comp.theory

Liste des GroupesPages :123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233
Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Aug 24   i                   i `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- partial simulation never reaches its halt state --- but full simulaition does.1Richard Damon
10 Aug 24   i                   `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---3Fred. Zwarts
10 Aug 24   i                    `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---2olcott
10 Aug 24   i                     `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state ---1Fred. Zwarts
4 Aug 24   `* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?11Mikko
4 Aug 24    `* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?10olcott
5 Aug 24     `* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?9Mikko
5 Aug 24      `* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?8olcott
7 Aug 24       `* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?7Mikko
7 Aug 24        `* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?6olcott
8 Aug 24         `* Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?5Mikko
8 Aug 24          `* HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state4olcott
9 Aug 24           `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state3Mikko
9 Aug 24            `* Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state2olcott
10 Aug 24             `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state1Mikko
13 Aug 24 * Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior29olcott
13 Aug 24 +- Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior1Python
13 Aug 24 +- Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior1Richard Damon
13 Aug 24 +* Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior23Mikko
13 Aug 24 i`* Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike22olcott
13 Aug 24 i +* Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike15Fred. Zwarts
13 Aug 24 i i`* Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- point by point14olcott
13 Aug 24 i i +* Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- point by point12Fred. Zwarts
13 Aug 24 i i i`* Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- point by point11olcott
13 Aug 24 i i i +* Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- point by point9Fred. Zwarts
13 Aug 24 i i i i`* Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- point by point8olcott
13 Aug 24 i i i i +* Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- point by point6Fred. Zwarts
13 Aug 24 i i i i i`* Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- point by point5olcott
14 Aug 24 i i i i i +- Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- point by point1Richard Damon
14 Aug 24 i i i i i `* Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- point by point3Fred. Zwarts
14 Aug 24 i i i i i  `* Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- in our head2olcott
14 Aug 24 i i i i i   `- Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- in our head1Fred. Zwarts
14 Aug 24 i i i i `- Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- point by point1Richard Damon
14 Aug 24 i i i `- Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- point by point1Richard Damon
14 Aug 24 i i `- Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike --- point by point1Richard Damon
14 Aug 24 i `* Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike6Mikko
14 Aug 24 i  `* Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike5olcott
14 Aug 24 i   +- Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike1Fred. Zwarts
15 Aug 24 i   `* Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike3Mikko
15 Aug 24 i    `* Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike2olcott
16 Aug 24 i     `- Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior --- Mike1Mikko
13 Aug 24 `* Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior3olcott
14 Aug 24  +- Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior1Richard Damon
14 Aug 24  `- Re: Overview of proof that the input to HHH(DDD) specifies non-halting behavior1Richard Damon
4 Aug 24 * Defining a correct halt decider67olcott
4 Aug 24 +* Re: Defining a correct halt decider45Richard Damon
4 Aug 24 i`* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider44olcott
4 Aug 24 i `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider43Richard Damon
4 Aug 24 i  `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider42olcott
4 Aug 24 i   +* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider20Richard Damon
4 Aug 24 i   i`* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider19olcott
4 Aug 24 i   i `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider18Richard Damon
4 Aug 24 i   i  `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider17olcott
4 Aug 24 i   i   `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider16Richard Damon
4 Aug 24 i   i    `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider15olcott
4 Aug 24 i   i     `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider14Richard Damon
4 Aug 24 i   i      `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider13olcott
5 Aug 24 i   i       `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider12Richard Damon
5 Aug 24 i   i        `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider11olcott
5 Aug 24 i   i         `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider10Richard Damon
5 Aug 24 i   i          `* You still seem too dishonest to admit that DDD correctly emulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach its own ,"return" instruction9olcott
5 Aug 24 i   i           `* Re: You still seem too dishonest to admit that DDD correctly emulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach its own ,"return" instruction8Richard Damon
5 Aug 24 i   i            `* Re: You still seem too dishonest to admit that DDD correctly emulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach its own ,"return" instruction7olcott
5 Aug 24 i   i             `* Re: You still seem too dishonest to admit that DDD correctly emulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach its own ,"return" instruction6Richard Damon
5 Aug 24 i   i              `* Re: You still seem too dishonest to admit that DDD correctly emulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach its own ,"return" instruction5olcott
5 Aug 24 i   i               `* Re: You still seem too dishonest to admit that DDD correctly emulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach its own ,"return" instruction4Richard Damon
5 Aug 24 i   i                `* Re: You still seem too dishonest to admit that DDD correctly emulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach its own ,"return" instruction3wij
5 Aug 24 i   i                 `* Re: You still seem too dishonest to admit that DDD correctly emulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach its own ,"return" instruction2olcott
5 Aug 24 i   i                  `- Re: Olcott still seems too dishonest to admit that his HHH doesn't correctly emulate DDD1Richard Damon
7 Aug 24 i   `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider21Mikko
7 Aug 24 i    `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider20olcott
8 Aug 24 i     +- Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider (Which isn't a valid criteria for a decider)1Richard Damon
8 Aug 24 i     `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider18Mikko
8 Aug 24 i      `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider17olcott
8 Aug 24 i       +* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider4Python
8 Aug 24 i       i`* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider3olcott
9 Aug 24 i       i +- Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider1Richard Damon
9 Aug 24 i       i `- Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider1Python
9 Aug 24 i       +- Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider1Richard Damon
9 Aug 24 i       `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider11Mikko
9 Aug 24 i        `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider10olcott
10 Aug 24 i         +- Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider1Richard Damon
10 Aug 24 i         `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider8Mikko
10 Aug 24 i          `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider7olcott
10 Aug 24 i           +* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider3Richard Damon
10 Aug 24 i           i`* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider2olcott
10 Aug 24 i           i `- Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider1Richard Damon
11 Aug 24 i           `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider3Mikko
11 Aug 24 i            `* Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider2olcott
11 Aug 24 i             `- Re: Defining a correct halting decidability decider1Richard Damon
5 Aug 24 `* Re: Defining a correct halt decider21Mikko
5 Aug 24  `* I call it a halting decidability decider20olcott
5 Aug 24   +* Re: I call it a halting decidability decider14Python
5 Aug 24   i`* Re: I call it a halting decidability decider13olcott
5 Aug 24   i +* Re: I call it a halting decidability decider, and thus isn't actually a computability decider.5Richard Damon
6 Aug 24   i i`* Re: I call it a halting decidability decider, and thus isn't actually a computability decider.4olcott
6 Aug 24   i i `* Re: I call it a halting decidability decider, and thus isn't actually a computability decider.3Richard Damon
6 Aug 24   i i  `* Re: I call it a halting decidability decider, and thus isn't actually a computability decider.2olcott
6 Aug 24   i i   `- Re: I call it a halting decidability decider, and thus isn't actually a computability decider.1Richard Damon
7 Aug 24   i `* Re: I call it a halting decidability decider7Mikko
7 Aug 24   i  `* HHH decides a non-trivial semantic property of its input6olcott
8 Aug 24   i   +- Re: HHH decides a trivial semantic non-property of its input1Richard Damon
8 Aug 24   i   +* Re: HHH decides a non-trivial semantic property of its input3Mikko
8 Aug 24   i   i`* Re: HHH decides a non-trivial semantic property of its input2olcott
9 Aug 24   i   i `- Re: HHH decides a non-trivial semantic property of its input1Richard Damon
8 Aug 24   i   `- Re: HHH decides a trivial non-semantic non-property of its input1Richard Damon
5 Aug 24   +- Re: I call it a halting decidability decider, and thus doesn't say anything about the halting problem1Richard Damon
7 Aug 24   `* Re: I call it a halting decidability decider4Mikko
7 Aug 24    `* Re: I call it a halting decidability decider3olcott
8 Aug 24     +- Re: I call it a halting decidability decider1Richard Damon
8 Aug 24     `- Re: I call it a halting decidability decider1Mikko
5 Aug 24 * Is everyone here faking that they know anything about the x86 language?8olcott
5 Aug 24 +- Re: Is everyone here faking that they know anything about the x86 language? Peter Olcott sure is,1Richard Damon
7 Aug 24 `* Re: Is everyone here faking that they know anything about the x86 language?6Mikko
7 Aug 24  `* Re: Is everyone here faking that they know anything about the x86 language?5olcott
8 Aug 24   +- Re: Is everyone here faking that they know anything about the x86 language?1Richard Damon
8 Aug 24   `* Re: Is everyone here faking that they know anything about the x86 language?3Mikko
8 Aug 24    `* HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state2olcott
9 Aug 24     `- Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it --- never reaches its halt state1Richard Damon
6 Aug 24 * Latest revision of my paper incorporating feedback --- last remaining sticking point26olcott
6 Aug 24 +* Re: behaviour and description18joes
6 Aug 24 i`* Re: behaviour and description17olcott
7 Aug 24 i `* Re: behaviour and description16Richard Damon
7 Aug 24 i  `* Re: behaviour and description --- Trust Mike?15olcott
7 Aug 24 i   `* Re: behaviour and description --- Lying Peter14Richard Damon
7 Aug 24 i    +* Re: behaviour and description --- Lying Peter2olcott
7 Aug 24 i    i`- Re: behaviour and description --- Lying Peter1Richard Damon
7 Aug 24 i    +* Re: behavior and description --- All Rebuttals have been pure bluster2olcott
7 Aug 24 i    i`- Re: behavior and description --- Peter Olcott's Rebuttals have been pure bluster1Richard Damon
7 Aug 24 i    `* Re: behavior and description --- All rebuttals have been pure bluster V39olcott
7 Aug 24 i     `* Re: behavior and description --- Peter Olcott's rebuttals have been pure bluster V38Richard Damon
7 Aug 24 i      `* Re: behavior and description --- Rebuttals have been pure bluster V37olcott
7 Aug 24 i       `* Re: behavior and description --- Peter Olcott's Rebuttals have been pure bluster V36Richard Damon
7 Aug 24 i        `* Re: behavior and description --- Richard still only has pure bluster5olcott
7 Aug 24 i         +* Re: behavior and description --- Peter still only has pure bluster and lies3Richard Damon
7 Aug 24 i         i`* Re: behavior and description --- All of the code is here it is just hard to find2olcott
8 Aug 24 i         i `- Re: behavior and description --- All of the code is here it is just hard to find (No its not, no HHH given)1Richard Damon
8 Aug 24 i         `- Re: behavior and description --- Richard still only has pure bluster1Mikko
7 Aug 24 +- Re: Latest revision of my paper incorporating feedback --- last remaining sticking point FAILED.1Richard Damon
7 Aug 24 +* Re: Latest revision of my paper incorporating feedback --- last remaining sticking point3Mikko
7 Aug 24 i`* Re: Latest revision of my paper incorporating feedback --- last remaining sticking point2olcott
8 Aug 24 i `- Re: Latest revision of my paper incorporating feedback --- last remaining sticking point1Mikko
7 Aug 24 `* Re: Latest revision of my paper incorporating feedback --- last remaining sticking point3Fred. Zwarts
7 Aug 24  `* Re: Latest revision of my paper incorporating feedback --- last remaining sticking point2olcott
8 Aug 24   `- Re: Latest revision of my paper incorporating feedback --- last remaining sticking point1Fred. Zwarts
2 Aug 24 * Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this37olcott
2 Aug 24 +* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this ---7olcott
2 Aug 24 i`* Re: Peter Olcott here seems to consistently lie about this ---6Richard Damon
2 Aug 24 i `* Re: Peter Olcott here seems to consistently lie about this ---5olcott
2 Aug 24 i  `* Re: Peter Olcott here seems to consistently lie about this ---4Richard Damon
2 Aug 24 i   `* Re: Peter Olcott here seems to consistently lie about this ---3olcott
2 Aug 24 i    `* Re: Peter Olcott seems to consistently lie about this ---2Richard Damon
3 Aug 24 i     `- Re: Peter Olcott seems to consistently lie about this ---1Mikko
2 Aug 24 +- Re: Peter Olcott here seems to consistently lie about this1Richard Damon
2 Aug 24 +* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this3Fred. Zwarts
2 Aug 24 i`* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this2olcott
2 Aug 24 i `- Re: Peter Olcott seems to consistently lie about this1Richard Damon
3 Aug 24 `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this25Mikko
3 Aug 24  `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this24olcott
3 Aug 24   +* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this9Fred. Zwarts
3 Aug 24   i`* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this8olcott
3 Aug 24   i `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this7Fred. Zwarts
3 Aug 24   i  `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this6olcott
4 Aug 24   i   `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this5Fred. Zwarts
4 Aug 24   i    `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this4olcott
4 Aug 24   i     +- Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this1Richard Damon
5 Aug 24   i     `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this2Mikko
5 Aug 24   i      `- Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this1olcott
4 Aug 24   `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this14Mikko
4 Aug 24    `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this13olcott
4 Aug 24     +- Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this1Richard Damon
5 Aug 24     `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this11Mikko
5 Aug 24      `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this10olcott
6 Aug 24       `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this9Mikko
6 Aug 24        `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this8olcott
6 Aug 24         +- Re: Peter Olcott seems to consistently lie about this1Richard Damon
6 Aug 24         +* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this3Richard Damon
6 Aug 24         i`* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this2olcott
7 Aug 24         i `- Re: Petyer Olcott seems to consistently lie about this1Richard Damon
7 Aug 24         `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this3Mikko
7 Aug 24          `* Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this2olcott
8 Aug 24           `- Re: Everyone here seems to consistently lie about this1Mikko
20 Jul 24 * Hypothetical possibilities221olcott
20 Jul 24 +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities3Richard Damon
20 Jul 24 i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities2olcott
20 Jul 24 i `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Richard Damon
20 Jul 24 +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities101Fred. Zwarts
20 Jul 24 i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities100olcott
20 Jul 24 i +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities47Fred. Zwarts
20 Jul 24 i i+* Re: Hypothetical possibilities6olcott
20 Jul 24 i ii+* Re: Hypothetical possibilities4Richard Damon
20 Jul 24 i iii`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities3olcott
20 Jul 24 i iii +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i iii `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Fred. Zwarts
21 Jul 24 i ii`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Fred. Zwarts
20 Jul 24 i i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities40Alan Mackenzie
20 Jul 24 i i +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities11olcott
20 Jul 24 i i i+* Re: Hypothetical possibilities2Alan Mackenzie
22 Jul 24 i i ii`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Alan Mackenzie tries to get away with mere rhetoric as a rebuttal1olcott
21 Jul 24 i i i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities8Fred. Zwarts
21 Jul 24 i i i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities7olcott
21 Jul 24 i i i  +* Re: Recursive simulation (was: Hypothetical possibilities)3joes
21 Jul 24 i i i  i`* Re: Recursive simulation2olcott
21 Jul 24 i i i  i `- Re: Recursive simulation1Fred. Zwarts
21 Jul 24 i i i  +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities2Fred. Zwarts
21 Jul 24 i i i  i`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1joes
21 Jul 24 i i i  `- Re: Hypothetical IMpossibilities1Richard Damon
20 Jul 24 i i +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities2olcott
20 Jul 24 i i i`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Richard Damon
20 Jul 24 i i +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Alan Mackenzie1olcott
20 Jul 24 i i +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Alan Mackenzie1olcott
21 Jul 24 i i +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities7olcott
21 Jul 24 i i i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities6Fred. Zwarts
21 Jul 24 i i i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities5olcott
21 Jul 24 i i i  +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities3Fred. Zwarts
22 Jul 24 i i i  i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities2olcott
22 Jul 24 i i i  i `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Fred. Zwarts
21 Jul 24 i i i  `- Re: Hypothetical IMpossibilities1Richard Damon
22 Jul 24 i i +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric16olcott
22 Jul 24 i i i+- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric1Fred. Zwarts
22 Jul 24 i i i+* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric4Alan Mackenzie
22 Jul 24 i i ii+- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric --- Liar?1olcott
22 Jul 24 i i ii`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away denying tautologies2olcott
23 Jul 24 i i ii `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away denying tautologies1Fred. Zwarts
23 Jul 24 i i i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric10Mikko
23 Jul 24 i i i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric9olcott
23 Jul 24 i i i  +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric7Alan Mackenzie
23 Jul 24 i i i  i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric --- Dishonest reviews that ignore what I say6olcott
23 Jul 24 i i i  i +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric --- Dishonest reviews that ignore what I say1Fred. Zwarts
24 Jul 24 i i i  i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric --- Dishonest reviews that ignore what I say4Richard Damon
24 Jul 24 i i i  i  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Mindless robots programmed to disagree3olcott
24 Jul 24 i i i  i   +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Olcott is a Mindless robots programmed to disagree1Richard Damon
24 Jul 24 i i i  i   `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Mindless robots programmed to disagree1Fred. Zwarts
25 Jul 24 i i i  `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric1Mikko
22 Jul 24 i i `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Alan Mackenzie tries to get away with mere rhetoric as a rebuttal1olcott
20 Jul 24 i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities52Richard Damon
20 Jul 24 i  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities51olcott
20 Jul 24 i   +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities49joes
20 Jul 24 i   i+- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Richard Damon
20 Jul 24 i   i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities47olcott
20 Jul 24 i   i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities46Richard Damon
20 Jul 24 i   i  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities45olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i   `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities44Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i    `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities43olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i     `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities42Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i      `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities41olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i       `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities40Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i        +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities31olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities30Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i        i +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities6olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal