sci.physics.relativity

Liste des Groupes Pages :123456789101112131415161718192021222324
Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Jul 24 i  i      +- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Maciej Wozniak
4 Jul 24 i  i      +* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.11Ross Finlayson
5 Jul 24 i  i      i`* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.10J. J. Lodder
6 Jul 24 i  i      i `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.9Ross Finlayson
6 Jul 24 i  i      i  `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.8J. J. Lodder
7 Jul 24 i  i      i   `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.7Ross Finlayson
7 Jul 24 i  i      i    `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.6J. J. Lodder
7 Jul 24 i  i      i     `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.5Ross Finlayson
8 Jul 24 i  i      i      `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.4J. J. Lodder
8 Jul 24 i  i      i       `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.3Ross Finlayson
10 Jul 24 i  i      i        `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.2J. J. Lodder
10 Jul 24 i  i      i         `- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Ross Finlayson
5 Jul 24 i  i      `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.8Leolin Balakirev
6 Jul 24 i  i       `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.7bertietaylor
6 Jul 24 i  i        `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.6Thomas Heger
6 Jul 24 i  i         +* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.4Richard Hachel
6 Jul 24 i  i         i+- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Ross Finlayson
7 Jul 24 i  i         i`* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.2Thomas Heger
7 Jul 24 i  i         i `- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Richard Hachel
6 Jul 24 i  i         `- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1bertietaylor
23 Jun 24 i  `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.2Ross Finlayson
23 Jun 24 i   `- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Rollie Kokoris Lao
24 Jun 24 `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.3JanPB
25 Jun 24  `* Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.2Ross Finlayson
25 Jun 24   `- Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.1Ross Finlayson
10 Jul 24 o Twin's star vision correctly explaned (Langevin's paradox)1Richard Hachel
10 Jul 24 o Langevin's treveler1Richard Hachel
8 Jul 24 * Proper time differences9Stefan Ram
8 Jul 24 +- Re: Proper time differences1Richard Hachel
8 Jul 24 +- Re: Proper time differences1Richard Hachel
8 Jul 24 +* Re: Proper time differences3Mikko
8 Jul 24 i+- Re: Proper time differences1Stefan Ram
8 Jul 24 i`- Re: Proper time differences1Richard Hachel
9 Jul 24 `* Re: Proper time differences3Sylvia Else
9 Jul 24  +- Re: Proper time differences1Richard Hachel
9 Jul 24  `- Re: Proper time differences1Richard Hachel
29 Jun 24 * Einstein's second mass-energy formula m'/m = e/c^210Ross Finlayson
29 Jun 24 +* Re: Einstein's second mass-energy formula m'/m = e/c^28Ross Finlayson
29 Jun 24 i`* Re: Einstein's second mass-energy formula m'/m = e/c^27Ross Finlayson
29 Jun 24 i +* Re: Einstein's second mass-energy formula m'/m = e/c^25Maciej Wozniak
29 Jun 24 i i+* Re: Einstein's second mass-energy formula m'/m = e/c^23Ross Finlayson
29 Jun 24 i ii`* Re: Einstein's second mass-energy formula m'/m = e/c^22Ross Finlayson
29 Jun 24 i ii `- Re: Einstein's second mass-energy formula m'/m = e/c^21Maciej Wozniak
29 Jun 24 i i`- Re: Einstein's second mass-energy formula m'/m = e/c^21Blass Andronov Yin
9 Jul 24 i `- Re: Einstein's second mass-energy formula m'/m = e/c^21Ross Finlayson
29 Jun 24 `- Re: Einstein's second mass-energy formula m'/m = e/c^21Maciej Wozniak
3 Jul 24 * The purpose of science28Maciej Wozniak
3 Jul 24 +* Re: The purpose of science12gharnagel
3 Jul 24 i+* Re: The purpose of science9Maciej Wozniak
3 Jul 24 ii`* Re: The purpose of science8gharnagel
3 Jul 24 ii +* Re: The purpose of science6gharnagel
3 Jul 24 ii i+- Re: The purpose of science1Bernabe Baráth Lim
3 Jul 24 ii i`* Re: The purpose of science4Maciej Wozniak
4 Jul 24 ii i `* Re: The purpose of science3gharnagel
4 Jul 24 ii i  `* Re: The purpose of science2Maciej Wozniak
4 Jul 24 ii i   `- Re: The purpose of science1gharnagel
4 Jul 24 ii `- Re: The purpose of science1Viahaul Turkov Yuan
4 Jul 24 i`* Re: The purpose of science2Oliber Kefalas Pian
4 Jul 24 i `- Re: The purpose of science1bertietaylor
4 Jul 24 +- Re: The purpose of science1bertietaylor
6 Jul 24 +* Re: The purpose of science13Thomas Heger
6 Jul 24 i`* Re: The purpose of science12Maciej Wozniak
6 Jul 24 i `* Re: The purpose of science11Thomas Heger
7 Jul 24 i  `* Re: The purpose of science10Thomas Heger
7 Jul 24 i   `* Re: The purpose of science9Maciej Wozniak
7 Jul 24 i    `* Re: The purpose of science8Maciej Wozniak
7 Jul 24 i     `* Re: The purpose of science7gharnagel
8 Jul 24 i      `* Re: The purpose of science6gharnagel
8 Jul 24 i       `* Re: The purpose of science5Maciej Wozniak
8 Jul 24 i        `* Re: The purpose of science4gharnagel
8 Jul 24 i         `* Re: The purpose of science3Maciej Wozniak
8 Jul 24 i          `* Re: The purpose of science2gharnagel
8 Jul 24 i           `- Re: The purpose of science1Maciej Wozniak
6 Jul 24 `- Re: The purpose of science1Maciej Wozniak
28 Jun 24 * In relativity "s" is for "spin"26LaurenceClarkCrossen
28 Jun 24 +* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"6LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Jul 24 i`* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"5bertietaylor
2 Jul 24 i +* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"2Turkul Julidov Seto
3 Jul 24 i i`- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1bertietaylor
7 Jul 24 i `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"2Volney
7 Jul 24 i  `- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Hassell Bakunov
29 Jun 24 +- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Mayker Belgibaev
29 Jun 24 +* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"17Mikko
29 Jun 24 i+- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Maciej Wozniak
29 Jun 24 i`* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"15LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 Jun 24 i +- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Kennedy Barabás Hor
30 Jun 24 i `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"13Mikko
30 Jun 24 i  +* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"2J. J. Lodder
1 Jul 24 i  i`- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Maciej Wozniak
1 Jul 24 i  `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"10LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Jul 24 i   `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"9J. J. Lodder
2 Jul 24 i    `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"8Ross Finlayson
2 Jul 24 i     +- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Maciej Wozniak
2 Jul 24 i     `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"6J. J. Lodder
2 Jul 24 i      `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"5Ross Finlayson
3 Jul 24 i       +- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Maciej Wozniak
3 Jul 24 i       `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"3J. J. Lodder
3 Jul 24 i        `* Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"2Ross Finlayson
4 Jul 24 i         `- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Ross Finlayson
29 Jun 24 `- Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"1Maciej Wozniak
3 Jul 24 * Schrödinger's E = ℎν heresy2Aether Regained
4 Jul 24 `- Re: Schrödinger's E = ℎν heresy1bertietaylor
2 Jul 24 * Re: Albert Einstein's movie2gharnagel
2 Jul 24 `- Re: Albert Einstein's movie1Rhett Csontos Kang
2 Jul 24 o Re: Albert Einstein's movie1bertietaylor
29 Jun 24 * REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:13LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 Jun 24 +* Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:3LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 Jun 24 i`* Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:2Ross Finlayson
30 Jun 24 i `- Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:1Ross Finlayson
30 Jun 24 `* Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:9Mikko
30 Jun 24  +- Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:1Maciej Wozniak
30 Jun 24  `* Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:7J. J. Lodder
30 Jun 24   +* Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:5LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Jul 24   i+- Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:1Clayburn Kalakos
1 Jul 24   i+- Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:1J. J. Lodder
2 Jul 24   i+- Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:1Ross Finlayson
2 Jul 24   i`- Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:1J. J. Lodder
1 Jul 24   `- Re: REASONS RELATIVISTS GIVE FOR DOUBLED DEFLECTION OF NEWTON'S:1Maciej Wozniak
24 May 24 * Location10neus
25 May 24 +- Re: Location1Mikko
26 May 24 +* Re: Location7Thomas Heger
27 May 24 i+* Re: Location3Thomas Heger
28 May 24 ii`* Re: Location2Thomas Heger
28 May 24 ii `- Re: Location1Dekota Bakaleinikov
27 May 24 i`* Re: Location3neus
28 May 24 i `* Re: Location2Maciej Wozniak
28 May 24 i  `- Re: Location1neus
30 Jun 24 `- Re: Location1neus
15 Jun 24 * Re: Space and spacetime108Roeidi Hegedüs
15 Jun 24 +* Re: Space and spacetime86Richard Hachel
15 Jun 24 i+* Re: Space and spacetime22Python
15 Jun 24 ii+* Re: Space and spacetime9Maciej Wozniak
15 Jun 24 iii`* Re: Space and spacetime8Python
15 Jun 24 iii +- Re: Space and spacetime1Maciej Wozniak
15 Jun 24 iii `* Re: Space and spacetime6Richard Hachel
15 Jun 24 iii  +* Re: Space and spacetime4Python
15 Jun 24 iii  i`* Re: Space and spacetime3Richard Hachel
16 Jun 24 iii  i `* Re: Space and spacetime2Alejandro Ślązak Mei
16 Jun 24 iii  i  `- Re: Space and spacetime1Moebius
16 Jun 24 iii  `- Re: Space and spacetime1Kory Muksinov Mak
15 Jun 24 ii`* Re: Space and spacetime12Richard Hachel
15 Jun 24 ii `* Re: Space and spacetime11Python
15 Jun 24 ii  +* Re: Space and spacetime9Python
16 Jun 24 ii  i`* Re: Space and spacetime8Maciej Wozniak
16 Jun 24 ii  i +- Re: Space and spacetime1Darin Stamatelos Zhai
16 Jun 24 ii  i `* Re: Space and spacetime6gharnagel
16 Jun 24 ii  i  +* Re: Space and spacetime2Osmel Pásztor Woo
22 Jun 24 ii  i  i`- Re: Space and spacetime1bertietaylor
16 Jun 24 ii  i  `* Re: Space and spacetime3Maciej Wozniak
17 Jun 24 ii  i   `* Re: Space and spacetime2gharnagel
17 Jun 24 ii  i    `- Re: Space and spacetime1Maciej Wozniak
15 Jun 24 ii  `- Re: Space and spacetime1Richard Hachel
16 Jun 24 i`* Re: Space and spacetime63JanPB
16 Jun 24 i +* Re: Space and spacetime61Richard Hachel
17 Jun 24 i i`* Re: Space and spacetime60Athel Cornish-Bowden
17 Jun 24 i i `* Re: Space and spacetime59Richard Hachel
18 Jun 24 i i  `* Re: Space and spacetime58gharnagel
18 Jun 24 i i   +- Re: Space and spacetime1Maciej Wozniak
18 Jun 24 i i   `* Re: Space and spacetime56Richard Hachel
18 Jun 24 i i    `* Re: Space and spacetime55Maciej Wozniak
18 Jun 24 i i     `* Re: Space and spacetime54gharnagel
18 Jun 24 i i      +* Re: Space and spacetime50Maciej Wozniak
18 Jun 24 i i      i+- Re: Space and spacetime1Python
18 Jun 24 i i      i`* Re: Space and spacetime48gharnagel
18 Jun 24 i i      i `* Re: Space and spacetime47gharnagel
19 Jun 24 i i      i  `* Re: Space and spacetime46Maciej Wozniak
19 Jun 24 i i      i   `* Re: Space and spacetime45gharnagel
19 Jun 24 i i      i    `* Re: Space and spacetime44Maciej Wozniak
19 Jun 24 i i      i     `* Re: Space and spacetime43gharnagel
20 Jun 24 i i      i      `* Re: Space and spacetime42gharnagel
20 Jun 24 i i      i       `* Re: Space and spacetime41gharnagel
20 Jun 24 i i      i        `* Re: Space and spacetime40Maciej Wozniak
20 Jun 24 i i      i         `* Re: Space and spacetime39gharnagel
20 Jun 24 i i      i          +* Re: Space and spacetime37Maciej Wozniak
20 Jun 24 i i      i          i`* Re: Space and spacetime36gharnagel
20 Jun 24 i i      i          i +* Re: Space and spacetime34Maciej Wozniak
21 Jun 24 i i      i          i i+* Re: Space and spacetime30gharnagel
21 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii`* Re: Space and spacetime29Maciej Wozniak
21 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii +* Re: Space and spacetime27gharnagel
21 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i`* Re: Space and spacetime26Maciej Wozniak
21 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i `* Re: Space and spacetime25gharnagel
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  +* Re: Space and spacetime23Maciej Wozniak
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i`* Re: Space and spacetime22gharnagel
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i `* Re: Space and spacetime21Maciej Wozniak
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i  `* Re: Space and spacetime20gharnagel
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i   `* Re: Space and spacetime19Maciej Wozniak
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i    `* Re: Space and spacetime18gharnagel
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i     `* Re: Space and spacetime17Maciej Wozniak
23 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i      `* Re: Space and spacetime16gharnagel
23 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       +* Re: Space and spacetime14Maciej Wozniak
23 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i`* Re: Space and spacetime13gharnagel
23 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i +* Re: Space and spacetime11Maciej Wozniak
23 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i i`* Re: Space and spacetime10gharnagel
23 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i i `* Re: Space and spacetime9gharnagel
24 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i i  `* Re: Space and spacetime8Maciej Wozniak
24 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i i   +- Re: Space and spacetime1Hugo Madarász Hew
24 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i i   `* Re: Space and spacetime6gharnagel
24 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i i    `* Re: Space and spacetime5gharnagel
24 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i i     `* Re: Space and spacetime4Maciej Wozniak
24 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i i      `* Re: Space and spacetime3gharnagel
24 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i i       `* Re: Space and spacetime2Maciej Wozniak
25 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i i        `- Re: Space and spacetime1gharnagel
23 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       i `- Re: Space and spacetime1Ommy Vadász
23 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  i       `- Re: Space and spacetime1Dieter Bakhmatov Bian
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii i  `- Re: Space and spacetime1Nestor Evelina Fei
21 Jun 24 i i      i          i ii `- Re: Space and spacetime1Jerid Tsapaev Zhui
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i i`* Re: Space and spacetime3Volney
26 Jun 24 i i      i          i i +- Re: Space and spacetime1Zackery Dudunov
26 Jun 24 i i      i          i i `- Re: Space and spacetime1Westley Wojewódzki
22 Jun 24 i i      i          i `- Re: Space and spacetime1Malvin Deangela
20 Jun 24 i i      i          `- Re: Space and spacetime1Richard Hachel
18 Jun 24 i i      +* Re: Space and spacetime2Richard Hachel
19 Jun 24 i i      i`- Re: Space and spacetime1Moody Slootmaekers Hong
18 Jun 24 i i      `- Re: Space and spacetime1Richard Hachel
17 Jun 24 i `- Re: Space and spacetime1Jassen Christakos
27 Jun 24 `* Re: Space and spacetime21bertietaylor
27 Jun 24  `* Re: Space and spacetime20Volney
27 Jun 24   +- Re: Space and spacetime1Arindam Banerjee
27 Jun 24   +* Re: Space and spacetime2Arindam Banerjee
27 Jun 24   i`- Re: Space and spacetime1Arindam Banerjee
27 Jun 24   +* Re: Space and spacetime6Maciej Wozniak
28 Jun 24   i`* Re: Space and spacetime5bertietaylor
28 Jun 24   i `* Re: Space and spacetime4Beuford Turarov
28 Jun 24   i  `* Re: Space and spacetime3bertietaylor
29 Jun 24   i   `* Re: Space and spacetime2nisha parveen
29 Jun 24   i    `- Re: Space and spacetime1bertietaylor
27 Jun 24   +* Re: Space and spacetime7Jim Pennino
30 Jun 24   i`* Re: Space and spacetime6Arindam Banerjee
30 Jun 24   i +* Re: Space and spacetime4gharnagel
30 Jun 24   i i+- Re: Space and spacetime1Jim Pennino
30 Jun 24   i i`* Re: Space and spacetime2bertietaylor
30 Jun 24   i i `- Re: Space and spacetime1bertietaylor
30 Jun 24   i `- Re: Space and spacetime1Jim Pennino
27 Jun 24   +- Re: Space and spacetime1Harlie Paraskos
27 Jun 24   +- Re: Space and spacetime1Baudilio Ibáñez Lang
27 Jun 24   `- Re: Space and spacetime1Bubba Romão Mao
12 Apr 24 * On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics51Aether Regained
22 Apr 24 +* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics8Aether Regained
27 Apr 24 i`* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics7bertietaylor
30 Apr 24 i `* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics6Aether Regained
1 May 24 i  `* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics5bertietaylor
1 May 24 i   `* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics4Volney
1 May 24 i    +* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics2Athel Cornish-Bowden
1 May 24 i    i`- Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics1bertietaylor
1 May 24 i    `- Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics1bertietaylor
22 Apr 24 +- Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics1J. J. Lodder
27 Apr 24 `* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics41bertietaylor
27 Apr 24  +- Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics1Arindam Banerjee
27 Apr 24  `* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics39J. J. Lodder
27 Apr 24   +* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics5Arindam Banerjee

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal