sci.math

Liste des Groupes Pages :12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334
Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii                     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)23Jim Burns
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii                      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)22WM
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii                       +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)20Jim Burns
6 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii                       i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)19WM
6 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii                       i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)18FromTheRafters
6 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii                       i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)17WM
6 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii                       i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)16FromTheRafters
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii                       i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)15WM
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii                       i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)14FromTheRafters
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii                       i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)13WM
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii                       i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)12FromTheRafters
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii                       i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)11WM
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii                       i         +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3FromTheRafters
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii                       i         i+- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
7 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii                       i         i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
8 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii                       i         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7Richard Damon
8 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii                       i          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6WM
8 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii                       i           `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5Richard Damon
8 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii                       i            `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4WM
9 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii                       i             `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Richard Damon
9 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii                       i              `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
9 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii                       i               `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
5 Jan 25  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          ii                       `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
22 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Richard Damon
22 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
22 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
22 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           i          `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
18 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i i                           `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1FromTheRafters
9 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)9joes
9 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i  +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Python
9 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i  +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
9 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6WM
10 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5joes
10 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2FromTheRafters
11 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i    i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (not extra-ordinary, fragments)1Ross Finlayson
11 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
14 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii i     `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
9 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          ii `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
8 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          i+- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
8 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3joes
8 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
9 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
10 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (not extra-ordinary, fragments)2Ross Finlayson
10 Dec 24  ii    i        i    iii           `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (not extra-ordinary, fragments)1Ross Finlayson
4 Dec 24  ii    i        i    ii`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2FromTheRafters
5 Dec 24  ii    i        i    ii `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
4 Dec 24  ii    i        i    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8Ross Finlayson
4 Dec 24  ii    i        i    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7FromTheRafters
4 Dec 24  ii    i        i    i  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5Chris M. Thomasson
5 Dec 24  ii    i        i    i  i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4FromTheRafters
5 Dec 24  ii    i        i    i  i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Ross Finlayson
5 Dec 24  ii    i        i    i  i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Chris M. Thomasson
5 Dec 24  ii    i        i    i  i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
5 Dec 24  ii    i        i    i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
4 Dec 24  ii    i        i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4joes
4 Dec 24  ii    i        i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
4 Dec 24  ii    i        i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
5 Dec 24  ii    i        i       `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
2 Dec 24  ii    i        +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Jim Burns
3 Dec 24  ii    i        `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
29 Nov 24  ii    `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
29 Nov 24  i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7Jim Burns
29 Nov 24  i +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, ordinary 'cardinoids')1Ross Finlayson
29 Nov 24  i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
29 Nov 24  i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4Jim Burns
29 Nov 24  i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
29 Nov 24  i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Jim Burns
29 Nov 24  i     `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
28 Nov 24  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
26 Jan 25 * The singularity is at the end of the rainbow3Mild Shock
27 Jan 25 `* Are immortal brains such as ChatGPT LLM the singularity? (Re: The singularity is at the end of the rainbow)2Mild Shock
27 Jan 25  `- HG2G: If there was singularity there will be signs (Re: Are immortal brains such as ChatGPT LLM the singularity?)1Mild Shock
1 Jan 25 * Re: Mathematics and the singularity, let's discuss it2Ross Finlayson
27 Jan 25 `- Roger Penrose versus Roy Kerr (Was: Mathematics and the singularity, let's discuss it)1Mild Shock
23 Jan 25 * More fun with fields...5Chris M. Thomasson
23 Jan 25 +- Re: More fun with fields...1Chris M. Thomasson
24 Jan 25 `* Re: More fun with fields...3Chris M. Thomasson
25 Jan 25  `* Re: More fun with fields...2FromTheRafters
25 Jan 25   `- Re: More fun with fields...1Chris M. Thomasson
22 Jan 25 o USA is still Shitting its Pants [Artificial Intelligence]1Mild Shock
22 Jan 25 * Roots of a second degree equation.3Richard Hachel
22 Jan 25 `* Re: Roots of a second degree equation.2Alan Mackenzie
22 Jan 25  `- Re: Roots of a second degree equation.1Moebius
18 Jan 25 * Secret Sauce of Dana Scott and Raymond Smullyan3Mild Shock
18 Jan 25 `* Philosophize not God, Philosophize the Door Knob (Re: Secret Sauce of Dana Scott and Raymond Smullyan)2Mild Shock
18 Jan 25  `- Foundations of Large Language Models (Re: Philosophize not God, Philosophize the Door Knob)1Mild Shock
18 Jan 25 * Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.3Richard Hachel
18 Jan 25 +- Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.1Maciej Wozniak
18 Jan 25 `- Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Jan 25 * What do you want to know about Trump?2Mild Shock
17 Jan 25 `- Blue Monday [Cliff Arnall] (Re: What do you want to know about Trump?)1Mild Shock
15 Dec 24 * Advent of Logic 2024: Weekend 16Mild Shock
15 Dec 24 +* Advent of Logic 2024: Weekend 2 (Was: Advent of Logic 2024: Weekend 1)3Mild Shock
15 Dec 24 i`* Advent of Logic 2024: Weekend 3 (Was: Advent of Logic 2024: Weekend 2)2Mild Shock
27 Dec 24 i `- 4th Family Member: Relevant Logic (Was: Advent of Logic 2024: Weekend 3)1Mild Shock
17 Jan 25 +- Re: Advent of Logic 2024: Weekend 11Mild Shock
17 Jan 25 `- Combinatorial Simple Typed Solution (Re: Advent of Logic 2024: Weekend 1)1Mild Shock
16 Jan 25 * Memory Powering the AI Revolution2Mild Shock
16 Jan 25 `- Re: Memory Powering the AI Revolution1Mild Shock
16 Jan 25 * Mathematicians are a bit strange ..4Peter Fairbrother
16 Jan 25 +* Re: Mathematicians are a bit strange ..2James Waldby
16 Jan 25 i`- Re: Mathematicians are a bit strange ..1James Waldby
16 Jan 25 `- Re: Mathematicians are a bit strange ..1Moebius
18 Nov 24 * Desmos 2024 Art Expo2sobriquet
16 Jan 25 `- Re: Desmos 2024 Art Expo1sobriquet
14 Jan 25 * Curry Prolog visualized [Julios Dream]3Mild Shock
14 Jan 25 `* Did you compare OpenAI to Anthropic (Re: Curry Prolog visualized [Julios Dream])2Mild Shock
14 Jan 25  `- First sign of AGI: OpenAI Job listings gone (Re: Did you compare OpenAI to Anthropic)1Mild Shock
12 Jan 25 * Doubly Infinite Strings.3me
12 Jan 25 +- Re: Doubly Infinite Strings.1Chris M. Thomasson
13 Jan 25 `- Re: Doubly Infinite Strings.1Mike Terry
11 Jan 25 * More fun with fields...5Chris M. Thomasson
11 Jan 25 `* Re: More fun with fields...4FromTheRafters
11 Jan 25  `* Re: More fun with fields...3Chris M. Thomasson
11 Jan 25   `* Re: More fun with fields...2Chris M. Thomasson
11 Jan 25    `- Re: More fun with fields...1Chris M. Thomasson
10 Jan 25 * Traditions die: Another one bites the Dust5Mild Shock
10 Jan 25 `* John Sowa is close with RNT (Re: Traditions die: Another one bites the Dust)4Mild Shock
10 Jan 25  `* Or ChatGPT is better in Program Verification (Re: John Sowa is close with RNT)3Mild Shock
11 Jan 25   `* What is Argonne doing now? (Re: Or ChatGPT is better in Program Verification)2Mild Shock
11 Jan 25    `- Lemanicus at EPFL Computer Museum [compare to NVIDIA H100 NVL]1Mild Shock
8 Jan 25 * Honoring Raymond Smullyan9Mild Shock
8 Jan 25 +* Re: Honoring Raymond Smullyan3Tom Bola
8 Jan 25 i`* For a 100th Time Fuck Stackexchange (Re: Honoring Raymond Smullyan)2Mild Shock
8 Jan 25 i `- Outdated Policy Nonsense by Stackexchange Farts (Was: For a 100th Time Fuck Stackexchange)1Mild Shock
9 Jan 25 `* RETRO Project Sebastian Borgeaud et al. - 7 Feb 2022 (Was: Honoring Raymond Smullyan)5Mild Shock
10 Jan 25  `* Prologers are hurt the most by LLMs (Re: RETRO Project Sebastian Borgeaud et al. - 7 Feb 2022)4Mild Shock
10 Jan 25   +* XAI is over and out (Re: Vectors are the new JSON)2Mild Shock
10 Jan 25   i`- Academia is retarded (Re: XAI is over and out)1Mild Shock
10 Jan 25   `- Vectors are the new JSON (Re: Prologers are hurt the most by LLMs)1Mild Shock
8 Jan 25 o Mathsbombe Competition 20251David Entwistle
6 Jan 25 * Heads will roll: AI means PANIC.3Mild Shock
6 Jan 25 `* Re: Heads will roll: AI means PANIC.2Mild Shock
6 Jan 25  `- Re: Heads will roll: AI means PANIC.1Moebius
4 Jan 25 * Was Poincare crushed by the New5Mild Shock
4 Jan 25 +* Re: Was Poincare crushed by the New2Mild Shock
4 Jan 25 i`- Re: Was Poincare crushed by the New1Mild Shock
6 Jan 25 +- NEW Logic versus OLD Logic (Re: Was Poincare crushed by the New)1Mild Shock
6 Jan 25 `- The current Sputnik Shock (Re: Was Poincare crushed by the New)1Mild Shock
5 Jan 25 o visual algebra1sobriquet
3 Jan 25 * Side Note, Why not DSLs? (Was: Chicken and egg, with curry?)5Mild Shock
3 Jan 25 `* Re: Side Note, Why not DSLs? (Was: Chicken and egg, with curry?)4Chris M. Thomasson
3 Jan 25  `* Re: Side Note, Why not DSLs? (Was: Chicken and egg, with curry?)3Mild Shock
3 Jan 25   `* How compile a DSL, does it need Types? (Re: Side Note, Why not DSLs?)2Mild Shock
3 Jan 25    `- Re: How compile a DSL, does it need Types? (Re: Side Note, Why not DSLs?)1Chris M. Thomasson
3 Jan 25 * NVIDIA Jetson Orin controlled by Prolog6Mild Shock
3 Jan 25 `* Linear Algebraic Approaches to Logic Programming (Re: NVIDIA Jetson Orin controlled by Prolog)5Mild Shock
5 Jan 25  `* The Emperor’s New Clothes [John Sowa] (Re: Linear Algebraic Approaches to Logic Programming)4Mild Shock
5 Jan 25   `* Re: The Emperor’s New Clothes [John Sowa] (Re: Linear Algebraic Approaches to Logic Programming)3Mild Shock
5 Jan 25    `* LLM versus CYC (Was: The Emperor’s New Clothes [John Sowa])2Mild Shock
5 Jan 25     `- Re: LLM versus CYC (Was: The Emperor’s New Clothes [John Sowa])1Mild Shock
1 Jan 25 * Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals, integer continuum, linear continuum, continuity)13Ross Finlayson
1 Jan 25 `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals, integer continuum, linear continuum, continuity)12Jim Burns
2 Jan 25  `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals, integer continuum, linear continuum, continuity)11Ross Finlayson
2 Jan 25   +* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals, integer continuum, linear continuum, continuity)4Ross Finlayson
2 Jan 25   i`* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals, integer continuum, linear continuum, continuity)3Jim Burns
2 Jan 25   i `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals, integer continuum, linear continuum, continuity)2Ross Finlayson
2 Jan 25   i  `- Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals, integer continuum, linear continuum, continuity)1Jim Burns
2 Jan 25   `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals, integer continuum, linear continuum, continuity)6Jim Burns
2 Jan 25    `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals, integer continuum, linear continuum, continuity)5Ross Finlayson
2 Jan 25     +* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals, integer continuum, linear continuum, continuity)2Ross Finlayson
3 Jan 25     i`- Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals, integer continuum, linear continuum, continuity)1Ross Finlayson
2 Jan 25     `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals, integer continuum, linear continuum, continuity)2Jim Burns
3 Jan 25      `- Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals, integer continuum, linear continuum, continuity)1Ross Finlayson
15 Dec 24 * Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)135joes
15 Dec 24 `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)134WM
15 Dec 24  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)133joes
16 Dec 24   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)132WM
16 Dec 24    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)14joes
16 Dec 24    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)13WM
16 Dec 24    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)12joes
16 Dec 24    i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)11WM
16 Dec 24    i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)10joes
17 Dec 24    i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)9WM
17 Dec 24    i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8Richard Damon
17 Dec 24    i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7WM
18 Dec 24    i       +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5joes
18 Dec 24    i       i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4WM
18 Dec 24    i       i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3joes
19 Dec 24    i       i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
26 Dec 24    i       i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
18 Dec 24    i       `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
17 Dec 24    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)117Richard Damon
17 Dec 24     +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
17 Dec 24     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)115WM
17 Dec 24      +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3FromTheRafters
17 Dec 24      i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
17 Dec 24      i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
17 Dec 24      +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)52Richard Damon
17 Dec 24      i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)51WM
18 Dec 24      i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)50Richard Damon
28 Dec 24      i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)49Chris M. Thomasson
28 Dec 24      i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)48Moebius
28 Dec 24      i    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)28Moebius
28 Dec 24      i    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)27Moebius
29 Dec 24      i    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)26WM
29 Dec 24      i    i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)25Chris M. Thomasson
29 Dec 24      i    i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)24Moebius
30 Dec 24      i    i    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)20WM
30 Dec 24      i    i    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)19joes
30 Dec 24      i    i    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)18WM
31 Dec 24      i    i    i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)17joes
31 Dec 24      i    i    i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)16WM
1 Jan 25      i    i    i    +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
1 Jan 25      i    i    i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)14FromTheRafters
2 Jan 25      i    i    i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)13WM
2 Jan 25      i    i    i      +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8Richard Damon
2 Jan 25      i    i    i      i+- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1FromTheRafters
2 Jan 25      i    i    i      i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6WM
2 Jan 25      i    i    i      i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5Richard Damon
3 Jan 25      i    i    i      i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4WM
3 Jan 25      i    i    i      i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
3 Jan 25      i    i    i      i   i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
3 Jan 25      i    i    i      i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
2 Jan 25      i    i    i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4FromTheRafters
3 Jan 25      i    i    i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Chris M. Thomasson
3 Jan 25      i    i    i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Moebius
3 Jan 25      i    i    i         `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1FromTheRafters
31 Dec 24      i    i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Moebius
31 Dec 24      i    i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
31 Dec 24      i    i      `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
28 Dec 24      i    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
28 Dec 24      i    i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Richard Damon
28 Dec 24      i    ii`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
28 Dec 24      i    ii `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
28 Dec 24      i    i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
28 Dec 24      i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)14WM
28 Dec 24      i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)13joes
29 Dec 24      i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)12WM
29 Dec 24      i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)11joes
29 Dec 24      i        +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
29 Dec 24      i        i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
29 Dec 24      i        i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
29 Dec 24      i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7Ross Finlayson
29 Dec 24      i         +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5Jim Burns
29 Dec 24      i         i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4Ross Finlayson
29 Dec 24      i         i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Jim Burns
30 Dec 24      i         i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Ross Finlayson
30 Dec 24      i         i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Jim Burns
29 Dec 24      i         `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
17 Dec 24      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)59joes
17 Dec 24       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)58WM
18 Dec 24        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)57Richard Damon
18 Dec 24         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)56WM
18 Dec 24          +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3joes
19 Dec 24          i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
26 Dec 24          i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
19 Dec 24          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)52Richard Damon
19 Dec 24           `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)51WM
19 Dec 24            +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal