comp.lang.forth

Liste des GroupesPages :123456789
Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                    `* Re: QUIT and ABORT16dxf
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                     `* Re: QUIT and ABORT15Ruvim
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      +* Re: QUIT and ABORT9mhx
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      i+* Re: QUIT and ABORT5Ruvim
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      ii`* Re: QUIT and ABORT4mhx
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      ii +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Ruvim
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      ii +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Anton Ertl
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      ii `- Re: QUIT and ABORT1albert
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      i`* Re: QUIT and ABORT3Anton Ertl
11 Jun 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      i `* Re: QUIT and ABORT2Gerry Jackson
12 Jun 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      i  `- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Anton Ertl
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1albert
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                      `* Re: QUIT and ABORT4dxf
24 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                       `* Re: QUIT and ABORT3Ruvim
25 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                        `* Re: QUIT and ABORT2dxf
26 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     i                         `- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
8 May 25 i  ii   ii i i     `- Re: QUIT and ABORT1Ruvim
5 May 25 i  ii   ii i `* Re: QUIT and ABORT5mhx
6 May 25 i  ii   ii i  +- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
7 May 25 i  ii   ii i  `* Re: QUIT and ABORT3albert
7 May 25 i  ii   ii i   `* Re: QUIT and ABORT2minforth
7 May 25 i  ii   ii i    `- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
4 May 25 i  ii   ii `- Re: QUIT and ABORT1dxf
4 May 25 i  ii   i`- Re: QUIT and ABORT (was: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth)1albert
5 May 25 i  ii   `- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1dxf
30 Apr 25 i  i`* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth2sjack
1 May 25 i  i `- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1dxf
30 Apr 25 i  `* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth3albert
30 Apr 25 i   `* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth2Hans Bezemer
30 Apr 25 i    `- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1mhx
4 Apr 25 +- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1dxf
5 Apr 25 `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"98dxf
5 Apr 25  +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"2Paul Rubin
6 Apr 25  i`- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1dxf
5 Apr 25  `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"95mhx
6 Apr 25   +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"2dxf
7 Apr 25   i`- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1Anton Ertl
6 Apr 25   `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"92dxf
6 Apr 25    +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"5mhx
6 Apr 25    i+* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"2mhx
6 Apr 25    ii`- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1albert
6 Apr 25    i+- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1dxf
10 Apr 25    i`- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1dxf
6 Apr 25    +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"6sjack
7 Apr 25    i+* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"2dxf
7 Apr 25    ii`- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1Kerr-Mudd, John
8 Apr 25    i`* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"3Hans Bezemer
8 Apr 25    i `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"2mhx
9 Apr 25    i  `- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1mhx
7 Apr 25    `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"80Anton Ertl
7 Apr 25     `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"79dxf
8 Apr 25      `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"78dxf
9 Apr 25       `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"77dxf
9 Apr 25        +- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1dxf
9 Apr 25        +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"54sjack
10 Apr 25        i`* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"53dxf
10 Apr 25        i +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"51sjack
11 Apr 25        i i`* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"50dxf
11 Apr 25        i i +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"6sjack
11 Apr 25        i i i`* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"5dxf
11 Apr 25        i i i `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"4mhx
12 Apr 25        i i i  `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"3dxf
12 Apr 25        i i i   `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"2mhx
12 Apr 25        i i i    `- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1dxf
11 Apr 25        i i `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"43Hans Bezemer
12 Apr 25        i i  +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"3dxf
12 Apr 25        i i  i+- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1dxf
13 Apr 25        i i  i`- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1dxf
12 Apr 25        i i  `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"39albert
12 Apr 25        i i   `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"38mhx
13 Apr 25        i i    `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"37Waldek Hebisch
13 Apr 25        i i     `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"36Hans Bezemer
13 Apr 25        i i      `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"35mhx
14 Apr 25        i i       `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"34dxf
14 Apr 25        i i        +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"31minforth
14 Apr 25        i i        i+- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1dxf
15 Apr 25        i i        i`* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"29dxf
15 Apr 25        i i        i `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"28Anton Ertl
15 Apr 25        i i        i  `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"27mhx
15 Apr 25        i i        i   +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"4Anton Ertl
16 Apr 25        i i        i   i+- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1Paul Rubin
16 Apr 25        i i        i   i`* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"2mhx
16 Apr 25        i i        i   i `- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1Anton Ertl
16 Apr 25        i i        i   `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"22dxf
16 Apr 25        i i        i    `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"21Anton Ertl
17 Apr 25        i i        i     +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"2albert
17 Apr 25        i i        i     i`- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1Hans Bezemer
18 Apr 25        i i        i     `* Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth18Anton Ertl
18 Apr 25        i i        i      +- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1albert
18 Apr 25        i i        i      +* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth2Wolfgang Allinger
19 Apr 25        i i        i      i`- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1dxf
20 Apr 25        i i        i      `* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth14Paul Rubin
20 Apr 25        i i        i       +- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1Gerry Jackson
20 Apr 25        i i        i       `* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth12dxf
20 Apr 25        i i        i        +- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1Anton Ertl
20 Apr 25        i i        i        +* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth9sjack
21 Apr 25        i i        i        i`* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth8dxf
21 Apr 25        i i        i        i `* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth7sjack
22 Apr 25        i i        i        i  `* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth6dxf
23 Apr 25        i i        i        i   `* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth5mhx
23 Apr 25        i i        i        i    +- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1dxf
23 Apr 25        i i        i        i    `* Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth3sjack
23 Apr 25        i i        i        i     +- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1mhx
24 Apr 25        i i        i        i     `- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1dxf
21 Apr 25        i i        i        `- Re: Why dial-a-standard is not a thing in Forth1dxf
14 Apr 25        i i        `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"2mhx
14 Apr 25        i i         `- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1dxf
11 Apr 25        i `- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1dxf
10 Apr 25        `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"21dxf
10 Apr 25         `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"20albert
11 Apr 25          +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"2dxf
11 Apr 25          i`- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1dxf
25 Apr 25          `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"17Hans Bezemer
26 Apr 25           `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"16dxf
26 Apr 25            +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"13albert
27 Apr 25            i`* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"12dxf
27 Apr 25            i +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"3albert
27 Apr 25            i i`* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"2albert
27 Apr 25            i i `- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1Hans Bezemer
27 Apr 25            i +- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1Paul Rubin
28 Apr 25            i +* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"2dxf
29 Apr 25            i i`- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1dxf
28 Apr 25            i `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"5dxf
28 Apr 25            i  +- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1dxf
28 Apr 25            i  `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"3dxf
28 Apr 25            i   +- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1Hans Bezemer
29 Apr 25            i   `- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1dxf
27 Apr 25            `* Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"2Hans Bezemer
27 Apr 25             `- Re: "The Best Programming Language for the End of the World"1dxf
31 May 25 * THROW codes and ambiguous conditions40dxf
31 May 25 +* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions7Anton Ertl
31 May 25 i+* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions2dxf
3 Jun 25 ii`- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1sjack
31 May 25 i`* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions4Anton Ertl
1 Jun 25 i `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions3albert
1 Jun 25 i  `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions2Anton Ertl
1 Jun 25 i   `- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1albert
1 Jun 25 `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions32Hans Bezemer
2 Jun 25  +- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
2 Jun 25  `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions30albert
3 Jun 25   `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions29dxf
3 Jun 25    +* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions25Anton Ertl
4 Jun 25    i`* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions24dxf
4 Jun 25    i `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions23sean
5 Jun 25    i  +- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
5 Jun 25    i  `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions21albert
6 Jun 25    i   +- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
6 Jun 25    i   `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions19sean
6 Jun 25    i    `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions18albert
6 Jun 25    i     `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions17sean
7 Jun 25    i      `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions16dxf
7 Jun 25    i       `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions15sean
7 Jun 25    i        +- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
7 Jun 25    i        +* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions12Anton Ertl
7 Jun 25    i        i`* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions11dxf
7 Jun 25    i        i `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions10Paul Rubin
8 Jun 25    i        i  +* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions4Paul Rubin
8 Jun 25    i        i  i+- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
8 Jun 25    i        i  i+- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1Anton Ertl
10 Jun 25    i        i  i`- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1Paul Rubin
8 Jun 25    i        i  +- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1dxf
8 Jun 25    i        i  `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions4Anton Ertl
8 Jun 25    i        i   `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions3dxf
9 Jun 25    i        i    `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions2dxf
9 Jun 25    i        i     `- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1LIT
7 Jun 25    i        `- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1LIT
3 Jun 25    +- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1John
4 Jun 25    `* Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions2dxf
6 Jun 25     `- Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions1Hans Bezemer
27 May 25 * "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"43Alexis
27 May 25 +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2Richard
27 May 25 i`- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1minforth
28 May 25 +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"39dxf
28 May 25 i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"38Richard
28 May 25 i +- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1John Ames
29 May 25 i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"36dxf
29 May 25 i  `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"35Anton Ertl
29 May 25 i   +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"29Paul Rubin
29 May 25 i   i+* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"4Anton Ertl
29 May 25 i   ii+- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1albert
31 May 25 i   ii`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2Paul Rubin
31 May 25 i   ii `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Anton Ertl
3 Jun 25 i   i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"24anthk
3 Jun 25 i   i +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"13Paul Rubin
6 Jun 25 i   i i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"12anthk
7 Jun 25 i   i i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"11Paul Rubin
8 Jun 25 i   i i  +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"9anthk
8 Jun 25 i   i i  i+* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"7LIT
8 Jun 25 i   i i  ii`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"6Anton Ertl
8 Jun 25 i   i i  ii `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"5LIT
9 Jun 25 i   i i  ii  `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"4Anton Ertl
9 Jun 25 i   i i  ii   +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2Anton Ertl
10 Jun 25 i   i i  ii   i`- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1dxf
10 Jun 25 i   i i  ii   `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Paul Rubin
10 Jun 25 i   i i  i`- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Paul Rubin
8 Jun 25 i   i i  `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1anthk
3 Jun 25 i   i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"10LIT
6 Jun 25 i   i  +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"6anthk
6 Jun 25 i   i  i`* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"5LIT
6 Jun 25 i   i  i `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"4John Ames
7 Jun 25 i   i  i  +- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1anthk
7 Jun 25 i   i  i  `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2anthk
9 Jun 25 i   i  i   `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1John Ames
6 Jun 25 i   i  `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"3sjack
6 Jun 25 i   i   +- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1dxf
6 Jun 25 i   i   `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1LIT
29 May 25 i   +* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2yeti
29 May 25 i   i`- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Paul Rubin
29 May 25 i   +- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1dxf
29 May 25 i   `* Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"2sjack
30 May 25 i    `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1dxf
4 Jun 25 `- Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes"1Kerr-Mudd, John
8 Jun 25 * Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r".12LIT
8 Jun 25 `* Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r".11dxf
8 Jun 25  +* Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r".4LIT
9 Jun 25  i`* Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r".3dxf
9 Jun 25  i +- Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r".1LIT
9 Jun 25  i `- Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r".1LIT
9 Jun 25  `* Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r".6dxf
9 Jun 25   +* Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r".4LIT
9 Jun 25   i`* Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r".3dxf
9 Jun 25   i `* Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r".2LIT
9 Jun 25   i  `- Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r".1dxf
9 Jun 25   `- Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r".1LIT
8 Jun 25 * Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r".3Anton Ertl
9 Jun 25 +- Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r".1Anton Ertl
9 Jun 25 `- Re: Roman numerals , recognizer "0r".1Anton Ertl
1 Jun 25 o Re: Lispification of Forth1Waldek Hebisch
27 May 25 * Re: Lispification of Forth6minforth
28 May 25 `* Re: Lispification of Forth5mhx
28 May 25  +* Re: Lispification of Forth3minforth
28 May 25  i+- Re: Lispification of Forth1Anton Ertl
29 May 25  i`- Re: Lispification of Forth1albert
29 May 25  `- Re: Lispification of Forth1albert
27 May 25 o Re: Lispification of Forth1mhx
24 May 25 * The joy of OO6albert
24 May 25 +- Re: The joy of OO1LIT
26 May 25 +* Re: The joy of OO2Paul Rubin
26 May 25 i`- Re: The joy of OO1albert
26 May 25 `* Re: The joy of OO2sjack
27 May 25  `- Re: The joy of OO1albert
25 May 25 o Mops1Anton Ertl
22 May 25 * Naming 'n' instances or repetitions9dxf
22 May 25 +* Re: Naming 'n' instances or repetitions2Anton Ertl
22 May 25 i`- Re: Naming 'n' instances or repetitions1dxf
23 May 25 +- Re: Naming 'n' instances or repetitions1dxf
23 May 25 +* Re: Naming 'n' instances or repetitions2Hans Bezemer
24 May 25 i`- Re: Naming 'n' instances or repetitions1dxf
24 May 25 `* Re: Naming 'n' instances or repetitions3Ruvim
24 May 25  +- Re: Naming 'n' instances or repetitions1albert

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal