sci.physics.relativity

Liste des GroupesPages :1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132
Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i     i `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
26 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i     i  `- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
26 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i     `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!11ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
26 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i      `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!10rhertz
26 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i       `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!9ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
26 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i        `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!8rhertz
27 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i         `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!7ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
27 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i          `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!6rhertz
27 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i           `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!5ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
28 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i            `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!4rhertz
28 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i             +* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!2Ross Finlayson
28 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i             i`- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
29 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  i             `- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1rhertz
22 Nov 24 i       i   i      i  `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!2Ross Finlayson
22 Nov 24 i       i   i      i   `- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1Ross Finlayson
22 Nov 24 i       i   i      `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!9rhertz
23 Nov 24 i       i   i       +* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!5Ross Finlayson
23 Nov 24 i       i   i       i+- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1rhertz
23 Nov 24 i       i   i       i`* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!3Ross Finlayson
23 Nov 24 i       i   i       i `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!2Ross Finlayson
27 Nov 24 i       i   i       i  `- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1Ross Finlayson
23 Nov 24 i       i   i       `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!3ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
11 Dec 24 i       i   i        `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!2Tom Roberts
11 Dec 24 i       i   i         `- Re: Want to prove E=mc?? University labs should try this!1J. J. Lodder
19 Nov 24 i       i   `- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1rhertz
19 Nov 24 i       `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!3ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
19 Nov 24 i        `* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!2Ross Finlayson
19 Nov 24 i         `- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1Ross Finlayson
17 Nov 24 +* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!2Ross Finlayson
18 Nov 24 i`- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1Ross Finlayson
17 Nov 24 +* Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!2LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Nov 24 i`- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1Ross Finlayson
17 Nov 24 +- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1rhertz
17 Nov 24 +- Re: Want to prove E=mc?? University labs should try this!1J. J. Lodder
11 Dec 24 `- Re: Want to prove E=mc²? University labs should try this!1LaurenceClarkCrossen
6 Dec 24 o Re: if physics is dead1Bertietaylor
5 Dec 24 o Re: will trump have the balls....1Bertietaylor
4 Dec 24 o Happy holidays, y'all!1greysky
12 Nov 24 * The Universe Is Not A Sphere23LaurenceClarkCrossen
12 Nov 24 +* Re: The Universe Is Not A Sphere15rhertz
12 Nov 24 i+* Re: The Universe Is Not A Sphere13LaurenceClarkCrossen
13 Nov 24 ii+* Re: The Universe Is Not A Sphere9Ross Finlayson
13 Nov 24 iii+- Re: The Universe Is Not A Sphere1LaurenceClarkCrossen
24 Nov 24 iii`* Re: The Universe Is Not A Sphere7J. J. Lodder
24 Nov 24 iii `* Re: The Universe Is Not A Sphere6Ross Finlayson
24 Nov 24 iii  +- Re: The Universe Is Not A Sphere1Ross Finlayson
26 Nov 24 iii  `* Re: The Universe Is Not A Sphere4Thomas Heger
27 Nov 24 iii   `* Re: The Universe Is Not A Sphere (continuous domain, infinity and laws of large numbers)3Ross Finlayson
27 Nov 24 iii    `* Re: The Universe Is Not A Sphere (continuous domain, infinity and laws of large numbers)2Ross Finlayson
28 Nov 24 iii     `- Re: The Universe Is Not A Sphere (continuous domain, infinity and laws of large numbers)1Ross Finlayson
29 Nov 24 ii`* Re: The Universe Is Not A Sphere3J. J. Lodder
29 Nov 24 ii `* Re: The Universe Is Not A Sphere (doubling spaces, pi ratio spaces)2Ross Finlayson
29 Nov 24 ii  `- Re: The Universe Is Not A Sphere (doubling spaces, pi ratio spaces)1Ross Finlayson
13 Nov 24 i`- Re: The Universe Is Not A Sphere1LaurenceClarkCrossen
13 Nov 24 +* Re: The Universe Is Not A Sphere6Mikko
13 Nov 24 i+- Re: The Universe Is Not A Sphere1Maciej Wozniak
13 Nov 24 i+* Re: The Universe Is Not A Sphere2LaurenceClarkCrossen
14 Nov 24 ii`- Re: The Universe Is Not A Sphere1Mikko
14 Nov 24 i+- Re: The Universe Is Not A Sphere1LaurenceClarkCrossen
14 Nov 24 i`- Re: The Universe Is Not A Sphere1LaurenceClarkCrossen
24 Nov 24 `- Re: The Universe Is Not A Sphere1Bertietaylor
29 Nov 24 * Re: will trump have the balls....5Bertietaylor
29 Nov 24 `* Re: will trump have the balls....4Jim Pennino
29 Nov 24  `* Re: will trump have the balls....3wugi
29 Nov 24   `* Re: will trump have the balls....2Bertietaylor
29 Nov 24    `- Re: will trump have the balls....1Jim Pennino
17 Nov 24 * Arindam's latest invention - a new method for marine propulsion7Bertietaylor
17 Nov 24 +- Re: Arindam's latest invention - a new method for marine propulsion1Jim Pennino
19 Nov 24 +- Re: Arindam's latest invention - a new method for marine propulsion1bertietaylor
20 Nov 24 +* Re: Arindam's latest invention - a new method for marine propulsion2Bertietaylor
20 Nov 24 i`- Re: Arindam's latest invention - a new method for marine propulsion1Bertietaylor
28 Nov 24 `* Re: Arindam's latest invention - a new method for marine propulsion2bertietaylor
29 Nov 24  `- Re: Arindam's latest invention - a new method for marine propulsion1Bertietaylor
24 Nov 24 * Be scary! AI answer its evolution by 2026 (only 2 more years)3rhertz
24 Nov 24 +- Re: Be scary! AI answer its evolution by 2026 (only 2 more years)1rhertz
27 Nov 24 `- Re: Be scary! AI answer its evolution by 2026 (only 2 more years)1jojo
27 Nov 24 o A short proof of the inconsistency of the mumble of your idiot guru1Maciej Wozniak
26 Nov 24 o Re: will trump have the balls....1Jim Pennino
19 Nov 24 * Relativity claims the corona is too thin to refract enough to curve starlight.19LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Nov 24 +* Re: Relativity claims the corona is too thin to refract enough to curve starlight.13ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
19 Nov 24 i+* Re: Relativity claims the corona is too thin to refract enough to curve starlight.11rhertz
19 Nov 24 ii+- Re: Relativity claims the corona is too thin to refract enough to curve starlight.1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
19 Nov 24 ii`* Re: Relativity claims the corona is too thin to refract enough to curve starlight.9LaurenceClarkCrossen
20 Nov 24 ii `* Re: Relativity claims the corona is too thin to refract enough to curve starlight.8rhertz
20 Nov 24 ii  +- Re: Relativity claims the corona is too thin to refract enough to curve starlight.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
21 Nov 24 ii  +- Re: Relativity claims the corona is too thin to refract enough to curve starlight.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
21 Nov 24 ii  +- Re: Relativity claims the corona is too thin to refract enough to curve starlight.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
23 Nov 24 ii  `* Re: Relativity claims the corona is too thin to refract enough to curve starlight.4ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
23 Nov 24 ii   +- Re: Relativity claims the corona is too thin to refract enough to curve starlight.1Maciej Wozniak
23 Nov 24 ii   `* Re: Relativity claims the corona is too thin to refract enough to curve starlight.2Ross Finlayson
23 Nov 24 ii    `- Re: Relativity claims the corona is too thin to refract enough to curve starlight.1Ross Finlayson
19 Nov 24 i`- Re: Relativity claims the corona is too thin to refract enough to curve starlight.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
20 Nov 24 `* Re: Relativity claims the corona is too thin to refract enough to curve starlight.5jojo
20 Nov 24  `* Re: Relativity claims the corona is too thin to refract enough to curve starlight.4LaurenceClarkCrossen
21 Nov 24   +- Re: Relativity claims the corona is too thin to refract enough to curve starlight.1jojo
23 Nov 24   `* Re: Relativity claims the corona is too thin to refract enough to curve starlight.2Mikko
23 Nov 24    `- Re: Relativity claims the corona is too thin to refract enough to curve starlight.1J. J. Lodder
19 Nov 24 * Relativity has proven the Ether!17LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Nov 24 +* Re: Relativity has proven the Ether!13Maciej Wozniak
19 Nov 24 i+* Re: Relativity has proven the Ether!10LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Nov 24 ii`* Re: Relativity has proven the Ether!9Maciej Wozniak
19 Nov 24 ii `* Re: Relativity has proven the Ether!8LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Nov 24 ii  `* Re: Relativity has proven the Ether!7Ross Finlayson
20 Nov 24 ii   `* Re: Relativity has proven the Ether!6LaurenceClarkCrossen
20 Nov 24 ii    `* Re: Relativity has proven the Ether!5Ross Finlayson
20 Nov 24 ii     +* Re: Relativity has proven the Ether!3Ross Finlayson
20 Nov 24 ii     i+- Re: Relativity has proven the Ether!1Ross Finlayson
21 Nov 24 ii     i`- Re: Relativity has proven the Ether!1LaurenceClarkCrossen
21 Nov 24 ii     `- Re: Relativity has proven the Ether!1LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Nov 24 i+- Re: Relativity has proven the Ether!1LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Nov 24 i`- Re: Relativity has proven the Ether!1LaurenceClarkCrossen
20 Nov 24 `* Re: Relativity has proven the Ether!3Mikko
21 Nov 24  `* Re: Relativity has proven the Ether!2LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Nov 24   `- Re: Relativity has proven the Ether!1Mikko
13 Nov 24 * Wikipedia crackpottey24Athel Cornish-Bowden
13 Nov 24 +* Re: Wikipedia crackpottey15ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
13 Nov 24 i+* Re: Wikipedia crackpottey3gharnagel
13 Nov 24 ii`* Re: Wikipedia crackpottey2J. J. Lodder
14 Nov 24 ii `- Re: Wikipedia crackpottey1bertietaylor
13 Nov 24 i+* Re: Wikipedia crackpottey2Ross Finlayson
13 Nov 24 ii`- Re: Wikipedia crackpottey1rhertz
13 Nov 24 i+* Re: Wikipedia crackpottey8J. J. Lodder
14 Nov 24 ii`* Re: Wikipedia crackpottey7ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
14 Nov 24 ii `* Re: Wikipedia crackpottey6J. J. Lodder
14 Nov 24 ii  +- Re: Wikipedia crackpottey1Athel Cornish-Bowden
14 Nov 24 ii  +* Re: Wikipedia crackpottey3rhertz
14 Nov 24 ii  i+- Revolutionary act1Richard Hachel
14 Nov 24 ii  i`- Re: Wikipedia crackpottey1Ross Finlayson
16 Nov 24 ii  `- Re: Wikipedia crackpottey1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
20 Nov 24 i`- Re: Wikipedia crackpottey1Aether Regained
13 Nov 24 +* Re: Wikipedia crackpottey7bertietaylor
13 Nov 24 i`* Re: Wikipedia crackpottey6Ross Finlayson
14 Nov 24 i `* Re: Wikipedia crackpottey5bertietaylor
14 Nov 24 i  `* Re: Wikipedia crackpottey4Ross Finlayson
15 Nov 24 i   `* Re: Wikipedia crackpottey3Bertietaylor
15 Nov 24 i    `* Re: Wikipedia crackpottey2Ross Finlayson
22 Nov 24 i     `- Re: Wikipedia crackpottey1Bertietaylor
13 Nov 24 `- Re: Wikipedia crackpottey1J. J. Lodder
20 Nov 24 * Paul Anderson Claims to Save the Ether From the Null Result!5LaurenceClarkCrossen
20 Nov 24 +* Re: Paul Anderson Claims to Save the Ether From the Null Result!3LaurenceClarkCrossen
20 Nov 24 i`* Re: Paul Anderson Claims to Save the Ether From the Null Result!2Richard Hachel
20 Nov 24 i `- Re: Paul Anderson Claims to Save the Ether From the Null Result!1LaurenceClarkCrossen
20 Nov 24 `- Re: Paul Anderson Claims to Save the Ether From the Null Result!1jojo
17 Nov 24 * Is Curved Space An Improvement Over The Use of the Concept of Forces?7LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Nov 24 `* Re: Is Curved Space An Improvement Over The Use of the Concept of Forces?6ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
17 Nov 24  +* Re: Is Curved Space An Improvement Over The Use of the Concept of Forces?4Ross Finlayson
17 Nov 24  i`* Re: Is Curved Space An Improvement Over The Use of the Concept of Forces?3Ross Finlayson
17 Nov 24  i `* Re: Is Curved Space An Improvement Over The Use of the Concept of Forces?2Ross Finlayson
18 Nov 24  i  `- Language of Philosophy of Science? LoL (Was: Is Curved Space An Improvement Over The Use of the Concept of Forces?)1Mild Shock
20 Nov 24  `- Re: Is Curved Space An Improvement Over The Use of the Concept of Forces?1LaurenceClarkCrossen
18 Nov 24 * Why can't relativists understand this?15LaurenceClarkCrossen
18 Nov 24 +* Re: Why can't relativists understand this?6ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
18 Nov 24 i+- Re: Why can't relativists understand this?1LaurenceClarkCrossen
18 Nov 24 i+- Re: Why can't relativists understand this?1LaurenceClarkCrossen
18 Nov 24 i+- Re: Why can't relativists understand this?1Richard Hachel
18 Nov 24 i+- Re: Why can't relativists understand this?1LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Nov 24 i`- Re: Why can't relativists understand this?1Maciej Wozniak
19 Nov 24 +* Re: Why can't relativists understand this?3Richard Hachel
19 Nov 24 i`* Re: Why can't relativists understand this?2LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Nov 24 i `- Re: Why can't relativists understand this?1Richard Hachel
19 Nov 24 +* Re: Why can't relativists understand this?3Mikko
19 Nov 24 i+- Re: Why can't relativists understand this?1LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Nov 24 i`- Re: Why can't relativists understand this?1LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Nov 24 +- Re: Why can't relativists understand this?1LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Nov 24 `- Re: Why can't relativists understand this?1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Nov 24 * Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light37LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Nov 24 +* Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light3gharnagel
16 Nov 24 i`* Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light2LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Nov 24 i `- Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light1gharnagel
16 Nov 24 +* Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light11J. J. Lodder
16 Nov 24 i+- Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light1Maciej Wozniak
16 Nov 24 i+* Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light2LaurenceClarkCrossen
18 Nov 24 ii`- Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light1J. J. Lodder
16 Nov 24 i`* Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light7LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Nov 24 i +* Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light3Mikko
17 Nov 24 i i`* Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light2LaurenceClarkCrossen
18 Nov 24 i i `- Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light1Mikko
17 Nov 24 i `* Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light3J. J. Lodder
17 Nov 24 i  `* Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light2LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Nov 24 i   `- Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light1J. J. Lodder
17 Nov 24 `* Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light22Mikko
17 Nov 24  +- Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light1Maciej Wozniak
17 Nov 24  +* Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light11J. J. Lodder
17 Nov 24  i+* Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light4ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
17 Nov 24  ii+- Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light1Ross Finlayson
17 Nov 24  ii+- Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light1J. J. Lodder
17 Nov 24  ii`- Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light1Maciej Wozniak
17 Nov 24  i+- Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light1Ross Finlayson
18 Nov 24  i`* Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light5Mikko
19 Nov 24  i `* Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light4J. J. Lodder
19 Nov 24  i  +- Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light1Maciej Wozniak
19 Nov 24  i  `* Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light2Ross Finlayson
19 Nov 24  i   `- Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light1Ross Finlayson
17 Nov 24  +* Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light5LaurenceClarkCrossen
18 Nov 24  i`* Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light4Mikko
18 Nov 24  i `* Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light3J. J. Lodder
18 Nov 24  i  +- Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light1Ross Finlayson
18 Nov 24  i  `- Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light1Maciej Wozniak
17 Nov 24  +- Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light1LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Nov 24  +- Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light1LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Nov 24  +- Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light1LaurenceClarkCrossen
18 Nov 24  `- Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light1Thomas Heger
6 Nov 24 * General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.41LaurenceClarkCrossen
6 Nov 24 +* Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.11Ross Finlayson
6 Nov 24 i+* Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.8LaurenceClarkCrossen
12 Nov 24 ii`* Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.7JanPB
12 Nov 24 ii +- Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.1Ross Finlayson
13 Nov 24 ii `* Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.5J. J. Lodder
13 Nov 24 ii  +* Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
14 Nov 24 ii  i`- Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.1J. J. Lodder
13 Nov 24 ii  +- Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.1Ross Finlayson
13 Nov 24 ii  `- Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.1Maciej Wozniak
7 Nov 24 i`* Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
7 Nov 24 i `- Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.1Ross Finlayson
6 Nov 24 +* Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.7LaurenceClarkCrossen
6 Nov 24 i`* Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.6Ross Finlayson
7 Nov 24 i `* Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.5LaurenceClarkCrossen
7 Nov 24 i  +- Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.1Ross Finlayson
12 Nov 24 i  `* Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.3JanPB
13 Nov 24 i   `* Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
13 Nov 24 i    `- Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.1Ross Finlayson
12 Nov 24 +* Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.2JanPB
12 Nov 24 i`- Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.1Maciej Wozniak
13 Nov 24 +* Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.17LaurenceClarkCrossen
13 Nov 24 i+* Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.15LaurenceClarkCrossen
14 Nov 24 ii+- Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.1Maciej Wozniak
14 Nov 24 ii+* Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Nov 24 iii`- Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.1Paul.B.Andersen
14 Nov 24 ii+* Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.4LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Nov 24 iii`* Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.3Ross Finlayson
15 Nov 24 iii `* Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.2Ross Finlayson
16 Nov 24 iii  `- Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.1Ross Finlayson
15 Nov 24 ii+* Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.6LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Nov 24 iii+* Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.4LaurenceClarkCrossen
16 Nov 24 iiii`* Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.3LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Nov 24 iiii `* Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
17 Nov 24 iiii  `- Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.1Maciej Wozniak
15 Nov 24 iii`- Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Nov 24 ii`- Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
13 Nov 24 i`- Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
13 Nov 24 `* Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.3Sylvia Else
13 Nov 24  +- Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.1Maciej Wozniak
13 Nov 24  `- Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.1Richard Hachel
16 Nov 24 * Announcing A Safe Space for Relativists!3LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Nov 24 +- Re: Announcing A Safe Space for Relativists!1Mikko
17 Nov 24 `- Re: Announcing A Safe Space for Relativists!1J. J. Lodder
16 Nov 24 * XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?18rhertz
16 Nov 24 +* Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?6Ross Finlayson
16 Nov 24 i`* Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?5rhertz
16 Nov 24 i +- Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?1rhertz

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal