sci.physics.relativity

Liste des GroupesPages :123456789101112131415161718
Date Sujet#  Auteur
19 Sep 24 ii    i +* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
19 Sep 24 ii    i i`- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Maciej Wozniak
19 Sep 24 ii    i `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,8rhertz
19 Sep 24 ii    i  +* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,6ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
19 Sep 24 ii    i  i`* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,5rhertz
19 Sep 24 ii    i  i `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,4ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
19 Sep 24 ii    i  i  `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,3rhertz
19 Sep 24 ii    i  i   +- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
19 Sep 24 ii    i  i   `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Sep 24 ii    i  `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Paul.B.Andersen
19 Sep 24 ii    +- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Paul.B.Andersen
19 Sep 24 ii    +- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Sep 24 ii    `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1LaurenceClarkCrossen
13 Sep 24 i`- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24 +- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1rhertz
17 Sep 24 +* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,3Volney
17 Sep 24 i`* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,2Volney
17 Sep 24 i `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Maciej Wozniak
18 Sep 24 +* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,6rhertz
18 Sep 24 i`* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,5ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
18 Sep 24 i `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,4ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
18 Sep 24 i  `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,3rhertz
18 Sep 24 i   `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
18 Sep 24 i    `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Maciej Wozniak
18 Sep 24 +* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,6rhertz
18 Sep 24 i+- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Ross Finlayson
18 Sep 24 i`* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,4ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
18 Sep 24 i +- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Maciej Wozniak
18 Sep 24 i +- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Paul.B.Andersen
18 Sep 24 i `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Ross Finlayson
19 Sep 24 +* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,5J. J. Lodder
19 Sep 24 i+- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Maciej Wozniak
19 Sep 24 i`* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,3rhertz
20 Sep 24 i `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,2J. J. Lodder
20 Sep 24 i  `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Maciej Wozniak
20 Sep 24 +* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,7rhertz
20 Sep 24 i+* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,3rhertz
21 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,2Paul.B.Andersen
22 Sep 24 ii `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Maciej Wozniak
20 Sep 24 i`* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,3Paul.B.Andersen
20 Sep 24 i `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,2rhertz
21 Sep 24 i  `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1Paul.B.Andersen
22 Sep 24 `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,6rhertz
22 Sep 24  +- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1rhertz
22 Sep 24  +- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
23 Sep 24  `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,3rhertz
24 Sep 24   `* Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,2rhertz
24 Sep 24    `- Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,1rhertz
19 Sep 24 * E. Noether contra B. Carter10JanPB
19 Sep 24 +* Re: E. Noether contra B. Carter3JanPB
19 Sep 24 i`* Re: E. Noether contra B. Carter2Ross Finlayson
20 Sep 24 i `- Re: E. Noether contra B. Carter1Ross Finlayson
19 Sep 24 `* Re: E. Noether contra B. Carter6JanPB
22 Sep 24  `* Re: E. Noether contra B. Carter5JanPB
22 Sep 24   +- Re: E. Noether contra B. Carter1JanPB
22 Sep 24   `* Re: E. Noether contra B. Carter3Ross Finlayson
23 Sep 24    `* Re: E. Noether contra B. Carter2JanPB
23 Sep 24     `- Re: E. Noether contra B. Carter1Ross Finlayson
15 Sep 24 * The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,15rhertz
15 Sep 24 +- Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,1Paul.B.Andersen
15 Sep 24 +* Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,8Paul.B.Andersen
15 Sep 24 i+- Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,1Maciej Wozniak
15 Sep 24 i+- Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,1Ross Finlayson
18 Sep 24 i`* Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,5ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
18 Sep 24 i +- Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,1Paul.B.Andersen
18 Sep 24 i `* Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,3gharnagel
22 Sep 24 i  `* Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
22 Sep 24 i   `- Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,1Ross Finlayson
16 Sep 24 +* Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,2Volney
16 Sep 24 i`- Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,1Maciej Wozniak
21 Sep 24 `* Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,3rhertz
21 Sep 24  +- Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,1Paul.B.Andersen
21 Sep 24  `- Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,1J. J. Lodder
30 Aug 24 * Re: Relativity and flat Earth15Arindam Banerjee
30 Aug 24 `* Re: Relativity and flat Earth14Jim Pennino
30 Aug 24  +* Re: Relativity and flat Earth4Python
31 Aug 24  i+* Re: Relativity and flat Earth2J. J. Lodder
1 Sep 24  ii`- Re: Relativity and flat Earth1bertietaylor
31 Aug 24  i`- Re: Relativity and flat Earth1bertietaylor
31 Aug 24  `* Re: Relativity and flat Earth9bertietaylor
1 Sep 24   `* Re: Relativity and flat Earth8Jim Pennino
1 Sep 24    +* Re: Relativity and flat Earth3bertietaylor
1 Sep 24    i`* Re: Relativity and flat Earth2Jim Pennino
1 Sep 24    i `- Re: Relativity and flat Earth1bertietaylor
5 Sep 24    `* Re: Relativity and flat Earth4J. J. Lodder
5 Sep 24     `* Re: Relativity and flat Earth3bertietaylor
5 Sep 24      `* Re: Relativity and flat Earth2Jim Pennino
22 Sep 24       `- Re: Relativity and flat Earth1bertietaylor
19 Sep 24 * A definition of "when"11Maciej Wozniak
19 Sep 24 `* Re: A definition of "when"10Python
19 Sep 24  `* Re: A definition of "when"9Maciej Wozniak
19 Sep 24   `* Re: A definition of "when"8Python
19 Sep 24    `* Re: A definition of "when"7Maciej Wozniak
19 Sep 24     `* Re: A definition of "when"6Python
19 Sep 24      `* Re: A definition of "when"5Maciej Wozniak
19 Sep 24       `* Re: A definition of "when"4Python
20 Sep 24        `* Re: A definition of "when"3Richard Hachel
20 Sep 24         `* Re: A definition of "when"2Python
20 Sep 24          `- Re: A definition of "when"1Richard Hachel
13 Sep 24 * Re: No evidence39LaurenceClarkCrossen
13 Sep 24 +* Re: No evidence2gharnagel
14 Sep 24 i`- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
14 Sep 24 `* Re: No evidence36Mikko
15 Sep 24  +* Re: No evidence5LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24  i+- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24  i`* Re: No evidence3Mikko
15 Sep 24  i +- Re: No evidence1Maciej Wozniak
15 Sep 24  i `- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24  `* Re: No evidence30LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24   +* Re: No evidence11gharnagel
15 Sep 24   i+* Re: No evidence9LaurenceClarkCrossen
16 Sep 24   ii`* Re: No evidence8gharnagel
16 Sep 24   ii +- Re: No evidence (rotating frames)1Ross Finlayson
16 Sep 24   ii `* Re: No evidence6gharnagel
18 Sep 24   ii  `* Re: No evidence5gharnagel
18 Sep 24   ii   `* Re: No evidence4gharnagel
18 Sep 24   ii    `* Re: No evidence3gharnagel
20 Sep 24   ii     `* Re: No evidence2gharnagel
20 Sep 24   ii      `- Re: No evidence1Maciej Wozniak
16 Sep 24   i`- Re: No evidence1gharnagel
15 Sep 24   `* Re: No evidence18Mikko
15 Sep 24    +- Re: No evidence1Maciej Wozniak
15 Sep 24    +* Re: No evidence4LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Sep 24    i`* Re: No evidence3Mikko
17 Sep 24    i +- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
20 Sep 24    i `- Re: No evidence1Thomas Heger
15 Sep 24    +* Re: No evidence5LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Sep 24    i`* Re: No evidence4Mikko
17 Sep 24    i `* Re: No evidence3Richard Hachel
19 Sep 24    i  `* Re: No evidence2Mikko
19 Sep 24    i   `- Re: No evidence1Richard Hachel
15 Sep 24    `* Re: No evidence7LaurenceClarkCrossen
16 Sep 24     +- Re: No evidence1gharnagel
16 Sep 24     +- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Sep 24     `* Re: No evidence4Mikko
17 Sep 24      `* Re: No evidence3LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Sep 24       `* Re: No evidence2Mikko
19 Sep 24        `- Re: No evidence1Maciej Wozniak
19 Sep 24 o Ether1Richard Hachel
18 Sep 24 * Another Mainstream "Science" Long Ago Thoroughly Refuted4LaurenceClarkCrossen
18 Sep 24 +* Re: Another Mainstream "Science" Long Ago Thoroughly Refuted2LaurenceClarkCrossen
18 Sep 24 i`- Re: Another Mainstream "Science" Long Ago Thoroughly Refuted1Python
19 Sep 24 `- Re: Another Mainstream "Science" Long Ago Thoroughly Refuted1Mikko
18 Sep 24 o Re: Mars is a dead planet1Chris M. Thomasson
15 Sep 24 * Where the 20th century lost its way. Time is not a dimension4LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24 `* Re: Where the 20th century lost its way. Time is not a dimension3LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Sep 24  +- Re: Where the 20th century lost its way. Time is not a dimension1LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Sep 24  `- Re: Where the 20th century lost its way. Time is not a dimension1LaurenceClarkCrossen
14 Sep 24 * In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,27rhertz
14 Sep 24 +* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,6LaurenceClarkCrossen
14 Sep 24 i`* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,5rhertz
14 Sep 24 i +- Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,1Ross Finlayson
14 Sep 24 i +* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,2Richard Hachel
14 Sep 24 i i`- Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,1Ross Finlayson
15 Sep 24 i `- Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,1Thomas Heger
14 Sep 24 +* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,11Paul.B.Andersen
14 Sep 24 i+- Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,1Paul.B.Andersen
15 Sep 24 i`* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,9rhertz
15 Sep 24 i +* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,7rhertz
15 Sep 24 i i`* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,6Ross Finlayson
15 Sep 24 i i `* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,5rhertz
15 Sep 24 i i  `* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,4LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24 i i   `* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,3Ross Finlayson
15 Sep 24 i i    `* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,2Ross Finlayson
15 Sep 24 i i     `- Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,1Ross Finlayson
15 Sep 24 i `- Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,1Paul.B.Andersen
16 Sep 24 `* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,9Mikko
16 Sep 24  `* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,8rhertz
16 Sep 24   +* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,5Paul.B.Andersen
16 Sep 24   i+- Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,1Maciej Wozniak
16 Sep 24   i`* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,3rhertz
17 Sep 24   i `* Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,2Paul.B.Andersen
17 Sep 24   i  `- Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,1LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Sep 24   +- Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,1Mikko
17 Sep 24   `- Re: In 1911, EInstein thought that photons had mass. Still in use 123 years after,1Mikko
16 Sep 24 * Relativistic synchronization3Richard Hachel
16 Sep 24 `* Re: Relativistic synchronization2Paul.B.Andersen
16 Sep 24  `- Re: Relativistic synchronization1Richard Hachel
4 Sep 24 * Yes, t'=t in GPS.60Maciej Wozniak
4 Sep 24 `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.59Python
4 Sep 24  `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.58Maciej Wozniak
4 Sep 24   `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.57gharnagel
4 Sep 24    `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.56Maciej Wozniak
4 Sep 24     +* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.14Python
4 Sep 24     i`* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.13Maciej Wozniak
4 Sep 24     i `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.12Python
5 Sep 24     i  +- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Maciej Wozniak
5 Sep 24     i  `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.10Thomas Heger
5 Sep 24     i   `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.9Maciej Wozniak
6 Sep 24     i    `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.8Thomas Heger
6 Sep 24     i     `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.7Maciej Wozniak
7 Sep 24     i      `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.6Thomas Heger
13 Sep 24     i       `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.5Thomas Heger
13 Sep 24     i        +- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Athel Cornish-Bowden
13 Sep 24     i        `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.3Maciej Wozniak
14 Sep 24     i         `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.2Thomas Heger
14 Sep 24     i          `- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Maciej Wozniak
5 Sep 24     `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.41gharnagel
5 Sep 24      +- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Python
5 Sep 24      `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.39gharnagel
5 Sep 24       `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.38Maciej Wozniak
6 Sep 24        `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.37gharnagel
6 Sep 24         `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.36Maciej Wozniak
7 Sep 24          `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.35gharnagel
7 Sep 24           `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.34Maciej Wozniak
8 Sep 24            `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.33gharnagel
8 Sep 24             `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.32Maciej Wozniak
9 Sep 24              `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.31gharnagel
10 Sep 24               `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.30gharnagel
10 Sep 24                `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.29gharnagel
10 Sep 24                 `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.28Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                  +* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.8Python
10 Sep 24                  i`* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.7Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                  i `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.6Python
10 Sep 24                  i  `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.5Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                  i   `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.4Python
10 Sep 24                  i    `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.3Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                  i     `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.2Python
11 Sep 24                  i      `- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                  `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.19gharnagel
10 Sep 24                   `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.18Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                    +* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.7Python
10 Sep 24                    i`* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.6Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                    i +* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.4Python
10 Sep 24                    i i+- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Maciej Wozniak
11 Sep 24                    i i`* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.2Richard Hachel
11 Sep 24                    i i `- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Python
10 Sep 24                    i `- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Python
11 Sep 24                    `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.10gharnagel
11 Sep 24                     `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.9Maciej Wozniak
12 Sep 24                      `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.8gharnagel
12 Sep 24                       `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.7Maciej Wozniak
13 Sep 24                        `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.6gharnagel
13 Sep 24                         `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.5Maciej Wozniak
14 Sep 24                          `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.4gharnagel
14 Sep 24                           `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.3Maciej Wozniak
14 Sep 24                            +- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Richard Hachel
15 Sep 24                            `- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1gharnagel
8 Sep 24 * Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.56LaurenceClarkCrossen
9 Sep 24 `* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.55rhertz
9 Sep 24  +* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.5Ross Finlayson
9 Sep 24  i`* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.4rhertz
9 Sep 24  i `* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.3Ross Finlayson
9 Sep 24  i  `* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.2Ross Finlayson
9 Sep 24  i   `- Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.1Ross Finlayson
9 Sep 24  +* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.47LaurenceClarkCrossen
9 Sep 24  i`* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.46Richard Hachel
9 Sep 24  i +- Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.1Ross Finlayson
9 Sep 24  i +* Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.43Paul.B.Andersen
9 Sep 24  i i+- Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.1LaurenceClarkCrossen

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal