comp.theory

Liste des GroupesPages :123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233
Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 Jul 24 i   i        i i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities5Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i        i i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities4olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        i i  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities3Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i        i i   `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities2olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        i i    `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i        i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully23olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        i  +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully6olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        i  i+- Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully1Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i        i  i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully4joes
21 Jul 24 i   i        i  i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully3olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        i  i  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully2joes
21 Jul 24 i   i        i  i   `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully1olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        i  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully16Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i        i   +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully14olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        i   i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully13Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i        i   i +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully8olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        i   i i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully7joes
21 Jul 24 i   i        i   i i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully6olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        i   i i  +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully4joes
21 Jul 24 i   i        i   i i  i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully3olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        i   i i  i +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully1Fred. Zwarts
21 Jul 24 i   i        i   i i  i `- Re: Hypothetical IMpossibilities -- I reread this again more carefully1Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i        i   i i  `- Re: Hypothetical IMpossibilities -- I reread this again more carefully1Richard Damon
22 Jul 24 i   i        i   i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully4olcott
22 Jul 24 i   i        i   i  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully3Richard Damon
22 Jul 24 i   i        i   i   `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully2olcott
23 Jul 24 i   i        i   i    `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully1Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i        i   `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully --- correction1olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i        `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities8olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i         `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities7Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i          `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities6olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i           `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities5Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i            `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities4olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i             `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities3Richard Damon
21 Jul 24 i   i              `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities2olcott
21 Jul 24 i   i               `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Richard Damon
20 Jul 24 i   `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities1Richard Damon
22 Jul 24 `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities116Mikko
22 Jul 24  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities115olcott
23 Jul 24   `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities114Mikko
23 Jul 24    `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities113olcott
24 Jul 24     `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities112Mikko
24 Jul 24      `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities111olcott
26 Jul 24       `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities110Mikko
26 Jul 24        `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities109olcott
27 Jul 24         `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities108Mikko
27 Jul 24          +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal96olcott
27 Jul 24          i+* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal88Alan Mackenzie
27 Jul 24          ii`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal87olcott
27 Jul 24          ii +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal3Alan Mackenzie
27 Jul 24          ii i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- strawman deception based rebuttal2olcott
28 Jul 24          ii i `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- strawman deception based rebuttal1Mikko
28 Jul 24          ii `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal83Mikko
29 Jul 24          ii  +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal4olcott
29 Jul 24          ii  i+* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal2joes
29 Jul 24          ii  ii`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal1olcott
30 Jul 24          ii  i`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal1Mikko
30 Jul 24          ii  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal78olcott
31 Jul 24          ii   +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal74Richard Damon
31 Jul 24          ii   i+* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal ---2olcott
31 Jul 24          ii   ii`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal by olcott---1Richard Damon
31 Jul 24          ii   i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal ---71olcott
31 Jul 24          ii   i +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid lying rebuttal by Olcott ---1Richard Damon
31 Jul 24          ii   i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal by Olcott---69Richard Damon
31 Jul 24          ii   i  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal ---68olcott
31 Jul 24          ii   i   `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal ---67Fred. Zwarts
31 Jul 24          ii   i    `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Correct emulation has been proven for three years66olcott
31 Jul 24          ii   i     `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Correct emulation has been proven for three years65Fred. Zwarts
31 Jul 24          ii   i      `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Correct emulation has been proven for three years64olcott
1 Aug 24          ii   i       +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Correct emulation has been proven for three years8joes
1 Aug 24          ii   i       i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Correct emulation has been proven for three years7olcott
1 Aug 24          ii   i       i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Correct emulation has been proven for three years6Fred. Zwarts
1 Aug 24          ii   i       i  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Correct emulation has been proven for three years5olcott
1 Aug 24          ii   i       i   `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Correct emulation has been proven for three years4Fred. Zwarts
1 Aug 24          ii   i       i    `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Correct emulation has been proven for three years3olcott
1 Aug 24          ii   i       i     +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Correct emulation has been proven for three years1Fred. Zwarts
2 Aug 24          ii   i       i     `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- INCorrect emulation has been proven for three years1Richard Damon
1 Aug 24          ii   i       `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Correct emulation has been proven for three years55Fred. Zwarts
1 Aug 24          ii   i        `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof54olcott
1 Aug 24          ii   i         `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof53Fred. Zwarts
1 Aug 24          ii   i          `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof52olcott
1 Aug 24          ii   i           +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof19Fred. Zwarts
1 Aug 24          ii   i           i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof18olcott
1 Aug 24          ii   i           i +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof3Fred. Zwarts
1 Aug 24          ii   i           i i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof2olcott
1 Aug 24          ii   i           i i `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof1Fred. Zwarts
1 Aug 24          ii   i           i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof14joes
1 Aug 24          ii   i           i  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof13olcott
1 Aug 24          ii   i           i   +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof7Fred. Zwarts
1 Aug 24          ii   i           i   i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof6olcott
2 Aug 24          ii   i           i   i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof5Fred. Zwarts
2 Aug 24          ii   i           i   i  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof4olcott
2 Aug 24          ii   i           i   i   +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof *FAILED*1Richard Damon
3 Aug 24          ii   i           i   i   +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof1Fred. Zwarts
3 Aug 24          ii   i           i   i   `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof1Mikko
2 Aug 24          ii   i           i   +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Completly incorrect Proof1Richard Damon
2 Aug 24          ii   i           i   `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof4Mikko
2 Aug 24          ii   i           i    `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof3olcott
2 Aug 24          ii   i           i     +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof *FAILED*1Richard Damon
3 Aug 24          ii   i           i     `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof1Mikko
2 Aug 24          ii   i           `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof32Mikko
2 Aug 24          ii   i            +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof3olcott
2 Aug 24          ii   i            i+- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof *FAILS*1Richard Damon
3 Aug 24          ii   i            i`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof1Mikko
2 Aug 24          ii   i            `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof28Mike Terry
2 Aug 24          ii   i             +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof2olcott
2 Aug 24          ii   i             i`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof *FAILED*1Richard Damon
2 Aug 24          ii   i             +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof24Richard Damon
2 Aug 24          ii   i             i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof23Mike Terry
2 Aug 24          ii   i             i +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof2olcott
3 Aug 24          ii   i             i i`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof1Richard Damon
2 Aug 24          ii   i             i +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof16Ben Bacarisse
2 Aug 24          ii   i             i i+* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof2olcott
3 Aug 24          ii   i             i ii`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof1Richard Damon
3 Aug 24          ii   i             i i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof13Mike Terry
3 Aug 24          ii   i             i i +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof1Richard Damon
3 Aug 24          ii   i             i i +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof -- more details2olcott
3 Aug 24          ii   i             i i i`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete FAILED Proof -- more details1Richard Damon
3 Aug 24          ii   i             i i +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof3Jeff Barnett
3 Aug 24          ii   i             i i i+- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof --- Halt State1olcott
6 Aug 24          ii   i             i i i`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof --- halt state1olcott
5 Aug 24          ii   i             i i +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof5Ben Bacarisse
5 Aug 24          ii   i             i i i+* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof2olcott
5 Aug 24          ii   i             i i ii`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof1Richard Damon
6 Aug 24          ii   i             i i i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof2olcott
6 Aug 24          ii   i             i i i `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Completely *FAILED* Proof1Richard Damon
6 Aug 24          ii   i             i i `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof1olcott
3 Aug 24          ii   i             i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof4Richard Damon
3 Aug 24          ii   i             i  +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof2Mike Terry
3 Aug 24          ii   i             i  i`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof1olcott
3 Aug 24          ii   i             i  `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof1Mikko
3 Aug 24          ii   i             `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof1Mikko
1 Aug 24          ii   `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal3Mikko
1 Aug 24          ii    `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal2olcott
3 Aug 24          ii     `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal1Mikko
28 Jul 24          i`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal7Mikko
29 Jul 24          i `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal6olcott
30 Jul 24          i  `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal5Mikko
30 Jul 24          i   `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal4olcott
1 Aug 24          i    `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal3Mikko
1 Aug 24          i     `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal2olcott
3 Aug 24          i      `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- stupid rebuttal1Mikko
27 Jul 24          +* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Sipser approved criteria6olcott
27 Jul 24          i+* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Sipser approved criteria4Alan Mackenzie
27 Jul 24          ii`* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Sipser approved criteria3olcott
28 Jul 24          ii `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Sipser approved criteria2Mikko
29 Jul 24          ii  `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Sipser approved criteria1olcott
28 Jul 24          i`- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Sipser approved criteria1Mikko
30 Jul 24          `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- strawman deception5olcott
1 Aug 24           `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- strawman deception4Mikko
1 Aug 24            `* Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- strawman deception3olcott
2 Aug 24             +- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- strawman deception1Richard Damon
3 Aug 24             `- Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- strawman deception1Mikko
29 Jul 24 * Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...78olcott
29 Jul 24 +* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...5Fred. Zwarts
29 Jul 24 i`* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...4olcott
29 Jul 24 i `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...3Fred. Zwarts
29 Jul 24 i  `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...2olcott
30 Jul 24 i   `- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...1Fred. Zwarts
30 Jul 24 +- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... DDD will HALT if HHH answers1Richard Damon
30 Jul 24 `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...71Mikko
30 Jul 24  `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...70olcott
30 Jul 24   +* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...57Fred. Zwarts
30 Jul 24   i`* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly56olcott
30 Jul 24   i `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly55Fred. Zwarts
30 Jul 24   i  `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly54olcott
30 Jul 24   i   +* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly51joes
30 Jul 24   i   i`* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly50olcott
31 Jul 24   i   i +* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly25Mad Hamish
31 Jul 24   i   i i`* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly24olcott
1 Aug 24   i   i i `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly23wij
1 Aug 24   i   i i  `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly22olcott
1 Aug 24   i   i i   +* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly7wij
1 Aug 24   i   i i   i+* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly2olcott
1 Aug 24   i   i i   ii`- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly1wij
1 Aug 24   i   i i   i`* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly4Mikko
1 Aug 24   i   i i   i `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly3olcott
2 Aug 24   i   i i   i  +- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict *IN*correctly1Richard Damon
2 Aug 24   i   i i   i  `- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly1Mikko
1 Aug 24   i   i i   +* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly11Fred. Zwarts
1 Aug 24   i   i i   i`* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly10olcott
1 Aug 24   i   i i   i +* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly7Fred. Zwarts
1 Aug 24   i   i i   i i`* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly6olcott
1 Aug 24   i   i i   i i +- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly1Fred. Zwarts
1 Aug 24   i   i i   i i `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly4joes
1 Aug 24   i   i i   i i  `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly3olcott
1 Aug 24   i   i i   i i   `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly2joes
1 Aug 24   i   i i   i i    `- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly1olcott
2 Aug 24   i   i i   i +- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict INcorrectly1Richard Damon
2 Aug 24   i   i i   i `- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly1Mikko
1 Aug 24   i   i i   `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly is to say Halting,3Richard Damon
1 Aug 24   i   i i    `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly is to say Halting,2olcott
2 Aug 24   i   i i     `- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly is to say Halting,1Richard Damon
31 Jul 24   i   i +- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly1Richard Damon
31 Jul 24   i   i +* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly22joes
31 Jul 24   i   i i`* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly21olcott
31 Jul 24   i   i i +- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict INcorrectly1Richard Damon
31 Jul 24   i   i i `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly19joes
31 Jul 24   i   i i  `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly18olcott
31 Jul 24   i   i i   +* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly16joes
31 Jul 24   i   i i   i`* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly15olcott
31 Jul 24   i   i i   i `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly14Fred. Zwarts
31 Jul 24   i   i i   i  `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly13olcott
1 Aug 24   i   i i   i   +* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly7joes
1 Aug 24   i   i i   i   i`* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly6olcott
1 Aug 24   i   i i   i   i `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly5Fred. Zwarts
1 Aug 24   i   i i   i   i  `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly4olcott
1 Aug 24   i   i i   i   i   `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly3Fred. Zwarts
1 Aug 24   i   i i   i   i    `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly2olcott
1 Aug 24   i   i i   i   i     `- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly1Fred. Zwarts
1 Aug 24   i   i i   i   `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly5Fred. Zwarts
1 Aug 24   i   i i   i    `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly4olcott
1 Aug 24   i   i i   i     `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly3Fred. Zwarts
1 Aug 24   i   i i   i      `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly2olcott
1 Aug 24   i   i i   i       `- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly1Fred. Zwarts
1 Aug 24   i   i i   `- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... H predicts INcorrectly1Richard Damon
31 Jul 24   i   i `- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly1Fred. Zwarts
31 Jul 24   i   +- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict INcorrectly1Richard Damon
31 Jul 24   i   `- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... predict correctly1Fred. Zwarts
31 Jul 24   +- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...1Richard Damon
31 Jul 24   `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...11Mikko
31 Jul 24    +* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...4Mikko
31 Jul 24    i`* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...3olcott
1 Aug 24    i +- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... The H incorrectly decides on the input.1Richard Damon
2 Aug 24    i `- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...1Mikko
31 Jul 24    `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...6olcott
1 Aug 24     +- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see... H predicts incorrectly1Richard Damon
2 Aug 24     `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...4Mikko
2 Aug 24      `* Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...3olcott
2 Aug 24       +- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...1Richard Damon
3 Aug 24       `- Re: Any honest person that knows the x86 language can see...1Mikko
12 Jul 24 * DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V2214olcott
12 Jul 24 +- Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting V21Fred. Zwarts
12 Jul 24 +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INcorrectly rejected as non-halting V2186Richard Damon
13 Jul 24 i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2185olcott
13 Jul 24 i +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V27Richard Damon
13 Jul 24 i i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V26olcott
13 Jul 24 i i +- Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V21Richard Damon
13 Jul 24 i i `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V24joes
13 Jul 24 i i  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V23olcott
13 Jul 24 i i   +- Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V21joes
13 Jul 24 i i   `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V21Richard Damon
13 Jul 24 i `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2177Fred. Zwarts
13 Jul 24 i  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2176olcott
13 Jul 24 i   +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2171Fred. Zwarts
13 Jul 24 i   i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V2170olcott
13 Jul 24 i   i +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V215Richard Damon
13 Jul 24 i   i i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V214olcott
13 Jul 24 i   i i `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is INCorrectly rejected as non-halting V213Richard Damon
13 Jul 24 i   i i  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as non-halting V212olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal