comp.lang.c

Liste des Groupes Pages :1234567891011121314151617181920
Date Sujet#  Auteur
18 May 24  ii +- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ###1olcott
19 May 24  ii `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ###2Mikko
19 May 24  ii  `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ###1James Kuyper
18 May 24  i`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ###7James Kuyper
18 May 24  i +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ###5Richard Damon
18 May 24  i i`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ###4James Kuyper
18 May 24  i i `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ###3Keith Thompson
18 May 24  i i  +- D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 061olcott
19 May 24  i i  `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ###1Mikko
18 May 24  i `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ###1olcott
27 May 24  `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ###1olcott
19 May 24 * Add JSON, XML, CSV to Baby X resource compiler10Malcolm McLean
20 May 24 `* Re: Add JSON, XML, CSV to Baby X resource compiler9bart
20 May 24  +- Re: Add JSON, XML, CSV to Baby X resource compiler1Michael S
20 May 24  +* Re: Add JSON, XML, CSV to Baby X resource compiler3Mikko
20 May 24  i`* Re: Add JSON, XML, CSV to Baby X resource compiler2Malcolm McLean
21 May 24  i `- Re: Add JSON, XML, CSV to Baby X resource compiler1Mikko
20 May 24  `* Re: Add JSON, XML, CSV to Baby X resource compiler4bart
21 May 24   +* Re: Add JSON, XML, CSV to Baby X resource compiler2Malcolm McLean
22 May 24   i`- Re: Add JSON, XML, CSV to Baby X resource compiler1Ben Bacarisse
25 May 24   `- Re: Add JSON, XML, CSV to Baby X resource compiler1Malcolm McLean
23 May 24 * Compile time checking of standards conformance11olcott
23 May 24 `* Re: Compile time checking of standards conformance10Paavo Helde
23 May 24  +- Re: Compile time checking of standards conformance1olcott
23 May 24  +* Re: Compile time checking of standards conformance4olcott
23 May 24  i`* Re: Compile time checking of standards conformance3David Brown
23 May 24  i `* Re: Compile time checking of standards conformance2olcott
23 May 24  i  `- Re: Compile time checking of standards conformance1David Brown
23 May 24  +* Re: Compile time checking of standards conformance3James Kuyper
24 May 24  i`* Re: Compile time checking of standards conformance2Paavo Helde
24 May 24  i `- Re: Compile time checking of standards conformance1James Kuyper
24 May 24  `- Re: Compile time checking of standards conformance1Keith Thompson
23 May 24 o Will Paypal $10 to the first person finding a valid counter-example1olcott
22 May 24 * D correctly simulated by pure function H remains stuck in recursive simulation s9olcott
22 May 24 `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H remains stuck in recursive simulation s8Bonita Montero
22 May 24  `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H remains stuck in recursive simulation s7olcott
22 May 24   +* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H remains stuck in recursive simulation s4Bonita Montero
22 May 24   i+- Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H remains stuck in recursive simulation1olcott
22 May 24   i+- Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H remains stuck in recursive simulation s1Chris M. Thomasson
22 May 24   i`- Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H remains stuck in recursive simulation1olcott
23 May 24   `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H remains stuck in recursive simulation s2Mikko
23 May 24    `- Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H remains stuck in recursive simulation s1olcott
20 May 24 * Alternative compilation model for C2Thiago Adams
23 May 24 `- Re: Alternative compilation model for C1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Apr 24 * [Meta] Personal announcement27Malcolm McLean
29 Apr 24 +- Re: [Meta] Personal announcement1Tim Rentsch
29 Apr 24 +- Re: [Meta] Personal announcement1Joe Pfeiffer
30 Apr 24 +* Re: [Meta] Personal announcement2Keith Thompson
7 May 24 i`- Re: [Meta] Personal announcement1Chris M. Thomasson
3 May 24 +* Re: [Meta] Personal announcement5Anton Shepelev
4 May 24 i`* Re: [Meta] Personal announcement4Malcolm McLean
5 May 24 i `* Re: [Meta] Personal announcement3David LaRue
5 May 24 i  `* Re: [Meta] Personal announcement2Malcolm McLean
5 May 24 i   `- Re: [Meta] Personal announcement1David LaRue
4 May 24 +- Re: [Meta] Personal announcement1Chris M. Thomasson
7 May 24 +* Re: [Meta] Personal announcement7DFS
7 May 24 i`* Re: [Meta] Personal announcement6Malcolm McLean
7 May 24 i `* Re: [Meta] Personal announcement5Malcolm McLean
11 May 24 i  `* Re: [Meta] Personal announcement4Phil Carmody
11 May 24 i   `* Re: [Meta] Personal announcement3Malcolm McLean
11 May 24 i    +- Re: [Meta] Personal announcement1Chris M. Thomasson
23 May 24 i    `- Re: [Meta] Personal announcement1Chris M. Thomasson
7 May 24 `* Re: [Meta] Personal announcement9Rosario19
7 May 24  +* Re: [Meta] Personal announcement7Rosario19
7 May 24  i+* Re: [Meta] Personal announcement2Anton Shepelev
8 May 24  ii`- Re: [Meta] Personal announcement1Rosario19
8 May 24  i`* Re: [Meta] Personal announcement4Rosario19
8 May 24  i +* Re: [Meta] Personal announcement2David Brown
11 May 24  i i`- Re: [Meta] Personal announcement1Phil Carmody
8 May 24  i `- Whacka-doodle! (Was: [Meta] Personal announcement)1Kenny McCormack
7 May 24  `- Re: [Meta] Personal announcement1David Brown
24 Apr 24 * "not-const" qualifier for C6Thiago Adams
25 Apr 24 +* Re: "not-const" qualifier for C3Kaz Kylheku
25 Apr 24 i`* Re: "not-const" qualifier for C2Thiago Adams
25 Apr 24 i `- Re: "not-const" qualifier for C1Kaz Kylheku
25 Apr 24 +- Re: "not-const" qualifier for C1Blue-Maned_Hawk
23 May 24 `- Re: "not-const" qualifier for C1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 May 24 * Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?137olcott
19 May 24 +- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Richard Damon
19 May 24 +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?3Sam
19 May 24 i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?2olcott
19 May 24 i `- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1jak
19 May 24 +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?2Rosario19
19 May 24 i`- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1olcott
19 May 24 +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?127Bonita Montero
19 May 24 i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?126olcott
19 May 24 i +- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Richard Damon
20 May 24 i `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?124Bonita Montero
20 May 24 i  `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?123olcott
20 May 24 i   +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?54Bonita Montero
20 May 24 i   i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?53olcott
20 May 24 i   i +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?44Bonita Montero
20 May 24 i   i i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?43olcott
20 May 24 i   i i `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?42Bonita Montero
20 May 24 i   i i  `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?41olcott
20 May 24 i   i i   `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?40Bonita Montero
20 May 24 i   i i    `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?39olcott
20 May 24 i   i i     +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?2Richard Harnden
20 May 24 i   i i     i`- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1olcott
20 May 24 i   i i     `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?36Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i      `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?35olcott
20 May 24 i   i i       `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?34Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?13olcott
20 May 24 i   i i        i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?12Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        i `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?11olcott
20 May 24 i   i i        i  +- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        i  +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?3Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        i  i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?2olcott
20 May 24 i   i i        i  i `- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        i  `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?6Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        i   `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?5olcott
20 May 24 i   i i        i    `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?4Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        i     `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?3olcott
20 May 24 i   i i        i      `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?2Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        i       `- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i        `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?20Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i         `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?19olcott
20 May 24 i   i i          `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?18Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i           `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?17olcott
20 May 24 i   i i            `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?16Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i             `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?15olcott
20 May 24 i   i i              `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?14Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i               `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?13olcott
20 May 24 i   i i                `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?12Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i                 +- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i                 `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?10olcott
20 May 24 i   i i                  `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?9Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i                   `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?8Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i                    `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?7olcott
20 May 24 i   i i                     +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?5Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i                     i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?4olcott
20 May 24 i   i i                     i `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?3Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i                     i  +- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i i                     i  `- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1olcott
20 May 24 i   i i                     `- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Chris M. Thomasson
20 May 24 i   i `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?8Fred. Zwarts
20 May 24 i   i  `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?7olcott
20 May 24 i   i   +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?2Paavo Helde
20 May 24 i   i   i`- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1olcott
20 May 24 i   i   `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?4Bonita Montero
20 May 24 i   i    `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?3olcott
21 May 24 i   i     `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?2Fred. Zwarts
21 May 24 i   i      `- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1olcott
21 May 24 i   +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?35Sam
21 May 24 i   i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?34olcott
21 May 24 i   i `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?33Sam
21 May 24 i   i  +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?30olcott
21 May 24 i   i  i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?29Sam
21 May 24 i   i  i `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?28olcott
21 May 24 i   i  i  `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?27Chris M. Thomasson
21 May 24 i   i  i   `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?26olcott
21 May 24 i   i  i    +- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Chris M. Thomasson
21 May 24 i   i  i    `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?24Sam
22 May 24 i   i  i     `* Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?23olcott
22 May 24 i   i  i      +* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?7Chris M. Thomasson
22 May 24 i   i  i      i`* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?6Chris M. Thomasson
22 May 24 i   i  i      i `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?5olcott
22 May 24 i   i  i      i  `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?4Chris M. Thomasson
22 May 24 i   i  i      i   `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?3olcott
22 May 24 i   i  i      i    `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?2Chris M. Thomasson
22 May 24 i   i  i      i     `- Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?1olcott
22 May 24 i   i  i      `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?15Sam
22 May 24 i   i  i       +* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?5olcott
22 May 24 i   i  i       i`* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?4Sam
22 May 24 i   i  i       i `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?3olcott
22 May 24 i   i  i       i  `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?2Sam
22 May 24 i   i  i       i   `- Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?1Tim Rentsch
22 May 24 i   i  i       `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?9olcott
22 May 24 i   i  i        +* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?3olcott
22 May 24 i   i  i        i`* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?2tTh
22 May 24 i   i  i        i `- Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?1Chris M. Thomasson
22 May 24 i   i  i        `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?5Sam
22 May 24 i   i  i         `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?4Bonita Montero
22 May 24 i   i  i          `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?3olcott
22 May 24 i   i  i           `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?2Sam
22 May 24 i   i  i            `- Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?1Chris M. Thomasson
21 May 24 i   i  `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?2Chris M. Thomasson
21 May 24 i   i   `- Can D simulated by any H possibly reach its own line 06 and halt?1olcott
21 May 24 i   +* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?31olcott
21 May 24 i   i+- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1Fred. Zwarts
21 May 24 i   i`* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?29Janis Papanagnou
21 May 24 i   i `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?28olcott
21 May 24 i   i  `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?27Bonita Montero
21 May 24 i   i   `* Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?26olcott
21 May 24 i   i    `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?25Bonita Montero
21 May 24 i   i     `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?24olcott
21 May 24 i   i      `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?23Bonita Montero
21 May 24 i   i       `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?22olcott
21 May 24 i   i        `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?21Bonita Montero
21 May 24 i   i         `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?20olcott
21 May 24 i   i          +* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?12bart
21 May 24 i   i          i`* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?11olcott
22 May 24 i   i          i `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?10David Brown
22 May 24 i   i          i  `* D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation9olcott
22 May 24 i   i          i   +- Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation1Fred. Zwarts
22 May 24 i   i          i   +* Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation [good attempt]3olcott
22 May 24 i   i          i   i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation [good attempt]2wij
22 May 24 i   i          i   i `- Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation [good attempt]1olcott
22 May 24 i   i          i   `* Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation4olcott
23 May 24 i   i          i    `* Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation3Chris M. Thomasson
23 May 24 i   i          i     `* Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation2olcott
23 May 24 i   i          i      `- Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation1Chris M. Thomasson
22 May 24 i   i          `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?7Bonita Montero
22 May 24 i   i           `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?6olcott
22 May 24 i   i            `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?5Bonita Montero
22 May 24 i   i             `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?4olcott
22 May 24 i   i              `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?3Bonita Montero
22 May 24 i   i               `* Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?2olcott
22 May 24 i   i                `- Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt?1Bonita Montero
22 May 24 i   `* Partial function types2Tim Rentsch
22 May 24 i    `- Re: Partial function types1Keith Thompson
20 May 24 `* Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?3Marcel Mueller
20 May 24  +- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1olcott
20 May 24  `- Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?1olcott
11 May 24 * storage of string literals3Johanne Fairchild
11 May 24 +- Re: storage of string literals1Barry Schwarz
11 May 24 `- Re: storage of string literals1David Brown
7 Mar 24 * Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig. Was: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"51Ben
9 Mar 24 `* Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig. Was: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"50Blue-Maned_Hawk
9 Mar 24  +* Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig. Was: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"5Keith Thompson
9 Mar 24  i`* Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig. Was: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"4Blue-Maned_Hawk
9 Mar 24  i `* Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig.3vallor
10 Mar 24  i  `* Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig.2Blue-Maned_Hawk
21 Mar 24  i   `- Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig.1Anton Shepelev
9 Mar 24  `* Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig.44Ben
9 Mar 24   +* Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig.3Richard Harnden
10 Mar 24   i`* Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig.2Ben Bacarisse
10 Mar 24   i `- Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig.1Richard Harnden
9 Mar 24   +* Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig.7Blue-Maned_Hawk
9 Mar 24   i`* Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig.6Richard Harnden
10 Mar 24   i +- Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig.1Blue-Maned_Hawk
10 Mar 24   i `* Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig.4Ben Bacarisse
10 Mar 24   i  `* Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig.3Michael S
10 Mar 24   i   +- Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig.1Blue-Maned_Hawk
10 Mar 24   i   `- Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig.1Kaz Kylheku
9 Mar 24   `* avoiding strdup() (was: Re: [OT] UTF-8 sig.)33vallor
9 Mar 24    +- Re: avoiding strdup()1Spiros Bousbouras
10 Mar 24    +* Re: avoiding strdup()30Keith Thompson
10 Mar 24    i`* Re: avoiding strdup()29Michael S
10 Mar 24    i +- Re: avoiding strdup()1Blue-Maned_Hawk
10 Mar 24    i `* Re: avoiding strdup()27Kaz Kylheku
10 Mar 24    i  +- Re: avoiding strdup()1Richard Harnden
11 Mar 24    i  +* Re: avoiding strdup()22Malcolm McLean
11 Mar 24    i  i+* Re: avoiding strdup()10Michael S
11 Mar 24    i  ii+* Re: avoiding strdup()6Keith Thompson
11 Mar 24    i  iii+* Re: avoiding strdup()2Kaz Kylheku
11 Mar 24    i  iiii`- Re: avoiding strdup()1Keith Thompson
11 Mar 24    i  iii+- Re: avoiding strdup()1Keith Thompson
11 Mar 24    i  iii`* Re: avoiding strdup()2Spiros Bousbouras
11 Mar 24    i  iii `- Re: avoiding strdup()1Keith Thompson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal