Date | Sujet | # | | Auteur |
14 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point | 2 | | joes |
14 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point | 1 | | olcott |
14 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping | 1 | | Richard Damon |
13 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping | 1 | | Fred. Zwarts |
14 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping | 1 | | Richard Damon |
13 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping | 10 | | Mikko |
13 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping | 9 | | olcott |
13 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping | 1 | | Fred. Zwarts |
14 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping | 7 | | Mikko |
14 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state --- | 6 | | olcott |
14 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state --- | 1 | | Fred. Zwarts |
14 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 1 | | joes |
15 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state --- | 3 | | Mikko |
15 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state --- | 2 | | olcott |
16 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state --- | 1 | | Mikko |
8 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 1 | | Richard Damon |
8 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 2 | | olcott |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 1 | | Richard Damon |
8 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 2 | | olcott |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 1 | | Richard Damon |
8 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it | 1 | | Mikko |
8 Aug 24 | Re: HHH computes the mapping from its input finite sting to the actual behavior specified by this finite string (Which is the results of running the input) | 1 | | Richard Damon |
7 Aug 24 | Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? | 4 | | Keith Thompson |
7 Aug 24 | Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? | 3 | | olcott |
7 Aug 24 | Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? | 1 | | Richard Damon |
7 Aug 24 | Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state? | 1 | | joes |
4 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 1 | | Fred. Zwarts |
3 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 1 | | Richard Damon |
3 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 96 | | Mikko |
3 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 95 | | olcott |
3 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 83 | | Fred. Zwarts |
3 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 82 | | olcott |
3 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 81 | | Fred. Zwarts |
3 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 80 | | olcott |
4 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 79 | | Fred. Zwarts |
4 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 78 | | olcott |
4 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 6 | | Richard Damon |
4 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 5 | | olcott |
4 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 1 | | Richard Damon |
7 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 3 | | Fred. Zwarts |
7 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 2 | | olcott |
8 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 1 | | Mikko |
5 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 15 | | Mikko |
5 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 14 | | olcott |
7 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 13 | | Mikko |
7 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 12 | | olcott |
7 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 4 | | Python |
7 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 2 | | olcott |
8 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 1 | | Richard Damon |
8 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 1 | | Mikko |
7 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD simulated by HHH cannot reach its own return? | 7 | | joes |
7 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD simulated by HHH cannot reach its own return? | 6 | | olcott |
7 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD simulated by HHH cannot reach its own return? (typos fixed) | 3 | | olcott |
8 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD simulated by HHH cannot reach its own return? (typos fixed) | 1 | | Richard Damon |
8 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD simulated by HHH cannot reach its own return? (typos fixed) | 1 | | Mikko |
8 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD simulated by HHH cannot reach its own return? | 1 | | Richard Damon |
8 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD simulated by HHH cannot reach its own return? | 1 | | Mikko |
7 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 56 | | Fred. Zwarts |
7 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 55 | | olcott |
8 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 1 | | Richard Damon |
8 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 53 | | Fred. Zwarts |
8 Aug 24 | HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 52 | | olcott |
8 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 13 | | Fred. Zwarts |
8 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 12 | | olcott |
8 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 11 | | Fred. Zwarts |
8 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 10 | | olcott |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 9 | | Fred. Zwarts |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 8 | | olcott |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 7 | | Fred. Zwarts |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 6 | | olcott |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 4 | | Fred. Zwarts |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 3 | | olcott |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- partial simulation never reaches its halt state, but the actual behavior of the actual program does | 1 | | Richard Damon |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 1 | | Fred. Zwarts |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- partial simulation never reaches its halt state, but the program does. | 1 | | Richard Damon |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 38 | | Richard Damon |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state --- | 37 | | olcott |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state --- | 22 | | Richard Damon |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state --- | 19 | | olcott |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state --- | 18 | | Richard Damon |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state --- | 17 | | olcott |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- | 16 | | Richard Damon |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- | 15 | | olcott |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider. | 14 | | Richard Damon |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider. | 13 | | olcott |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider. | 12 | | Richard Damon |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider. | 11 | | olcott |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider. | 10 | | Richard Damon |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider. | 9 | | olcott |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider. | 8 | | Richard Damon |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider. | 7 | | olcott |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider. | 5 | | Richard Damon |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider. | 4 | | olcott |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider. | 3 | | Richard Damon |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider. | 2 | | olcott |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider. | 1 | | Richard Damon |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider. | 1 | | Mikko |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state --- | 2 | | olcott |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- partial simulation never reaches its halt state, but the actual behavior of the actual program does | 1 | | Richard Damon |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state --- | 14 | | Fred. Zwarts |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state --- | 13 | | olcott |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state --- | 12 | | Fred. Zwarts |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state --- | 11 | | olcott |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state --- | 10 | | Fred. Zwarts |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state --- | 9 | | olcott |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state --- | 8 | | Fred. Zwarts |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state --- | 7 | | olcott |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state --- | 3 | | Richard Damon |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state --- | 2 | | olcott |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- partial simulation never reaches its halt state --- but full simulaition does. | 1 | | Richard Damon |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state --- | 3 | | Fred. Zwarts |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state --- | 2 | | olcott |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state --- | 1 | | Fred. Zwarts |
4 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 11 | | Mikko |
4 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 10 | | olcott |
5 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 9 | | Mikko |
5 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 8 | | olcott |
7 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 7 | | Mikko |
7 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 6 | | olcott |
8 Aug 24 | Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? | 5 | | Mikko |
8 Aug 24 | HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 4 | | olcott |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 3 | | Mikko |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 2 | | olcott |
10 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 1 | | Mikko |
13 Aug 24 | Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior | 29 | | olcott |
13 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior | 1 | | Python |
13 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior | 1 | | Richard Damon |
13 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior | 23 | | Mikko |
13 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike | 22 | | olcott |
13 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike | 15 | | Fred. Zwarts |
13 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- point by point | 14 | | olcott |
13 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- point by point | 12 | | Fred. Zwarts |
13 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- point by point | 11 | | olcott |
13 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- point by point | 9 | | Fred. Zwarts |
13 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- point by point | 8 | | olcott |
13 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- point by point | 6 | | Fred. Zwarts |
13 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- point by point | 5 | | olcott |
14 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- point by point | 1 | | Richard Damon |
14 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- point by point | 3 | | Fred. Zwarts |
14 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- in our head | 2 | | olcott |
14 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- in our head | 1 | | Fred. Zwarts |
14 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- point by point | 1 | | Richard Damon |
14 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- point by point | 1 | | Richard Damon |
14 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- point by point | 1 | | Richard Damon |
14 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike | 6 | | Mikko |
14 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike | 5 | | olcott |
14 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike | 1 | | Fred. Zwarts |
15 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike | 3 | | Mikko |
15 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike | 2 | | olcott |
16 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike | 1 | | Mikko |
13 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior | 3 | | olcott |
14 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior | 1 | | Richard Damon |
14 Aug 24 | Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior | 1 | | Richard Damon |
4 Aug 24 | Defining a correct halt decider | 67 | | olcott |
4 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halt decider | 45 | | Richard Damon |
4 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 44 | | olcott |
4 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 43 | | Richard Damon |
4 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 42 | | olcott |
4 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 20 | | Richard Damon |
4 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 19 | | olcott |
4 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 18 | | Richard Damon |
4 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 17 | | olcott |
5 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 16 | | Richard Damon |
5 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 15 | | olcott |
5 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 14 | | Richard Damon |
5 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 13 | | olcott |
5 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 12 | | Richard Damon |
5 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 11 | | olcott |
5 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 10 | | Richard Damon |
5 Aug 24 | You still seem too dishonest to admit that DDD correctly emulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach its own ,"return" instruction | 9 | | olcott |
5 Aug 24 | Re: You still seem too dishonest to admit that DDD correctly emulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach its own ,"return" instruction | 8 | | Richard Damon |
5 Aug 24 | Re: You still seem too dishonest to admit that DDD correctly emulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach its own ,"return" instruction | 7 | | olcott |
5 Aug 24 | Re: You still seem too dishonest to admit that DDD correctly emulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach its own ,"return" instruction | 6 | | Richard Damon |
5 Aug 24 | Re: You still seem too dishonest to admit that DDD correctly emulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach its own ,"return" instruction | 5 | | olcott |
5 Aug 24 | Re: You still seem too dishonest to admit that DDD correctly emulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach its own ,"return" instruction | 4 | | Richard Damon |
5 Aug 24 | Re: You still seem too dishonest to admit that DDD correctly emulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach its own ,"return" instruction | 3 | | wij |
5 Aug 24 | Re: You still seem too dishonest to admit that DDD correctly emulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach its own ,"return" instruction | 2 | | olcott |
6 Aug 24 | Re: Olcott still seems too dishonest to admit that his HHH doesn't correctly emulate DDD | 1 | | Richard Damon |
7 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 21 | | Mikko |
7 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 20 | | olcott |
8 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider (Which isn't a valid criteria for a decider) | 1 | | Richard Damon |
8 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 18 | | Mikko |
8 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 17 | | olcott |
8 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 4 | | Python |
8 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 3 | | olcott |
9 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 1 | | Richard Damon |
9 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 1 | | Python |
9 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 1 | | Richard Damon |
9 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 11 | | Mikko |
9 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 10 | | olcott |
10 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 1 | | Richard Damon |
10 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 8 | | Mikko |
10 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 7 | | olcott |
10 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 3 | | Richard Damon |
10 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 2 | | olcott |
10 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 1 | | Richard Damon |
11 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 3 | | Mikko |
11 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 2 | | olcott |
11 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider | 1 | | Richard Damon |
5 Aug 24 | Re: Defining a correct halt decider | 21 | | Mikko |
5 Aug 24 | I call it a halting decidability decider | 20 | | olcott |
5 Aug 24 | Re: I call it a halting decidability decider | 14 | | Python |
5 Aug 24 | Re: I call it a halting decidability decider | 13 | | olcott |
6 Aug 24 | Re: I call it a halting decidability decider, and thus isn't actually a computability decider. | 5 | | Richard Damon |
6 Aug 24 | Re: I call it a halting decidability decider, and thus isn't actually a computability decider. | 4 | | olcott |
6 Aug 24 | Re: I call it a halting decidability decider, and thus isn't actually a computability decider. | 3 | | Richard Damon |
6 Aug 24 | Re: I call it a halting decidability decider, and thus isn't actually a computability decider. | 2 | | olcott |
6 Aug 24 | Re: I call it a halting decidability decider, and thus isn't actually a computability decider. | 1 | | Richard Damon |
7 Aug 24 | Re: I call it a halting decidability decider | 7 | | Mikko |
7 Aug 24 | HHH decides a non-trivial semantic property of its input | 6 | | olcott |
8 Aug 24 | Re: HHH decides a trivial semantic non-property of its input | 1 | | Richard Damon |
8 Aug 24 | Re: HHH decides a non-trivial semantic property of its input | 3 | | Mikko |
8 Aug 24 | Re: HHH decides a non-trivial semantic property of its input | 2 | | olcott |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH decides a non-trivial semantic property of its input | 1 | | Richard Damon |
8 Aug 24 | Re: HHH decides a trivial non-semantic non-property of its input | 1 | | Richard Damon |
6 Aug 24 | Re: I call it a halting decidability decider, and thus doesn't say anything about the halting problem | 1 | | Richard Damon |
7 Aug 24 | Re: I call it a halting decidability decider | 4 | | Mikko |
7 Aug 24 | Re: I call it a halting decidability decider | 3 | | olcott |
8 Aug 24 | Re: I call it a halting decidability decider | 1 | | Richard Damon |
8 Aug 24 | Re: I call it a halting decidability decider | 1 | | Mikko |
5 Aug 24 | Is everyone here faking that they know anything about the x86 language? | 8 | | olcott |
6 Aug 24 | Re: Is everyone here faking that they know anything about the x86 language? Peter Olcott sure is, | 1 | | Richard Damon |
7 Aug 24 | Re: Is everyone here faking that they know anything about the x86 language? | 6 | | Mikko |
7 Aug 24 | Re: Is everyone here faking that they know anything about the x86 language? | 5 | | olcott |
8 Aug 24 | Re: Is everyone here faking that they know anything about the x86 language? | 1 | | Richard Damon |
8 Aug 24 | Re: Is everyone here faking that they know anything about the x86 language? | 3 | | Mikko |
8 Aug 24 | HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 2 | | olcott |
9 Aug 24 | Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state | 1 | | Richard Damon |
6 Aug 24 | Latest revision of my paper incorporating feedback --- last remaining sticking point | 26 | | olcott |
6 Aug 24 | Re: behaviour and description | 18 | | joes |
6 Aug 24 | Re: behaviour and description | 17 | | olcott |
7 Aug 24 | Re: behaviour and description | 16 | | Richard Damon |
7 Aug 24 | Re: behaviour and description --- Trust Mike? | 15 | | olcott |
7 Aug 24 | Re: behaviour and description --- Lying Peter | 14 | | Richard Damon |
7 Aug 24 | Re: behaviour and description --- Lying Peter | 2 | | olcott |
7 Aug 24 | Re: behaviour and description --- Lying Peter | 1 | | Richard Damon |
7 Aug 24 | Re: behavior and description --- All Rebuttals have been pure bluster | 2 | | olcott |
7 Aug 24 | Re: behavior and description --- Peter Olcott's Rebuttals have been pure bluster | 1 | | Richard Damon |
7 Aug 24 | Re: behavior and description --- All rebuttals have been pure bluster V3 | 9 | | olcott |
7 Aug 24 | Re: behavior and description --- Peter Olcott's rebuttals have been pure bluster V3 | 8 | | Richard Damon |
7 Aug 24 | Re: behavior and description --- Rebuttals have been pure bluster V3 | 7 | | olcott |
7 Aug 24 | Re: behavior and description --- Peter Olcott's Rebuttals have been pure bluster V3 | 6 | | Richard Damon |
7 Aug 24 | Re: behavior and description --- Richard still only has pure bluster | 5 | | olcott |
7 Aug 24 | Re: behavior and description --- Peter still only has pure bluster and lies | 3 | | Richard Damon |
7 Aug 24 | Re: behavior and description --- All of the code is here it is just hard to find | 2 | | olcott |
8 Aug 24 | Re: behavior and description --- All of the code is here it is just hard to find (No its not, no HHH given) | 1 | | Richard Damon |
8 Aug 24 | Re: behavior and description --- Richard still only has pure bluster | 1 | | Mikko |
7 Aug 24 | Re: Latest revision of my paper incorporating feedback --- last remaining sticking point FAILED. | 1 | | Richard Damon |
7 Aug 24 | Re: Latest revision of my paper incorporating feedback --- last remaining sticking point | 3 | | Mikko |
7 Aug 24 | Re: Latest revision of my paper incorporating feedback --- last remaining sticking point | 2 | | olcott |