comp.theory

Liste des GroupesPages :123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233
Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Fred. Zwarts
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Fred. Zwarts
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser31joes
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser30olcott
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Richard Damon
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser28joes
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i  `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser27olcott
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i   `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser26Fred. Zwarts
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i    `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Execution trace of simulating termination analyzer HHH on DDD input25olcott
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input10joes
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input9olcott
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input8Fred. Zwarts
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i  +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input3olcott
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i  i+- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input1Richard Damon
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i  i`- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input1Fred. Zwarts
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i  `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input4Mikko
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i   `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input3olcott
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i    +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input1Richard Damon
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     i    `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input1Fred. Zwarts
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Execution trace of simulating termination analyzer HHH on DDD input1Richard Damon
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i     `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Execution trace of simulating termination analyzer HHH on DDD input13Fred. Zwarts
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i      `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Execution trace of simulating termination analyzer HHH on DDD input12olcott
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i       +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Execution trace of simulating termination analyzer HHH on DDD input1Richard Damon
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i       +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Execution trace of simulating termination analyzer HHH on DDD input7Mikko
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i       i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Execution trace of simulating termination analyzer HHH on DDD input6olcott
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i       i +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Execution trace of simulating termination analyzer HHH on DDD input1Richard Damon
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i       i `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Execution trace of simulating termination analyzer HHH on DDD input4Fred. Zwarts
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i       i  `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Execution trace of simulating termination analyzer HHH on DDD input3olcott
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i       i   +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Execution trace of simulating termination analyzer HHH on DDD input1Fred. Zwarts
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i       i   `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Execution trace of simulating termination analyzer HHH on DDD input1Richard Damon
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i       `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Execution trace of simulating termination analyzer HHH on DDD input3Fred. Zwarts
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i        `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Execution trace of simulating termination analyzer HHH on DDD input2olcott
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   i         `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Execution trace of simulating termination analyzer HHH on DDD input1Richard Damon
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Richard Damon
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i   `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser19Mikko
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i    `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser18olcott
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i     +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Richard Damon
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i     `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser16Fred. Zwarts
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i      `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser15olcott
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i       +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser13Fred. Zwarts
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i       i`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser12olcott
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i       i +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser7Fred. Zwarts
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i       i i`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser6olcott
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i       i i `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser5Fred. Zwarts
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i       i i  `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser4olcott
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i       i i   `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser3Fred. Zwarts
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i       i i    `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser2olcott
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i       i i     `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Fred. Zwarts
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i       i `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser4Mikko
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i       i  `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser3olcott
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i       i   +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Richard Damon
30 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i       i   `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   i       `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Richard Damon
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i   `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser176joes
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i    +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser3olcott
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i    i+- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Richard Damon
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i    i`- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i    `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser172Ben Bacarisse
23 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Ben Bacarisse is the only one that understood ---2olcott
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i`- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Ben Bacarisse is the only one that understood ---1Richard Damon
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser142Mike Terry
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i+- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Mike Terry understands my code the best1olcott
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i+* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser4Mikko
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     ii+- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser1olcott
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     ii`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser2Mike Terry
24 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     ii `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- values denigration over truth1olcott
26 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i`* Re: V5 --- PO's trickery136Ben Bacarisse
26 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i +- Re: V5 --- PO's trickery1Python
26 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i +* Correcting misconceptions of Ben Bacarisse3olcott
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i i+- Re: Correcting misconceptions of Ben Bacarisse1Richard Damon
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i i`- Re: Correcting misconceptions of Ben Bacarisse1immibis
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i `* Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS131olcott
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  +* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders compute the mapping from inputs65joes
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i`* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders compute the mapping from inputs64olcott
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i +- Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders compute the mapping from inputs1Richard Damon
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i `* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders compute the mapping from inputs62Mikko
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i  `* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders compute the mapping from inputs61olcott
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i   +* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders compute the mapping from inputs4Fred. Zwarts
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i   i`* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders compute the mapping from inputs3olcott
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i   i +- Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders compute the mapping from inputs1Fred. Zwarts
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i   i `- Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders compute the mapping from inputs1Richard Damon
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i   +- Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders compute the mapping from inputs1Richard Damon
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i   `* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders compute the mapping from inputs55Mikko
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i    `* Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH54olcott
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i     +- Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH1Richard Damon
30 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i     `* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH52Mikko
31 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i      `* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH51olcott
31 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       +* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH46Fred. Zwarts
31 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i`* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH45olcott
31 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i +- Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH1Richard Damon
31 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i `* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH43Fred. Zwarts
31 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  +* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH38olcott
31 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i+- Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH1Richard Damon
1 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i`* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH36Fred. Zwarts
2 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i `* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH35olcott
2 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i  +- Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH1Richard Damon
2 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i  +- Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH1Fred. Zwarts
4 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i  `* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH32joes
4 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i   `* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH31olcott
5 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i    +- Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH1Richard Damon
5 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i    `* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH29Fred. Zwarts
5 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i     `* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH28olcott
5 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i      +* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH2joes
5 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i      i`- Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH1olcott
6 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i      +- Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH1Richard Damon
6 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i      `* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH24Fred. Zwarts
6 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i       `* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH23olcott
7 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i        +- Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH1Richard Damon
7 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i        `* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH21Fred. Zwarts
7 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i         `* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH20olcott
7 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i          +- Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH1Richard Damon
8 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i          +* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH17Mikko
8 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i          i`* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH --- Deception16olcott
8 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i          i +* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH --- Deception14Mikko
9 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i          i i`* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH --- Deception13olcott
10 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i          i i +- Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH --- Deception1Richard Damon
10 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i          i i +* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH --- Deception7Mikko
10 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i          i i i`* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH --- Deception6olcott
10 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i          i i i +* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH --- Deception4Richard Damon
11 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i          i i i i`* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH --- Moron or Liar ?3olcott
11 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i          i i i i +- Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH --- Moron or Liar ?1Fred. Zwarts
12 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i          i i i i `- Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH --- Moron or Liar ?1Richard Damon
11 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i          i i i `- Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH --- Deception1Mikko
10 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i          i i `* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH --- Deception4Fred. Zwarts
11 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i          i i  `* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH --- Deception3olcott
11 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i          i i   +- Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH --- Deception1Fred. Zwarts
12 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i          i i   `- Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH --- Deception1Richard Damon
8 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i          i `- Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH --- Deception1Richard Damon
8 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  i          `- Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH1Fred. Zwarts
1 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i  `* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH4Mikko
2 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i   `* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH3olcott
2 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i    +- Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH1Richard Damon
2 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       i    `- Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH1Fred. Zwarts
31 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       +- Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH1Richard Damon
1 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i       `* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH3Mikko
2 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i        `* Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH2olcott
2 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i  i         `- Re: Indirect Reference Changes the Behavior of DDD() relative to DDD emulated by HHH1Richard Damon
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  +* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS9Fred. Zwarts
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i`* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS8olcott
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i +- Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS1Richard Damon
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i `* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS6Fred. Zwarts
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i  `* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS5olcott
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i   +* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS3Fred. Zwarts
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i   i`* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS2olcott
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i   i `- Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS1Fred. Zwarts
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i   `- Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS1Richard Damon
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  +- Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS1immibis
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  `* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS55Mikko
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   +* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS --- I proved that I am correct and Mikko Ignored it50olcott
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i`* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS --- I proved that I am correct and Mikko Ignored it49Mikko
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i +* PO's nonsense2Ben Bacarisse
30 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i i`- Re: PO's nonsense1Mikko
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i `* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS --- I proved that I am correct and Mikko Ignored it46olcott
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  +* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS --- I proved that I am correct and Mikko Ignored it43Fred. Zwarts
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  i+* Pathological self-reference changes the semantics of the same finite string.22olcott
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii+* Re: Pathological self-reference changes the semantics of the same finite string.3Fred. Zwarts
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  iii`* Re: Pathological self-reference changes the semantics of the same finite string.2olcott
30 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  iii `- Re: Pathological self-reference changes the semantics of the same finite string.1Fred. Zwarts
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii+- Re: Pathological self-reference changes the semantics of the same finite string.1Richard Damon
30 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii+* Re: Pathological self-reference changes the semantics of the same finite string.3Mikko
30 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  iii`* Re: Pathological self-reference changes the semantics of the same finite string.2olcott
30 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  iii `- Re: Pathological self-reference changes the semantics of the same finite string.1Richard Damon
30 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii`* Re: Pathological self-reference changes the semantics of the same finite string.14Mikko
30 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii `* Re: Pathological self-reference changes the semantics of the same finite string.13olcott
30 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii  +- Re: Pathological self-reference changes the semantics of the same finite string.1Richard Damon
30 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii  +* Re: Pathological self-reference changes the semantics of the same finite string.10Mikko
31 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii  i`* Re: Pathological self-reference changes the semantics of the same finite string.9olcott
31 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii  i +* Re: Pathological self-reference changes the semantics of the same finite string.3Fred. Zwarts
31 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii  i i`* Re: Pathological self-reference changes the semantics of the same finite string.2olcott
31 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii  i i `- Re: Pathological self-reference changes the semantics of the same finite string.1Richard Damon
31 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii  i +- Re: Pathological self-reference changes the semantics of the same finite string.1Richard Damon
1 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii  i `* Re: Pathological self-reference changes the semantics of the same finite string.4Mikko
2 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii  i  `* Re: Pathological self-reference changes the semantics of the same finite string.3olcott
2 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii  i   +- Re: Pathological self-reference changes the semantics of the same finite string.1Richard Damon
3 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii  i   `- Re: Pathological self-reference changes the semantics of the same finite string.1Mikko
30 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii  `- Re: Pathological self-reference changes the semantics of the same finite string.1Fred. Zwarts
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  i+* Pathological self-reference changes the meaning of the same finite string13olcott
30 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii`* Re: Pathological self-reference changes the meaning of the same finite string12Fred. Zwarts
31 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii `* Re: Pathological self-reference changes the meaning of the same finite string11olcott
31 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii  +- Re: Pathological self-reference changes the meaning of the same finite string1Richard Damon
31 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii  +* Re: Pathological self-reference changes the meaning of the same finite string8Fred. Zwarts
31 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii  i`* Re: Pathological self-reference changes the meaning of the same finite string7olcott
31 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii  i +- Re: Pathological self-reference changes the meaning of the same finite string1Richard Damon
1 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii  i `* Re: Pathological self-reference changes the meaning of the same finite string5Fred. Zwarts
1 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii  i  `* Re: Pathological self-reference changes the meaning of the same finite string4Mikko
2 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii  i   +- Re: Pathological self-reference changes the meaning of the same finite string1Fred. Zwarts
2 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii  i   `* Re: Pathological self-reference changes the meaning of the same finite string2olcott
2 Sep 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii  i    `- Re: Pathological self-reference changes the meaning of the same finite string1Richard Damon
31 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  ii  `- Re: Pathological self-reference changes the meaning of the same finite string1olcott
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  i`* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS7olcott
30 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  i `* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS6Fred. Zwarts
30 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  i  `* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS5olcott
30 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  i   `* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS4Fred. Zwarts
31 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  i    `* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS3olcott
31 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  i     +- Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS1Richard Damon
31 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  i     `- Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS1Fred. Zwarts
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  +- Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS --- I proved that I am correct and Mikko Ignored it1Richard Damon
30 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   i  `- Re: Xxx Xxxxxxxxx fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS --- I proved that I am correct and Mikko Ignored it1Mikko
28 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i   `* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS4immibis
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i    `* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS3Mikko
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i     `* Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS2olcott
30 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i      `- Re: Ben Bacarisse fails understand that deciders COMPUTE THE MAPPING FROM INPUTS1immibis
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Does Ben Bacarisse believe that Professor Sipser is wrong?25olcott
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i+- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Does Ben Bacarisse believe that Professor Sipser is wrong?1Richard Damon
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Does Ben Bacarisse believe that Professor Sipser is wrong?23Fred. Zwarts
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Does Ben Bacarisse believe that Professor Sipser is wrong?22olcott
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Does Ben Bacarisse believe that Professor Sipser is wrong?20Fred. Zwarts
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Does Ben Bacarisse believe that Professor Sipser is wrong?19olcott
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Does Ben Bacarisse believe that Professor Sipser is wrong?1Richard Damon
26 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Does Ben Bacarisse believe that Professor Sipser is wrong?17Fred. Zwarts
26 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i  +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Does Ben Bacarisse believe that Professor Sipser is wrong?6olcott
26 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i  i+* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Does Ben Bacarisse believe that Professor Sipser is wrong?4Fred. Zwarts
26 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i  ii`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Does Ben Bacarisse believe that Professor Sipser is wrong?3olcott
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i  ii +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Does Ben Bacarisse believe that Professor Sipser is wrong?1Richard Damon
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i  ii `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Does Ben Bacarisse believe that Professor Sipser is wrong?1Fred. Zwarts
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i  i`- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Does Ben Bacarisse believe that Professor Sipser is wrong?1Richard Damon
26 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i  +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Does Ben Bacarisse believe that Professor Sipser is wrong?4olcott
26 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i  i+* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Ben understands the DDD emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its halt state2olcott
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i  ii`- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Ben understands the DDD emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its halt state1Richard Damon
26 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i  i`- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Does Ben Bacarisse believe that Professor Sipser is wrong?1Fred. Zwarts
26 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i  `* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Does Ben Bacarisse believe that Professor Sipser is wrong?6olcott
26 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i   +* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Does Ben Bacarisse believe that Professor Sipser is wrong?4Fred. Zwarts
26 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i   i`* Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Does Ben Bacarisse believe that Professor Sipser is wrong?3olcott
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i   i +- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Does Ben Bacarisse believe that Professor Sipser is wrong?1Richard Damon
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i   i `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Does Ben Bacarisse believe that Professor Sipser is wrong?1Fred. Zwarts
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  i   `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Does Ben Bacarisse believe that Professor Sipser is wrong?1Mikko
25 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     i  `- Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- Does Ben Bacarisse believe that Professor Sipser is wrong?1Richard Damon
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i     `* Ben seems to be contradicting himself2olcott
29 Aug 24 i     i i i i i      `- Re: Ben seems to be contradicting himself1Python
27 Aug 24 i     i i i i `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
21 Aug 24 i     i i i +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser6Richard Damon
21 Aug 24 i     i i i i`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser5olcott
21 Aug 24 i     i i i i +* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser3Fred. Zwarts
21 Aug 24 i     i i i i i`* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser2olcott
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i i `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Fred. Zwarts
22 Aug 24 i     i i i i `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Richard Damon
27 Aug 24 i     i i i `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
27 Aug 24 i     i i `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
21 Aug 24 i     i +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
27 Aug 24 i     i `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
21 Aug 24 i     +- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
27 Aug 24 i     `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5 --- Professor Sipser1Mikko
20 Aug 24 `* Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V52Mikko
20 Aug 24  `- Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V51olcott
27 Aug 24 * DDD emulated by HHH --- (does not refer to prior posts)100olcott
27 Aug 24 +* Re: DDD emulated by HHH --- (does not refer to prior posts)4Mikko
27 Aug 24 i`* Re: DDD emulated by HHH --- (does not refer to prior posts)3olcott
28 Aug 24 i +- Re: DDD emulated by HHH --- (does not refer to prior posts)1Richard Damon
28 Aug 24 i `- Re: DDD emulated by HHH --- (does not refer to prior posts)1Mikko
27 Aug 24 +* Re: DDD emulated by HHH --- (does not refer to prior posts)94Fred. Zwarts

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal