comp.theory

Liste des Groupes Pages :1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132
Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 Jun 25 i   iii       `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3Mikko
22 Jun 25 i   iii        `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
23 Jun 25 i   iii         `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Mikko
18 Jun 25 i   ii`- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
18 Jun 25 i   i`- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
17 Jun 25 i   `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT4Mikko
17 Jun 25 i    `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3olcott
18 Jun 25 i     `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2Mikko
18 Jun 25 i      `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1olcott
16 Jun 25 +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2Mikko
16 Jun 25 i`- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1olcott
16 Jun 25 `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT73Fred. Zwarts
16 Jun 25  +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT4olcott
17 Jun 25  i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3Fred. Zwarts
17 Jun 25  i `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
18 Jun 25  i  `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
16 Jun 25  `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT68olcott
17 Jun 25   `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT67Fred. Zwarts
17 Jun 25    `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT66olcott
18 Jun 25     `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT65Fred. Zwarts
18 Jun 25      `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT64olcott
19 Jun 25       `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT63Fred. Zwarts
19 Jun 25        `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT62olcott
20 Jun 25         `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT61Fred. Zwarts
20 Jun 25          `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT60olcott
20 Jun 25           +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT11joes
20 Jun 25           i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT10olcott
21 Jun 25           i `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT9Richard Damon
21 Jun 25           i  `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT8olcott
21 Jun 25           i   `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT7Richard Damon
21 Jun 25           i    `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT6olcott
22 Jun 25           i     `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT5Richard Damon
22 Jun 25           i      `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT4olcott
22 Jun 25           i       `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT3Richard Damon
22 Jun 25           i        `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
23 Jun 25           i         `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- PROOF THAT I AM CORRECT1Richard Damon
22 Jun 25           `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT48Fred. Zwarts
22 Jun 25            `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT47olcott
23 Jun 25             `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT46Fred. Zwarts
23 Jun 25              +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT40olcott
24 Jun 25              i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT39Fred. Zwarts
24 Jun 25              i `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT38olcott
25 Jun 25              i  +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT18Mikko
25 Jun 25              i  i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT17olcott
26 Jun 25              i  i `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT16Mikko
27 Jun 25              i  i  `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT15olcott
27 Jun 25              i  i   `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT14olcott
28 Jun 25              i  i    +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT7Fred. Zwarts
29 Jun 25              i  i    i+* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3Mikko
29 Jun 25              i  i    ii`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
30 Jun 25              i  i    ii `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Mikko
29 Jun 25              i  i    i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3Fred. Zwarts
29 Jun 25              i  i    i `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
30 Jun 25              i  i    i  `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
28 Jun 25              i  i    `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT6Mikko
28 Jun 25              i  i     `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT5olcott
29 Jun 25              i  i      `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT4Mikko
29 Jun 25              i  i       `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3olcott
30 Jun 25              i  i        +- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun 25              i  i        `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Mikko
25 Jun 25              i  `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT19Fred. Zwarts
25 Jun 25              i   `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT18olcott
26 Jun 25              i    `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT17Fred. Zwarts
28 Jun 25              i     `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT16olcott
28 Jun 25              i      `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT15Fred. Zwarts
28 Jun 25              i       `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT14olcott
29 Jun 25              i        +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3Mikko
29 Jun 25              i        i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
30 Jun 25              i        i `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Mikko
29 Jun 25              i        `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT10Fred. Zwarts
29 Jun 25              i         +- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1olcott
29 Jun 25              i         `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT8olcott
30 Jun 25              i          `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT7Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun 25              i           +* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT4olcott
1 Jul 25              i           i`* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3Fred. Zwarts
1 Jul 25              i           i `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
2 Jul 25              i           i  `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun 25              i           `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
1 Jul 25              i            `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Fred. Zwarts
24 Jun 25              `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT5Mikko
24 Jun 25               `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT4olcott
25 Jun 25                `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT3Mikko
25 Jun 25                 `* Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT2olcott
26 Jun 25                  `- Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting --- EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT1Mikko
23 Jun 25 * ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis90olcott
23 Jun 25 `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis89Richard Damon
23 Jun 25  +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis21olcott
23 Jun 25  i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis20Richard Damon
23 Jun 25  i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis19olcott
23 Jun 25  i  +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis17joes
23 Jun 25  i  i+* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis8olcott
24 Jun 25  i  ii`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis7Richard Damon
24 Jun 25  i  ii `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis6olcott
24 Jun 25  i  ii  `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis5Richard Damon
24 Jun 25  i  ii   `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis4olcott
25 Jun 25  i  ii    `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis3Richard Damon
25 Jun 25  i  ii     `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis2olcott
26 Jun 25  i  ii      `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
23 Jun 25  i  i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis8olcott
23 Jun 25  i  i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis7joes
23 Jun 25  i  i  `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis6olcott
24 Jun 25  i  i   `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis5joes
24 Jun 25  i  i    `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis4olcott
25 Jun 25  i  i     `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis3Mikko
25 Jun 25  i  i      `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis2olcott
26 Jun 25  i  i       `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Mikko
24 Jun 25  i  `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
24 Jun 25  `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis67olcott
24 Jun 25   `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis66Richard Damon
24 Jun 25    `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis65olcott
24 Jun 25     +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis3Chris M. Thomasson
24 Jun 25     i+- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1olcott
25 Jun 25     i`- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Mikko
25 Jun 25     +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis9Richard Damon
25 Jun 25     i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis8olcott
25 Jun 25     i +- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1olcott
26 Jun 25     i +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis5Richard Damon
26 Jun 25     i i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis4olcott
26 Jun 25     i i +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis2olcott
26 Jun 25     i i i`- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
26 Jun 25     i i `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
26 Jun 25     i `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
25 Jun 25     +- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
25 Jun 25     `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis51Mikko
25 Jun 25      `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis50olcott
26 Jun 25       +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis18Fred. Zwarts
27 Jun 25       i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis17olcott
27 Jun 25       i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis16Fred. Zwarts
27 Jun 25       i  `* ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---15olcott
28 Jun 25       i   `* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---14Fred. Zwarts
28 Jun 25       i    `* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---13olcott
28 Jun 25       i     +- Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---1Richard Damon
29 Jun 25       i     `* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---11Fred. Zwarts
29 Jun 25       i      `* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---10olcott
29 Jun 25       i       +- Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---1Richard Damon
30 Jun 25       i       `* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---8Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun 25       i        `* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---7olcott
30 Jun 25       i         `* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---6joes
30 Jun 25       i          `* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---5olcott
1 Jul 25       i           +* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---3joes
1 Jul 25       i           i`* Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---2olcott
1 Jul 25       i           i `- Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---1joes
1 Jul 25       i           `- Re: ChatGPT and claude.ai agree that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique ---1Fred. Zwarts
26 Jun 25       `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis31Mikko
27 Jun 25        `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis30olcott
27 Jun 25         `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis29Mikko
27 Jun 25          `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis28olcott
28 Jun 25           `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis27Mikko
28 Jun 25            `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis26olcott
28 Jun 25             +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis20Richard Damon
28 Jun 25             i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis19olcott
29 Jun 25             i +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis16Richard Damon
29 Jun 25             i i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis15olcott
29 Jun 25             i i +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis4Richard Damon
29 Jun 25             i i i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis3olcott
29 Jun 25             i i i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis2Richard Damon
29 Jun 25             i i i  `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1olcott
29 Jun 25             i i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis10olcott
30 Jun 25             i i  +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis8Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun 25             i i  i+* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis2olcott
1 Jul 25             i i  ii`- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun 25             i i  i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis5Mike Terry
30 Jun 25             i i  i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis4olcott
1 Jul 25             i i  i  `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis3Fred. Zwarts
1 Jul 25             i i  i   `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis2olcott
2 Jul 25             i i  i    `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun 25             i i  `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Mikko
29 Jun 25             i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis2olcott
30 Jun 25             i  `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Mikko
29 Jun 25             `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis5Mikko
29 Jun 25              `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis4olcott
30 Jun 25               `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis3Mikko
1 Jul 25                `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis2olcott
2 Jul 25                 `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Mikko
21 Jun 25 * ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique58olcott
22 Jun 25 +* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique3Keith Thompson
22 Jun 25 i`* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique2olcott
22 Jun 25 i `- Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique1Richard Damon
22 Jun 25 +* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique2Mike Terry
22 Jun 25 i`- Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique1olcott
22 Jun 25 +* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique10Alan Mackenzie
22 Jun 25 i`* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique9olcott
22 Jun 25 i +- Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique1Richard Damon
23 Jun 25 i `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique7Mikko
23 Jun 25 i  `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique6olcott
24 Jun 25 i   `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique5Mikko
24 Jun 25 i    `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique4olcott
25 Jun 25 i     `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique3Mikko
25 Jun 25 i      `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique2olcott
26 Jun 25 i       `- Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique1Mikko
22 Jun 25 +* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique37Mikko
22 Jun 25 i`* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique36olcott
22 Jun 25 i +- Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique1Richard Damon
23 Jun 25 i `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique34Mikko
23 Jun 25 i  `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique33olcott
23 Jun 25 i   `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique32Mike Terry
23 Jun 25 i    `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique31olcott
24 Jun 25 i     `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique30Mikko
24 Jun 25 i      `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique29olcott
24 Jun 25 i       +* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique2wij
24 Jun 25 i       i`- Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique1olcott
24 Jun 25 i       +* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique25Alan Mackenzie
24 Jun 25 i       i`* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique24olcott
24 Jun 25 i       i `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique23Alan Mackenzie
24 Jun 25 i       i  `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique22olcott
24 Jun 25 i       i   +* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique16joes
24 Jun 25 i       i   i`* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique15olcott
24 Jun 25 i       i   i `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique14joes
24 Jun 25 i       i   i  `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique13olcott
25 Jun 25 i       i   i   `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique12Mikko
25 Jun 25 i       i   i    `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique11olcott
26 Jun 25 i       i   i     `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique10Mikko
27 Jun 25 i       i   i      `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique9olcott
28 Jun 25 i       i   i       `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique8Mikko
28 Jun 25 i       i   i        `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique7olcott
29 Jun 25 i       i   i         `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique6Mikko
29 Jun 25 i       i   i          `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique5olcott
30 Jun 25 i       i   i           `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique4Mikko
30 Jun 25 i       i   i            `* Turing machine HHH is not allowed to report on the behavior of the directly executed DDD()3olcott
1 Jul 25 i       i   i             `* Re: Turing machine HHH is not allowed to report on the behavior of the directly executed DDD()2Mikko
1 Jul 25 i       i   i              `- Re: Turing machine HHH is not allowed to report on the behavior of the directly executed DDD()1olcott
24 Jun 25 i       i   `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique5Alan Mackenzie
24 Jun 25 i       i    `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique4olcott
24 Jun 25 i       i     `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique3Alan Mackenzie
24 Jun 25 i       i      `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique2olcott
24 Jun 25 i       i       `- Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique1Chris M. Thomasson
25 Jun 25 i       `- Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique1Mikko
22 Jun 25 `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique5Richard Damon
22 Jun 25  `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique4olcott
22 Jun 25   `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique3Richard Damon
22 Jun 25    `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique2olcott
23 Jun 25     `- Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique1Richard Damon
28 Jun 25 o Re: Damon's claim about lying to AI1Richard Damon
27 Jun 25 o Re: Damon's claim about lying to AI1olcott
26 Jun 25 * ChatGPT figured out on its own how I defeated the common HP proof method2olcott
26 Jun 25 `- Re: ChatGPT figured out on its own how I defeated the common HP proof method1Richard Damon
10 Jun 25 * Re: "big fat ignorant liar"46Richard Damon
10 Jun 25 `* Re: "big fat ignorant liar"45olcott
10 Jun 25  `* Re: "big fat ignorant liar"44Richard Damon
10 Jun 25   `* Re: "big fat ignorant liar"43olcott
10 Jun 25    +- Re: "big fat ignorant liar"1Richard Damon
11 Jun 25    `* Re: "big fat ignorant liar"41Mikko
11 Jun 25     `* Re: "big fat ignorant liar"40olcott
11 Jun 25      +- Re: "big fat ignorant liar"1Richard Damon
12 Jun 25      `* Re: "big fat ignorant liar"38Mikko
12 Jun 25       `* Re: "big fat ignorant liar"37olcott
12 Jun 25        +- Re: "big fat ignorant liar"1Richard Damon
13 Jun 25        `* Re: "big fat ignorant liar"35Mikko
13 Jun 25         `* Re: "big fat ignorant liar"34olcott
15 Jun 25          `* Re: "big fat ignorant liar"33Mikko

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal