comp.theory

Liste des GroupesPages :123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233
Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i           `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it ---117Richard Damon
10 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i            `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it ---116olcott
10 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i             `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it ---115Richard Damon
10 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i              `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it ---114olcott
10 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i               `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it ---113Richard Damon
11 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs112olcott
11 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                 `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs111Richard Damon
11 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                  `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs110olcott
11 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                   `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs109Richard Damon
11 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                    `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs108olcott
11 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                     `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs107Richard Damon
11 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                      `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs106olcott
11 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                       `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs105Richard Damon
11 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                        `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs104olcott
11 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                         `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs103Richard Damon
12 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                          `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs102olcott
12 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           +* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs100Richard Damon
12 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i`* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs99olcott
12 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs98Richard Damon
12 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i  `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs97olcott
12 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i   `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs96Richard Damon
12 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i    `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs95olcott
12 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     +* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike91olcott
12 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     i+* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike88Richard Damon
12 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii`* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike87olcott
12 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike86Richard Damon
12 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii  +- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike1Richard Damon
12 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii  `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike84olcott
12 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   +* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike81Richard Damon
12 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i+* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike8olcott
12 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   ii+- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike1Richard Damon
12 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   ii`* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike6joes
12 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   ii `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- fakers or liars?5olcott
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   ii  +* Re: key error in all the proofs --- fakers or liars?3joes
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   ii  i`* Re: key error in all the proofs --- fakers or liars?2olcott
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   ii  i `- Re: key error in all the proofs --- fakers or liars?1Richard Damon
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   ii  `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- fakers or liars?1Richard Damon
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i`* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike72Mike Terry
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike --- basis71olcott
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i  `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike --- basis70Richard Damon
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i   `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike --- basis69olcott
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i    +* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Mike --- basis7joes
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i    i`* Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior6olcott
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i    i +* Re: Overview of proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior4joes
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i    i i`* Re: Overview of proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior3olcott
14 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i    i i +- Re: Overview of proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior1Richard Damon
14 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i    i i `- Re: Overview of proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior1joes
14 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i    i `- Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior1Richard Damon
14 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i    +- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike --- basis1Richard Damon
14 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i    `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike --- basis60Mikko
14 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i     `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike --- basis59olcott
14 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      +* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Mike --- basis54joes
14 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i`* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Mike's correction53olcott
14 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i `* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Mike's correction52Mike Terry
14 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i  `* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Mike's correction of Joes51olcott
14 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i   +- Re: key error in all the proofs --- Mike's correction of Joes1olcott
15 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i   +* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Mike's correction of Joes6joes
15 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i   i`* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Mike's correction of Joes5olcott
15 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i   i +- Re: key error in all the proofs --- Mike's correction of Joes1Fred. Zwarts
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i   i `* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Mike's correction of Joes3Mikko
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i   i  `* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Mike's correction of Joes2olcott
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i   i   `- Re: key error in all the proofs --- Mike's correction of Joes1Mikko
15 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i   `* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Mike's correction of Joes43Fred. Zwarts
15 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i    `* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred42olcott
15 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i     +- Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred1Fred. Zwarts
15 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i     +- Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred1joes
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i     `* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred39Mikko
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i      `* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred38olcott
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       +* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred35Mikko
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i`* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred34olcott
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i +* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred29Richard Damon
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i`* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred28olcott
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i +* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred11Richard Damon
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i i`* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred10olcott
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i i `* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred9Richard Damon
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i i  `* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred8olcott
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i i   `* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred7Richard Damon
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i i    `* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred6olcott
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i i     `* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred5Richard Damon
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i i      `* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred4olcott
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i i       +- Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred1Richard Damon
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i i       +- Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred1joes
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i i       `- Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred1Fred. Zwarts
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i +* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred15joes
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i i`* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred14olcott
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i i +* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred12joes
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i i i`* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred11olcott
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i i i `* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred10Richard Damon
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i i i  `* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred9olcott
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i i i   +- Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred1joes
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i i i   +* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred6Richard Damon
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i i i   i`* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred5olcott
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i i i   i +* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred3Richard Damon
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i i i   i i`* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred2olcott
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i i i   i i `- Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred1Richard Damon
17 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i i i   i `- Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred1Mikko
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i i i   `- Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred1Fred. Zwarts
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i i `- Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred1Fred. Zwarts
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i i `- Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred1Fred. Zwarts
17 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i `* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred4Mikko
17 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i  `* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred3olcott
18 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i   `* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred2Mikko
18 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       i    `- Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred1olcott
17 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i       `* Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred2joes
17 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      i        `- Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred1olcott
15 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      +- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike --- basis1Richard Damon
15 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i      `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike --- basis3Mikko
15 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i       `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike --- basis2olcott
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   i        `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike --- basis1Mikko
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii   `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike2joes
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     ii    `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike1olcott
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     i`* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike2joes
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     i `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs --- Mike1olcott
12 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     +- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs1Richard Damon
12 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i     `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs2joes
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           i      `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs1olcott
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i i                           `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- key error in all the proofs1Fred. Zwarts
10 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i i `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it ---1Fred. Zwarts
10 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping9Fred. Zwarts
10 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i  `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping8olcott
10 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i   +* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping6Fred. Zwarts
10 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i   i`* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping5olcott
10 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i   i +- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping1Richard Damon
11 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i   i `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping3Fred. Zwarts
11 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i   i  `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping2olcott
11 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i   i   `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping1Richard Damon
10 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i i   `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping1Richard Damon
10 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i i `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- partial simulation never reaches its halt state, but full behavior does ---natural number mapping1Richard Damon
10 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     i `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- partial emulation never reaches its halt state (But DDD itself does) ---natural number mapping1Richard Damon
11 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii     `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping27Mikko
11 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii      `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping26olcott
11 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii       +- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping1Richard Damon
11 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii       +* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping14Fred. Zwarts
12 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii       i`* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping13olcott
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii       i `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping12Fred. Zwarts
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii       i  `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping11olcott
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii       i   +* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping8Alan Mackenzie
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii       i   i`* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping7olcott
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii       i   i +- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping1Fred. Zwarts
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii       i   i +* Re: never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping4joes
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii       i   i i`* Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point3olcott
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii       i   i i `* Re: Overview of proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point2joes
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii       i   i i  `- Re: Overview of proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point1olcott
14 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii       i   i `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping1Richard Damon
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii       i   +- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping1Fred. Zwarts
14 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii       i   `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping1Richard Damon
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii       `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping10Mikko
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii        `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping9olcott
13 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii         +- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping1Fred. Zwarts
14 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii         `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---natural number mapping7Mikko
14 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii          `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---6olcott
14 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii           +- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---1Fred. Zwarts
14 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii           +- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state1joes
15 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii           `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---3Mikko
15 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii            `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---2olcott
16 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   ii             `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---1Mikko
8 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   i`- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state1Richard Damon
8 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   +* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state2olcott
9 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   i`- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state1Richard Damon
8 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii   `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state2olcott
9 Aug 24 i i   i       i   ii    `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state1Richard Damon
8 Aug 24 i i   i       i   i`- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it1Mikko
8 Aug 24 i i   i       i   `- Re: HHH computes the mapping from its input finite sting to the actual behavior specified by this finite string (Which is the results of running the input)1Richard Damon
7 Aug 24 i i   i       `* Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state?4Keith Thompson
7 Aug 24 i i   i        `* Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state?3olcott
7 Aug 24 i i   i         +- Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state?1Richard Damon
7 Aug 24 i i   i         `- Re: Who knows that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction final state?1joes
4 Aug 24 i i   `- Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?1Fred. Zwarts
3 Aug 24 i `- Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?1Richard Damon
3 Aug 24 `* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?96Mikko
3 Aug 24  `* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?95olcott
3 Aug 24   +* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?83Fred. Zwarts
3 Aug 24   i`* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?82olcott
3 Aug 24   i `* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?81Fred. Zwarts
3 Aug 24   i  `* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?80olcott
4 Aug 24   i   `* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?79Fred. Zwarts
4 Aug 24   i    `* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?78olcott
4 Aug 24   i     +* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?6Richard Damon
4 Aug 24   i     i`* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?5olcott
4 Aug 24   i     i +- Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?1Richard Damon
7 Aug 24   i     i `* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?3Fred. Zwarts
7 Aug 24   i     i  `* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?2olcott
8 Aug 24   i     i   `- Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?1Mikko
5 Aug 24   i     +* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?15Mikko
5 Aug 24   i     i`* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?14olcott
7 Aug 24   i     i `* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?13Mikko
7 Aug 24   i     i  `* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?12olcott
7 Aug 24   i     i   +* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?4Python
7 Aug 24   i     i   i+* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?2olcott
8 Aug 24   i     i   ii`- Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?1Richard Damon
8 Aug 24   i     i   i`- Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?1Mikko
7 Aug 24   i     i   `* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD simulated by HHH cannot reach its own return?7joes
7 Aug 24   i     i    `* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD simulated by HHH cannot reach its own return?6olcott
7 Aug 24   i     i     +* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD simulated by HHH cannot reach its own return? (typos fixed)3olcott
8 Aug 24   i     i     i+- Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD simulated by HHH cannot reach its own return? (typos fixed)1Richard Damon
8 Aug 24   i     i     i`- Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD simulated by HHH cannot reach its own return? (typos fixed)1Mikko
8 Aug 24   i     i     +- Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD simulated by HHH cannot reach its own return?1Richard Damon
8 Aug 24   i     i     `- Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD simulated by HHH cannot reach its own return?1Mikko
7 Aug 24   i     `* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?56Fred. Zwarts
7 Aug 24   i      `* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?55olcott
8 Aug 24   i       +- Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?1Richard Damon
8 Aug 24   i       `* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?53Fred. Zwarts
8 Aug 24   i        `* HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state52olcott
8 Aug 24   i         +* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state13Fred. Zwarts
8 Aug 24   i         i`* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state12olcott
8 Aug 24   i         i `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state11Fred. Zwarts
8 Aug 24   i         i  `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state10olcott
9 Aug 24   i         i   `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state9Fred. Zwarts
9 Aug 24   i         i    `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state8olcott
9 Aug 24   i         i     `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state7Fred. Zwarts
9 Aug 24   i         i      `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state6olcott
9 Aug 24   i         i       +* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state4Fred. Zwarts
9 Aug 24   i         i       i`* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state3olcott
10 Aug 24   i         i       i +- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- partial simulation never reaches its halt state, but the actual behavior of the actual program does1Richard Damon
10 Aug 24   i         i       i `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state1Fred. Zwarts
10 Aug 24   i         i       `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- partial simulation never reaches its halt state, but the program does.1Richard Damon
9 Aug 24   i         `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state38Richard Damon
9 Aug 24   i          `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---37olcott
9 Aug 24   i           +* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---22Richard Damon
9 Aug 24   i           i+* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---19olcott
9 Aug 24   i           ii`* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---18Richard Damon
9 Aug 24   i           ii `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---17olcott
9 Aug 24   i           ii  `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state ---16Richard Damon
9 Aug 24   i           ii   `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state ---15olcott
10 Aug 24   i           ii    `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider.14Richard Damon
10 Aug 24   i           ii     `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider.13olcott
10 Aug 24   i           ii      `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider.12Richard Damon
10 Aug 24   i           ii       `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider.11olcott
10 Aug 24   i           ii        `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider.10Richard Damon
10 Aug 24   i           ii         `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider.9olcott
10 Aug 24   i           ii          `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider.8Richard Damon
10 Aug 24   i           ii           `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider.7olcott
10 Aug 24   i           ii            +* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider.5Richard Damon
10 Aug 24   i           ii            i`* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider.4olcott
10 Aug 24   i           ii            i `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider.3Richard Damon
10 Aug 24   i           ii            i  `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider.2olcott
10 Aug 24   i           ii            i   `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider.1Richard Damon
10 Aug 24   i           ii            `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- reaches its halt state --- Which DDD does if HHH(DDD) returns and answer, which it does since it is a decider.1Mikko
9 Aug 24   i           i`* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---2olcott
10 Aug 24   i           i `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- partial simulation never reaches its halt state, but the actual behavior of the actual program does1Richard Damon
9 Aug 24   i           `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---14Fred. Zwarts
9 Aug 24   i            `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---13olcott
9 Aug 24   i             `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---12Fred. Zwarts
9 Aug 24   i              `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---11olcott
9 Aug 24   i               `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---10Fred. Zwarts
9 Aug 24   i                `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---9olcott
10 Aug 24   i                 `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---8Fred. Zwarts
10 Aug 24   i                  `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---7olcott
10 Aug 24   i                   +* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---3Richard Damon
10 Aug 24   i                   i`* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---2olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal