sci.logic
Liste des Groupes
Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Date
Sujet
#
Auteur
26 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
2
olcott
26 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
1
Richard Damon
26 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
1
Richard Damon
26 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
1
Richard Damon
25 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis
1
Richard Damon
21 Jun 25
ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique
16
olcott
22 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique
3
Keith Thompson
22 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique
2
olcott
22 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique
1
Richard Damon
22 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique
5
Richard Damon
22 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique
4
olcott
22 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique
3
Richard Damon
22 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique
2
olcott
23 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique
1
Richard Damon
23 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique
1
olcott
23 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique
6
olcott
24 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique
4
olcott
24 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique
3
Alan Mackenzie
24 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique
2
olcott
24 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique
1
Chris M. Thomasson
24 Jun 25
Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique
1
olcott
20 Jun 25
How do simulating termination analyzers work? (V2)
11
olcott
21 Jun 25
Re: How do simulating termination analyzers work? (V2)
10
Richard Damon
21 Jun 25
Re: How do simulating termination analyzers work? (V2)
9
olcott
21 Jun 25
Re: How do simulating termination analyzers work? (V2)
7
olcott
21 Jun 25
Re: How do simulating termination analyzers work? (V2)
6
olcott
22 Jun 25
Re: How do simulating termination analyzers work? (V2)
5
Richard Damon
22 Jun 25
Re: How do simulating termination analyzers work? (V2)
4
olcott
22 Jun 25
Re: How do simulating termination analyzers work? (V2)
3
Richard Damon
24 Jun 25
Re: How do simulating termination analyzers work? (V2)
2
Richard Heathfield
24 Jun 25
Re: How do simulating termination analyzers work? (V2)
1
olcott
21 Jun 25
Re: How do simulating termination analyzers work? (V2)
1
Richard Damon
21 Jun 25
Re: HP counter-example INPUT cannot possibly exist --- Peter Linz HP Proof
1
olcott
17 Jun 25
Dog Shit: Call my name "jan.ai" (Re: Why do IDEs have Power Save mode?)
1
Mild Shock
9 Jun 25
Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
74
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
67
dbush
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
66
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
63
dbush
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
62
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
52
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
51
dbush
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
50
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
49
dbush
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
47
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
46
dbush
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
44
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
43
dbush
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
42
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
1
dbush
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
40
dbush
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
39
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
38
dbush
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
37
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
36
dbush
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
35
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
34
dbush
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
33
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
32
dbush
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
31
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
30
dbush
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
29
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
28
dbush
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
27
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
14
dbush
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
13
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
12
dbush
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
11
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
10
dbush
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
9
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
8
dbush
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
7
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
4
dbush
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
1
olcott
10 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
1
olcott
10 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
1
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
2
dbush
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
1
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
12
dbush
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
11
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
10
dbush
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
4
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
3
dbush
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
2
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
1
dbush
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
5
Richard Heathfield
10 Jun 25
It has always been impossible to define an INPUT that does the opposite of its halt decider
1
olcott
10 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
3
olcott
10 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
2
Richard Damon
10 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
1
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
1
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
1
olcott
10 Jun 25
Mike can't even count to eight --- HHH(DDD)
2
olcott
10 Jun 25
Re: Mike can't even count to eight --- HHH(DDD)
1
Richard Damon
14 Jun 25
The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++
7
olcott
15 Jun 25
Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++
6
Fred. Zwarts
15 Jun 25
Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++
3
olcott
15 Jun 25
Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++
1
Richard Damon
16 Jun 25
Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++
1
Fred. Zwarts
15 Jun 25
Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++
2
olcott
16 Jun 25
Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++
1
Fred. Zwarts
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
2
Richard Damon
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
1
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
1
Keith Thompson
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
5
Richard Damon
9 Jun 25
Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point
4
olcott
14 Jun 25
The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++
3
olcott
15 Jun 25
Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++
2
Fred. Zwarts
15 Jun 25
Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++
1
olcott
15 Jun 25
Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem --- CHALLENGE
2
olcott
15 Jun 25
Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem --- CHALLENGE
1
Richard Damon
13 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT
6
olcott
14 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT
5
Fred. Zwarts
14 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT
4
olcott
15 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT
2
Fred. Zwarts
15 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++
1
olcott
15 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT
1
olcott
14 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++
2
olcott
14 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++
1
Richard Damon
14 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT
2
olcott
14 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT
1
Richard Damon
12 Jun 25
HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT
17
olcott
12 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) INcorrectly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT
11
Richard Damon
13 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) INcorrectly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT
10
olcott
13 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) INcorrectly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT
9
Richard Damon
13 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) INcorrectly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT
8
olcott
14 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT
7
olcott
14 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT
6
Richard Damon
14 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) Does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT
5
olcott
14 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) Does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT
1
Fred. Zwarts
14 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) Does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT
3
Richard Damon
14 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) Does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++
2
olcott
14 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) Does incorrectly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++ and Oclotts VERIFIED LIES
1
Richard Damon
13 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT
5
olcott
14 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT
1
Fred. Zwarts
14 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++
3
olcott
14 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++ Mike
1
olcott
14 Jun 25
Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++
1
Richard Damon
13 Jun 25
Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed
1
olcott
7 Jun 25
The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
26
olcott
7 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
10
dbush
7 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
9
olcott
7 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
7
dbush
7 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
6
olcott
7 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
5
dbush
7 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
4
olcott
7 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
2
dbush
7 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
1
olcott
8 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
1
Richard Damon
7 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
1
Richard Damon
7 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
1
wij
7 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
4
Richard Damon
8 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
3
Richard Damon
8 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
2
Richard Damon
9 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
1
Richard Damon
8 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
1
Fred. Zwarts
11 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
9
anthk
12 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
8
olcott
12 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
7
Richard Damon
12 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
4
olcott
12 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
2
Fred. Zwarts
12 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence --- VERIFIED FACTS
1
olcott
12 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence
1
Richard Damon
12 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence --- VERIFIED FACTS
2
olcott
12 Jun 25
Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence --- VERIFIED FACTS
1
Richard Damon
6 Jun 25
Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE
16
olcott
7 Jun 25
Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE
15
Richard Damon
7 Jun 25
Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE
14
olcott
7 Jun 25
Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE
13
Richard Damon
7 Jun 25
Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE
12
olcott
8 Jun 25
Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE
11
Richard Damon
8 Jun 25
Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE
10
olcott
8 Jun 25
Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE
9
Richard Damon
8 Jun 25
Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE
8
olcott
8 Jun 25
Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE
4
Fred. Zwarts
8 Jun 25
Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE
3
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE
1
Richard Damon
9 Jun 25
Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE
1
Fred. Zwarts
8 Jun 25
Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE
3
Richard Damon
8 Jun 25
Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE
2
olcott
9 Jun 25
Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE
1
Richard Damon
4 Jun 25
DCGs are dead: ROKs transformation from FGCS 1982
2
Mild Shock
4 Jun 25
long live DGCs: Prolog systems before Stargate LLC in 2025 (Was DCGs are dead: ROKs transformation from FGCS 1982)
1
Mild Shock
23 May 25
AI: Choose your favorite McDonald, Burger King, etc..
1
Mild Shock
21 May 25
The story of Sam & Jony
1
Mild Shock
20 May 25
FYI, a snapshot of the open math copilot race
1
Mild Shock
12 May 25
How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
5
olcott
13 May 25
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
3
Mikko
13 May 25
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
2
olcott
18 May 25
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
1
Mikko
17 May 25
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike my best reviewer
1
olcott
17 May 25
Logos 2000: rulial foundations
4
Ross Finlayson
17 May 25
Re: Logos 2000: rulial foundations
1
Ross Finlayson
17 May 25
Re: Logos 2000: rulial foundations
1
Ross Finlayson
17 May 25
Re: Logos 2000: rulial foundations
1
Ross Finlayson
12 May 25
Re: Michael Sipser of MIT validates the notion of a simulating halt decider
4
olcott
13 May 25
Re: Michael Sipser of MIT validates the notion of a simulating halt decider
1
Richard Damon
13 May 25
Re: Michael Sipser of MIT validates the notion of a simulating halt decider
2
Mikko
13 May 25
Re: Michael Sipser of MIT validates the notion of a simulating halt decider
1
olcott
12 May 25
Improved version: New proof of dark numbers by means of the thinned out harmonic series
1
WM
12 May 25
Improved version: New proof of dark numbers
1
WM
5 May 25
Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable
21
olcott
5 May 25
Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable
3
Mikko
5 May 25
Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable
2
olcott
6 May 25
Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable
1
Mikko
5 May 25
Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable
4
Alan Mackenzie
5 May 25
Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable
3
olcott
6 May 25
Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable
2
Alan Mackenzie
6 May 25
Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable
1
Mikko
5 May 25
Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable
13
Richard Damon
5 May 25
Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable
9
olcott
6 May 25
Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable
3
Richard Damon
6 May 25
Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable
2
olcott
6 May 25
Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable
1
Richard Damon
6 May 25
Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable
5
olcott
6 May 25
Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable
1
Alan Mackenzie
6 May 25
Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable
3
Richard Damon
6 May 25
Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable ---ELABORATED
2
olcott
7 May 25
Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable ---ELABORATED
1
Richard Damon
5 May 25
Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable
2
Richard Heathfield
5 May 25
Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable
1
Richard Heathfield
6 May 25
Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable
1
Richard Damon
19 Dec 24
Larger Collected Reasoning 2024
43
Ross Finlayson
19 Dec 24
Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024
15
Ross Finlayson
19 Dec 24
Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024)
13
Mild Shock
19 Dec 24
Re: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024)
12
Mild Shock
19 Dec 24
USENET is the information panspermia (Was: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy)
1
Mild Shock
20 Dec 24
Re: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024)
4
Ross Finlayson
20 Dec 24
Re: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024)
3
Mild Shock
20 Dec 24
Re: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024)
2
Ross Finlayson
20 Dec 24
Re: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024)
1
Mild Shock
22 Dec 24
Re: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024)
6
Thomas Heger
22 Dec 24
Re: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024)
5
Ross Finlayson
23 Dec 24
Re: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024)
1
Thomas Heger
23 Dec 24
Re: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024)
3
Julio Di Egidio
23 Dec 24
Re: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024)
2
Python
24 Dec 24
Re: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024)
1
Chris M. Thomasson
1 May 25
Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024
1
Ross Finlayson
22 Dec 24
Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024
27
Julio Di Egidio
22 Dec 24
Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024
26
Ross Finlayson
23 Dec 24
Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024
25
Julio Di Egidio
24 Dec 24
Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024
24
Chris M. Thomasson
24 Dec 24
Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024
16
Moebius
24 Dec 24
Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024
1
Chris M. Thomasson
24 Dec 24
Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024
14
Moebius
24 Dec 24
Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024
3
Chris M. Thomasson
24 Dec 24
Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024
2
Moebius
24 Dec 24
Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024
1
Chris M. Thomasson
24 Dec 24
Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024
10
Moebius
24 Dec 24
Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024
9
Chris M. Thomasson
24 Dec 24
Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024
8
Moebius
Haut de la page
Les messages affichés proviennent d'
usenet
.
NewsPortal