comp.theory

Liste des Groupes Pages :1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132
Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Jun 24 i ii i         i         +- Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis1Richard Damon
10 Jun 24 i ii i         i         `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis3Mikko
10 Jun 24 i ii i         i          `* Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis2olcott
11 Jun 24 i ii i         i           `- Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Ben's 10/2022 analysis1Mikko
7 Jun 24 i ii i         `- Re: How Partial Simulations correctly determine non-halting ---Mike Terry Error1Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 i ii `- Re: Mike Terry Reply to Fred Zwarts1Fred. Zwarts
4 Jun 24 i i`- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review1Richard Damon
3 Jun 24 i `- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?1Mike Terry
3 Jun 24 +* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?20Fred. Zwarts
3 Jun 24 i`* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?19Mike Terry
3 Jun 24 i `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?18olcott
3 Jun 24 i  `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?17Mike Terry
3 Jun 24 i   +- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- woeful ignorance1olcott
4 Jun 24 i   `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?15olcott
4 Jun 24 i    +* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?13Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 i    i`* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?12olcott
4 Jun 24 i    i `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?11Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 i    i  `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?10olcott
4 Jun 24 i    i   `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?9Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 i    i    `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?8olcott
4 Jun 24 i    i     `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?7Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 i    i      `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?6olcott
4 Jun 24 i    i       `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?5Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 i    i        `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?4olcott
5 Jun 24 i    i         +- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?1Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i    i         `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?2Fred. Zwarts
5 Jun 24 i    i          `- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?1olcott
4 Jun 24 i    `- Re: Why is Olcott so ignorant, anyway?1immibis
3 Jun 24 `- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?1Mikko
8 Jun 24 * Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'?17wij
8 Jun 24 +- Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'?1wij
9 Jun 24 `* Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'?15Ben Bacarisse
9 Jun 24  `* Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'?14wij
10 Jun 24   +* Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'?4Andy Walker
10 Jun 24   i`* Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'?3wij
10 Jun 24   i `* Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'?2Andy Walker
10 Jun 24   i  `- Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'?1wij
10 Jun 24   `* Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'?9Ben Bacarisse
10 Jun 24    +* Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'?6wij
10 Jun 24    i`* Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'?5Ben Bacarisse
11 Jun 24    i `* Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'?4wij
11 Jun 24    i  +* Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'?2Jeff Barnett
11 Jun 24    i  i`- Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'?1wij
11 Jun 24    i  `- Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'?1Ben Bacarisse
10 Jun 24    `* Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'?2wij
10 Jun 24     `- Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'?1Ben Bacarisse
7 Jun 24 * Proof that DD correctly simulated by HH provides the correct halt status criteria14olcott
7 Jun 24 +* Re: Proof that DD correctly simulated by HH provides the correct halt status criteria2Python
8 Jun 24 i`- Re: Proof that DD correctly simulated by HH provides the correct halt status criteria1olcott
8 Jun 24 +- Re: Proof that DD correctly simulated by HH provides the correct halt status criteria1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 +* Re: Proof that DD correctly simulated by HH provides the correct halt status criteria7Mikko
8 Jun 24 i`* Re: Proof that DD correctly simulated by HH provides the correct halt status criteria6olcott
8 Jun 24 i +- Re: Proof that DD correctly simulated by HH provides the correct halt status criteria1Richard Damon
9 Jun 24 i `* Re: Proof that DD correctly simulated by HH provides the correct halt status criteria4Mikko
9 Jun 24 i  `* Re: Proof that DD correctly simulated by HH provides the correct halt status criteria3olcott
9 Jun 24 i   +- Re: Proof that DD correctly simulated by HH provides the correct halt status criteria1Mikko
9 Jun 24 i   `- Re: Proof that DD correctly simulated by HH provides the correct halt status criteria1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 `* Re: Proof that DD correctly simulated by HH provides the correct halt status criteria3Fred. Zwarts
8 Jun 24  `* Re: Proof that DD correctly simulated by HH provides the correct halt status criteria2olcott
8 Jun 24   `- Re: Proof that DD correctly simulated by HH provides the correct halt status criteria1Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 * Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly28olcott
4 Jun 24 +* Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly5Fred. Zwarts
4 Jun 24 i`* Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly4olcott
5 Jun 24 i `* Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly3Fred. Zwarts
5 Jun 24 i  `* Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly2olcott
5 Jun 24 i   `- Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly1Fred. Zwarts
4 Jun 24 +* Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly -- Mike Terry20olcott
4 Jun 24 i`* Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly -- Mike Terry19Fred. Zwarts
5 Jun 24 i `* Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly -- Mike Terry18Mikko
5 Jun 24 i  `* Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly -- Mike Terry17olcott
6 Jun 24 i   `* Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly -- Mike Terry16Mikko
6 Jun 24 i    `* Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly -- Mike Terry15olcott
6 Jun 24 i     +* Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly -- Mike Terry13Mikko
6 Jun 24 i     i`* Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly -- Mike Terry12olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i +- Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly -- Mike Terry1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i `* Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly -- Mike Terry10Mikko
7 Jun 24 i     i  `* Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly -- Mike Terry9olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   +- Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly -- Mike Terry1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i   `* Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly -- Mike Terry7Mikko
8 Jun 24 i     i    `* Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly -- Mike Terry6olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i     +- Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly -- Mike Terry1Richard Damon
9 Jun 24 i     i     `* Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly -- Mike Terry4Mikko
9 Jun 24 i     i      `* Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly -- Mike Terry3olcott
9 Jun 24 i     i       `* Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly -- Mike Terry2Mikko
9 Jun 24 i     i        `- Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly -- Mike Terry1olcott
7 Jun 24 i     `- Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly -- Mike Terry1Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 +- Re: Proof that Olcott is a liar1immibis
5 Jun 24 `- Re: Proof that executed HH(DD,DD) and simulated HH(DD,DD) simulate DD correctly1Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 * DD correctly simulated by HH --- never stops running without aborting its simulation15olcott
6 Jun 24 +* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH --- never stops running without aborting its simulation4Rafael Doofenschmirtz
7 Jun 24 i`* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH --- never stops running without aborting its simulation3Mikko
7 Jun 24 i `* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH --- never stops running without aborting its simulation2olcott
7 Jun 24 i  `- Re: DD correctly simulated by HH --- never stops running without aborting its simulation1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 +- Re: DD correctly simulated by HH --- never stops running without aborting its simulation1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 +* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH --- never stops running without aborting its simulation4Mikko
7 Jun 24 i`* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH --- never stops running without aborting its simulation3olcott
7 Jun 24 i +- Re: DD correctly simulated by HH --- never stops running without aborting its simulation1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i `- Re: DD correctly simulated by HH --- never stops running without aborting its simulation1Mikko
7 Jun 24 `* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH --- never stops running without aborting its simulation5Fred. Zwarts
7 Jun 24  `* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH --- never stops running without aborting its simulation4olcott
7 Jun 24   +- Re: DD correctly simulated by HH --- never stops running without aborting its simulation1olcott
7 Jun 24   +- Re: DD correctly simulated by HH --- never stops running without aborting its simulation1Fred. Zwarts
7 Jun 24   `- Re: DD correctly simulated by HH --- never stops running without aborting its simulation1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 o 19 years1immibis
8 Jun 24 o Copy (2) of Final final final final last end of communication with Richard1immibis
6 Jun 24 * When Richard calls people liars he lies17olcott
6 Jun 24 +* Re: When Richard calls people liars he lies6Mikko
6 Jun 24 i`* Re: When Richard calls people liars he lies5olcott
7 Jun 24 i +- Re: When Richard calls people liars he lies1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i `* Re: When Richard calls people liars he lies3Mikko
7 Jun 24 i  `* Re: When Richard calls people liars he lies2olcott
7 Jun 24 i   `- Re: When Richard calls people liars he lies1Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 +* Re: When Richard calls people liars he lies8Alan Mackenzie
6 Jun 24 i+* Re: When Richard calls people liars he lies2olcott
7 Jun 24 ii`- Re: When Richard calls people liars he lies1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i`* Re: When Richard calls people liars he lies5Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i `* Re: When Richard calls people liars he lies4Alan Mackenzie
7 Jun 24 i  +* Re: When Richard calls people liars he lies2olcott
7 Jun 24 i  i`- Re: When Richard calls people liars he lies1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i  `- Re: When Richard calls people liars he lies1Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 +- Re: When Richard calls people liars he lies --- this post counters defamation in this forum1olcott
7 Jun 24 `- Re: When Olcott calls people liars he lies1Richard Damon
3 May 24 * D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 0328olcott
3 May 24 +* Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 033Richard Damon
4 May 24 i`* Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 032olcott
4 May 24 i `- Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 031Richard Damon
4 May 24 +* Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 034olcott
4 May 24 i+* Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 032olcott
4 May 24 ii`- Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 031Richard Damon
4 May 24 i`- Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 031Richard Damon
4 May 24 +* Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 034olcott
4 May 24 i`* Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 033Richard Damon
4 May 24 i `* Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 032olcott
4 May 24 i  `- Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 031Richard Damon
2 Jun 24 `* Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 0316Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 24  `* Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 0315olcott
3 Jun 24   `* Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 0314Mikko
3 Jun 24    `* Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 0313olcott
3 Jun 24     `* Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 0312Mikko
3 Jun 24      `* Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 0311olcott
3 Jun 24       +- Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 031Fred. Zwarts
4 Jun 24       +- Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 031Richard Damon
4 Jun 24       +* Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 032joes
4 Jun 24       i`- Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 031olcott
5 Jun 24       `* Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 036Mikko
5 Jun 24        `* Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 035olcott
5 Jun 24         +- Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 031joes
6 Jun 24         +* Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 032Mikko
6 Jun 24         i`- Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 031olcott
7 Jun 24         `- Re: D(D) simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 031immibis
30 May 24 * Improved ℙ≠ℕℙ proof11wij
31 May 24 `* Re: Improved ℙ≠ℕℙ proof10wij
31 May 24  +* Re: Improved ℙ≠ℕℙ proof4immibis
1 Jun 24  i`* Re: Improved ℙ≠ℕℙ proof3wij
1 Jun 24  i `* Re: Improved ℙ≠ℕℙ proof2immibis
2 Jun 24  i  `- Re: Improved ℙ≠ℕℙ proof1wij
3 Jun 24  `* Re: Improved ℙ≠ℕℙ proof5wij
3 Jun 24   +* Re: Improved ℙ≠ℕℙ proof2wij
6 Jun 24   i`- Re: Improved ℙ≠ℕℙ proof1wij
4 Jun 24   `* Re: Improved ℙ≠ℕℙ proof2immibis
5 Jun 24    `- Re: Improved ℙ≠ℕℙ proof1wij
3 Jun 24 * The error of the halting problem21olcott
4 Jun 24 +* Re: The error of the halting problem17Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 i`* Re: The error of the halting problem16olcott
4 Jun 24 i +* Re: The error of the halting problem14Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 i i`* Re: The error of the halting problem13olcott
4 Jun 24 i i `* Re: The error of the halting problem12Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 i i  `* Re: The error of the halting problem11olcott
4 Jun 24 i i   +* Re: The error of the halting problem9Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 i i   i`* Re: The error of the halting problem8olcott
4 Jun 24 i i   i `* Re: The error of the halting problem7Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 i i   i  `* Re: The error of the halting problem6olcott
4 Jun 24 i i   i   +- Re: The error of the halting problem1Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 i i   i   +* Re: The error of the halting problem3joes
4 Jun 24 i i   i   i`* Re: The error of the halting problem --- G is untrue in PA2olcott
5 Jun 24 i i   i   i `- Re: The error of the halting problem --- G is untrue in PA1Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 i i   i   `- Re: The error of the halting problem1Mikko
4 Jun 24 i i   `- Re: The error of the halting problem1joes
4 Jun 24 i `- Re: The error of the halting problem1Mikko
4 Jun 24 `* Re: The error of the halting problem3Mikko
4 Jun 24  `* Re: The error of the halting problem2olcott
5 Jun 24   `- Re: The error of the halting problem1Richard Damon
28 May 24 * D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets360olcott
29 May 24 +* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets307Richard Damon
29 May 24 i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets306olcott
29 May 24 i `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets305Richard Damon
29 May 24 i  `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets304olcott
29 May 24 i   +* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets26Mikko
29 May 24 i   i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets25olcott
30 May 24 i   i `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets24Richard Damon
30 May 24 i   i  `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets23olcott
30 May 24 i   i   `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets22Richard Damon
30 May 24 i   i    `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets21olcott
30 May 24 i   i     `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets20Richard Damon
30 May 24 i   i      `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets19olcott
30 May 24 i   i       `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets18Richard Damon
30 May 24 i   i        `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets17olcott
30 May 24 i   i         `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets16Richard Damon
30 May 24 i   i          `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets15olcott
30 May 24 i   i           `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets14Richard Damon
30 May 24 i   i            `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets13olcott
30 May 24 i   i             `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets12Richard Damon
30 May 24 i   i              `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets11olcott
30 May 24 i   i               +* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets4joes
30 May 24 i   i               i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets3olcott
30 May 24 i   i               i +- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets1immibis
31 May 24 i   i               i `- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets1Richard Damon
30 May 24 i   i               +* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets5immibis
30 May 24 i   i               i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets4Richard Damon
31 May 24 i   i               i `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets3Mikko
31 May 24 i   i               i  `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets2immibis
31 May 24 i   i               i   `- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets1Mikko
30 May 24 i   i               `- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets1Richard Damon
29 May 24 i   `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets277Richard Damon
29 May 24 i    `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets276olcott
29 May 24 i     +* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets274Alan Mackenzie
29 May 24 i     i+* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets7olcott
29 May 24 i     ii+* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets5Mike Terry
29 May 24 i     iii+* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets2olcott
30 May 24 i     iiii`- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets1Richard Damon
29 May 24 i     iii`* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets2olcott
30 May 24 i     iii `- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets1Richard Damon
30 May 24 i     ii`- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets1Richard Damon
29 May 24 i     i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets266Ben Bacarisse
29 May 24 i     i `* Two dozen people were simply wrong265olcott
29 May 24 i     i  +* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong4Alan Mackenzie
29 May 24 i     i  i`* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong3olcott
29 May 24 i     i  i `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong2Python
29 May 24 i     i  i  `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong1olcott
30 May 24 i     i  +* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong (including Olcott)233Richard Damon
30 May 24 i     i  i`* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise232olcott
30 May 24 i     i  i +* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise230Richard Damon
30 May 24 i     i  i i`* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise229olcott
30 May 24 i     i  i i `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise228Richard Damon
30 May 24 i     i  i i  `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise227olcott
30 May 24 i     i  i i   `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise226Richard Damon
30 May 24 i     i  i i    `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise225olcott
30 May 24 i     i  i i     +* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise15Richard Damon
30 May 24 i     i  i i     i+* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise2olcott
30 May 24 i     i  i i     ii`- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise1Richard Damon
30 May 24 i     i  i i     i`* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise12olcott
30 May 24 i     i  i i     i `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise11Richard Damon
30 May 24 i     i  i i     i  `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise10olcott
30 May 24 i     i  i i     i   +* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise5Richard Damon
30 May 24 i     i  i i     i   i`* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise4olcott
30 May 24 i     i  i i     i   i `* Re: Olcott was simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise3Richard Damon
30 May 24 i     i  i i     i   i  `* Re: Olcott was simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise2olcott
31 May 24 i     i  i i     i   i   `- Re: Olcott was simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise1Richard Damon
30 May 24 i     i  i i     i   `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise4joes
30 May 24 i     i  i i     i    +- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise1olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal