sci.physics.relativity

Liste des Groupes Pages :123456789101112131415161718192021222324
Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Jul 24 i      i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again4Mikko
14 Jul 24 i      i i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again3Maciej Wozniak
14 Jul 24 i      i i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24 i      i i  `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Finis Maryanna
14 Jul 24 i      i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24 i      i  `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Athel Cornish-Bowden
12 Jul 24 i      `* Re: Langevin's paradox again90Paul.B.Andersen
12 Jul 24 i       +* Re: Langevin's paradox again82Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24 i       i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again81Paul.B.Andersen
14 Jul 24 i       i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again79Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24 i       i i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again78Paul.B.Andersen
14 Jul 24 i       i i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Conard Lèmmi
14 Jul 24 i       i i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24 i       i i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again5Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24 i       i i i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again4Paul.B.Andersen
14 Jul 24 i       i i i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
14 Jul 24 i       i i i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i       i i i `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Thomas Heger
14 Jul 24 i       i i +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24 i       i i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again69Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24 i       i i  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again68Paul.B.Andersen
14 Jul 24 i       i i   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again67Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i       i i    `* Re: Langevin's paradox again66Paul.B.Andersen
15 Jul 24 i       i i     +* Re: Langevin's paradox again64Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i       i i     i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again63Paul.B.Andersen
15 Jul 24 i       i i     i +* Re: Langevin's paradox again35Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24 i       i i     i i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again34Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jul 24 i       i i     i i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again33Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24 i       i i     i i  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again32Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jul 24 i       i i     i i   +* Re: Langevin's paradox again19Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24 i       i i     i i   i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again18Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jul 24 i       i i     i i   i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again17Richard Hachel
17 Jul 24 i       i i     i i   i  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again16Paul.B.Andersen
17 Jul 24 i       i i     i i   i   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again15Richard Hachel
18 Jul 24 i       i i     i i   i    `* Re: Langevin's paradox again14Paul.B.Andersen
18 Jul 24 i       i i     i i   i     +* Re: Langevin's paradox again8Richard Hachel
19 Jul 24 i       i i     i i   i     i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again7J. J. Lodder
19 Jul 24 i       i i     i i   i     i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again6Richard Hachel
19 Jul 24 i       i i     i i   i     i  +* Re: Langevin's paradox again3J. J. Lodder
19 Jul 24 i       i i     i i   i     i  i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
20 Jul 24 i       i i     i i   i     i  i `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1J. J. Lodder
20 Jul 24 i       i i     i i   i     i  +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Paul.B.Andersen
20 Jul 24 i       i i     i i   i     i  `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Paul.B.Andersen
19 Jul 24 i       i i     i i   i     `* Re: Langevin's paradox again5Paul.B.Andersen
19 Jul 24 i       i i     i i   i      +* Re: Langevin's paradox again3Richard Hachel
20 Jul 24 i       i i     i i   i      i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Paul.B.Andersen
22 Jul 24 i       i i     i i   i      i `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1J. J. Lodder
19 Jul 24 i       i i     i i   i      `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Tyrone Mokrousov
16 Jul 24 i       i i     i i   `* Re: Langevin's paradox again12Python
16 Jul 24 i       i i     i i    +* Re: Langevin's paradox again3Maciej Wozniak
17 Jul 24 i       i i     i i    i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
17 Jul 24 i       i i     i i    i `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Python
17 Jul 24 i       i i     i i    `* Re: Langevin's paradox again8Richard Hachel
17 Jul 24 i       i i     i i     `* Re: Langevin's paradox again7Python
17 Jul 24 i       i i     i i      +* Re: Langevin's paradox again5Richard Hachel
17 Jul 24 i       i i     i i      i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again4Python
17 Jul 24 i       i i     i i      i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again3Richard Hachel
17 Jul 24 i       i i     i i      i  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Python
17 Jul 24 i       i i     i i      i   `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
17 Jul 24 i       i i     i i      `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
15 Jul 24 i       i i     i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again27Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24 i       i i     i  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again26Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jul 24 i       i i     i   `* Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)25Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24 i       i i     i    +- Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)1Python
16 Jul 24 i       i i     i    `* Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)23Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jul 24 i       i i     i     `* Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)22Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24 i       i i     i      `* Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)21Paul.B.Andersen
17 Jul 24 i       i i     i       `* Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)20Thomas Heger
17 Jul 24 i       i i     i        `* Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)19Paul.B.Andersen
17 Jul 24 i       i i     i         +* Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)2Python
17 Jul 24 i       i i     i         i`- Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)1Richard Hachel
17 Jul 24 i       i i     i         +- Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)1Maciej Wozniak
17 Jul 24 i       i i     i         +* Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)4Richard Hachel
17 Jul 24 i       i i     i         i`* Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)3Python
17 Jul 24 i       i i     i         i `* Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)2Richard Hachel
17 Jul 24 i       i i     i         i  `- Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)1Python
18 Jul 24 i       i i     i         `* Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)11Thomas Heger
18 Jul 24 i       i i     i          `* Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)10Paul.B.Andersen
18 Jul 24 i       i i     i           +* Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)4Stefan Ram
18 Jul 24 i       i i     i           i+- Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)1Richard Hachel
20 Jul 24 i       i i     i           i`* Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)2Mikko
21 Jul 24 i       i i     i           i `- Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)1Thomas Heger
19 Jul 24 i       i i     i           `* Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)5Thomas Heger
19 Jul 24 i       i i     i            `* Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)4Python
20 Jul 24 i       i i     i             `* Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)3Thomas Heger
20 Jul 24 i       i i     i              `* Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)2Python
21 Jul 24 i       i i     i               `- Re: Le piège parfait (the perfect trap)1Thomas Heger
15 Jul 24 i       i i     `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24 i       i `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
12 Jul 24 i       +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
12 Jul 24 i       +* Re: Langevin's paradox again3Richard Hachel
12 Jul 24 i       i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Maciej Wozniak
12 Jul 24 i       i `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
12 Jul 24 i       +- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Richard Hachel
12 Jul 24 i       `* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Richard Hachel
12 Jul 24 i        `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Maciej Wozniak
11 Jul 24 `* Re: Langevin's paradox again15J. J. Lodder
12 Jul 24  `* Re: Langevin's paradox again14Thomas Heger
12 Jul 24   +* Re: Langevin's paradox again12Athel Cornish-Bowden
13 Jul 24   i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again11Thomas Heger
13 Jul 24   i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again10Thomas Heger
13 Jul 24   i  +* Re: Langevin's paradox again8Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24   i  i`* Re: Langevin's paradox again7Thomas Heger
15 Jul 24   i  i `* Re: Langevin's paradox again6Athel Cornish-Bowden
15 Jul 24   i  i  +* Re: Langevin's paradox again2J. J. Lodder
15 Jul 24   i  i  i`- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Athel Cornish-Bowden
16 Jul 24   i  i  +* Re: Langevin's paradox again2Thomas Heger
16 Jul 24   i  i  i`- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Thomas Heger
16 Jul 24   i  i  `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Thomas Heger
13 Jul 24   i  `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1Codey Pasternak Miao
12 Jul 24   `- Re: Langevin's paradox again1J. J. Lodder
21 Jul 24 o Re: Israeli Faces From Earlier Today :-)1Seymour Kalakos
19 Jul 24 * tau egality in relalivity17Richard Hachel
20 Jul 24 `* Re: tau egality in relalivity16Python
20 Jul 24  `* Re: tau egality in relalivity15Richard Hachel
20 Jul 24   `* Re: tau egality in relalivity14Python
20 Jul 24    +* Re: tau egality in relalivity6Maciej Wozniak
20 Jul 24    i`* Re: tau egality in relalivity5Python
20 Jul 24    i `* Re: tau egality in relalivity4Maciej Wozniak
20 Jul 24    i  `* Re: tau egality in relalivity3Python
20 Jul 24    i   `* Re: tau egality in relalivity2Maciej Wozniak
20 Jul 24    i    `- Re: tau egality in relalivity1Richard Hachel
20 Jul 24    `* Re: tau egality in relalivity7Richard Hachel
20 Jul 24     `* Re: tau egality in relalivity6Python
20 Jul 24      +* Re: tau egality in relalivity2Maciej Wozniak
20 Jul 24      i`- Re: tau egality in relalivity1Python
21 Jul 24      `* Re: tau egality in relalivity3Richard Hachel
21 Jul 24       `* Re: tau egality in relalivity2Python
21 Jul 24        `- Re: tau egality in relalivity1Maciej Wozniak
17 Jul 24 * What surprises me.23Richard Hachel
17 Jul 24 `* Re: What surprises me.22Python
17 Jul 24  +* Re: What surprises me.20Maciej Wozniak
17 Jul 24  i`* Re: What surprises me.19Richard Hachel
17 Jul 24  i +- Re: What surprises me.1Python
17 Jul 24  i `* Re: What surprises me.17Maciej Wozniak
17 Jul 24  i  `* Re: What surprises me.16Richard Hachel
17 Jul 24  i   +* Re: What surprises me.5Athel Cornish-Bowden
17 Jul 24  i   i`* Re: What surprises me.4Richard Hachel
18 Jul 24  i   i `* Re: What surprises me.3Athel Cornish-Bowden
18 Jul 24  i   i  +- LOL1Richard Hachel
18 Jul 24  i   i  `- Re: What surprises me.1Maciej Wozniak
17 Jul 24  i   `* Re: What surprises me.10Richard Hachel
17 Jul 24  i    `* Re: What surprises me.9Maciej Wozniak
17 Jul 24  i     `* Re: What surprises me.8gharnagel
17 Jul 24  i      `* Re: What surprises me.7Maciej Wozniak
18 Jul 24  i       `* Re: What surprises me.6gharnagel
18 Jul 24  i        `* Re: What surprises me.5Maciej Wozniak
18 Jul 24  i         `* Re: What surprises me.4gharnagel
18 Jul 24  i          `* Re: What surprises me.3gharnagel
18 Jul 24  i           `* Re: What surprises me.2gharnagel
19 Jul 24  i            `- Re: What surprises me.1Horace Papadelias
17 Jul 24  `- Re: What surprises me.1Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24 * Book by late Professor Ching-Chuan Su of Taiwan brings physics back to a much better path9amirjf nin
16 Jul 24 +* Re: Book by late Professor Ching-Chuan Su of Taiwan brings physics back to a much better path6amirjf nin
16 Jul 24 i`* Re: Book by late Professor Ching-Chuan Su of Taiwan brings physics back to a much better path5J. J. Lodder
16 Jul 24 i +- Re: Book by late Professor Ching-Chuan Su of Taiwan brings physics back to a much better path1amirjf nin
16 Jul 24 i +- Re: Book by late Professor Ching-Chuan Su of Taiwan brings physics back to a much better path1amirjf nin
16 Jul 24 i +- Re: Book by late Professor Ching-Chuan Su of Taiwan brings physics back to a much better path1amirjf nin
16 Jul 24 i `- Re: Book by late Professor Ching-Chuan Su of Taiwan brings physics back to a much better path1Ross Finlayson
18 Jul 24 `* Re: Book by late Professor Ching-Chuan Su of Taiwan brings physics back to a much better path2J. J. Lodder
18 Jul 24  `- Re: Book by late Professor Ching-Chuan Su of Taiwan brings physics back to a much better path1amirjf nin
15 Jul 24 * Explanation to Paul (Stella's vision)4Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 `* Re: Explanation to Paul (Stella's vision)3guido wugi
15 Jul 24  `* Re: Explanation to Paul (Stella's vision)2Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24   `- Re: Explanation to Paul (Stella's vision)1Bosephis Voznitsin
16 Jul 24 o out with e=mcc, up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k) - derivation of Arindam's formula1bertietaylor
15 Jul 24 * Re: Le voyageur de Langevin2Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 `- Re: Le voyageur de Langevin1Richard Hachel
13 Jul 24 * Time as "what clocks indicate"7Maciej Wozniak
13 Jul 24 +* Re: Time as "what clocks indicate"2Richard Hachel
13 Jul 24 i`- Re: Time as "what clocks indicate"1Paler Hornyák Gong
15 Jul 24 +- Re: Time as "what clocks indicate"1J. J. Lodder
15 Jul 24 `* Re: Time as "what clocks indicate"3bertietaylor
15 Jul 24  `* Re: Time as "what clocks indicate"2Python
15 Jul 24   `- Re: Time as "what clocks indicate"1Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 o Corrigendum (correctif)1Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 o Arindam's new physics, inertia violation, going to the stars, etc.1bertietaylor
15 Jul 24 o What will observers observe1Maciej Wozniak
11 Jul 24 * Paper Series: Shift-symmetry in Einstein’s Universe24Eric_Baird
11 Jul 24 +* Re: Paper Series: Shift-symmetry in Einstein’s Universe22Mikko
11 Jul 24 i`* Re: Paper Series: Shift-symmetry in Einstein’s Universe21gharnagel
11 Jul 24 i +* Re: Paper Series: Shift-symmetry in Einstein’s Universe5gharnagel
11 Jul 24 i i`* Re: Paper Series: Shift-symmetry in Einstein’s Universe4Maciej Wozniak
11 Jul 24 i i `* Re: Paper Series: Shift-symmetry in Einstein’s Universe3gharnagel
12 Jul 24 i i  `* Re: Paper Series: Shift-symmetry in Einstein’s Universe2gharnagel
12 Jul 24 i i   `- Re: Paper Series: Shift-symmetry in Einstein’s Universe1Maciej Wozniak
11 Jul 24 i +* Re: Paper Series: Shift-symmetry in Einstein’s Universe10Ross Finlayson
11 Jul 24 i i+- Re: Paper Series: Shift-symmetry in Einstein’s Universe1Mantra Bajukov Chao
13 Jul 24 i i`* Re: Paper Series: Shift-symmetry in Einstein’s Universe8Ross Finlayson
14 Jul 24 i i `* Re: Paper Series: Shift-symmetry in Einstein’s Universe7gharnagel
14 Jul 24 i i  +- Re: Paper Series: Shift-symmetry in Einstein’s Universe1Ross Finlayson
14 Jul 24 i i  +- Re: Paper Series: Shift-symmetry in Einstein’s Universe1Sigfredo Mészáros
14 Jul 24 i i  `* Re: Paper Series: Shift-symmetry in Einstein’s Universe4Richard Hachel
14 Jul 24 i i   `* Re: Paper Series: Shift-symmetry in Einstein’s Universe3gharnagel
14 Jul 24 i i    `* Re: Paper Series: Shift-symmetry in Einstein’s Universe2Ross Finlayson
15 Jul 24 i i     `- Re: Paper Series: Shift-symmetry in Einstein’s Universe1gharnagel
12 Jul 24 i `* Re: Paper Series: Shift-symmetry in Einstein’s Universe5Mikko
13 Jul 24 i  `* Re: Paper Series: Shift-symmetry in Einstein’s Universe4gharnagel
13 Jul 24 i   +- Re: Paper Series: Shift-symmetry in Einstein’s Universe1Maciej Wozniak
14 Jul 24 i   +- Re: Paper Series: Shift-symmetry in Einstein’s Universe1Jermaine Grammatakakis
14 Jul 24 i   `- Re: Paper Series: Shift-symmetry in Einstein’s Universe1Jonhantan Escamilla
12 Jul 24 `- Re: Paper Series: Shift-symmetry in Einstein’s Universe1Eric_Baird
10 Jul 24 o [SR] relativistic elasticities1Richard Hachel
21 Jun 24 * The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.72LaurenceClarkCrossen
21 Jun 24 +* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.32J. J. Lodder
21 Jun 24 i+* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.5LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Jun 24 ii`* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.4Mikko
23 Jun 24 ii `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.3LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Jun 24 ii  `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.2Mikko
23 Jun 24 ii   `- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Joda Muromtsov Hui
21 Jun 24 i+* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.9LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Jun 24 ii`* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.8J. J. Lodder
22 Jun 24 ii +- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Maciej Wozniak
22 Jun 24 ii +* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.5Ross Finlayson
22 Jun 24 ii i+* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.2Ross Finlayson
22 Jun 24 ii ii`- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Ross Finlayson
23 Jun 24 ii i`* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.2J. J. Lodder
23 Jun 24 ii i `- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Ross Finlayson
23 Jun 24 ii `- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Jun 24 i+- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Jun 24 i+- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Darrell Wojewódzki
22 Jun 24 i+* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.13LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Jun 24 ii+* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.3Ross Finlayson
22 Jun 24 iii`* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Jun 24 iii `- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Mikko
22 Jun 24 ii`* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.9J. J. Lodder
22 Jun 24 ii +- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Ross Finlayson
22 Jun 24 ii +- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Ross Finlayson
22 Jun 24 ii +* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.4Athel Cornish-Bowden
23 Jun 24 ii i`* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.3J. J. Lodder
23 Jun 24 ii i `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.2Mikko
23 Jun 24 ii i  `- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1J. J. Lodder
23 Jun 24 ii `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Jun 24 ii  `- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1J. J. Lodder
23 Jun 24 i`* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Jun 24 i `- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Mikko
22 Jun 24 +* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.36Maciej Wozniak
23 Jun 24 i`* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.35LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Jun 24 i `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.34Tom Roberts
23 Jun 24 i  +- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Maciej Wozniak
23 Jun 24 i  +* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.30J. J. Lodder
25 Jun 24 i  i`* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.29Tom Roberts
25 Jun 24 i  i +- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Maciej Wozniak
25 Jun 24 i  i +- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Stuart Balboni
25 Jun 24 i  i `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.26Thomas Heger
25 Jun 24 i  i  `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.25Ross Finlayson
26 Jun 24 i  i   +- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Thomas Heger
26 Jun 24 i  i   `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.23J. J. Lodder
26 Jun 24 i  i    `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.22Ross Finlayson
4 Jul 24 i  i     `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.21J. J. Lodder

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal