comp.theory
Liste des Groupes
Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Date
Sujet
#
Auteur
5 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
8
Fred. Zwarts
5 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
7
olcott
6 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
1
Richard Damon
6 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
5
Fred. Zwarts
6 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
4
olcott
6 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
2
joes
6 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
1
olcott
7 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
1
Richard Damon
5 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
3
Richard Damon
5 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
2
olcott
6 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
1
Richard Damon
5 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
3
Richard Damon
5 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
2
olcott
6 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
1
Richard Damon
5 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
3
Richard Damon
5 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
2
olcott
6 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
1
Richard Damon
5 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
4
Mikko
5 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
3
olcott
6 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
1
Richard Damon
6 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
1
Mikko
5 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
7
Mikko
5 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
6
olcott
6 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
4
Mikko
6 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
3
olcott
7 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
1
Richard Damon
8 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
1
Mikko
6 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
1
Fred. Zwarts
5 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
3
Richard Damon
5 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
2
olcott
6 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
1
Richard Damon
5 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
16
Mikko
5 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
15
olcott
6 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
1
Richard Damon
6 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
4
Mikko
6 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
3
olcott
7 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
1
Richard Damon
8 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
1
Mikko
6 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
9
Fred. Zwarts
6 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
8
olcott
6 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
6
joes
6 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
5
olcott
6 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
2
joes
6 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
1
olcott
7 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
1
Richard Damon
8 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
1
Mikko
7 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
1
Richard Damon
7 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
4
Mikko
7 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
3
olcott
8 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
1
Richard Damon
8 Jun 25
Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
1
Mikko
4 Jul 25
Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
52
olcott
4 Jul 25
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
9
Richard Damon
4 Jul 25
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
8
olcott
5 Jul 25
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
4
Fred. Zwarts
5 Jul 25
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
3
olcott
6 Jul 25
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
1
Richard Damon
6 Jul 25
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
1
Fred. Zwarts
5 Jul 25
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
3
Richard Damon
5 Jul 25
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
2
olcott
6 Jul 25
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
1
Richard Damon
5 Jul 25
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
1
Mikko
5 Jul 25
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
41
Mikko
5 Jul 25
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
40
olcott
6 Jul 25
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
39
Mikko
6 Jul
15:48
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
38
olcott
6 Jul
17:41
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
1
Richard Damon
7 Jul
09:20
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
36
Mikko
7 Jul
14:57
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
35
olcott
8 Jul
00:10
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
1
Richard Damon
8 Jul
08:41
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
33
Mikko
8 Jul
15:18
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
32
olcott
9 Jul
09:29
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
30
Mikko
9 Jul
13:31
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
29
olcott
9 Jul
15:04
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
15
joes
9 Jul
15:16
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
13
olcott
10 Jul
10:05
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
11
Mikko
10 Jul
15:09
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
10
olcott
11 Jul
09:43
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
9
Mikko
11 Jul
16:30
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
8
olcott
11 Jul
16:50
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
6
joes
11 Jul
21:52
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
5
olcott
11 Jul
23:58
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
1
Richard Damon
12 Jul
11:54
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
3
joes
12 Jul
16:18
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
2
olcott
12 Jul
23:58
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
1
Richard Damon
11 Jul
23:55
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
1
Richard Damon
10 Jul
12:26
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
1
Richard Damon
9 Jul
16:09
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
1
olcott
10 Jul
10:02
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
13
Mikko
10 Jul
15:09
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
12
olcott
10 Jul
15:55
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
2
olcott
11 Jul
02:59
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
1
Richard Damon
11 Jul
02:58
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
8
Richard Damon
11 Jul
04:58
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
7
André G. Isaak
11 Jul
05:29
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
6
olcott
11 Jul
05:42
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
4
André G. Isaak
11 Jul
06:12
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
3
olcott
12 Jul
18:09
André G. Isaak still has not noticed his mistake
1
olcott
13 Jul
00:03
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
1
Richard Damon
11 Jul
14:35
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
1
Richard Damon
11 Jul
09:47
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
1
Mikko
9 Jul
12:09
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
1
Richard Damon
15 Jun 25
HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
117
olcott
16 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
41
Richard Damon
16 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
40
olcott
16 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
2
Fred. Zwarts
16 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
1
olcott
16 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
13
Richard Damon
16 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
10
olcott
17 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
9
Richard Damon
17 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
3
olcott
17 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
1
Fred. Zwarts
18 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
1
Richard Damon
17 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
5
olcott
17 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
3
Fred. Zwarts
17 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
2
olcott
18 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
1
Fred. Zwarts
18 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
1
Richard Damon
16 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT !!!
2
olcott
17 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT !!!
1
Fred. Zwarts
16 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
24
Mikko
16 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
23
olcott
17 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
18
Fred. Zwarts
17 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
16
olcott
18 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
14
Richard Damon
18 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
13
olcott
19 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
1
Richard Damon
19 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
11
Mikko
19 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
10
olcott
20 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
1
Richard Damon
20 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
8
Mikko
20 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
7
olcott
21 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
6
Mikko
21 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
5
olcott
21 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
1
Richard Damon
22 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
3
Mikko
22 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
2
olcott
23 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
1
Mikko
18 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
1
Fred. Zwarts
18 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
1
Fred. Zwarts
17 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
4
Mikko
17 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
3
olcott
18 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
2
Mikko
18 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
1
olcott
16 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
2
Mikko
16 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
1
olcott
16 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
73
Fred. Zwarts
16 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
4
olcott
17 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
3
Fred. Zwarts
17 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
2
olcott
18 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
1
Fred. Zwarts
16 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
68
olcott
17 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
67
Fred. Zwarts
17 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
66
olcott
18 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
65
Fred. Zwarts
18 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
64
olcott
19 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
63
Fred. Zwarts
19 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
62
olcott
20 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
61
Fred. Zwarts
20 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
60
olcott
20 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
11
joes
20 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
10
olcott
21 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
9
Richard Damon
21 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT
8
olcott
21 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT
7
Richard Damon
21 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT
6
olcott
22 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT
5
Richard Damon
22 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT
4
olcott
22 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT
3
Richard Damon
22 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT
2
olcott
23 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT
1
Richard Damon
22 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
48
Fred. Zwarts
22 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
47
olcott
23 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
46
Fred. Zwarts
23 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
40
olcott
24 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
39
Fred. Zwarts
24 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
38
olcott
25 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
18
Mikko
25 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
17
olcott
26 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
16
Mikko
27 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
15
olcott
27 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
14
olcott
28 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
7
Fred. Zwarts
29 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
3
Mikko
29 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
2
olcott
30 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
1
Mikko
29 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
3
Fred. Zwarts
29 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
2
olcott
30 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
1
Fred. Zwarts
28 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
6
Mikko
28 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
5
olcott
29 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
4
Mikko
29 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
3
olcott
30 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
1
Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
1
Mikko
25 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
19
Fred. Zwarts
25 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
18
olcott
26 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
17
Fred. Zwarts
28 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
16
olcott
28 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
15
Fred. Zwarts
28 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
14
olcott
29 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
3
Mikko
29 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
2
olcott
30 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
1
Mikko
29 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
10
Fred. Zwarts
29 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
1
olcott
29 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
8
olcott
30 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
7
Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
4
olcott
1 Jul 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
3
Fred. Zwarts
1 Jul 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
2
olcott
2 Jul 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
1
Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
2
olcott
1 Jul 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
1
Fred. Zwarts
24 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
5
Mikko
24 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
4
olcott
25 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
3
Mikko
25 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
2
olcott
26 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
1
Mikko
23 Jun 25
ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
90
olcott
23 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
89
Richard Damon
23 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
21
olcott
23 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
20
Richard Damon
23 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
19
olcott
23 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
17
joes
23 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
8
olcott
24 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
7
Richard Damon
24 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
6
olcott
24 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
5
Richard Damon
24 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
4
olcott
25 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
3
Richard Damon
25 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
2
olcott
26 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
1
Richard Damon
23 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
8
olcott
23 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
7
joes
23 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
6
olcott
24 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
5
joes
24 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
4
olcott
25 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
3
Mikko
25 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
2
olcott
26 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
1
Mikko
24 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
1
Richard Damon
24 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
67
olcott
24 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
66
Richard Damon
24 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
65
olcott
24 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
3
Chris M. Thomasson
24 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
1
olcott
25 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
1
Mikko
25 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
9
Richard Damon
Haut de la page
Les messages affichés proviennent d'
usenet
.
NewsPortal