comp.theory
Liste des Groupes
Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Date
Sujet
#
Auteur
7 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
37
Richard Damon
7 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
36
olcott
8 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
35
Richard Damon
8 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
34
olcott
8 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
33
Richard Damon
8 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
32
olcott
8 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
31
Richard Damon
8 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
30
olcott
8 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
29
Richard Damon
8 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
28
olcott
8 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
27
Richard Damon
8 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
26
olcott
8 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
25
Richard Damon
8 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
24
olcott
8 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
23
Richard Damon
8 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
22
olcott
8 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
21
Richard Damon
8 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
20
olcott
8 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
19
Richard Damon
9 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
18
olcott
9 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
2
wij
9 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
1
olcott
9 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
15
Richard Damon
9 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
14
olcott
9 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- HHH(DDD)==0
13
Richard Damon
9 Oct 24
HHH(DDD)==0
12
olcott
9 Oct 24
Re: HHH(DDD)==0
8
Mikko
9 Oct 24
Re: HHH(DDD)==0
7
olcott
9 Oct 24
Re: HHH(DDD)==0
5
Richard Damon
9 Oct 24
Re: HHH(DDD)==0
4
olcott
10 Oct 24
Re: HHH(DDD)==0
1
Richard Damon
10 Oct 24
Re: HHH(DDD)==0
2
Mikko
10 Oct 24
Re: HHH(DDD)==0
1
olcott
10 Oct 24
Re: HHH(DDD)==0
1
Mikko
9 Oct 24
Re: HHH(DDD)==0
3
Richard Damon
9 Oct 24
Re: HHH(DDD)==0
2
olcott
9 Oct 24
Re: HHH(DDD)==0
1
Richard Damon
7 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- different execution traces have different behavior !!!
3
Mikko
7 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- different execution traces have different behavior !!!
2
olcott
7 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- different execution traces have different behavior !!!
1
Richard Damon
4 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- different execution traces have different behavior !!!
2
joes
4 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now --- different execution traces have different behavior !!!
1
olcott
3 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now
1
Richard Damon
2 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now
1
olcott
1 Oct 24
ChatGPT correctly analyzed the first page of my paper:
11
olcott
1 Oct 24
Re: ChatGPT correctly analyzed the first page of my paper:
10
Alan Mackenzie
2 Oct 24
Re: ChatGPT correctly analyzed the first page of my paper:
9
olcott
2 Oct 24
Re: ChatGPT correctly analyzed the first page of my paper:
5
Alan Mackenzie
2 Oct 24
Re: ChatGPT correctly analyzed the first page of my paper:
4
olcott
2 Oct 24
Re: ChatGPT correctly analyzed the first page of my paper: (typo corrected)
2
olcott
3 Oct 24
Re: ChatGPT correctly analyzed the first page of my paper: (typo corrected)
1
Mikko
3 Oct 24
Re: ChatGPT correctly analyzed the first page of my paper:
1
Mikko
2 Oct 24
Re: ChatGPT correctly analyzed the first page of my paper:
3
Richard Damon
2 Oct 24
Re: ChatGPT correctly analyzed the first page of my paper:
2
olcott
2 Oct 24
Re: ChatGPT correctly analyzed the first page of my paper:
1
Richard Damon
1 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now
1
Richard Damon
2 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now
6
Mikko
2 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now
3
olcott
2 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now
1
Richard Damon
3 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now
1
Mikko
2 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now
2
olcott
3 Oct 24
Re: Even Google AI Overview understands me now
1
Mikko
7 Oct 24
Simulating Termination Analyzer HHH(DDD) rejects input DDD
8
olcott
7 Oct 24
Re: Simulating Termination Analyzer HHH(DDD) rejects input DDD
3
Richard Damon
8 Oct 24
Re: Simulating Termination Analyzer HHH(DDD) rejects input DDD
2
olcott
8 Oct 24
Re: Simulating Termination Analyzer HHH(DDD) rejects input DDD
1
Richard Damon
8 Oct 24
Re: Simulating Termination Analyzer HHH(DDD) rejects input DDD
4
Mikko
8 Oct 24
Re: Simulating Termination Analyzer HHH(DDD) rejects input DDD
3
olcott
8 Oct 24
Re: Simulating Termination Analyzer HHH(DDD) rejects input DDD
1
Richard Damon
9 Oct 24
Re: Simulating Termination Analyzer HHH(DDD) rejects input DDD
1
Mikko
6 Oct 24
A Lego turing machine.
1
Alan Mackenzie
1 Oct 24
We got rid of Richard?
2
olcott
1 Oct 24
Re: We got rid of Richard?
1
Richard Damon
22 Sep 24
Enough of losers stuck in rebuttal mode
8
olcott
22 Sep 24
Re: Enough of losers stuck in rebuttal mode
1
Richard Damon
23 Sep 24
Re: Enough of losers stuck in rebuttal mode
6
Python
23 Sep 24
Re: Enough of losers stuck in rebuttal mode
5
Mild Shock
23 Sep 24
Re: Enough of losers stuck in rebuttal mode
4
Mild Shock
23 Sep 24
Re: Enough of losers stuck in rebuttal mode
1
Mild Shock
23 Sep 24
Re: Enough of losers stuck in rebuttal mode
1
Mild Shock
23 Sep 24
Re: Enough of losers stuck in rebuttal mode
1
Mild Shock
4 Sep 24
The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
22
olcott
13 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
21
Mikko
13 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
20
olcott
13 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
1
Richard Damon
14 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
18
Mikko
14 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
17
olcott
15 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
16
Mikko
15 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
14
olcott
15 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
1
Richard Damon
16 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
12
Mikko
16 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
11
olcott
16 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
1
Richard Damon
17 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
9
Mikko
17 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
8
olcott
17 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
7
Mikko
17 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
6
olcott
17 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
1
Richard Damon
18 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
4
Mikko
18 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
3
olcott
18 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
1
Richard Damon
19 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
1
Mikko
16 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is stipulated relations between finite strings
1
Fred. Zwarts
15 Sep 24
Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof
18
olcott
15 Sep 24
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof
3
Richard Damon
15 Sep 24
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof
2
olcott
16 Sep 24
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof
1
Richard Damon
16 Sep 24
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof
3
Mikko
16 Sep 24
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof
2
olcott
17 Sep 24
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof
1
Mikko
16 Sep 24
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof
1
Fred. Zwarts
16 Sep 24
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof
10
Fred. Zwarts
16 Sep 24
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof --- damned liar
9
olcott
16 Sep 24
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof --- damned liar
7
Fred. Zwarts
16 Sep 24
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof --- H emulating H emulating D
6
olcott
16 Sep 24
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof --- H emulating H emulating D
5
Richard Damon
17 Sep 24
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof --- H emulating H emulating D
4
olcott
17 Sep 24
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof --- H emulating H emulating D
3
Richard Damon
17 Sep 24
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof --- H emulating H emulating D
2
olcott
17 Sep 24
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof --- H emulating H emulating D
1
Richard Damon
16 Sep 24
Re: Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof --- damned liar
1
Richard Damon
17 Sep 24
The Foundation of Linguistic truth is NOT stipulated relations between finite strings
4
Jeff Barnett
17 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is NOT stipulated relations between finite strings
3
olcott
17 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is NOT stipulated relations between finite strings
1
Richard Damon
17 Sep 24
Re: The Foundation of Linguistic truth is NOT stipulated relations between finite strings
1
Mikko
2 Sep 24
Defining a correct simulating halt decider
193
olcott
2 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
2 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
39
Fred. Zwarts
2 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
27
olcott
2 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
4
Fred. Zwarts
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
olcott
4 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
4 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
21
joes
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
olcott
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
19
olcott
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
13
joes
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
12
olcott
4 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
4 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
10
Fred. Zwarts
4 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
9
olcott
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
7
Fred. Zwarts
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
olcott
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
4 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
4 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
4
Fred. Zwarts
4 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
olcott
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
2 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
11
olcott
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
7
Fred. Zwarts
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
6
olcott
4 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
4 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
4
Fred. Zwarts
4 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
olcott
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
2
joes
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
olcott
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
olcott
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
148
Mikko
3 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
147
olcott
4 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
145
Mikko
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
144
olcott
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
56
joes
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
55
olcott
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
52
joes
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
51
olcott
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
48
joes
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
47
olcott
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
41
joes
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
9
olcott
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
8
joes
5 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
2
olcott
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
joes
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
2
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
31
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
29
joes
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
28
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
17
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
16
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
15
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
14
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
13
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
12
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
11
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
10
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
9
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
4
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
2
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
4
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
2
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
8 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
10
Fred. Zwarts
8 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
9
olcott
8 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
9 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
7
Fred. Zwarts
9 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
6
olcott
10 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
10 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
4
Fred. Zwarts
11 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
olcott
11 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
12 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
4
Fred. Zwarts
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
85
Mikko
6 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
84
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
67
joes
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
66
Mikko
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
65
olcott
7 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
8 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
4
joes
8 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
3
olcott
8 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
9 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Fred. Zwarts
8 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
59
Mikko
9 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
58
olcott
9 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
6
joes
9 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
5
olcott
9 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
2
olcott
10 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
10 Sep 24
Re: Defining a correct simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
Haut de la page
Les messages affichés proviennent d'
usenet
.
NewsPortal