comp.theory
Liste des Groupes
Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Date
Sujet
#
Auteur
16 May 25
Re: How could HHH report on the behavior of its caller?
2
olcott
17 May 25
Re: How could HHH report on the behavior of its caller?
1
Mikko
16 May 25
Re: How could HHH report on the behavior of its caller?
3
Richard Damon
16 May 25
Re: How could HHH report on the behavior of its caller?
2
olcott
16 May 25
Re: How could HHH report on the behavior of its caller?
1
Richard Damon
15 May 25
Re: Why Peter Olcott is both right and wrong
8
Ben Bacarisse
16 May 25
Re: Why Peter Olcott is both right and wrong
2
Richard Heathfield
16 May 25
Re: Why Peter Olcott is both right and wrong
1
Ben Bacarisse
16 May 25
Re: Why Peter Olcott is both right and wrong
5
Ben Bacarisse
16 May 25
Re: Why Peter Olcott is both right and wrong
4
olcott
16 May 25
Re: Why Peter Olcott is both right and wrong
2
olcott
17 May 25
Re: Why Peter Olcott is both right and wrong
1
Richard Damon
17 May 25
Re: Why Peter Olcott is both right and wrong
1
Richard Damon
16 May 25
Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
13
olcott
16 May 25
Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
3
Richard Damon
17 May 25
Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
2
olcott
17 May 25
Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
1
Richard Damon
16 May 25
Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
9
Mike Terry
16 May 25
Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
8
olcott
16 May 25
Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
7
Richard Damon
16 May 25
Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
6
olcott
16 May 25
Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
5
Richard Damon
16 May 25
Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
2
olcott
17 May 25
Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
1
Richard Damon
16 May 25
Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met -- wrong words
2
olcott
17 May 25
Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met -- wrong words
1
Richard Damon
10 May 25
What it would take...
143
Richard Heathfield
10 May 25
Re: What it would take...
10
Richard Damon
10 May 25
Re: What it would take...
2
Richard Damon
10 May 25
Re: What it would take...
1
Richard Damon
10 May 25
Re: What it would take...
7
olcott
10 May 25
Re: What it would take...
1
Fred. Zwarts
10 May 25
Re: What it would take...
5
wij
10 May 25
Re: What it would take...
4
olcott
10 May 25
Re: What it would take...
2
olcott
10 May 25
Re: What it would take...
1
Richard Damon
11 May 25
Re: What it would take...
1
Mikko
12 May 25
Re: What it would take...
130
Ben Bacarisse
12 May 25
Re: What it would take...
121
Richard Heathfield
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
118
Ben Bacarisse
13 May 25
Re: What it would take... TO GET MY REVIEWERS TO PAY COMPLETE ATTENTION?
4
olcott
13 May 25
Re: What it would take... TO GET MY REVIEWERS TO PAY COMPLETE ATTENTION?
1
dbush
13 May 25
Re: What it would take... TO GET MY REVIEWERS TO PAY COMPLETE ATTENTION?
1
Richard Damon
13 May 25
Re: What it would take... TO GET MY REVIEWERS TO PAY COMPLETE ATTENTION?
1
Mikko
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
16
Richard Heathfield
13 May 25
How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
15
olcott
13 May 25
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
8
Richard Heathfield
13 May 25
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
7
olcott
13 May 25
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
1
dbush
13 May 25
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
1
Richard Heathfield
13 May 25
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
3
Richard Damon
13 May 25
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
2
olcott
13 May 25
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
1
Richard Damon
13 May 25
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
1
Mikko
13 May 25
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
5
Richard Damon
13 May 25
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
4
olcott
13 May 25
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
3
Richard Damon
14 May 25
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
2
olcott
14 May 25
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
1
Richard Damon
13 May 25
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
1
Fred. Zwarts
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
97
Mike Terry
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
1
Richard Heathfield
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
8
olcott
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
5
Richard Heathfield
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
2
olcott
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
1
Richard Damon
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
2
olcott
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
1
Richard Damon
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
1
Richard Damon
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
1
Mikko
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
87
André G. Isaak
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
86
olcott
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
85
Fred. Zwarts
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
84
Mike Terry
13 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
83
olcott
13 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
74
dbush
13 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
52
olcott
13 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
50
dbush
13 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
49
olcott
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
47
dbush
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
46
olcott
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
44
dbush
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
43
olcott
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
42
dbush
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
41
olcott
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
40
dbush
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
39
olcott
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
38
dbush
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
37
olcott
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
36
dbush
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
35
olcott
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
6
dbush
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
5
olcott
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
3
Fred. Zwarts
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
2
olcott
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
1
dbush
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
1
dbush
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
28
Richard Heathfield
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
27
olcott
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
26
Richard Heathfield
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
25
olcott
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
24
Richard Heathfield
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
23
olcott
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
21
Richard Heathfield
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
20
olcott
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
18
Richard Heathfield
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
17
olcott
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
11
Richard Heathfield
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
10
olcott
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
8
Richard Heathfield
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
7
olcott
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
6
Richard Heathfield
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
5
olcott
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
4
dbush
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
3
olcott
15 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
2
Fred. Zwarts
16 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
1
olcott
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
1
dbush
16 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
5
joes
16 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
4
olcott
16 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
3
Richard Damon
16 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
2
olcott
16 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
1
Richard Damon
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
1
joes
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
1
joes
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
1
Richard Damon
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP
1
Richard Damon
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
1
Richard Damon
13 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
21
Richard Heathfield
13 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
9
dbush
13 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
8
Richard Heathfield
13 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
7
Mike Terry
13 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
1
wij
13 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
5
olcott
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
3
Fred. Zwarts
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
2
olcott
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
1
dbush
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
1
Richard Damon
13 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
11
olcott
13 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
3
Richard Heathfield
13 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
2
olcott
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
1
Fred. Zwarts
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
1
dbush
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
6
Richard Damon
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
5
olcott
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
4
Richard Heathfield
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
3
olcott
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
2
Richard Heathfield
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
1
olcott
13 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
7
olcott
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
1
Fred. Zwarts
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
5
Richard Damon
14 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
4
olcott
15 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
3
Richard Damon
15 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
2
olcott
15 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
1
Richard Damon
13 May 25
Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric
1
Richard Damon
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
2
Mike Terry
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
1
Richard Heathfield
12 May 25
Re: What it would take...
8
Andy Walker
12 May 25
How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
1
olcott
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
1
wij
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
1
Richard Heathfield
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
3
Richard Heathfield
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
2
Richard Heathfield
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
1
Richard Heathfield
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
1
Andy Walker
12 May 25
Re: What it would take...
2
olcott
13 May 25
Re: What it would take...
1
Fred. Zwarts
14 May 25
What. A. Slog.
24
vallor
14 May 25
Re: What. A. Slog.
2
olcott
15 May 25
Re: What. A. Slog.
1
Richard Damon
14 May 25
Re: What. A. Slog.
20
Mike Terry
14 May 25
The exact words of this spec are met
2
olcott
15 May 25
Re: The exact words of this spec are met
1
Richard Damon
14 May 25
Re: What. A. Slog.
17
Mike Terry
14 May 25
HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification
16
olcott
14 May 25
Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification
7
dbush
14 May 25
Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification
1
olcott
14 May 25
Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification
5
olcott
14 May 25
Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification
1
dbush
15 May 25
Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification
3
Mikko
16 May 25
Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification
2
olcott
16 May 25
Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification
1
Mikko
15 May 25
Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification
8
Richard Damon
15 May 25
Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification
7
olcott
15 May 25
Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification
5
Richard Damon
15 May 25
Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification
4
olcott
15 May 25
Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification
2
Fred. Zwarts
16 May 25
Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification
1
Mikko
15 May 25
Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification
1
Richard Damon
15 May 25
Re: HHH(DDD) correctly determines the halt status of its input according to this specification
1
Richard Heathfield
15 May 25
Re: What. A. Slog.
1
Mikko
15 May 25
Re: Why Peter Olcott is both right and wrong
2
Richard Damon
16 May 25
Re: Why Peter Olcott is both right and wrong
1
Mikko
15 May 25
Re: Why Peter Olcott is both right and wrong
3
Mikko
16 May 25
Re: Why Peter Olcott is both right and wrong
1
Richard Damon
16 May 25
Re: Why Peter Olcott is both right and wrong
1
Mikko
21 Apr 25
Re: Refutation of Turing’s 1936 Halting Problem Proof Based on Self-Referential Conflation as a Category (Type) Error
450
Keith Thompson
22 Apr 25
Re: Refutation of Turing’s 1936 Halting Problem Proof Based on Self-Referential Conflation as a Category (Type) Error
442
olcott
22 Apr 25
Re: Refutation of Turing’s 1936 Halting Problem Proof Based on Self-Referential Conflation as a Category (Type) Error
1
Richard Damon
25 Apr 25
Re: Refutation of Turing’s 1936 Halting Problem Proof Based on Self-Referential Conflation as a Category (Type) Error
440
olcott
25 Apr 25
Re: Refutation of Turing’s 1936 Halting Problem Proof Based on Self-Referential Conflation as a Category (Type) Error
195
Richard Damon
25 Apr 25
Re: Refutation of Turing’s 1936 Halting Problem Proof Based on Self-Referential Conflation as a Category (Type) Error
194
olcott
25 Apr 25
Re: Refutation of Turing’s 1936 Halting Problem Proof Based on Self-Referential Conflation as a Category (Type) Error
192
joes
26 Apr 25
Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
191
olcott
26 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
1
dbush
26 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
188
joes
26 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
187
olcott
26 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
185
Fred. Zwarts
26 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
184
olcott
26 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
1
dbush
26 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
181
Richard Damon
26 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
180
olcott
26 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
172
dbush
26 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
171
olcott
26 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
170
dbush
27 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
169
olcott
27 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
137
dbush
27 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
136
olcott
27 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
134
dbush
27 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
132
olcott
27 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
5
dbush
28 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
4
olcott
28 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
1
joes
28 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
1
Richard Damon
28 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
1
dbush
28 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
1
Richard Damon
28 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
125
Fred. Zwarts
28 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
124
Richard Heathfield
28 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
123
olcott
28 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
15
dbush
28 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
14
olcott
28 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
11
dbush
28 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
10
olcott
28 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
7
dbush
28 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
6
olcott
28 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
4
dbush
28 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
3
olcott
28 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
1
dbush
29 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
1
Richard Damon
29 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
1
Richard Damon
28 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
1
Fred. Zwarts
29 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
1
Richard Damon
29 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
2
Richard Damon
29 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
1
Richard Heathfield
28 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
1
joes
28 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
104
Richard Heathfield
28 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
103
olcott
28 Apr 25
Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs
14
dbush
Haut de la page
Les messages affichés proviennent d'
usenet
.
NewsPortal