comp.theory

Liste des Groupes Pages :123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233
Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i              i i  i `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply2olcott
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i              i i  i  `- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply1Richard Damon
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i              i i  `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Dogma12olcott
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i              i i   `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Dogma11Richard Damon
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i              i i    `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Dogma10olcott
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i              i i     +* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Dogma6joes
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i              i i     i`* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Dogma5olcott
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i              i i     i +- Re: Dogma -- other deciders1joes
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i              i i     i `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Dogma3Richard Damon
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i              i i     i  `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Dogma2olcott
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i              i i     i   `- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Dogma1Richard Damon
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i              i i     `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Dogma3Richard Damon
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i              i i      `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Dogma2olcott
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i              i i       `- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Dogma1Richard Damon
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i              i `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply8joes
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i              i  `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply7olcott
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i              i   +* Re: Boilerplate Reply -- different simulation3joes
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i              i   i`* Re: Boilerplate Reply -- different simulation2olcott
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i              i   i `- Re: Boilerplate Reply -- different simulation1joes
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i              i   `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply3Richard Damon
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i              i    `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply2olcott
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i              i     `- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply1Richard Damon
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i              `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply3Mikko
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i               `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply2olcott
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      i                `- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply1Richard Damon
21 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i      `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply2olcott
21 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    i       `- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply1Richard Damon
21 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                    `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)83Mikko
21 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                     `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)82olcott
21 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                      +- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)1Richard Damon
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                      +- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)1Mikko
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                      `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)79Fred. Zwarts
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                       `* DDD correctly emulated by H078olcott
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                        +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H03Fred. Zwarts
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                        i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H02olcott
22 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                        i `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H01Richard Damon
25 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                        `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H074joes
25 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                         `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H073olcott
25 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                          `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H072Alan Mackenzie
25 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H05olcott
25 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i+- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H01Alan Mackenzie
25 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H03joes
25 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H02olcott
25 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i  `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H01joes
25 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H064Ben Bacarisse
25 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i+* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Ben fails to understand computable functions2olcott
26 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           ii`- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Ben fails to understand computable functions1Richard Damon
25 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H061Alan Mackenzie
25 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met60olcott
26 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met59Richard Damon
26 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i   `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met58olcott
26 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i    `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met57Richard Damon
26 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i     `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met56olcott
26 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met36Richard Damon
26 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met35olcott
26 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met34Richard Damon
26 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met33olcott
26 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i   `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met32Richard Damon
26 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i    `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met31olcott
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i     `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met30Richard Damon
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i      `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met29olcott
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i       `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met28Richard Damon
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i        `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met27olcott
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i         `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met26Richard Damon
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i          `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met25Mike Terry
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i           +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met23Mike Terry
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i           i+* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met19Richard Damon
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i           ii+* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met10Mike Terry
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i           iii+* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met2olcott
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i           iiii`- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met1Richard Damon
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i           iii`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met7Richard Damon
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i           iii `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met6olcott
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i           iii  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met5Richard Damon
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i           iii   `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met4olcott
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i           iii    `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met3Richard Damon
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i           iii     `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met2olcott
28 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i           iii      `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met1Richard Damon
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i           ii`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met8olcott
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i           ii `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met7Richard Damon
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i           ii  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met6olcott
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i           ii   `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met5Richard Damon
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i           ii    `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met4olcott
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i           ii     `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met3Richard Damon
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i           ii      `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met2olcott
28 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i           ii       `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met1Richard Damon
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i           i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met3olcott
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i           i `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met2Mike Terry
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i           i  `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met1olcott
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      i           `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met1olcott
26 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i      `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met19Mikko
26 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i       `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met18olcott
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i        +- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met1Richard Damon
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i        `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met16Mikko
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i         `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met15olcott
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i          `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met14Mikko
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i           `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met13olcott
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i            +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met6joes
27 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i            i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met5olcott
28 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i            i `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met4Mikko
28 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i            i  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met3olcott
28 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i            i   +- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met1joes
29 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i            i   `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met1Mikko
28 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i            +- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met1Richard Damon
28 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i            `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met5Mikko
28 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i             `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met4olcott
28 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i              +- Re: Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met1joes
29 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i              +- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met1Richard Damon
29 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           i              `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met1Mikko
25 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                           `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by H02Mike Terry
25 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   i                            `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by H01olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i   `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)58Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i    `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)57olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i     `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)56Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i      +* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)6olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i      i`* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)5Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i      i `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)4olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i      i  `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)3Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i      i   `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)2olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i      i    `- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)1Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i      `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)49olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i       `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)48Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i        `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.47olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         +* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.39Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i`* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.38olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.37Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i  `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.36olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i   `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.35Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i    `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.34olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i     `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.33Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i      `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.32olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i       `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.31Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i        `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.30olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i         `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.29Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i          `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.28olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i           `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.27Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i            `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.26olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i             `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.25Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i              `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.24olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i               `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.23Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i                `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.22olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i                 `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.21Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i                  `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.20olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i                   `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.19Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i                    `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.18olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i                     `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.17Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i                      `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.16olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i                       `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.15Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i                        `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.14olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i                         `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.13Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i                          `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.12olcott
16 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i                           `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.11Richard Damon
16 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i                            `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.10olcott
16 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i                             `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.9Richard Damon
16 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i                              `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.8olcott
16 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i                               `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.7Richard Damon
16 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i                                `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.6olcott
16 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i                                 `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.5Richard Damon
16 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i                                  `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.4olcott
16 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i                                   `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.3Richard Damon
16 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i                                    `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.2olcott
16 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         i                                     `- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.1Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i         `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.7joes
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i          `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken.6olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i           `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. (Just misunderstood)5Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i            +* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. (Just misunderstood)2olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i            i`- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. (Just misunderstood)1Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i            `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. (Just misunderstood)2olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  i             `- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. (Just misunderstood)1Richard Damon
14 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)2joes
14 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i   `- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)1olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      +* H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V2 ---ignoring all other replies12olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i`* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V2 ---ignoring all other replies11Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V2 ---ignoring all other replies10olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i  `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V2 ---ignoring all other replies9Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i   `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V2 ---ignoring all other replies8olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i    +* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V2 ---ignoring all other replies5joes
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i    i`* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V2 ---ignoring all other replies4olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i    i `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V2 ---ignoring all other replies3Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i    i  `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V2 ---ignoring all other replies2olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i    i   `- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V2 ---ignoring all other replies1Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i    `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V2 ---ignoring all other replies2Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      i     `- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V2 ---ignoring all other replies1olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i      `* H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES18olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i       `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES17Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i        `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES16olcott
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i         `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES15Richard Damon
15 Jun 24       i i       i i     i          `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES14olcott
16 Jun 24       i i       i i     i           `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES13Richard Damon
16 Jun 24       i i       i i     i            `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES12olcott
16 Jun 24       i i       i i     i             `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES11Richard Damon
16 Jun 24       i i       i i     i              `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES10olcott
16 Jun 24       i i       i i     i               `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES9Richard Damon
16 Jun 24       i i       i i     i                `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES8olcott
16 Jun 24       i i       i i     i                 `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES7Richard Damon
16 Jun 24       i i       i i     i                  `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES6olcott
16 Jun 24       i i       i i     i                   +* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES2Mikko
16 Jun 24       i i       i i     i                   i`- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES1olcott
16 Jun 24       i i       i i     i                   `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES3Richard Damon
16 Jun 24       i i       i i     i                    `* Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES2olcott
16 Jun 24       i i       i i     i                     `- Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES1Richard Damon
13 Jun 24       i i       i i     `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules5joes
13 Jun 24       i i       i i      `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules4olcott
13 Jun 24       i i       i i       +* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules2Mr Ön!on
13 Jun 24       i i       i i       i`- Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ 🏳️‍🌈D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules🏳️‍🌈 ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ (Was: 🏳️‍🌈D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules🏳️‍🌈)1=?UTF-8?B?8J+MiPCfkpDwn4y78J+MuvCfjLnwn4y78J+SkPCfjLfwn4y68J+MiA==?=Jen=?UTF-8?B?8J+MiPCfkpDwn4y78J+MuvCfjLnwn4y78J+SkPCfjLfwn4y68J+MiA==?= Dershmender 💐🌻🌺🌹🌻💐🌷🌺🐶笛🌈💐🌻🌺🌹🌻💐🌷🌺🌈
14 Jun 24       i i       i i       `- Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules1Richard Damon
13 Jun 24       i i       i `- Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules1joes
13 Jun 24       i i       `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules6joes
13 Jun 24       i i        `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules5olcott
13 Jun 24       i i         `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules4joes
13 Jun 24       i i          `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules3olcott
13 Jun 24       i i           `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- simulating vs. deciding2joes
14 Jun 24       i i            `- Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- simulating vs. deciding1olcott
12 Jun 24       i `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten51Richard Damon
12 Jun 24       i  `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten50olcott
12 Jun 24       i   `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten49Richard Damon
12 Jun 24       i    `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten48olcott
13 Jun 24       i     `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten47Richard Damon
13 Jun 24       i      `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten46olcott
13 Jun 24       i       +* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten29Richard Damon
13 Jun 24       i       i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten28olcott
13 Jun 24       i       i `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten27Richard Damon
13 Jun 24       i       i  `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten26olcott
13 Jun 24       i       i   `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten25Richard Damon
13 Jun 24       i       i    `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten24olcott
13 Jun 24       i       i     +* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten15Richard Damon
13 Jun 24       i       i     i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten14olcott
13 Jun 24       i       i     i `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten13Richard Damon
13 Jun 24       i       i     i  `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten12olcott
13 Jun 24       i       i     i   `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten11Richard Damon
13 Jun 24       i       i     i    `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten10olcott
13 Jun 24       i       i     i     `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten9Richard Damon
13 Jun 24       i       i     i      `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten8olcott
13 Jun 24       i       i     i       +- Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten1joes
13 Jun 24       i       i     i       `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten6Richard Damon
13 Jun 24       i       i     i        `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten5olcott
13 Jun 24       i       i     i         +- Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten1joes
14 Jun 24       i       i     i         `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten3Richard Damon
14 Jun 24       i       i     i          `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten2olcott
14 Jun 24       i       i     i           `- Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten1Richard Damon
13 Jun 24       i       i     `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten8joes
13 Jun 24       i       i      `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite sting transformations7olcott
13 Jun 24       i       i       +* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite sting transfermentations4joes
13 Jun 24       i       i       i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite sting transfermentations3olcott
14 Jun 24       i       i       i `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite sting transfermentations2Richard Damon
14 Jun 24       i       i       i  `- Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite sting transfermentations1olcott
14 Jun 24       i       i       `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite sting transformations2Richard Damon
14 Jun 24       i       i        `- Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite sting transformations1olcott
13 Jun 24       i       `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten16joes
13 Jun 24       i        `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten15olcott
13 Jun 24       i         +* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten11Alan Mackenzie

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal