comp.os.linux.advocacy

Liste des Groupes Pages :1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435
Date Sujet#  Auteur
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1D
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security9rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i  `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2rbowman
4 Nov 24 iii  i  i   i`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Physfitfreak
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security3The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i    +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Pancho
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i    `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 iii  i  `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security72The Natural Philosopher
26 Oct 24 iii  i   `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security71Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 iii  i    +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2vallor
26 Oct 24 iii  i    i`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Chris Ahlstrom
26 Oct 24 iii  i    `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security68rbowman
26 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 iii  i     i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security5186282@ud0s4.net
26 Oct 24 iii  i     i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security4The Natural Philosopher
26 Oct 24 iii  i     i  +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2D
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1186282@ud0s4.net
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1186282@ud0s4.net
26 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security5vallor
26 Oct 24 iii  i     i+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2rbowman
26 Oct 24 iii  i     ii`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Chris Ahlstrom
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .27Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i`* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .26186282@ud0s4.net
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1D
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .24The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  +* Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).7The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i+* Re: We're in the middle, always.3The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  ii+- Re: Who you are, where you are, when you are.1The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  ii`- Re: We're in the middle, always.1rbowman
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i+* Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).2rbowman
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  ii`- Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i`- Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .16D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .10186282@ud0s4.net
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i+- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i`* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .8D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .7186282@ud0s4.net
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i  +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i  +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i  `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .4D
29 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i   `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .3rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i    `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i     `- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1rbowman
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .5The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i    `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .4D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i     `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .3The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i      +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i      `- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security6The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i+- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security4D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security3The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i  +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i  `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .13The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i+* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .11rbowman
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii`* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .10186282@ud0s4.net
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .3The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i     ii i`* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .2186282@ud0s4.net
29 Oct 24 iii  i     ii i `- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .6DFS
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii  `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .5Joel
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii   +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .3DFS
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii   i+- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1Joel
29 Oct 24 iii  i     ii   i`- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 iii  i     ii   `- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i`- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security7Physfitfreak
28 Oct 24 iii  i      +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1DFS
28 Oct 24 iii  i      +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i      +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Joel
28 Oct 24 iii  i      `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 iii  i       `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i        `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1DFS
26 Oct 24 iii  `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Richard Kettlewell
27 Oct 24 iii   `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 ii`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security3186282@ud0s4.net
25 Oct 24 ii `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 ii  `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1186282@ud0s4.net
23 Oct 24 i+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Phillip Frabott
25 Oct 24 ii`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1186282@ud0s4.net
24 Oct 24 i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Lester Thorpe
25 Oct 24 i `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1186282@ud0s4.net
25 Oct 24 +- Migrant1Steve Hayes
29 Jan 25 +- Re: {OT illegal-alien} ...was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1J.O. Aho
9 Feb 25 `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1MarioCCCP
6 Feb 25 * Trans "ally" creep knows developer is a male, refers to him as "they" anyway12DFS
6 Feb 25 +- Re: Trans "ally" creep knows developer is a male, refers to him as "they" anyway1rbowman
7 Feb 25 +* Re: Trans "ally" creep knows developer is a male, refers to him as "they" anyway4DFS
7 Feb 25 i`* Re: Trans "ally" creep knows developer is a male, refers to him as "they" anyway3RonB
7 Feb 25 i `* Re: Trans "ally" creep knows developer is a male, refers to him as "they" anyway2RonB
8 Feb 25 i  `- Re: Trans "ally" creep knows developer is a male, refers to him as "they" anyway1RonB
7 Feb 25 +* Re: Trans "ally" creep knows developer is a male, refers to him as "they" anyway3RonB
7 Feb 25 i`* Re: Trans "ally" creep knows developer is a male, refers to him as "they" anyway2RonB
8 Feb 25 i `- Re: Trans "ally" creep knows developer is a male, refers to him as "they" anyway1RonB
7 Feb 25 `* Re: Trans "ally" creep knows developer is a male, refers to him as "they" anyway3RonB
7 Feb 25  `* Re: Trans "ally" creep knows developer is a male, refers to him as "they" anyway2RonB
8 Feb 25   `- Re: Trans "ally" creep knows developer is a male, refers to him as "they" anyway1RonB
7 Feb 25 * Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech9MummyChunk
7 Feb 25 +* Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech3RonB
7 Feb 25 i`* Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech2MummyChunk
7 Feb 25 i `- Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech1RonB
7 Feb 25 +- Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech1%
7 Feb 25 `* Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech4RonB
8 Feb 25  +* Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech2pothead
8 Feb 25  i`- Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech1RonB
8 Feb 25  `- Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech1RonB
4 Feb 25 * A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!21Farley Flud
4 Feb 25 +* Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!12%
4 Feb 25 i+- Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!1%
4 Feb 25 i+* Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!9Physfitfreak
4 Feb 25 ii`* Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!8Physfitfreak
4 Feb 25 ii +* Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!4Physfitfreak
4 Feb 25 ii i`* Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!3Farley Flud
4 Feb 25 ii i +- Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!1%
5 Feb 25 ii i `- Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!1Physfitfreak
4 Feb 25 ii `* Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!3Farley Flud
5 Feb 25 ii  +- Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!1Physfitfreak
6 Feb 25 ii  `- Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!1DFS
7 Feb 25 i`- Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!1Stéphane CARPENTIER
4 Feb 25 +- Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!1<Brock McNuggets>
4 Feb 25 +- Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!1Physfitfreak
5 Feb 25 +* Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!5vallor
5 Feb 25 i+- Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!1Physfitfreak
5 Feb 25 i`* Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!3rbowman
5 Feb 25 i `* Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!2vallor
5 Feb 25 i  `- Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!1%
7 Feb 25 `- Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!1Stéphane CARPENTIER
17 Jan 25 * Fun With Dates -- Need Help46Farley Flud
18 Jan 25 `* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help45Farley Flud
18 Jan 25  +* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help43Stéphane CARPENTIER
18 Jan 25  i+* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help4Farley Flud
18 Jan 25  ii`* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help3Physfitfreak
18 Jan 25  ii `* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help2Farley Flud
19 Jan 25  ii  `- Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help1Physfitfreak
18 Jan 25  i+* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help34Diego Garcia
18 Jan 25  ii`* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help33Stéphane CARPENTIER
19 Jan 25  ii +- Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help1Farley Flud
19 Jan 25  ii +* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help12Farley Flud
24 Jan 25  ii i`* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help11Stéphane CARPENTIER
24 Jan 25  ii i +* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help8Stéphane CARPENTIER
25 Jan 25  ii i i`* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help7Farley Flud
25 Jan 25  ii i i `* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help6Stéphane CARPENTIER
25 Jan 25  ii i i  `* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help5Farley Flud
25 Jan 25  ii i i   +* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help2Stéphane CARPENTIER
7 Feb 25  ii i i   i`- Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help1candycanearter07
25 Jan 25  ii i i   `* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help2Physfitfreak
26 Jan 25  ii i i    `- Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help1-hh
25 Jan 25  ii i +- Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help1DFS
25 Jan 25  ii i `- Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help1rbowman
19 Jan 25  ii `* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help19Farley Flud
20 Jan 25  ii  +* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help2Physfitfreak
20 Jan 25  ii  i`- Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help1Farley Flud
24 Jan 25  ii  `* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help16Stéphane CARPENTIER
24 Jan 25  ii   +* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help9DFS
24 Jan 25  ii   i`* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help8Stéphane CARPENTIER
24 Jan 25  ii   i `* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help7DFS
25 Jan 25  ii   i  +- Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help1rbowman
25 Jan 25  ii   i  `* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help5Stéphane CARPENTIER
25 Jan 25  ii   i   +* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help3DFS
25 Jan 25  ii   i   i`* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help2DFS
26 Jan 25  ii   i   i `- Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help1DFS
25 Jan 25  ii   i   `- Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help1Farley Flud
25 Jan 25  ii   +- Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help1rbowman
25 Jan 25  ii   +* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Jan 25  ii   i`* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help3Stéphane CARPENTIER
29 Jan 25  ii   i `* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help2DFS
1 Feb 25  ii   i  `- Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help1Stéphane CARPENTIER
25 Jan 25  ii   `- Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help1Farley Flud
18 Jan 25  i+* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help2Farley Flud
19 Jan 25  ii`- Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help1Stéphane CARPENTIER
18 Jan 25  i`* Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help2Farley Flud
18 Jan 25  i `- Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help1Physfitfreak
18 Jan 25  `- Re: Fun With Dates -- Need Help1Physfitfreak
7 Feb 25 * Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech2MummyChunk
7 Feb 25 `- Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech1RonB
7 Feb 25 * Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech2RonB
7 Feb 25 `- Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech1RonB
7 Feb 25 * Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech2RonB
7 Feb 25 `- Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech1RonB
25 Jan 25 * Kernel 6.13 Changes32Farley Flud
25 Jan 25 `* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes31Stéphane CARPENTIER
25 Jan 25  +* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes25Stéphane CARPENTIER
25 Jan 25  i`* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes24Farley Flud
25 Jan 25  i +- Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes1Physfitfreak
25 Jan 25  i +- Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes1Physfitfreak
25 Jan 25  i +* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes20Stéphane CARPENTIER
25 Jan 25  i i+* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes3Farley Flud
25 Jan 25  i ii`* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes2pothead
26 Jan 25  i ii `- Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes1Stéphane CARPENTIER
26 Jan 25  i i`* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes16DFS
26 Jan 25  i i +- Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes1pothead
26 Jan 25  i i `* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes14rbowman
26 Jan 25  i i  +* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes2DFS
26 Jan 25  i i  i`- Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes1rbowman
26 Jan 25  i i  `* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes11Physfitfreak
27 Jan 25  i i   `* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes10DFS
27 Jan 25  i i    +* OT: Amélie (was: Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes)6vallor
29 Jan 25  i i    i`* Re: OT: Amélie5DFS
1 Feb 25  i i    i `* Re: OT: Amélie4Stéphane CARPENTIER
1 Feb 25  i i    i  +- Re: OT: Amélie1vallor
7 Feb 25  i i    i  `* Re: OT: Name Conventions2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Feb 25  i i    i   `- Re: OT: Name Conventions1DFS
29 Jan 25  i i    `* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes3DFS
29 Jan 25  i i     `* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes2DFS
29 Jan 25  i i      `- Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes1DFS
25 Jan 25  i `- Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes1Stéphane CARPENTIER
25 Jan 25  `* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes5Physfitfreak
26 Jan 25   +- Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes1Physfitfreak
26 Jan 25   +- Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes1-hh
27 Jan 25   `* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes2rbowman
27 Jan 25    `- Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes1Chris Ahlstrom
3 Feb 25 * Windows is for boomers: Stay young and cool by switching to Nitrux Linux 3.9.03rbowman
6 Feb 25 `* Re: Windows is for boomers: Stay young and cool by switching to Nitrux Linux 3.9.02DFS
6 Feb 25  `- Re: Windows is for boomers: Stay young and cool by switching to Nitrux Linux 3.9.01rbowman
6 Feb 25 o Re: Chelsea Clinton receiving $84 million in taxpayer funding ? HOLY SHIT !1MummyChunk
2 Feb 25 * Re: Mommy! Mommy! "i Don't Want To Be A Boy" !! SICK STUFF..2DFS
6 Feb 25 `- Re: Mommy! Mommy! "i Don't Want To Be A Boy" !! SICK STUFF..1DFS
28 Jan 25 * Facebook goes mental41vallor
29 Jan 25 +* Re: Facebook goes mental3pothead
29 Jan 25 i+- Re: Facebook goes mental1-hh
29 Jan 25 i`- Re: Facebook goes mental1Chris Ahlstrom
29 Jan 25 +- Re: Facebook goes mental1candycanearter07
30 Jan 25 `* Re: Facebook goes mental36Lawrence D'Oliveiro
31 Jan 25  `* Re: Facebook goes mental35RonB
31 Jan 25   +* Re: Facebook goes mental32RonB
31 Jan 25   i+* Re: Facebook goes mental30vallor
1 Feb 25   ii+* Re: Facebook goes mental28RonB
1 Feb 25   iii+- Re: Facebook goes mental1vallor
1 Feb 25   iii`* Re: Facebook goes mental26RonB
2 Feb 25   iii `* Re: Facebook goes mental25RonB
2 Feb 25   iii  +* Re: Facebook goes mental22rbowman
3 Feb 25   iii  i+* Re: Facebook goes mental11pothead
3 Feb 25   iii  ii+* Re: Facebook goes mental8RonB
3 Feb 25   iii  iii`* Re: Facebook goes mental7rbowman
3 Feb 25   iii  iii +- Re: Facebook goes mental1Chris Ahlstrom
4 Feb 25   iii  iii +- Re: Facebook goes mental1pothead
4 Feb 25   iii  iii +* Re: Facebook goes mental2RonB
4 Feb 25   iii  iii i`- Re: Facebook goes mental1-hh
4 Feb 25   iii  iii `* Re: Facebook goes mental2RonB
4 Feb 25   iii  iii  `- Re: Facebook goes mental1RonB
4 Feb 25   iii  ii+- Re: Facebook goes mental1RonB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal