comp.theory

Liste des Groupes Pages :123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233
Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Jun 25      i `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method1Richard Damon
27 Jun 25      `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method1Richard Damon
4 Jul 25 * Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof47olcott
4 Jul 25 +* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof9Richard Damon
4 Jul 25 i`* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof8olcott
5 Jul08:43 i +* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof4Fred. Zwarts
5 Jul16:28 i i`* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof3olcott
6 Jul01:14 i i +- Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof1Richard Damon
6 Jul10:15 i i `- Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof1Fred. Zwarts
5 Jul13:54 i `* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof3Richard Damon
5 Jul16:37 i  `* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof2olcott
6 Jul01:20 i   `- Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof1Richard Damon
5 Jul09:46 +- Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof1Mikko
5 Jul10:06 `* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof36Mikko
5 Jul16:18  `* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof35olcott
6 Jul09:30   `* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof34Mikko
6 Jul15:48    `* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof33olcott
6 Jul17:41     +- Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof1Richard Damon
7 Jul09:20     `* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof31Mikko
7 Jul14:57      `* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof30olcott
8 Jul00:10       +- Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof1Richard Damon
8 Jul08:41       `* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof28Mikko
8 Jul15:18        `* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof27olcott
9 Jul09:29         +* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof25Mikko
9 Jul13:31         i`* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof24olcott
9 Jul15:04         i +* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof12joes
9 Jul15:16         i i+* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof10olcott
10 Jul10:05         i ii+* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof8Mikko
10 Jul15:09         i iii`* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof7olcott
11 Jul09:43         i iii `* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof6Mikko
11 Jul16:30         i iii  `* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof5olcott
11 Jul16:50         i iii   +* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof3joes
11 Jul21:52         i iii   i`* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof2olcott
11 Jul23:58         i iii   i `- Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof1Richard Damon
11 Jul23:55         i iii   `- Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof1Richard Damon
10 Jul12:26         i ii`- Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof1Richard Damon
9 Jul16:09         i i`- Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof1olcott
10 Jul10:02         i `* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof11Mikko
10 Jul15:09         i  `* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof10olcott
10 Jul15:55         i   +* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof2olcott
11 Jul02:59         i   i`- Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof1Richard Damon
11 Jul02:58         i   +* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof6Richard Damon
11 Jul04:58         i   i`* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof5AndrĂ© G. Isaak
11 Jul05:29         i   i `* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof4olcott
11 Jul05:42         i   i  +* Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof2AndrĂ© G. Isaak
11 Jul06:12         i   i  i`- Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof1olcott
11 Jul14:35         i   i  `- Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof1Richard Damon
11 Jul09:47         i   `- Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof1Mikko
9 Jul12:09         `- Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof1Richard Damon
15 Jun 25 * HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT117olcott
16 Jun 25 +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT41Richard Damon
16 Jun 25 i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT40olcott
16 Jun 25 i +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2Fred. Zwarts
16 Jun 25 i i`- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1olcott
16 Jun 25 i +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT13Richard Damon
16 Jun 25 i i+* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT10olcott
17 Jun 25 i ii`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT9Richard Damon
17 Jun 25 i ii +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3olcott
17 Jun 25 i ii i+- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
18 Jun 25 i ii i`- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Richard Damon
17 Jun 25 i ii `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT5olcott
17 Jun 25 i ii  +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3Fred. Zwarts
17 Jun 25 i ii  i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
18 Jun 25 i ii  i `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
18 Jun 25 i ii  `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Richard Damon
16 Jun 25 i i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT !!!2olcott
17 Jun 25 i i `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT !!!1Fred. Zwarts
16 Jun 25 i `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT24Mikko
16 Jun 25 i  `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT23olcott
17 Jun 25 i   +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT18Fred. Zwarts
17 Jun 25 i   i+* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT16olcott
18 Jun 25 i   ii+* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT14Richard Damon
18 Jun 25 i   iii`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT13olcott
19 Jun 25 i   iii +- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Richard Damon
19 Jun 25 i   iii `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT11Mikko
19 Jun 25 i   iii  `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT10olcott
20 Jun 25 i   iii   +- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Richard Damon
20 Jun 25 i   iii   `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT8Mikko
20 Jun 25 i   iii    `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT7olcott
21 Jun 25 i   iii     `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT6Mikko
21 Jun 25 i   iii      `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT5olcott
21 Jun 25 i   iii       +- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Richard Damon
22 Jun 25 i   iii       `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3Mikko
22 Jun 25 i   iii        `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
23 Jun 25 i   iii         `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Mikko
18 Jun 25 i   ii`- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
18 Jun 25 i   i`- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
17 Jun 25 i   `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT4Mikko
17 Jun 25 i    `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3olcott
18 Jun 25 i     `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2Mikko
18 Jun 25 i      `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1olcott
16 Jun 25 +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2Mikko
16 Jun 25 i`- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1olcott
16 Jun 25 `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT73Fred. Zwarts
16 Jun 25  +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT4olcott
17 Jun 25  i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3Fred. Zwarts
17 Jun 25  i `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
18 Jun 25  i  `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
16 Jun 25  `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT68olcott
17 Jun 25   `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT67Fred. Zwarts
17 Jun 25    `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT66olcott
18 Jun 25     `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT65Fred. Zwarts
18 Jun 25      `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT64olcott
19 Jun 25       `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT63Fred. Zwarts
19 Jun 25        `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT62olcott
20 Jun 25         `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT61Fred. Zwarts
20 Jun 25          `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT60olcott
20 Jun 25           +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT11joes
20 Jun 25           i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT10olcott
21 Jun 25           i `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT9Richard Damon
21 Jun 25           i  `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT8olcott
21 Jun 25           i   `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT7Richard Damon
21 Jun 25           i    `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT6olcott
22 Jun 25           i     `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT5Richard Damon
22 Jun 25           i      `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT4olcott
22 Jun 25           i       `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT3Richard Damon
22 Jun 25           i        `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
23 Jun 25           i         `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT1Richard Damon
22 Jun 25           `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT48Fred. Zwarts
22 Jun 25            `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT47olcott
23 Jun 25             `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT46Fred. Zwarts
23 Jun 25              +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT40olcott
24 Jun 25              i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT39Fred. Zwarts
24 Jun 25              i `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT38olcott
25 Jun 25              i  +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT18Mikko
25 Jun 25              i  i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT17olcott
26 Jun 25              i  i `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT16Mikko
27 Jun 25              i  i  `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT15olcott
27 Jun 25              i  i   `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT14olcott
28 Jun 25              i  i    +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT7Fred. Zwarts
29 Jun 25              i  i    i+* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3Mikko
29 Jun 25              i  i    ii`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
30 Jun 25              i  i    ii `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Mikko
29 Jun 25              i  i    i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3Fred. Zwarts
29 Jun 25              i  i    i `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
30 Jun 25              i  i    i  `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
28 Jun 25              i  i    `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT6Mikko
28 Jun 25              i  i     `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT5olcott
29 Jun 25              i  i      `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT4Mikko
29 Jun 25              i  i       `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3olcott
30 Jun 25              i  i        +- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun 25              i  i        `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Mikko
25 Jun 25              i  `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT19Fred. Zwarts
25 Jun 25              i   `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT18olcott
26 Jun 25              i    `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT17Fred. Zwarts
28 Jun 25              i     `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT16olcott
28 Jun 25              i      `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT15Fred. Zwarts
28 Jun 25              i       `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT14olcott
29 Jun 25              i        +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3Mikko
29 Jun 25              i        i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
30 Jun 25              i        i `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Mikko
29 Jun 25              i        `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT10Fred. Zwarts
29 Jun 25              i         +- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1olcott
29 Jun 25              i         `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT8olcott
30 Jun 25              i          `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT7Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun 25              i           +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT4olcott
1 Jul 25              i           i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3Fred. Zwarts
1 Jul 25              i           i `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
2 Jul 25              i           i  `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun 25              i           `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
1 Jul 25              i            `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
24 Jun 25              `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT5Mikko
24 Jun 25               `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT4olcott
25 Jun 25                `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3Mikko
25 Jun 25                 `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
26 Jun 25                  `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Mikko
23 Jun 25 * ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis90olcott
23 Jun 25 `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis89Richard Damon
23 Jun 25  +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis21olcott
23 Jun 25  i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis20Richard Damon
23 Jun 25  i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis19olcott
23 Jun 25  i  +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis17joes
23 Jun 25  i  i+* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis8olcott
24 Jun 25  i  ii`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis7Richard Damon
24 Jun 25  i  ii `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis6olcott
24 Jun 25  i  ii  `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis5Richard Damon
24 Jun 25  i  ii   `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis4olcott
25 Jun 25  i  ii    `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis3Richard Damon
25 Jun 25  i  ii     `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis2olcott
26 Jun 25  i  ii      `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
23 Jun 25  i  i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis8olcott
23 Jun 25  i  i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis7joes
23 Jun 25  i  i  `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis6olcott
24 Jun 25  i  i   `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis5joes
24 Jun 25  i  i    `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis4olcott
25 Jun 25  i  i     `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis3Mikko
25 Jun 25  i  i      `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis2olcott
26 Jun 25  i  i       `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Mikko
24 Jun 25  i  `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
24 Jun 25  `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis67olcott
24 Jun 25   `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis66Richard Damon
24 Jun 25    `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis65olcott
24 Jun 25     +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis3Chris M. Thomasson
24 Jun 25     i+- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1olcott
25 Jun 25     i`- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Mikko
25 Jun 25     +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis9Richard Damon
25 Jun 25     i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis8olcott
25 Jun 25     i +- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1olcott
26 Jun 25     i +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis5Richard Damon
26 Jun 25     i i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis4olcott
26 Jun 25     i i +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis2olcott
26 Jun 25     i i i`- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
26 Jun 25     i i `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
26 Jun 25     i `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
25 Jun 25     +- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
25 Jun 25     `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis51Mikko
25 Jun 25      `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis50olcott
26 Jun 25       +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis18Fred. Zwarts
27 Jun 25       i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis17olcott
27 Jun 25       i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis16Fred. Zwarts
27 Jun 25       i  `* ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---15olcott
28 Jun 25       i   `* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---14Fred. Zwarts
28 Jun 25       i    `* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---13olcott
28 Jun 25       i     +- Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---1Richard Damon
29 Jun 25       i     `* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---11Fred. Zwarts
29 Jun 25       i      `* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---10olcott
29 Jun 25       i       +- Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---1Richard Damon
30 Jun 25       i       `* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---8Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun 25       i        `* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---7olcott
30 Jun 25       i         `* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---6joes
30 Jun 25       i          `* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---5olcott
1 Jul 25       i           +* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---3joes
1 Jul 25       i           i`* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---2olcott
1 Jul 25       i           i `- Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---1joes
1 Jul 25       i           `- Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---1Fred. Zwarts
26 Jun 25       `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis31Mikko
27 Jun 25        `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis30olcott
27 Jun 25         `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis29Mikko
27 Jun 25          `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis28olcott
28 Jun 25           `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis27Mikko
28 Jun 25            `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis26olcott
28 Jun 25             +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis20Richard Damon
28 Jun 25             i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis19olcott
29 Jun 25             i +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis16Richard Damon
29 Jun 25             i i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis15olcott
29 Jun 25             i i +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis4Richard Damon
29 Jun 25             i i i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis3olcott
29 Jun 25             i i i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis2Richard Damon
29 Jun 25             i i i  `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1olcott
29 Jun 25             i i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis10olcott
30 Jun 25             i i  +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis8Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun 25             i i  i+* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis2olcott
1 Jul 25             i i  ii`- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun 25             i i  i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis5Mike Terry
30 Jun 25             i i  i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis4olcott
1 Jul 25             i i  i  `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis3Fred. Zwarts
1 Jul 25             i i  i   `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis2olcott
2 Jul 25             i i  i    `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun 25             i i  `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Mikko
29 Jun 25             i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis2olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal