sci.math

Liste des Groupes Pages :12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334
Date Sujet#  Auteur
28 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)5Jim Burns
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)4WM
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)3Richard Damon
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2WM
30 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Richard Damon
28 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)29Richard Damon
28 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)17Ross Finlayson
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)8Jim Burns
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   ii`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)7Ross Finlayson
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   ii +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Ross Finlayson
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   ii `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)5Jim Burns
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   ii  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)4Ross Finlayson
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   ii   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)3Jim Burns
30 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   ii    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2Ross Finlayson
30 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   ii     `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Jim Burns
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)8Chris M. Thomasson
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   i +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Moebius
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)5Moebius
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   i i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)3Chris M. Thomasson
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   i ii`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2Moebius
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   i ii `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Moebius
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   i i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1FromTheRafters
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Moebius
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)11WM
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)10Richard Damon
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i     +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)8WM
30 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i     i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)7Richard Damon
30 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i     i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)6WM
30 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i     i  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2joes
30 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i     i  i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1WM
30 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i     i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)3Richard Damon
30 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i     i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)2WM
31 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i     i    `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)1Richard Damon
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    i     `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively, super-standard)1Ross Finlayson
28 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)485WM
28 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii     +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3joes
28 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii     i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
28 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii     i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
28 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)481Jim Burns
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)480WM
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)479Jim Burns
29 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)478WM
31 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)477Jim Burns
31 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)476WM
31 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii           `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)475Jim Burns
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii            `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)474WM
2 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii             `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)473Jim Burns
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii              `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)472WM
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)422joes
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)421WM
3 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)420Chris M. Thomasson
4 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)419WM
4 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)388Chris M. Thomasson
4 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Moebius
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   ii`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)385WM
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)384joes
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)383WM
6 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i   +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
6 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)381Jim Burns
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)15Ross Finlayson
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Ross Finlayson
10 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    ii`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)12WM
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8Richard Damon
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7WM
8 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6Richard Damon
8 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
8 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4Richard Damon
8 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Chris M. Thomasson
9 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Richard Damon
9 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i i      `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3FromTheRafters
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1FromTheRafters
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)365WM
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7FromTheRafters
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     ii`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Richard Damon
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     ii `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1FromTheRafters
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Ross Finlayson
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2FromTheRafters
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
8 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)233Jim Burns
8 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)232WM
8 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)231Jim Burns
8 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)230WM
8 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
9 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)190joes
9 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)189WM
9 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)185Richard Damon
9 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)184WM
10 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)183Richard Damon
10 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)182WM
10 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)175Jim Burns
10 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)174WM
11 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)46Richard Damon
11 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)45WM
11 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)43joes
11 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)10WM
11 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i ii`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)9joes
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i ii `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8WM
13 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i ii  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7Richard Damon
13 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i ii   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6WM
14 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i ii    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5Richard Damon
14 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i ii     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4WM
14 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i ii      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Richard Damon
15 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i ii       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
16 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i ii        `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
11 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)32FromTheRafters
11 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
11 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1FromTheRafters
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)12Chris M. Thomasson
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2FromTheRafters
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i ii`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)9WM
13 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8Richard Damon
13 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7Chris M. Thomasson
13 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6Moebius
13 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
13 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4Jim Burns
13 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
13 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Jim Burns
14 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i i        `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)17WM
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)12FromTheRafters
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i  i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)10WM
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i  ii`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)9joes
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i  ii +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
13 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i  ii i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i  ii `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6FromTheRafters
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i  ii  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i  ii   +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Python
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i  ii   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3joes
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i  ii    +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Python
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i  ii    `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1FromTheRafters
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i  i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3joes
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i  i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i  i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
13 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
11 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
11 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Richard Damon
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
13 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)124Jim Burns
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)123WM
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)122Jim Burns
12 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)121WM
13 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i     +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
13 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)119Jim Burns
13 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)118WM
13 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)106Jim Burns
14 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)105WM
14 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)19Richard Damon
15 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)18WM
15 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)16joes
16 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)15WM
17 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)14Richard Damon
17 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)13WM
17 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)9joes
17 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i i   i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8WM
17 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i i   i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7Richard Damon
17 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i i   i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6WM
18 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i i   i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5Richard Damon
19 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i i   i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4WM
19 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i i   i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Richard Damon
20 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i i   i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
20 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i i   i       `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
17 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Richard Damon
17 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
18 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i i     `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
16 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
14 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)18Jim Burns
15 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)17WM
15 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1FromTheRafters
16 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
16 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)14Jim Burns
17 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)13WM
17 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)12Jim Burns
17 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)11WM
18 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)10Jim Burns
18 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)9WM
18 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i       +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Jim Burns
19 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i       i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
18 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6Jim Burns
19 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
19 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i         +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
20 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i         i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
20 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Jim Burns
20 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i i          `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
15 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)67Jim Burns
15 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)66WM
15 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8Jim Burns
16 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i   i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7WM
17 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i   i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6Richard Damon
17 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i   i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
17 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i   i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3joes
17 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i   i   i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
17 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i   i   i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
17 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i   i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
16 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6Jim Burns
16 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i   i+- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Peter Fairbrother
16 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i   i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4WM
17 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i   i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Jim Burns
17 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i   i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
17 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i   i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
16 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)51Richard Damon
16 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)50WM
17 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)49Richard Damon
17 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)48WM
17 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)47Richard Damon
17 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)46WM
18 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i         +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)23joes
19 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i         i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)22WM
19 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i         i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)21FromTheRafters
19 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i         i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)20WM
19 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i         i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)18FromTheRafters
20 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i         i   i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)17WM
20 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i         i   i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)16Richard Damon
21 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i         i   i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)15WM
21 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i         i   i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)14Richard Damon
21 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i         i   i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)13WM
22 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i         i   i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)12Richard Damon
22 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i         i   i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)11WM
22 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i         i   i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)10Richard Damon
22 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i         i   i        +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
23 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i         i   i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8WM
23 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i         i   i         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7Richard Damon
24 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i         i   i          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6WM
24 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i         i   i           `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5Richard Damon
25 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i         i   i            `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4WM
25 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i         i   i             `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Richard Damon
26 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i         i   i              `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
26 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i         i   i               `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
19 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i         i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
18 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)22Richard Damon
19 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)21WM
19 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i           +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8Richard Damon
20 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i           i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7WM
20 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i           i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4FromTheRafters
20 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i           i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
20 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i           i i +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
20 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i           i i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
20 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i           i +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
20 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i           i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
19 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i           +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6joes
20 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i           i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
20 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i           i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4FromTheRafters
20 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii               i   i     i   i i   i       i           i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal