re: Datasheets and probability2Klaus Kragelund
6 Feb 25  `- Re: Datasheets and probability1John S
30 Jan 25 * 1kHz 130dB distortion sinewave oscillator.28Edward Rawde
31 Jan 25 +* Re: 1kHz 130dB distortion sinewave oscillator.23Bill Sloman
31 Jan 25 i+- Re: 1kHz 130dB distortion sinewave oscillator.1Edward Rawde
1 Feb 25 i`* Re: 1kHz 130dB distortion sinewave oscillator.21Edward Rawde
1 Feb 25 i `* Re: 1kHz 130dB distortion sinewave oscillator.20Bill Sloman
1 Feb 25 i  `* Re: 1kHz 130dB distortion sinewave oscillator.19Edward Rawde
1 Feb 25 i   `* Re: 1kHz 130dB distortion sinewave oscillator.18Bill Sloman
1 Feb 25 i    `* Re: 1kHz 130dB distortion sinewave oscillator.17Edward Rawde
2 Feb 25 i     +* Re: 1kHz 130dB distortion sinewave oscillator.9JM

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal