sci.logic

Liste des Groupes Pages :1234567891011121314151617
Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Jun 25     i i +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis2olcott
26 Jun 25     i i i`- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
26 Jun 25     i i `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
26 Jun 25     i `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
25 Jun 25     `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that I have refuted the conventional Halting Problem proof technique --- Full 38 page analysis1Richard Damon
21 Jun 25 * ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique16olcott
22 Jun 25 +* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique3Keith Thompson
22 Jun 25 i`* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique2olcott
22 Jun 25 i `- Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique1Richard Damon
22 Jun 25 +* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique5Richard Damon
22 Jun 25 i`* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique4olcott
22 Jun 25 i `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique3Richard Damon
22 Jun 25 i  `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique2olcott
23 Jun 25 i   `- Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique1Richard Damon
23 Jun 25 +- Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique1olcott
23 Jun 25 `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique6olcott
24 Jun 25  +* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique4olcott
24 Jun 25  i`* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique3Alan Mackenzie
24 Jun 25  i `* Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique2olcott
24 Jun 25  i  `- Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique1Chris M. Thomasson
24 Jun 25  `- Re: ChatGPT totally understands exactly how I refuted the conventional halting problem proof technique1olcott
20 Jun 25 * How do simulating termination analyzers work? (V2)11olcott
21 Jun 25 `* Re: How do simulating termination analyzers work? (V2)10Richard Damon
21 Jun 25  `* Re: How do simulating termination analyzers work? (V2)9olcott
21 Jun 25   +* Re: How do simulating termination analyzers work? (V2)7olcott
21 Jun 25   i`* Re: How do simulating termination analyzers work? (V2)6olcott
22 Jun 25   i `* Re: How do simulating termination analyzers work? (V2)5Richard Damon
22 Jun 25   i  `* Re: How do simulating termination analyzers work? (V2)4olcott
22 Jun 25   i   `* Re: How do simulating termination analyzers work? (V2)3Richard Damon
24 Jun 25   i    `* Re: How do simulating termination analyzers work? (V2)2Richard Heathfield
24 Jun 25   i     `- Re: How do simulating termination analyzers work? (V2)1olcott
21 Jun 25   `- Re: How do simulating termination analyzers work? (V2)1Richard Damon
21 Jun 25 o Re: HP counter-example INPUT cannot possibly exist --- Peter Linz HP Proof1olcott
17 Jun 25 o Dog Shit: Call my name "jan.ai" (Re: Why do IDEs have Power Save mode?)1Mild Shock
9 Jun 25 * Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point74olcott
9 Jun 25 +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point67dbush
9 Jun 25 i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point66olcott
9 Jun 25 i +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point63dbush
9 Jun 25 i i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point62olcott
9 Jun 25 i i +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point52olcott
9 Jun 25 i i i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point51dbush
9 Jun 25 i i i `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point50olcott
9 Jun 25 i i i  `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point49dbush
9 Jun 25 i i i   +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point47olcott
9 Jun 25 i i i   i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point46dbush
9 Jun 25 i i i   i +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point44olcott
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point43dbush
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point42olcott
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i  +- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1dbush
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i  `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point40dbush
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i   `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point39olcott
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i    `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point38dbush
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i     `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point37olcott
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i      `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point36dbush
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i       `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point35olcott
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i        `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point34dbush
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i         `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point33olcott
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i          `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point32dbush
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i           `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point31olcott
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i            `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point30dbush
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i             `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point29olcott
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i              `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point28dbush
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i               `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point27olcott
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i                +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point14dbush
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i                i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point13olcott
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i                i `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point12dbush
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i                i  `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point11olcott
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i                i   `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point10dbush
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i                i    `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point9olcott
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i                i     `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point8dbush
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i                i      `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point7olcott
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i                i       +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point4dbush
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i                i       i+- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
10 Jun 25 i i i   i i                i       i+- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
10 Jun 25 i i i   i i                i       i`- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i                i       `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point2dbush
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i                i        `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i                `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point12dbush
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i                 `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point11olcott
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i                  `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point10dbush
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i                   +* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point4olcott
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i                   i`* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point3dbush
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i                   i `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point2olcott
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i                   i  `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1dbush
9 Jun 25 i i i   i i                   `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point5Richard Heathfield
10 Jun 25 i i i   i i                    +- It has always been impossible to define an INPUT that does the opposite of its halt decider1olcott
10 Jun 25 i i i   i i                    `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point3olcott
10 Jun 25 i i i   i i                     `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point2Richard Damon
10 Jun 25 i i i   i i                      `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
9 Jun 25 i i i   i `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
9 Jun 25 i i i   `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
10 Jun 25 i i +* Mike can't even count to eight --- HHH(DDD)2olcott
10 Jun 25 i i i`- Re: Mike can't even count to eight --- HHH(DDD)1Richard Damon
14 Jun 25 i i `* The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++7olcott
15 Jun 25 i i  `* Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++6Fred. Zwarts
15 Jun 25 i i   +* Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++3olcott
15 Jun 25 i i   i+- Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++1Richard Damon
16 Jun 25 i i   i`- Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++1Fred. Zwarts
15 Jun 25 i i   `* Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++2olcott
16 Jun 25 i i    `- Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++1Fred. Zwarts
9 Jun 25 i `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point2Richard Damon
9 Jun 25 i  `- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1olcott
9 Jun 25 +- Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point1Keith Thompson
9 Jun 25 `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point5Richard Damon
9 Jun 25  `* Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about this point4olcott
14 Jun 25   `* The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++3olcott
15 Jun 25    `* Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++2Fred. Zwarts
15 Jun 25     `- Re: The input to HHH(DDD) specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations +++1olcott
15 Jun 25 * Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem --- CHALLENGE2olcott
15 Jun 25 `- Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem --- CHALLENGE1Richard Damon
13 Jun 25 * Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT6olcott
14 Jun 25 `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT5Fred. Zwarts
14 Jun 25  `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT4olcott
15 Jun 25   +* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT2Fred. Zwarts
15 Jun 25   i`- Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++1olcott
15 Jun 25   `- Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT1olcott
14 Jun 25 * Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++2olcott
14 Jun 25 `- Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++1Richard Damon
14 Jun 25 * Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT2olcott
14 Jun 25 `- Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT1Richard Damon
12 Jun 25 * HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT17olcott
12 Jun 25 +* Re: HHH(DD) INcorrectly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT11Richard Damon
13 Jun 25 i`* Re: HHH(DD) INcorrectly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT10olcott
13 Jun 25 i `* Re: HHH(DD) INcorrectly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT9Richard Damon
13 Jun 25 i  `* Re: HHH(DD) INcorrectly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT8olcott
14 Jun 25 i   `* Re: HHH(DD) correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT7olcott
14 Jun 25 i    `* Re: HHH(DD) correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT6Richard Damon
14 Jun 25 i     `* Re: HHH(DD) Does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT5olcott
14 Jun 25 i      +- Re: HHH(DD) Does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT1Fred. Zwarts
14 Jun 25 i      `* Re: HHH(DD) Does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT3Richard Damon
14 Jun 25 i       `* Re: HHH(DD) Does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++2olcott
14 Jun 25 i        `- Re: HHH(DD) Does incorrectly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++ and Oclotts VERIFIED LIES1Richard Damon
13 Jun 25 `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT5olcott
14 Jun 25  +- Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT1Fred. Zwarts
14 Jun 25  `* Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++3olcott
14 Jun 25   +- Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++ Mike1olcott
14 Jun 25   `- Re: HHH(DD) does correctly reject its input as non-halting --- VERIFIED FACT +++1Richard Damon
13 Jun 25 o Re: Alan Turing's Halting Problem is incorrectly formed1olcott
7 Jun 25 * The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence26olcott
7 Jun 25 +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence10dbush
7 Jun 25 i`* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence9olcott
7 Jun 25 i +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence7dbush
7 Jun 25 i i`* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence6olcott
7 Jun 25 i i `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence5dbush
7 Jun 25 i i  `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence4olcott
7 Jun 25 i i   +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence2dbush
7 Jun 25 i i   i`- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1olcott
8 Jun 25 i i   `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Richard Damon
7 Jun 25 i `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Richard Damon
7 Jun 25 +- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1wij
7 Jun 25 +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence4Richard Damon
8 Jun 25 i`* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence3Richard Damon
8 Jun 25 i `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence2Richard Damon
9 Jun 25 i  `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Richard Damon
8 Jun 25 +- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Fred. Zwarts
11 Jun 25 `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence9anthk
12 Jun 25  `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence8olcott
12 Jun 25   `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence7Richard Damon
12 Jun 25    +* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence4olcott
12 Jun 25    i+* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence2Fred. Zwarts
12 Jun 25    ii`- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence --- VERIFIED FACTS1olcott
12 Jun 25    i`- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence1Richard Damon
12 Jun 25    `* Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence --- VERIFIED FACTS2olcott
12 Jun 25     `- Re: The execution trace of HHH1(DDD) shows the divergence --- VERIFIED FACTS1Richard Damon
6 Jun 25 * Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE16olcott
7 Jun 25 `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE15Richard Damon
7 Jun 25  `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE14olcott
7 Jun 25   `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE13Richard Damon
7 Jun 25    `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE12olcott
8 Jun 25     `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE11Richard Damon
8 Jun 25      `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE10olcott
8 Jun 25       `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE9Richard Damon
8 Jun 25        `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE8olcott
8 Jun 25         +* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE4Fred. Zwarts
8 Jun 25         i`* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE3olcott
9 Jun 25         i +- Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE1Richard Damon
9 Jun 25         i `- Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE1Fred. Zwarts
8 Jun 25         `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE3Richard Damon
8 Jun 25          `* Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE2olcott
9 Jun 25           `- Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1--- BEST ONE1Richard Damon
4 Jun 25 * DCGs are dead: ROKs transformation from FGCS 19822Mild Shock
4 Jun 25 `- long live DGCs: Prolog systems before Stargate LLC in 2025 (Was DCGs are dead: ROKs transformation from FGCS 1982)1Mild Shock
23 May 25 o AI: Choose your favorite McDonald, Burger King, etc..1Mild Shock
21 May 25 o The story of Sam & Jony1Mild Shock
20 May 25 o FYI, a snapshot of the open math copilot race1Mild Shock
12 May 25 * How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met5olcott
13 May 25 +* Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met3Mikko
13 May 25 i`* Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met2olcott
18 May 25 i `- Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met1Mikko
17 May 25 `- Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike my best reviewer1olcott
17 May 25 * Logos 2000: rulial foundations4Ross Finlayson
17 May 25 +- Re: Logos 2000: rulial foundations1Ross Finlayson
17 May 25 +- Re: Logos 2000: rulial foundations1Ross Finlayson
17 May 25 `- Re: Logos 2000: rulial foundations1Ross Finlayson
12 May 25 * Re: Michael Sipser of MIT validates the notion of a simulating halt decider4olcott
13 May 25 +- Re: Michael Sipser of MIT validates the notion of a simulating halt decider1Richard Damon
13 May 25 `* Re: Michael Sipser of MIT validates the notion of a simulating halt decider2Mikko
13 May 25  `- Re: Michael Sipser of MIT validates the notion of a simulating halt decider1olcott
12 May 25 o Improved version: New proof of dark numbers by means of the thinned out harmonic series1WM
12 May 25 o Improved version: New proof of dark numbers1WM
5 May 25 * Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable21olcott
5 May 25 +* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable3Mikko
5 May 25 i`* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable2olcott
6 May 25 i `- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1Mikko
5 May 25 +* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable4Alan Mackenzie
5 May 25 i`* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable3olcott
6 May 25 i `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable2Alan Mackenzie
6 May 25 i  `- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1Mikko
5 May 25 `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable13Richard Damon
5 May 25  +* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable9olcott
6 May 25  i+* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable3Richard Damon
6 May 25  ii`* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable2olcott
6 May 25  ii `- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1Richard Damon
6 May 25  i`* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable5olcott
6 May 25  i +- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1Alan Mackenzie
6 May 25  i `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable3Richard Damon
6 May 25  i  `* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable ---ELABORATED2olcott
7 May 25  i   `- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable ---ELABORATED1Richard Damon
5 May 25  +* Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable2Richard Heathfield
5 May 25  i`- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1Richard Heathfield
6 May 25  `- Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable1Richard Damon
19 Dec 24 * Larger Collected Reasoning 202443Ross Finlayson
19 Dec 24 +* Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 202415Ross Finlayson
19 Dec 24 i+* Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024)13Mild Shock
19 Dec 24 ii`* Re: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024)12Mild Shock
19 Dec 24 ii +- USENET is the information panspermia (Was: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy)1Mild Shock
20 Dec 24 ii +* Re: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024)4Ross Finlayson
20 Dec 24 ii i`* Re: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024)3Mild Shock
20 Dec 24 ii i `* Re: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024)2Ross Finlayson
20 Dec 24 ii i  `- Re: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024)1Mild Shock
22 Dec 24 ii `* Re: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024)6Thomas Heger
22 Dec 24 ii  `* Re: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024)5Ross Finlayson
23 Dec 24 ii   +- Re: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024)1Thomas Heger
23 Dec 24 ii   `* Re: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024)3Julio Di Egidio
23 Dec 24 ii    `* Re: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024)2Python
24 Dec 24 ii     `- Re: Is Rossy Boy the new Archy Boy (Was: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024)1Chris M. Thomasson
1 May 25 i`- Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 20241Ross Finlayson
22 Dec 24 `* Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 202427Julio Di Egidio
22 Dec 24  `* Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 202426Ross Finlayson
23 Dec 24   `* Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 202425Julio Di Egidio
24 Dec 24    `* Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 202424Chris M. Thomasson
24 Dec 24     +* Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 202416Moebius
24 Dec 24     i+- Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 20241Chris M. Thomasson
24 Dec 24     i`* Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 202414Moebius
24 Dec 24     i +* Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 20243Chris M. Thomasson
24 Dec 24     i i`* Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 20242Moebius
24 Dec 24     i i `- Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 20241Chris M. Thomasson
24 Dec 24     i `* Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 202410Moebius
24 Dec 24     i  `* Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 20249Chris M. Thomasson
24 Dec 24     i   `* Re: Larger Collected Reasoning 20248Moebius

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal