comp.theory

Liste des GroupesPages :12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334
Date Sujet#  Auteur
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i   i i i `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i   i i `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i   i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard3Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i   i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard2olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i   i   `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard3Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i    `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard2olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard53Alan Mackenzie
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard52olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard4Alan Mackenzie
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard3olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i i +- Re: olcott is a moron1immibis
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i i `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard (we wish)47Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard (we wish)46olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i   +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard (we wish)1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure44joes
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i    `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure43olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure17Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure16olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure15Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure14olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure13Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i    `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure12olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i     `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure11Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i      `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure10olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i       `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure9Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i        `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure8olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i         `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure7Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i          `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure6olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i           `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure5Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i            `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure4olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i             `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure3Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i              `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure2olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i               `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure19joes
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure18olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure17Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i  +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure4olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i  i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure3Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i  i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure2olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i  i  `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure12olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure11Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i    `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure10olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i     `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure9Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i      `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure8olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i       `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure7Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i        `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure6olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i         `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure5Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i          `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure4olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i           `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure3Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i            `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure2olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     i             `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i     `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure6Mikko
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i      +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure3Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i      i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure2olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i      i `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i      `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure2olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i i       `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard9joes
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard8olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard7Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i    +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard4olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i    i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard3Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i    i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard2olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i    i  `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i    `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard2olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i     `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard7Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard6olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard4Python
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i  +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard2olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i i   `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Python
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard17Mikko
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard16olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i   +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
9 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard14Mikko
9 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i    `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard13olcott
9 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i     +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard3Andy Walker
9 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i     i`* Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt2olcott
9 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i     i `- Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt1Richard Damon
9 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i     +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard2joes
9 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i     i`- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1olcott
9 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i     `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard7Richard Damon
10 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i      `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard6olcott
10 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i       `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard5Richard Damon
10 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i        `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard4olcott
10 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i         `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard3Richard Damon
10 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i          `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard2olcott
10 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     i           `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    i     `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1joes
7 Jun 24 i     i                  i    `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1immibis
6 Jun 24 i     i                  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact6olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i                   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact5Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i                    +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact2olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i                    i`- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i                    `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact2olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i                     `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact4ornott
6 Jun 24 i      `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact3olcott
6 Jun 24 i       +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1prescott
7 Jun 24 i       `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact3Fred. Zwarts
5 Jun 24  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact2olcott
5 Jun 24   `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1Fred. Zwarts
9 Jun 24 * Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt27olcott
9 Jun 24 `* Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt26olcott
9 Jun 24  `* Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt25joes
9 Jun 24   `* Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt24olcott
9 Jun 24    `* Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt23joes
10 Jun 24     `* Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt22olcott
10 Jun 24      +* Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt19Richard Damon
10 Jun 24      i`* Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt18olcott
10 Jun 24      i `* Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt17Richard Damon
10 Jun 24      i  `* Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt16olcott
10 Jun 24      i   `* Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt15Richard Damon
10 Jun 24      i    `* Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt14olcott
10 Jun 24      i     `* Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt13Richard Damon
10 Jun 24      i      `* D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case12olcott
10 Jun 24      i       +* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case7Richard Damon
10 Jun 24      i       i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case6olcott
10 Jun 24      i       i `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case5Richard Damon
10 Jun 24      i       i  `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case4olcott
10 Jun 24      i       i   `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case3Richard Damon
10 Jun 24      i       i    `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case2olcott
10 Jun 24      i       i     `- Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case1Richard Damon
10 Jun 24      i       `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- losing a defamation case4Alan Mackenzie
10 Jun 24      i        `* Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- verified fact for 3 years3olcott
10 Jun 24      i         +- Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- verified fact for 3 years1joes
12 Jun 24      i         `- Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- verified fact for 3 years1Richard Damon
10 Jun 24      `* Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt2joes
10 Jun 24       `- Re: Simplified proof that DDD correctly simulated by HHH does not halt1olcott
3 Jun 24 * Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?332immibis
3 Jun 24 +- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?1Richard Damon
3 Jun 24 +* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?309Mike Terry
3 Jun 24 i+* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review29olcott
3 Jun 24 ii+- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review1Richard Damon
3 Jun 24 ii+- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review1immibis
3 Jun 24 ii`* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review26Mike Terry
3 Jun 24 ii `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review25olcott
4 Jun 24 ii  +- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review1Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 ii  `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review23Mike Terry
4 Jun 24 ii   `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review22olcott
4 Jun 24 ii    `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review21Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 ii     `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review20olcott
4 Jun 24 ii      +* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review13Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 ii      i`* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review12olcott
5 Jun 24 ii      i +- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review1Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 ii      i `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review10Mikko
5 Jun 24 ii      i  `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review9olcott
5 Jun 24 ii      i   +* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review2wij
5 Jun 24 ii      i   i`- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review1olcott
6 Jun 24 ii      i   +* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review5Mikko
6 Jun 24 ii      i   i`* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review4olcott
6 Jun 24 ii      i   i `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review3Mikko
6 Jun 24 ii      i   i  `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review2olcott
7 Jun 24 ii      i   i   `- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review1Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 ii      i   `- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review1Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 ii      `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review6Mike Terry
4 Jun 24 ii       `* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review5olcott
4 Jun 24 ii        +* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review3Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 ii        i`* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review2olcott
5 Jun 24 ii        i `- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review1Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 ii        `- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Mikes Review1immibis
3 Jun 24 i`* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway?279Ben Bacarisse
3 Jun 24 i +* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review277olcott
3 Jun 24 i i+- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review1immibis
3 Jun 24 i i+* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review73Mikko
3 Jun 24 i ii`* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review72olcott
4 Jun 24 i ii +- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review1Richard Damon
4 Jun 24 i ii +* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review2joes
4 Jun 24 i ii i`- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review1olcott
4 Jun 24 i ii +* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review67Mikko
4 Jun 24 i ii i`* Halting Problem is wrong two different ways66olcott
4 Jun 24 i ii i +- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1immibis
5 Jun 24 i ii i +* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways41Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i ii i i`* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways40olcott
5 Jun 24 i ii i i +* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways21John Smith
5 Jun 24 i ii i i i`* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways20olcott
5 Jun 24 i ii i i i +* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways4Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i ii i i i i`* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways3Mikko
5 Jun 24 i ii i i i i `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways2olcott
6 Jun 24 i ii i i i i  `- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i ii i i i `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways15John Smith
5 Jun 24 i ii i i i  `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways14olcott
5 Jun 24 i ii i i i   +* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways3John Smith
5 Jun 24 i ii i i i   i+- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1olcott
5 Jun 24 i ii i i i   i`- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1joes
5 Jun 24 i ii i i i   +* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways6joes
6 Jun 24 i ii i i i   i`* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways --very stupid5olcott
6 Jun 24 i ii i i i   i +- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways --very stupid1Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i ii i i i   i `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways --very stupid3Mikko
6 Jun 24 i ii i i i   i  `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways --very stupid2olcott
7 Jun 24 i ii i i i   i   `- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways --very stupid1Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i ii i i i   +- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i ii i i i   `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways3Mikko
6 Jun 24 i ii i i i    `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways2olcott
7 Jun 24 i ii i i i     `- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i ii i i +- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i ii i i `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways17Fred. Zwarts
5 Jun 24 i ii i i  `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways16olcott
5 Jun 24 i ii i i   +* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways7Fred. Zwarts
6 Jun 24 i ii i i   i`* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways6olcott
6 Jun 24 i ii i i   i `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways5Fred. Zwarts
6 Jun 24 i ii i i   i  `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways4olcott
6 Jun 24 i ii i i   i   `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways3Fred. Zwarts
6 Jun 24 i ii i i   i    +- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1olcott
6 Jun 24 i ii i i   i    `- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1immibis
6 Jun 24 i ii i i   +- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i ii i i   `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways7Mikko
6 Jun 24 i ii i i    `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways6olcott
6 Jun 24 i ii i i     +* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways4Mikko
6 Jun 24 i ii i i     i`* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways3olcott
7 Jun 24 i ii i i     i +- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i ii i i     i `- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1Mikko
7 Jun 24 i ii i i     `- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i ii i `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways23Mikko
5 Jun 24 i ii i  `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways22olcott
5 Jun 24 i ii i   +- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1joes
6 Jun 24 i ii i   +- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i ii i   +* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways18Mikko
6 Jun 24 i ii i   i`* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways17olcott
6 Jun 24 i ii i   i `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways16Mikko
6 Jun 24 i ii i   i  `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways15olcott
7 Jun 24 i ii i   i   `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways14Mikko
7 Jun 24 i ii i   i    `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways13olcott
7 Jun 24 i ii i   i     +- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i ii i   i     +* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways8joes
8 Jun 24 i ii i   i     i`* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways7olcott
8 Jun 24 i ii i   i     i `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways6Mikko
8 Jun 24 i ii i   i     i  `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways5olcott
8 Jun 24 i ii i   i     i   +- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1Richard Damon
9 Jun 24 i ii i   i     i   `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways3Mikko
9 Jun 24 i ii i   i     i    `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways2olcott
9 Jun 24 i ii i   i     i     `- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i ii i   i     `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways3Mikko
8 Jun 24 i ii i   i      `* Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways2olcott
8 Jun 24 i ii i   i       `- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i ii i   `- Re: Halting Problem is wrong two different ways1immibis
4 Jun 24 i ii `- Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review1immibis
3 Jun 24 i i+* Re: Why does Olcott care about simulation, anyway? --- Ben's Review201Fred. Zwarts
3 Jun 24 i ii`* Mike Terry Reply to Fred Zwarts200olcott
4 Jun 24 i ii +* Re: Mike Terry Reply to Fred Zwarts198Fred. Zwarts
4 Jun 24 i ii i`* Re: Mike Terry Reply to Fred Zwarts197Fred. Zwarts
4 Jun 24 i ii i `* Re: Mike Terry Reply to Fred Zwarts196Mike Terry

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal