Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?
Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Yes to both for Peter Olcott Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Can ADD be this severe? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Can ADD be this severe? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? For Olcott: YES to both. Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Maybe... Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Maybe... Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Maybe... Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Maybe... Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Maybe... Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Maybe... Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Maybe... Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Can ADD be this severe? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Can ADD be this severe? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Can ADD be this severe? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Can ADD be this severe? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Can ADD be this severe? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Can ADD be this severe? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks the professor Sipser is wrong Ben thinks processor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks processor Sipser is wrong Re: Ben thinks processor Sipser is wrong Ben fails to understand Re: Ben fails to understand---- correction Re: Ben fails to understand---- correction Re: Ben fails to understand Re: Ben fails to understand Re: Ben fails to understand Re: Ben fails to understand Re: Ben fails to understand Re: Ben fails to understand Re: Ben fails to understand Re: Ben fails to understand Re: Ben fails to understand Re: Ben fails to understand Re: Ben fails to understand Re: Ben fails to understand Re: Ben fails to understand Re: Ben fails to understand Re: Ben fails to understand People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: olcott is still disagreeing with the semantics of simulation Re: olcott is still disagreeing with the semantics of simulation Re: olcott is still disagreeing with the semantics of simulation Re: olcott is still disagreeing with the semantics of simulation Re: olcott is still disagreeing with the semantics of simulation Re: olcott is still disagreeing with the semantics of simulation Re: olcott is still disagreeing with the semantics of simulation Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language --- repeat until acknowledged Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language --- repeat until acknowledged Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language --- repeat until acknowledged Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language --- repeat until acknowledged Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that can possibly exist DOES NOT HALT Re: DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that can possibly exist DOES NOT HALT Re: DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that can possibly exist DOES NOT HALT Re: DDD correctly emulated by any pure function HHH that can possibly exist DOES NOT HALT Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Ben fails to understand --- supersedes the rest Re: Ben fails to understand --- supersedes the rest The Tarski Undefinability Theorem failed to understand truthmaker theory Re: The Tarski Undefinability Theorem failed to understand truthmaker theory