comp.os.linux.advocacy

Liste des Groupes Pages :12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334
Date Sujet#  Auteur
3 Feb 25 +* Re: ATTENTION! NEW GROUP FOR SERIOUS POSTERS ONLY!2Physfitfreak
6 Feb 25 i`- Re: ATTENTION! NEW GROUP FOR SERIOUS POSTERS ONLY!1DFS
4 Feb 25 +* Re: TRANSLATION (AGAIN!) (was: ATTENTION! NEW GROUP FOR SERIOUS POSTERS ONLY!)12Tyrone
4 Feb 25 i+* Re: TRANSLATION (AGAIN!) (was: ATTENTION! NEW GROUP FOR SERIOUS POSTERS ONLY!)7Farley Flud
4 Feb 25 ii`* Re: TRANSLATION (AGAIN!)6Tyrone
4 Feb 25 ii `* Re: TRANSLATION (AGAIN!)5Farley Flud
4 Feb 25 ii  `* Re: TRANSLATION (AGAIN!)4Physfitfreak
4 Feb 25 ii   `* Re: TRANSLATION (AGAIN!)3Physfitfreak
4 Feb 25 ii    `* Re: TRANSLATION (AGAIN!)2Farley Flud
14 Feb 25 ii     `- Re: TRANSLATION (AGAIN!)1Physfitfreak
6 Feb 25 i`* Re: TRANSLATION (AGAIN!)4DFS
6 Feb 25 i `* Re: TRANSLATION (AGAIN!)3vallor
7 Feb 25 i  `* Re: TRANSLATION (AGAIN!)2RonB
7 Feb 25 i   `- Re: TRANSLATION (AGAIN!)1RonB
4 Feb 25 +- Re: ATTENTION! NEW GROUP FOR SERIOUS POSTERS ONLY!1MummyChunk
7 Feb 25 `- Re: ATTENTION! NEW GROUP FOR SERIOUS POSTERS ONLY!1Stéphane CARPENTIER
14 Feb 25 o (OT) Do as Soros says, not as he does1RonB
13 Feb 25 * Re: Codeberg announces fight against the right3RonB
14 Feb 25 +- Re: Codeberg announces fight against the right1RonB
14 Feb 25 `- Re: Codeberg announces fight against the right1RonB
13 Feb 25 * Got In My Pi5 SATA Hat - Testing Proceeds Tomorrow4WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
13 Feb 25 +- Re: Got In My Pi5 SATA Hat - Testing Proceeds Tomorrow1rbowman
13 Feb 25 `* Re: Got In My Pi5 SATA Hat - Testing Proceeds Tomorrow2rbowman
14 Feb 25  `- Re: Got In My Pi5 SATA Hat - Testing Proceeds Tomorrow1WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
14 Feb 25 o Re: The thanks you get for buying Windows1candycanearter07
13 Feb 25 * new NAS2vallor
13 Feb 25 `- Re: new NAS1-hh
10 Feb 25 * Report on "comp.os.linux.hardawe"9vallor
10 Feb 25 +* Re: Report on "comp.os.linux.hardawe"2Tyrone
11 Feb 25 i`- Re: Report on "comp.os.linux.hardawe"1Physfitfreak
11 Feb 25 +- Re: Report on "comp.os.linux.hardawe"1Mikey
11 Feb 25 +* Re: Report on "comp.os.linux.hardawe"2Physfitfreak
12 Feb 25 i`- Re: Report on "comp.os.linux.hardawe"1Physfitfreak
12 Feb 25 `* Re: Report on "comp.os.linux.hardawe"3MummyChunk
12 Feb 25  +- Re: Report on "comp.os.linux.hardawe"1%
13 Feb 25  `- Re: Report on "comp.os.linux.hardawe"1vallor
11 Feb 25 o Re: 10% Of Americans Believe Trump Is Fulfilling Campaign Promises1Physfitfreak
11 Feb 25 * NOT running Linux 6.14-rc22vallor
11 Feb 25 `- Linux 6.14-rc2 (was: Re: NOT running Linux 6.14-rc2)1vallor
24 Jan 25 * Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account17DFS
26 Jan 25 `* Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account16Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Jan 25  `* Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account15DFS
27 Jan 25   `* Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account14Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Jan 25    +* Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account11DFS
6 Feb 25    i+* Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Feb 25    ii`- Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account1DFS
7 Feb 25    i`* Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account8DFS
7 Feb 25    i `* Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account7RonB
8 Feb 25    i  `* Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account6RonB
8 Feb 25    i   +- Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account1RonB
8 Feb 25    i   `* Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account4RonB
8 Feb 25    i    `* Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account3RonB
10 Feb 25    i     +- Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account1RonB
10 Feb 25    i     `- Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account1candycanearter07
30 Jan 25    `* Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account2Physfitfreak
30 Jan 25     `- Re: How sad: Hackers use Windows RID hijacking to create hidden admin account1Physfitfreak
10 Feb 25 o Re: If you want to torture yourself1MummyChunk
10 Feb 25 o Linux 6.13.21vallor
21 Oct 24 * Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security115Lester Thorpe
22 Oct 24 +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1John McCue
23 Oct 24 +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security110186282@ud0s4.net
23 Oct 24 i+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security105Richard Kettlewell
24 Oct 24 ii+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security101Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Oct 24 iii`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security100Richard Kettlewell
24 Oct 24 iii `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security99Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 iii  +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security96candycanearter07
25 Oct 24 iii  i+- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
25 Oct 24 iii  i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security94Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 iii  i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security93John Ames
26 Oct 24 iii  i  +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security20Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security19candycanearter07
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security8The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i i+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security5candycanearter07
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i ii+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Chris Ahlstrom
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i iii`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1candycanearter07
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i ii`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i ii `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i i+- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1D
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i i`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1D
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security9rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i  `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2rbowman
4 Nov 24 iii  i  i   i`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Physfitfreak
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security3The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i    +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Pancho
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i    `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 iii  i  `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security72The Natural Philosopher
26 Oct 24 iii  i   `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security71Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 iii  i    +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2vallor
26 Oct 24 iii  i    i`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Chris Ahlstrom
26 Oct 24 iii  i    `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security68rbowman
26 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 iii  i     i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security5186282@ud0s4.net
26 Oct 24 iii  i     i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security4The Natural Philosopher
26 Oct 24 iii  i     i  +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2D
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1186282@ud0s4.net
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1186282@ud0s4.net
26 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security5vallor
26 Oct 24 iii  i     i+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2rbowman
26 Oct 24 iii  i     ii`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Chris Ahlstrom
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .27Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i`* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .26186282@ud0s4.net
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1D
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .24The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  +* Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).7The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i+* Re: We're in the middle, always.3The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  ii+- Re: Who you are, where you are, when you are.1The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  ii`- Re: We're in the middle, always.1rbowman
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i+* Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).2rbowman
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  ii`- Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i`- Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .16D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .10186282@ud0s4.net
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i+- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i`* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .8D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .7186282@ud0s4.net
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i  +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i  +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i  `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .4D
29 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i   `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .3rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i    `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i     `- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1rbowman
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .5The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i    `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .4D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i     `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .3The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i      +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i      `- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security6The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i+- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security4D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security3The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i  +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i  `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .13The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i+* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .11rbowman
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii`* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .10186282@ud0s4.net
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .3The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i     ii i`* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .2186282@ud0s4.net
29 Oct 24 iii  i     ii i `- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .6DFS
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii  `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .5Joel
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii   +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .3DFS
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii   i+- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1Joel
29 Oct 24 iii  i     ii   i`- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 iii  i     ii   `- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i`- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security7Physfitfreak
28 Oct 24 iii  i      +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1DFS
28 Oct 24 iii  i      +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i      +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Joel
28 Oct 24 iii  i      `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 iii  i       `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i        `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1DFS
26 Oct 24 iii  `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Richard Kettlewell
27 Oct 24 iii   `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 ii`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security3186282@ud0s4.net
25 Oct 24 ii `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 ii  `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1186282@ud0s4.net
23 Oct 24 i+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Phillip Frabott
25 Oct 24 ii`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1186282@ud0s4.net
24 Oct 24 i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Lester Thorpe
25 Oct 24 i `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1186282@ud0s4.net
25 Oct 24 +- Migrant1Steve Hayes
29 Jan 25 +- Re: {OT illegal-alien} ...was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1J.O. Aho
9 Feb 25 `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1MarioCCCP
6 Feb 25 * Trans "ally" creep knows developer is a male, refers to him as "they" anyway12DFS
6 Feb 25 +- Re: Trans "ally" creep knows developer is a male, refers to him as "they" anyway1rbowman
7 Feb 25 +* Re: Trans "ally" creep knows developer is a male, refers to him as "they" anyway4DFS
7 Feb 25 i`* Re: Trans "ally" creep knows developer is a male, refers to him as "they" anyway3RonB
7 Feb 25 i `* Re: Trans "ally" creep knows developer is a male, refers to him as "they" anyway2RonB
8 Feb 25 i  `- Re: Trans "ally" creep knows developer is a male, refers to him as "they" anyway1RonB
7 Feb 25 +* Re: Trans "ally" creep knows developer is a male, refers to him as "they" anyway3RonB
7 Feb 25 i`* Re: Trans "ally" creep knows developer is a male, refers to him as "they" anyway2RonB
8 Feb 25 i `- Re: Trans "ally" creep knows developer is a male, refers to him as "they" anyway1RonB
7 Feb 25 `* Re: Trans "ally" creep knows developer is a male, refers to him as "they" anyway3RonB
7 Feb 25  `* Re: Trans "ally" creep knows developer is a male, refers to him as "they" anyway2RonB
8 Feb 25   `- Re: Trans "ally" creep knows developer is a male, refers to him as "they" anyway1RonB
7 Feb 25 * Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech9MummyChunk
7 Feb 25 +* Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech3RonB
7 Feb 25 i`* Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech2MummyChunk
7 Feb 25 i `- Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech1RonB
7 Feb 25 +- Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech1%
7 Feb 25 `* Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech4RonB
8 Feb 25  +* Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech2pothead
8 Feb 25  i`- Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech1RonB
8 Feb 25  `- Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech1RonB
4 Feb 25 * A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!22Farley Flud
4 Feb 25 +* Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!13%
4 Feb 25 i`* Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!12Farley Flud
4 Feb 25 i +- Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!1%
4 Feb 25 i +* Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!9Physfitfreak
4 Feb 25 i i`* Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!8Physfitfreak
4 Feb 25 i i +* Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!4Physfitfreak
4 Feb 25 i i i`* Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!3Farley Flud
4 Feb 25 i i i +- Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!1%
5 Feb 25 i i i `- Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!1Physfitfreak
4 Feb 25 i i `* Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!3Farley Flud
5 Feb 25 i i  +- Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!1Physfitfreak
6 Feb 25 i i  `- Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!1DFS
7 Feb 25 i `- Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!1Stéphane CARPENTIER
4 Feb 25 +- Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!1<Brock McNuggets>
4 Feb 25 +- Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!1Physfitfreak
5 Feb 25 +* Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!5vallor
5 Feb 25 i+- Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!1Physfitfreak
5 Feb 25 i`* Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!3rbowman
5 Feb 25 i `* Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!2vallor
5 Feb 25 i  `- Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!1%
7 Feb 25 `- Re: A GNU Party is in Town! Move Your Asses Over!1Stéphane CARPENTIER
7 Feb 25 * Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech2MummyChunk
7 Feb 25 `- Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech1RonB
7 Feb 25 * Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech2RonB
7 Feb 25 `- Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech1RonB
7 Feb 25 * Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech2RonB
7 Feb 25 `- Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech1RonB
25 Jan 25 * Kernel 6.13 Changes33Farley Flud
25 Jan 25 `* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes32Stéphane CARPENTIER
25 Jan 25  +* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes26Stéphane CARPENTIER
25 Jan 25  i`* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes25Farley Flud
25 Jan 25  i +- Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes1Physfitfreak
25 Jan 25  i +- Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes1Physfitfreak
25 Jan 25  i +* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes21Stéphane CARPENTIER
25 Jan 25  i i+* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes4Farley Flud
25 Jan 25  i ii`* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes3pothead
26 Jan 25  i ii +- Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes1Stéphane CARPENTIER
26 Jan 25  i ii `- Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes1Diego Garcia
26 Jan 25  i i`* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes16DFS
26 Jan 25  i i +- Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes1pothead
26 Jan 25  i i `* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes14rbowman
26 Jan 25  i i  +* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes2DFS
26 Jan 25  i i  i`- Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes1rbowman
26 Jan 25  i i  `* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes11Physfitfreak
27 Jan 25  i i   `* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes10DFS
27 Jan 25  i i    +* OT: Amélie (was: Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes)6vallor
29 Jan 25  i i    i`* Re: OT: Amélie5DFS
1 Feb 25  i i    i `* Re: OT: Amélie4Stéphane CARPENTIER
1 Feb 25  i i    i  +- Re: OT: Amélie1vallor
7 Feb 25  i i    i  `* Re: OT: Name Conventions2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Feb 25  i i    i   `- Re: OT: Name Conventions1DFS
29 Jan 25  i i    `* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes3DFS
29 Jan 25  i i     `* Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes2DFS
29 Jan 25  i i      `- Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes1DFS
25 Jan 25  i `- Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes1Stéphane CARPENTIER

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal