sci.physics.relativity

Liste des GroupesPages :123456789101112131415161718192021222324
Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Apr 24   i`* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics4Ross Finlayson
28 Apr 24   i +* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics2bertietaylor
28 Apr 24   i i`- Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics1bertietaylor
27 Jun 24   i `- Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics1Arindam Banerjee
28 Apr 24   `* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics33Volney
28 Apr 24    +* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics2Demps Fotopoulos
3 May 24    i`- Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics1bertietaylor
1 May 24    +- Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics1bertietaylor
2 May 24    `* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics29J. J. Lodder
2 May 24     +- Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics1Arindam Banerjee
2 May 24     +* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics3bertietaylor
2 May 24     i`* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics2J. J. Lodder
2 May 24     i `- Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics1bertietaylor
2 May 24     `* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics24Volney
2 May 24      +* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics4Landon De la fuente
3 May 24      i`* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics3bertietaylor
3 May 24      i `* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics2Bányai Móricz Várkonyi
4 May 24      i  `- Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics1bertietaylor
3 May 24      +* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics16bertietaylor
3 May 24      i+* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics5bertietaylor
5 May 24      ii`* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics4Aether Regained
5 May 24      ii +* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics2J. J. Lodder
7 May 24      ii i`- Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics1bertietaylor
7 May 24      ii `- Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics1bertietaylor
3 May 24      i`* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics10Lakhram Vassilikos
3 May 24      i `* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics9bertietaylor
3 May 24      i  `* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics8Macgreger Bobienski
4 May 24      i   `* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics7bertietaylor
4 May 24      i    `* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics6Leonides Krakowski
5 May 24      i     `* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics5bertietaylor
5 May 24      i      `* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics4Bud Fudlacker
7 May 24      i       `* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics3bertietaylor
7 May 24      i        `* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics2Santiago Schröder
7 May 24      i         `- Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics1Arindam Banerjee
5 May 24      `* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics3J. J. Lodder
7 May 24       +- Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics1bertietaylor
7 May 24       `- Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics1Arindam Banerjee
25 Jun 24 * Re: A correct prediction17gharnagel
25 Jun 24 +* Re: A correct prediction15Athel Cornish-Bowden
25 Jun 24 i`* Re: A correct prediction14Python
25 Jun 24 i `* Re: A correct prediction13Maciej Wozniak
25 Jun 24 i  +- Re: A correct prediction1Python
26 Jun 24 i  `* Re: A correct prediction11gharnagel
26 Jun 24 i   `* Re: A correct prediction10Richard Hachel
26 Jun 24 i    `* Re: A correct prediction9Maciej Wozniak
26 Jun 24 i     `* Re: A correct prediction8gharnagel
26 Jun 24 i      `* Re: A correct prediction7gharnagel
26 Jun 24 i       `* Re: A correct prediction6Maciej Wozniak
26 Jun 24 i        `* Re: A correct prediction5gharnagel
26 Jun 24 i         `* Re: A correct prediction4Maciej Wozniak
27 Jun 24 i          `* Re: A correct prediction3gharnagel
27 Jun 24 i           +- Re: A correct prediction1Maciej Wozniak
27 Jun 24 i           `- Re: A correct prediction1Caleb Császár
26 Jun 24 `- Re: A correct prediction1Jonathan Mu Stamatelos Thean
26 Jun 24 o Re: Electric Salmon, on YouTube...1Jadie Habibullaev Dou
25 Jun 24 * Re: A quick proof of the inconcistency of the physics of your idiot guru15gharnagel
25 Jun 24 `* Re: A quick proof of the inconcistency of the physics of your idiot guru14Maciej Wozniak
25 Jun 24  `* Re: A quick proof of the inconcistency of the physics of your idiot guru13gharnagel
25 Jun 24   `* Re: A quick proof of the inconcistency of the physics of your idiot guru12Maciej Wozniak
25 Jun 24    `* Re: A quick proof of the inconcistency of the physics of your idiot guru11gharnagel
25 Jun 24     `* Re: A quick proof of the inconcistency of the physics of your idiot guru10Maciej Wozniak
26 Jun 24      `* Re: A quick proof of the inconcistency of the physics of your idiot guru9gharnagel
26 Jun 24       `* Re: A quick proof of the inconcistency of the physics of your idiot guru8Maciej Wozniak
26 Jun 24        `* Re: A quick proof of the inconcistency of the physics of your idiot guru7gharnagel
26 Jun 24         `* Re: A quick proof of the inconcistency of the physics of your idiot guru6Maciej Wozniak
26 Jun 24          `* Re: A quick proof of the inconcistency of the physics of your idiot guru5gharnagel
26 Jun 24           `* Re: A quick proof of the inconcistency of the physics of your idiot guru4Maciej Wozniak
26 Jun 24            `* Re: A quick proof of the inconcistency of the physics of your idiot guru3gharnagel
26 Jun 24             `* Re: A quick proof of the inconcistency of the physics of your idiot guru2Maciej Wozniak
26 Jun 24              `- Re: A quick proof of the inconcistency of the physics of your idiot guru1gharnagel
20 Jun 24 * Relativity has misled us for "a staggeringly long time."2LaurenceClarkCrossen
24 Jun 24 `- Re: Relativity has misled us for "a staggeringly long time."1palsing
24 Jun 24 o Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science.1Swen Karameros Ping
21 Jun 24 * Re: And the clocks are adjustable3LaurenceClarkCrossen
22 Jun 24 `* Re: And the clocks are adjustable2Mikko
22 Jun 24  `- Re: And the clocks are adjustable1Maciej Wozniak
22 Jun 24 o Strange universe in accelerated frames1Richard Hachel
19 Jun 24 * [SR] Why?13Richard Hachel
19 Jun 24 +* Re: [SR] Why?6gharnagel
19 Jun 24 i`* Re: [SR] Why?5Richard Hachel
20 Jun 24 i `* Re: [SR] Why?4gharnagel
20 Jun 24 i  `* Re: [SR] Why?3Richard Hachel
20 Jun 24 i   +- Re: [SR] Why?1gharnagel
20 Jun 24 i   `- Re: [SR] Why?1Maciej Wozniak
21 Jun 24 `* Re: [SR] Why?6Felierix Orbán Ping
21 Jun 24  `* Re: [SR] Why?5Richard Hachel
21 Jun 24   +* Re: [SR] Why?2gharnagel
22 Jun 24   i`- Re: [SR] Why?1Sordo Campana Peng
21 Jun 24   +- Re: [SR] Why?1T.J." Bogdán
21 Jun 24   `- Re: [SR] Why?1Wilkins Kalakos
19 Jun 24 * Philip Ball: A common misunderstanding about wave-particle duality2Aether Regained
20 Jun 24 `- Re: Philip Ball: A common misunderstanding about wave-particle duality1Ross Finlayson
18 Jun 24 * The relativistic cage paradox7Richard Hachel
18 Jun 24 `* Re: The relativistic cage paradox6Python
18 Jun 24  +* Re: The relativistic cage paradox4Python
18 Jun 24  i`* Re: The relativistic cage paradox3Maciej Wozniak
18 Jun 24  i `* Re: The relativistic cage paradox2Python
18 Jun 24  i  `- Re: The relativistic cage paradox1Maciej Wozniak
18 Jun 24  `- Re: The relativistic cage paradox1Richard Hachel
8 Jun 24 * The Magnetopause17Ross Finlayson
8 Jun 24 +* Re: The Magnetopause12gharnagel
8 Jun 24 i+- Re: The Magnetopause1Ross Finlayson
9 Jun 24 i+* Re: The Magnetopause4gharnagel
9 Jun 24 ii+- Re: The Magnetopause1Maciej Wozniak
9 Jun 24 ii+- Re: The Magnetopause1Cecilio Kecskés
9 Jun 24 ii`- Re: The Magnetopause1Blain Demakis Chu
9 Jun 24 i`* Re: The Magnetopause6J. J. Lodder
9 Jun 24 i `* Re: The Magnetopause5Maciej Wozniak
9 Jun 24 i  `* Re: The Magnetopause4Richard Hachel
11 Jun 24 i   +- Re: The Magnetopause1J. J. Lodder
11 Jun 24 i   `* Re: The Magnetopause2Ross Finlayson
15 Jun 24 i    `- Re: The Magnetopause1Ross Finlayson
8 Jun 24 `* Re: The Magnetopause4Ross Finlayson
11 Jun 24  `* Re: The Magnetopause3Ross Finlayson
11 Jun 24   +- Re: The Magnetopause1Ross Finlayson
11 Jun 24   `- Re: The Magnetopause1Lantz Filippenkov Balanovski
15 Jun 24 o Re: blender to visualize math (Penrose tiling as a projection from higher to lower dimensions1James Willi Tatár
15 Jun 24 o Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 20241Burlie Koulaxizis Yee
13 Jun 24 o Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science.1Mitch Sardelis Hang
13 Jun 24 o Re: Russian warships...in my hemisphere????1Hunter Muzarev Lupanov
12 Jun 24 o Re: The letter that launched the arms race.1Joesph Csányi
6 Jun 24 * Is Light Stationary?8TRS-90
6 Jun 24 +- Re: Is Light Stationary?1Ross Finlayson
10 Jun 24 `* Re: Is Light Stationary?6J. J. Lodder
10 Jun 24  +* Re: Is Light Stationary?4gharnagel
10 Jun 24  i`* Re: Is Light Stationary?3Ross Finlayson
11 Jun 24  i `* Re: Is Light Stationary?2gharnagel
11 Jun 24  i  `- Re: Is Light Stationary?1Senewa Hegedüs
11 Jun 24  `- Re: Is Light Stationary?1Mikko
10 Jun 24 * The true story of The Shit2Maciej Wozniak
10 Jun 24 `- Re: The true story of The Shit1Teodro Babenkov Sui
9 Jun 24 o Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science.1Randle Tuboltsev Chin
3 Jun 24 * CHAWLA EXPERIMENTALLY PROVES HAMMOND CORRECT6George Hammond
3 Jun 24 `* Re: CHAWLA EXPERIMENTALLY PROVES HAMMOND CORRECT5gharnagel
4 Jun 24  `* Re: CHAWLA EXPERIMENTALLY PROVES HAMMOND CORRECT4George Hammond
5 Jun 24   `* Re: CHAWLA EXPERIMENTALLY PROVES HAMMOND CORRECT3Ishmal Babenyshev
5 Jun 24    `* Re: CHAWLA EXPERIMENTALLY PROVES HAMMOND CORRECT2George Hammond
8 Jun 24     `- Re: CHAWLA EXPERIMENTALLY PROVES HAMMOND CORRECT1Tupanes Babadzhan
5 Jun 24 * Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 19052Thomas Heger
6 Jun 24 `- Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 19051Thomas Heger
30 May 24 * Re: SpaceTime60Thomas Heger
31 May 24 +* Re: SpaceTime58Tom Roberts
31 May 24 i+- Re: SpaceTime1Thomas Heger
1 Jun 24 i+* Re: SpaceTime47gharnagel
1 Jun 24 ii+- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 24 ii`* Re: SpaceTime45Thomas Heger
2 Jun 24 ii `* Re: SpaceTime44gharnagel
2 Jun 24 ii  +* Re: SpaceTime42Maciej Wozniak
2 Jun 24 ii  i`* Re: SpaceTime41gharnagel
2 Jun 24 ii  i +- Re: SpaceTime1Maciej Wozniak
2 Jun 24 ii  i `* Re: SpaceTime39Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 24 ii  i  +* Re: SpaceTime34gharnagel
2 Jun 24 ii  i  i+* Re: SpaceTime2Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24 ii  i  ii`- Re: SpaceTime1Thomas Heger
2 Jun 24 ii  i  i+- Re: SpaceTime1Dmitriy Makricosta
2 Jun 24 ii  i  i`* Re: SpaceTime30Richard Hachel
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i `* Re: SpaceTime29gharnagel
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i  +* Re: SpaceTime3Richard Hachel
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i  i`* Re: SpaceTime2gharnagel
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i  i `- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i  +* Re: SpaceTime4Richard Hachel
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i  i+- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i  i`* Re: SpaceTime2gharnagel
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i  i `- Re: SpaceTime1Hank Bogdán
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i  `* Re: SpaceTime21Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i   +- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i   `* Re: SpaceTime19gharnagel
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i    +* Re: SpaceTime7Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i    i+* Re: SpaceTime5Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i    ii`* Re: SpaceTime4Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i    ii `* Re: SpaceTime3Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i    ii  `* Re: SpaceTime2Ross Finlayson
5 Jun 24 ii  i  i    ii   `- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24 ii  i  i    i`- Re: SpaceTime1Maciej Wozniak
4 Jun 24 ii  i  i    `* Re: SpaceTime11Richard Hachel
4 Jun 24 ii  i  i     `* Re: SpaceTime10Python
5 Jun 24 ii  i  i      +- Re: SpaceTime1Richard Hachel
5 Jun 24 ii  i  i      `* Re: SpaceTime8gharnagel
5 Jun 24 ii  i  i       +* Re: SpaceTime3Maciej Wozniak
5 Jun 24 ii  i  i       i`* Re: SpaceTime2gharnagel
5 Jun 24 ii  i  i       i `- Re: SpaceTime1Maciej Wozniak
5 Jun 24 ii  i  i       +- Re: SpaceTime1Richard Hachel
5 Jun 24 ii  i  i       `* Re: SpaceTime3Richard Hachel
5 Jun 24 ii  i  i        `* Re: SpaceTime2gharnagel
5 Jun 24 ii  i  i         `- Re: SpaceTime1gharnagel
2 Jun 24 ii  i  `* Re: SpaceTime4Maciej Wozniak
2 Jun 24 ii  i   `* Re: SpaceTime3Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 24 ii  i    `* Re: SpaceTime2Maciej Wozniak
2 Jun 24 ii  i     `- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 24 ii  `- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
1 Jun 24 i`* Re: SpaceTime9Maciej Wozniak
1 Jun 24 i `* Re: SpaceTime8Ross Finlayson
1 Jun 24 i  `* Re: SpaceTime7Maciej Wozniak
1 Jun 24 i   `* Re: SpaceTime6Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 24 i    +- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 24 i    `* Re: SpaceTime4Maciej Wozniak
2 Jun 24 i     `* Re: SpaceTime3Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 24 i      `* Re: SpaceTime2Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 24 i       `- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
31 May 24 `- Re: SpaceTime1Thomas Heger
3 Jun 24 * Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 19053x
4 Jun 24 +- Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 19051Richard Hachel
4 Jun 24 `- Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 19051Paul B. Andersen
1 Jun 24 * Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem26Richard Hachel
1 Jun 24 +* Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem24palsing
1 Jun 24 i+- Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem1Ross Finlayson
1 Jun 24 i`* Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem22Athel Cornish-Bowden
2 Jun 24 i `* Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem21Richard Hachel
2 Jun 24 i  `* Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem20gharnagel
2 Jun 24 i   +- Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem1Richard Hachel
2 Jun 24 i   `* Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem18Richard Hachel
2 Jun 24 i    `* Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem17gharnagel
2 Jun 24 i     +- Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem1Richard Hachel
2 Jun 24 i     +* Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem10Richard Hachel
2 Jun 24 i     i`* Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem9Python
2 Jun 24 i     i +- Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem1Richard Hachel
2 Jun 24 i     i `* Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem7Maciej Wozniak
2 Jun 24 i     i  `* Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem6Python
2 Jun 24 i     i   `* Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem5Python
2 Jun 24 i     i    `* Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem4Python
2 Jun 24 i     i     `* Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem3Python
2 Jun 24 i     i      +- Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem1Richard Hachel
2 Jun 24 i     i      `- Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem1Maciej Wozniak
2 Jun 24 i     +* Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem2Richard Hachel
2 Jun 24 i     i`- Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem1Volney
2 Jun 24 i     `* Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem3Richard Hachel
2 Jun 24 i      +- Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem1Python
2 Jun 24 i      `- Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem1gharnagel
2 Jun 24 `- Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem1Volney
2 Jun 24 o Re: Chock full o'Nuts is that heavenly coffee,1%
1 Jun 24 o Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science.1Athel Cornish-Bowden
9 Mar 24 * Re: Acceleration's higher orders17Volney
9 Mar 24 `* Re: Acceleration's higher orders16hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
9 Mar 24  +- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Ross Finlayson
9 Mar 24  +* Re: Acceleration's higher orders12Ramiro Juárez
10 Mar 24  i`* Re: Acceleration's higher orders11Ross Finlayson
10 Mar 24  i `* Re: Acceleration's higher orders10Ismael Balazowsky Homutov
11 Mar 24  i  +- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Bonny χρήται Μαιανδρίου
11 Mar 24  i  +- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Lou Bodnár Sárközi
20 Mar 24  i  `* Re: Acceleration's higher orders7Ross Finlayson
21 Mar 24  i   +- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Olden Ibuka Yokokawa
7 Apr 24  i   +* Re: Acceleration's higher orders3Ross Finlayson
24 Apr 24  i   i`* Re: Acceleration's higher orders2bertietaylor
24 Apr 24  i   i `- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1bertietaylor
23 Apr 24  i   +- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Ross Finlayson
31 May 24  i   `- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Ross Finlayson
23 Apr 24  `* Re: Acceleration's higher orders2J. J. Lodder
24 Apr 24   `- Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Andrea Krakowski
30 May 24 * Re: If Sagnac gets non-null results, why should Michelson-Morley not?2Thomas Heger
30 May 24 `- Re: If Sagnac gets non-null results, why should Michelson-Morley not?1Ross Finlayson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal