HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar
Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar
Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar
Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar
Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD) Probably not much time left It seems very doubtful that I will live three more months Re: It seems very doubtful that I will live three more months Re: It seems very doubtful that I will live three more months Re: It seems very doubtful that I will live three more months Re: It seems very doubtful that I will live three more months Re: It seems very doubtful that I will live three more months Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---MY LEGACY Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---MY LEGACY Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---MY LEGACY Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---MY LEGACY Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- ChatGPT explains why by rebuttal of the halting problem proofs is correct Re: ChatGPT explains why by rebuttal of the halting problem proofs is correct Re: ChatGPT explains why by rebuttal of the halting problem proofs is correct Re: ChatGPT explains why by rebuttal of the halting problem proofs is correct have you purchased any pro account? Re: have you purchased any pro account? Re: have you purchased any pro account? Re: have you purchased any pro account? The Gates of the Boolean Logic Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic Re: The Gates of the Boolean Logic Correcting the AI hallucination of LLM systems Re: Correcting the AI hallucination of LLM systems
test server V3 test Re: test Re: test Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... DDD will HALT if HHH answers Ben's agreement that D must be aborted by H --- Better words now. Re: Ben's agreement that D must be aborted by H --- Better words now. Hypothetical possibilities V2 Re: Hypothetical possibilities V2 Re: Hypothetical possibilities V2 Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Re: Hypothetical possibilities Who here understands that the last paragraph is Necessarily True? --- AKA a Tautology Re: Who here understands that the last paragraph is Necessarily True? --- AKA a Tautology DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INcorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is *IN*Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is *IN*Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is *IN*Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2 Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V2