Re: Still on negative translation for substructural logics
intuitionistic vs. classical implication in Prolog code (Was: Still on negative translation for substructural logics)
Re: intuitionistic vs. classical implication in Prolog code (Was: Still on negative translation for substructural logics) Girards Exponentiation after Dragalins Implication (Was: intuitionistic vs. classical implication in Prolog code)
Does Jens Ottens Int-Prover also do the Repeat? (Was: Girards Exponentiation after Dragalins Implication) Re: intuitionistic vs. classical implication in Prolog code Re: intuitionistic vs. classical implication in Prolog code Re: intuitionistic vs. classical implication in Prolog code Re: intuitionistic vs. classical implication in Prolog code Re: intuitionistic vs. classical implication in Prolog code Re: intuitionistic vs. classical implication in Prolog code Re: intuitionistic vs. classical implication in Prolog code Re: intuitionistic vs. classical implication in Prolog code Re: intuitionistic vs. classical implication in Prolog code Re: intuitionistic vs. classical implication in Prolog code Re: intuitionistic vs. classical implication in Prolog code Re: intuitionistic vs. classical implication in Prolog code Re: intuitionistic vs. classical implication in Prolog code Re: intuitionistic vs. classical implication in Prolog code Re: intuitionistic vs. classical implication in Prolog code Re: Still on negative translation for substructural logics Re: Still on negative translation for substructural logics Re: Still on negative translation for substructural logics Re: Still on negative translation for substructural logics Re: Still on negative translation for substructural logics Re: Still on negative translation for substructural logics The solver does not terminate (Was: Still on negative translation for substructural logics) Re: The solver does not terminate Re: The solver does not terminate Re: The solver does not terminate Re: The solver does not terminate Re: The solver does not terminate Re: The solver does not terminate Re: The solver does not terminate Re: The solver does not terminate Re: The solver does not terminate Re: The solver does not terminate Re: The solver does not terminate Re: The solver does not terminate Seventy-Five Problems for Testing Automatic Theorem Provers (Was: Fuck the nazi-retards) Re: Seventy-Five Problems for Testing Automatic Theorem Provers (Was: Fuck the nazi-retards) Re: Seventy-Five Problems for Testing Automatic Theorem Provers Re: Seventy-Five Problems for Testing Automatic Theorem Provers Re: Still on negative translation for substructural logics Re: Still on negative translation for substructural logics Re: Still on negative translation for substructural logics Re: Still on negative translation for substructural logics Counter Example by Troelstra & Schwichtenberg (Was: Still on negative translation for substructural logics) Re: Counter Example by Troelstra & Schwichtenberg (Was: Still on negative translation for substructural logics) Affine Logic, what Properties does it have? (Was: Counter Example by Troelstra & Schwichtenberg) Re: Affine Logic, what Properties does it have? (Was: Counter Example by Troelstra & Schwichtenberg) leanTap wasn't a good idea Re: leanTap wasn't a good idea How to prove this theorem with intuitionistic natural deduction? Re: How to prove this theorem with intuitionistic natural deduction? Re: How to prove this theorem with intuitionistic natural deduction? can λ-prolog do it? (Was: How to prove this theorem with intuitionistic natural deduction?) Re: can λ-prolog do it? (Was: How to prove this theorem with intuitionistic natural deduction?) Re: can λ-prolog do it? (Was: How to prove this theorem with intuitionistic natural deduction?) Re: can λ-prolog do it? (Was: How to prove this theorem with intuitionistic natural deduction?) Re: can λ-prolog do it? (Was: How to prove this theorem with intuitionistic natural deduction?) Re: can λ-prolog do it? (Was: How to prove this theorem with intuitionistic natural deduction?) Re: can λ-prolog do it? (Was: How to prove this theorem with intuitionistic natural deduction?) Re: can λ-prolog do it? (Was: How to prove this theorem with intuitionistic natural deduction?) Re: can λ-prolog do it? (Was: How to prove this theorem with intuitionistic natural deduction?) Re: can λ-prolog do it? (Was: How to prove this theorem with intuitionistic natural deduction?) Re: can λ-prolog do it? (Was: How to prove this theorem with intuitionistic natural deduction?) Re: can λ-prolog do it? (Was: How to prove this theorem with intuitionistic natural deduction?) Negative translation for propositional linear (or affine) logic? Re: Negative translation for propositional linear (or affine) logic? Re: Negative translation for propositional linear (or affine) logic? Re: Negative translation for propositional linear (or affine) logic? Re: Negative translation for propositional linear (or affine) logic? Re: Negative translation for propositional linear (or affine) logic? Re: Negative translation for propositional linear (or affine) logic? Re: Negative translation for propositional linear (or affine) logic? Re: Negative translation for propositional linear (or affine) logic? Re: Negative translation for propositional linear (or affine) logic? Re: can λ-prolog do it? (Was: How to prove this theorem with intuitionistic natural deduction?) I am busy with other stuff (Was: can λ-prolog do it?) Andrej Bauer is a red flag (Was: How to prove this theorem with intuitionistic natural deduction?) Re: Andrej Bauer is a red flag (Was: How to prove this theorem with intuitionistic natural deduction?) Re: Andrej Bauer is a red flag (Was: How to prove this theorem with intuitionistic natural deduction?) Re: Andrej Bauer is a red flag (Was: How to prove this theorem with intuitionistic natural deduction?) Re: Andrej Bauer is a red flag (Was: How to prove this theorem with intuitionistic natural deduction?) Re: Andrej Bauer is a red flag (Was: How to prove this theorem with intuitionistic natural deduction?) Re: Andrej Bauer is a red flag (Was: How to prove this theorem with intuitionistic natural deduction?) Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023) (Re: Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam Doug Lenant (1950 - 2023)) para-governemental institution of violence (Was: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation") Good Bye Stack-Overflow Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow they shoot themselves into the foot (Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow) Re: they shoot themselves into the foot (Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow) Re: they shoot themselves into the foot (Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow) Re: they shoot themselves into the foot (Re: Good Bye Stack-Overflow) A different perspective on undecidability Re: A different perspective on undecidability Re: A different perspective on undecidability Re: A different perspective on undecidability Re: A different perspective on undecidability Re: A different perspective on undecidability Re: A different perspective on undecidability Re: A different perspective on undecidability Re: A different perspective on undecidability Re: A different perspective on undecidability Re: A different perspective on undecidability Re: A different perspective on undecidability Re: A different perspective on undecidability Re: A different perspective on undecidability Re: A different perspective on undecidability Re: A different perspective on undecidability Re: A different perspective on undecidability Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question --- PROGRESS Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question --- PROGRESS Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question --- PROGRESS Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question --- PROGRESS Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- This philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- Re: This philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- Re: This philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question FYI: New Journal NAI (Re: Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence) The Bee Clock Model (Re: FYI: New Journal NAI) Waste of EU money / bread and butter of statistics (Re: Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence) Re: Waste of EU money / bread and butter of statistics (Re: Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence) Zero Tokens comming out of me (Re: Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence) Low-Code Penetration Prediction (Re: Zero Tokens comming out of me) Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- news group failure Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- news group failure Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- Richard contradicts himself Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- Richard contradicts himself Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- Richard contradicts himself Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- Olcott lies as he POOPs himself