sci.electronics.design

Liste des GroupesPages :123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233
Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 Jan 25   `- Re: Donuts1Cursitor Doom
17 Jan 25 * OT: Curious goings-on at the ODI2Cursitor Doom
18 Jan 25 `- Re: OT: Curious goings-on at the ODI1Bill Sloman
14 Jan 25 * Serial, concurrent, parallel35Don Y
14 Jan 25 +* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel9Liz Tuddenham
14 Jan 25 i`* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel8Don Y
14 Jan 25 i `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel7Liz Tuddenham
15 Jan 25 i  `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel6Don Y
16 Jan 25 i   `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel5Liz Tuddenham
16 Jan 25 i    `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel4Don Y
16 Jan 25 i     `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel3Liz Tuddenham
16 Jan 25 i      +- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1Don Y
16 Jan 25 i      `- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1ehsjr
16 Jan 25 +* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel20Martin Brown
16 Jan 25 i`* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel19Don Y
16 Jan 25 i +* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel16Liz Tuddenham
16 Jan 25 i i+* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel13Don Y
16 Jan 25 i ii`* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel12Liz Tuddenham
16 Jan 25 i ii +* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel5Don Y
17 Jan 25 i ii i`* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel4Liz Tuddenham
17 Jan 25 i ii i `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel3Don Y
17 Jan 25 i ii i  +- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1Don Y
17 Jan 25 i ii i  `- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1Don Y
16 Jan 25 i ii `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel6Edward Rawde
17 Jan 25 i ii  `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel5Don Y
17 Jan 25 i ii   `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel4Edward Rawde
17 Jan 25 i ii    `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel3Don Y
17 Jan 25 i ii     `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel2Edward Rawde
17 Jan 25 i ii      `- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1Don Y
16 Jan 25 i i`* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel2Martin Brown
16 Jan 25 i i `- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1Don Y
16 Jan 25 i `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel2Martin Brown
16 Jan 25 i  `- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1Don Y
16 Jan 25 `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel5brian
16 Jan 25  +* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel3john larkin
17 Jan 25  i`* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel2brian
17 Jan 25  i `- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1john larkin
16 Jan 25  `- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1Don Y
17 Jan 25 o A new optical memory platform for super fast calculations1Jan Panteltje
16 Jan 25 * Peavey Amp KBA/152TTman
16 Jan 25 `- Re: Peavey Amp KBA/151Edward Rawde
14 Jan 25 * dc/dc startup8john larkin
14 Jan 25 +* Re: dc/dc startup6Martin Rid
14 Jan 25 i`* Re: dc/dc startup5john larkin
14 Jan 25 i +* Re: dc/dc startup2Tilmann Reh
14 Jan 25 i i`- Re: dc/dc startup1john larkin
14 Jan 25 i `* Re: dc/dc startup2Jeroen Belleman
14 Jan 25 i  `- Re: dc/dc startup1john larkin
14 Jan 25 `- Re: dc/dc startup1Jan Panteltje
6 Jan 25 * The Einstein Effect36john larkin
6 Jan 25 +* Re: The Einstein Effect13Cursitor Doom
7 Jan 25 i`* Re: The Einstein Effect12john larkin
7 Jan 25 i +* Re: The Einstein Effect2Joe Gwinn
7 Jan 25 i i`- Re: The Einstein Effect1john larkin
7 Jan 25 i +- Re: The Einstein Effect1Bill Sloman
7 Jan 25 i `* Re: The Einstein Effect8Martin Brown
7 Jan 25 i  +- Re: The Einstein Effect1Bill Sloman
7 Jan 25 i  `* Re: The Einstein Effect6Cursitor Doom
8 Jan 25 i   `* Re: The Einstein Effect5Martin Brown
8 Jan 25 i    +* Re: The Einstein Effect3Don
8 Jan 25 i    i+- Re: The Einstein Effect1Martin Brown
8 Jan 25 i    i`- Re: The Einstein Effect1Cursitor Doom
8 Jan 25 i    `- Re: The Einstein Effect1Cursitor Doom
8 Jan 25 +* Re: The Einstein Effect19Don
9 Jan 25 i+* Re: The Einstein Effect2Martin Brown
9 Jan 25 ii`- Re: The Einstein Effect1Don
9 Jan 25 i`* Re: The Einstein Effect16john larkin
9 Jan 25 i +* Re: The Einstein Effect14Jeroen Belleman
10 Jan 25 i i+* Re: The Einstein Effect7john larkin
10 Jan 25 i ii+* Re: The Einstein Effect4Jeroen Belleman
10 Jan 25 i iii`* Re: The Einstein Effect3john larkin
10 Jan 25 i iii +- Re: The Einstein Effect1Martin Brown
10 Jan 25 i iii `- Re: The Einstein Effect1Jeroen Belleman
10 Jan 25 i ii+- Re: The Einstein Effect1Bill Sloman
10 Jan 25 i ii`- Re: The Einstein Effect1Martin Brown
10 Jan 25 i i`* Re: The Einstein Effect6Don
11 Jan 25 i i `* Re: The Einstein Effect5Bill Sloman
11 Jan 25 i i  `* Re: The Einstein Effect4Don
12 Jan 25 i i   +- Re: The Einstein Effect1Bill Sloman
12 Jan 25 i i   `* Re: The Einstein Effect2Martin Brown
12 Jan 25 i i    `- Re: The Einstein Effect1Don
10 Jan 25 i `- Re: The Einstein Effect1Martin Brown
13 Jan 25 `* Re: The Einstein Effect3john larkin
14 Jan 25  `* Re: The Einstein Effect2Martin Brown
14 Jan 25   `- Re: The Einstein Effect1john larkin
10 Jan 25 * US Intuitive Machines set for second moon landing in February15Jan Panteltje
10 Jan 25 `* Re: US Intuitive Machines set for second moon landing in February14john larkin
11 Jan 25  `* Re: US Intuitive Machines set for second moon landing in February13Bill Sloman
11 Jan 25   `* Re: US Intuitive Machines set for second moon landing in February12Jeff Layman
11 Jan 25    +* Re: US Intuitive Machines set for second moon landing in February9Bill Sloman
11 Jan 25    i`* Re: US Intuitive Machines set for second moon landing in February8Jeff Layman
11 Jan 25    i +* Re: US Intuitive Machines set for second moon landing in February2john larkin
12 Jan 25    i i`- Re: US Intuitive Machines set for second moon landing in February1Bill Sloman
11 Jan 25    i +* Re: US Intuitive Machines set for second moon landing in February3Martin Brown
11 Jan 25    i i`* Re: US Intuitive Machines set for second moon landing in February2Joe Gwinn
12 Jan 25    i i `- Re: US Intuitive Machines set for second moon landing in February1Bill Sloman
12 Jan 25    i +- Re: US Intuitive Machines set for second moon landing in February1Bill Sloman
14 Jan 25    i `- Re: US Intuitive Machines set for second moon landing in February1David Lesher
11 Jan 25    `* Re: US Intuitive Machines set for second moon landing in February2john larkin
13 Jan 25     `- Re: US Intuitive Machines set for second moon landing in February1Bill Sloman
13 Jan 25 * Researchers achive real time detection of low gas concentrations4Jan Panteltje
13 Jan 25 `* Re: Researchers achive real time detection of low gas concentrations3Bill Sloman
13 Jan 25  `* Re: Researchers achive real time detection of low gas concentrations2john larkin
14 Jan 25   `- Re: Researchers achive real time detection of low gas concentrations1Bill Sloman
12 Jan 25 * OT: Dark energy 'does not exists'5Jan Panteltje
12 Jan 25 +* Re: OT: Dark energy 'does not exists'2Martin Brown
12 Jan 25 i`- Re: OT: Dark energy 'does not exists'1Jan Panteltje
12 Jan 25 `* Re: OT: Dark energy 'does not exists'2Don
13 Jan 25  `- Re: OT: Dark energy 'does not exists'1Jan Panteltje
10 Jan 25 * AI11Cursitor Doom
10 Jan 25 +* Re: AI5Jeroen Belleman
10 Jan 25 i`* Re: AI4Cursitor Doom
11 Jan 25 i `* Re: AI3Jeroen Belleman
11 Jan 25 i  `* Re: AI2Cursitor Doom
11 Jan 25 i   `- Re: AI1Bill Sloman
10 Jan 25 `* Re: AI5john larkin
11 Jan 25  `* Re: AI4Cursitor Doom
11 Jan 25   `* Re: AI3john larkin
11 Jan 25    `* Re: AI2Cursitor Doom
11 Jan 25     `- Re: AI1john larkin
6 Jan 25 * Cascading UPSs12Don Y
7 Jan 25 +* Re: Cascading UPSs9Sylvia Else
7 Jan 25 i+* Re: Cascading UPSs7Don Y
8 Jan 25 ii`* Re: Cascading UPSs6Sylvia Else
8 Jan 25 ii `* Re: Cascading UPSs5Don Y
10 Jan 25 ii  +- Re: Cascading UPSs1Don Y
10 Jan 25 ii  +* Re: Cascading UPSs2Carlos E.R.
11 Jan 25 ii  i`- Re: Cascading UPSs1Don Y
10 Jan 25 ii  `- Re: Cascading UPSs1Carlos E.R.
10 Jan 25 i`- Re: Cascading UPSs1Don Y
7 Jan 25 `* Re: Cascading UPSs2Martin Rid
7 Jan 25  `- Re: Cascading UPSs1Don Y
10 Jan 25 o Xport1Martin Rid
7 Jan 25 * MOSFET varieties12Cursitor Doom
7 Jan 25 +* Re: MOSFET varieties2Phil Hobbs
7 Jan 25 i`- Re: MOSFET varieties1Cursitor Doom
7 Jan 25 `* Re: MOSFET varieties9john larkin
7 Jan 25  `* Re: MOSFET varieties8Cursitor Doom
7 Jan 25   `* Re: MOSFET varieties7john larkin
7 Jan 25    +- Re: MOSFET varieties1Cursitor Doom
8 Jan 25    `* Re: MOSFET varieties5Phil Hobbs
8 Jan 25     +- Re: MOSFET varieties1john larkin
8 Jan 25     `* Re: MOSFET varieties3Cursitor Doom
8 Jan 25      `* Re: MOSFET varieties2john larkin
9 Jan 25       `- Re: MOSFET varieties1Cursitor Doom
8 Jan 25 * cool fire map3john larkin
8 Jan 25 +- Re: cool fire map1Cursitor Doom
8 Jan 25 `- Re: cool fire map1Buzz McCool
5 Jan 25 * S-VHS cassette recorders26Jeff Layman
5 Jan 25 +* Re: S-VHS cassette recorders6Cursitor Doom
5 Jan 25 i`* Re: S-VHS cassette recorders5Jeff Layman
5 Jan 25 i `* Re: S-VHS cassette recorders4Don Y
6 Jan 25 i  `* Re: S-VHS cassette recorders3Jeff Layman
6 Jan 25 i   `* Re: S-VHS cassette recorders2Don Y
6 Jan 25 i    `- Re: S-VHS cassette recorders1Don Y
5 Jan 25 +* Re: S-VHS cassette recorders17john larkin
5 Jan 25 i+* Re: S-VHS cassette recorders15Don Y
6 Jan 25 ii+* Re: S-VHS cassette recorders13Cursitor Doom
6 Jan 25 iii`* Re: S-VHS cassette recorders12Lasse Langwadt
6 Jan 25 iii +* Re: S-VHS cassette recorders9bitrex
6 Jan 25 iii i+* Re: S-VHS cassette recorders7Don Y
6 Jan 25 iii ii+* Re: S-VHS cassette recorders4bitrex
6 Jan 25 iii iii+- Re: S-VHS cassette recorders1Don Y
7 Jan 25 iii iii+- Re: S-VHS cassette recorders1Jan Panteltje
8 Jan 25 iii iii`- Re: S-VHS cassette recorders1Jan Panteltje
7 Jan 25 iii ii`* Re: S-VHS cassette recorders2Lasse Langwadt
7 Jan 25 iii ii `- Re: S-VHS cassette recorders1Don Y
6 Jan 25 iii i`- Re: S-VHS cassette recorders1Cursitor Doom
6 Jan 25 iii +- Re: S-VHS cassette recorders1Liz Tuddenham
6 Jan 25 iii `- Re: S-VHS cassette recorders1Cursitor Doom
6 Jan 25 ii`- Re: S-VHS cassette recorders1john larkin
6 Jan 25 i`- Re: S-VHS cassette recorders1Lasse Langwadt
5 Jan 25 `* Re: S-VHS cassette recorders2Don
5 Jan 25  `- Re: S-VHS cassette recorders1Don
1 Jan 25 * OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"62Cursitor Doom
1 Jan 25 +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
1 Jan 25 i`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Carlos E.R.
2 Jan 25 +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
2 Jan 25 +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"56Sylvia Else
2 Jan 25 i+* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"44Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"43bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
4 Jan 25 ii i`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"40john larkin
4 Jan 25 ii  +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"4bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii  i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"3john larkin
4 Jan 25 ii  i +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1john larkin
5 Jan 25 ii  i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii  +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"34bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii  i+* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"31john larkin
4 Jan 25 ii  ii`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"30bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii  ii `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"29john larkin
4 Jan 25 ii  ii  +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"24bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i+- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Liz Tuddenham
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"22john larkin
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"13bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"12john larkin
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"8bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"7john larkin
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
7 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
7 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"4bitrex
7 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i  `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"3john larkin
7 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i   +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
8 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i   `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"7bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"6john larkin
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"3Cursitor Doom
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i+- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1john larkin
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Bill Sloman
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i  `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Liz Tuddenham
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"4Cursitor Doom
5 Jan 25 ii  ii   +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii   +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii   `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii  i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
6 Jan 25 ii  i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
5 Jan 25 ii  `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
2 Jan 25 i+* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
3 Jan 25 ii`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
3 Jan 25 i+* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"7john larkin
3 Jan 25 ii`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"6Cursitor Doom
4 Jan 25 ii `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"5Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii  +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii  `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"3bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii   `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
4 Jan 25 ii    `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
3 Jan 25 i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2john larkin
4 Jan 25 i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
2 Jan 25 `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2john larkin
3 Jan 25  `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
7 Jan 25 * multi-supply audio amp9john larkin
7 Jan 25 +* Re: multi-supply audio amp2Phil Hobbs
7 Jan 25 i`- Re: multi-supply audio amp1john larkin
7 Jan 25 +- Re: multi-supply audio amp1Edward Rawde
7 Jan 25 `* Re: multi-supply audio amp5Lasse Langwadt
7 Jan 25  `* Re: multi-supply audio amp4john larkin
8 Jan 25   `* Re: multi-supply audio amp3Phil Hobbs
8 Jan 25    `* Re: multi-supply audio amp2john larkin
8 Jan 25     `- Re: multi-supply audio amp1Phil Hobbs
7 Jan 25 * AI slashes cost and time for chip design, but that is not all2Jan Panteltje
7 Jan 25 `- Re: AI slashes cost and time for chip design, but that is not all1Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 * OT?: Musk: We are going straight to Mars16Jan Panteltje
4 Jan 25 +* Re: OT?: Musk: We are going straight to Mars6Martin Brown
4 Jan 25 i+* Re: OT?: Musk: We are going straight to Mars4Jan Panteltje

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal