D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state
How pathological self-reference is confused with undecidability
Re: How pathological self-reference is confused with undecidability
Re: How pathological self-reference is confused with undecidability
Re: How pathological self-reference is confused with undecidability Re: How pathological self-reference is confused with undecidability Re: How pathological self-reference is confused with undecidability Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state Weasel word double talk excuses =--- AKA Liars Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state DDD simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state Re: DDD simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state Re: DDD simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state Re: DDD simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state Re: DDD simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state Glossary of names of my simulating termination analyzer HHH(DD) polcott agrees the Kaz is a damned liar --- DD simulated by HHH Re: polcott agrees the Kaz is a damned liar --- DD simulated by HHH polcott agrees the Kaz is a damned liar --- DD simulated by HHH Re: polcott agrees the Kaz is a damned liar --- DD simulated by HHH Dangerous Precipice that could end all life --- DD simulated by HHH Re: Dangerous Precipice that could end all life --- DD simulated by HHH Re: Dangerous Precipice that could end all life --- DD simulated by HHH Re: Dangerous Precipice that could end all life --- DD simulated by HHH DD simulated by HHH and DD simulated by HHH1 Re: DD simulated by HHH and DD simulated by HHH1 Re: DD simulated by HHH and DD simulated by HHH1 Re: DD simulated by HHH and DD simulated by HHH1 Re: DD simulated by HHH and DD simulated by HHH1 Re: DD simulated by HHH and DD simulated by HHH1 Re: DD simulated by HHH and DD simulated by HHH1 Re: DD simulated by HHH and DD simulated by HHH1 Re: DD simulated by HHH and DD simulated by HHH1 Re: DD simulated by HHH and DD simulated by HHH1 Re: DD simulated by HHH and DD simulated by HHH1 Re: DD simulated by HHH and DD simulated by HHH1 Re: DD simulated by HHH and DD simulated by HHH1 Re: DD simulated by HHH and DD simulated by HHH1 Re: DD simulated by HHH and DD simulated by HHH1 Re: DD simulated by HHH and DD simulated by HHH1 Re: DD simulated by HHH and DD simulated by HHH1 Re: DD simulated by HHH and DD simulated by HHH1 Re: DD simulated by HHH and DD simulated by HHH1 Re: DD simulated by HHH and DD simulated by HHH1 Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways Re: The halting problem is incorrect two different ways Olcott is provably correct --- no one can correctly refute this
Olcott is provably correct --- no one can correctly refute this strspn() Re: strspn() Re: strspn() Re: strspn() Re: strspn() Re: strspn() Re: strspn() Re: strspn() Re: strspn() Re: strspn() P!=NP proof (revised) Re: P!=NP proof (revised) C90+ toequiv() Re: C90+ toequiv() Re: C90+ toequiv() Re: C90+ toequiv() Re: C90+ toequiv() Re: C90+ toequiv() Re: C90+ toequiv() Re: C90+ toequiv() Re: C90+ toequiv() polcott agrees the Kaz is a damned liar --- DD simulated by HHH polcott agrees the Kaz is a damned liar --- DD simulated by HHH Re: polcott agrees the Kaz is a damned liar --- DD simulated by HHH Re: polcott agrees the Kaz is a damned liar --- DD simulated by HHH Re: polcott agrees the Kaz is a damned liar --- DD simulated by HHH Re: polcott agrees the Kaz is a damned liar --- DD simulated by HHH Re: polcott agrees the Kaz is a damned liar --- DD simulated by HHH Re: polcott agrees the Kaz is a damned liar --- DD simulated by HHH Glossary of names in my termination analyzer system polcott agrees the halting problem is incorrect --- is libel against him Re: the halting problem is founded in computer science Liars try to get away with DD simulated by HHH halts Re: Liars try to get away with DD simulated by HHH halts Re: Liars try to get away with DD simulated by HHH halts Re: Liars try to get away with DD simulated by HHH halts Attributes on functions/variables (static, in particular) Re: Attributes on functions/variables (static, in particular) Re: Attributes on functions/variables (static, in particular) Re: Attributes on functions/variables (static, in particular) Re: Attributes on functions/variables (static, in particular) Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Re: Mike Terry just answer this one question I will keep bugging YOU until you do !!! D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state How to handle pathological cases (was Re: ...) Re: How to handle pathological cases (was Re: ...) Re: How to handle pathological cases (was Re: ...) Re: How to handle pathological cases (was Re: ...) Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state Any article that contains the string "olcott" is junk (Was: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state) Re: Any article that contains the string "olcott" is junk (Was: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state) Re: Any article that contains the string "olcott" is junk (Was: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state) Re: Any article that contains the string "olcott" is junk (Was: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state) Re: Any article that contains the string "olcott" is junk (Was: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final halt state) 5 statements of D simulated by H Re: 5 statements of D simulated by H Re: 5 statements of D simulated by H Re: Rejecting expressions of formal language having pathological self-reference Re: Rejecting expressions of formal language having pathological self-reference click_link() Re: click_link() Re: click_link() mini_repl.c Re: mini_repl.c Re: mini_repl.c Re: mini_repl.c Re: mini_repl.c Re: mini_repl.c Re: mini_repl.c Re: mini_repl.c Re: mini_repl.c Re: mini_repl.c D simulated by H where H is a C interpreter --- Maybe Mike has become a liar ??? Re: D simulated by H where H is a C interpreter --- What is up with Mike ??? Re: D simulated by H where H is a C interpreter --- What is up with Mike ??? Re: D simulated by H where H is a C interpreter --- Maybe Mike has become a liar ??? Flood of old articles Re: Flood of old articles Re: Flood of old articles Re: Flood of old articles Re: Flood of old articles Re: Flood of old articles Re: Flood of old articles Re: Flood of old articles Re: Flood of old articles Re: Flood of old articles Re: Flood of old articles Re: Flood of old articles Re: Flood of old articles Re: Flood of old articles Re: Flood of old articles Re: Flood of old articles Re: Flood of old articles Re: Flood of old articles Re: Flood of old articles Re: Flood of old articles Re: Flood of old articles Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Three Year Update of proof of D simulated by H Geodetic Development Kit GeoDLL D simulated by H where H is a C interpreter Re: Does D simulated by H reach its own "return" statement? Proof that D simulated by H never reaches its own simulated "return" statement Kaz does not understand his own code. Re: Kaz does not understand his own code --- I AM PROVED EXACTLY CORRECT Re: Kaz does not understand his own code. --- I AM PROVED EXACTLY CORRECT. Addressing duffer-speak Re: Addressing duffer-speak Why do programmers confuse Halloween with Christmas? Re: Why do programmers confuse Halloween with Christmas? Re: Why do programmers confuse Halloween with Christmas? Re: Why do programmers confuse Halloween with Christmas? Re: Why do programmers confuse Halloween with Christmas? Re: Why do programmers confuse Halloween with Christmas? Re: Why do programmers confuse Halloween with Christmas? Re: Why do programmers confuse Halloween with Christmas? Re: Why do programmers confuse Halloween with Christmas? Re: Why do programmers confuse Halloween with Christmas? Re: Why do programmers confuse Halloween with Christmas? Re: Why do programmers confuse Halloween with Christmas? Re: Why do programmers confuse Halloween with Christmas? Re: Why do programmers confuse Halloween with Christmas? Re: "duffer speak" ??? Mike can't be dishonest so what is left ? I am only referring the this C code right D simulated by H uset config test Re: Never any actual rebuttal to HHH(DD)==0 Since 10/13/2022 Re: Never any actual rebuttal to HHH(DD)==0 Since 10/13/2022 Re: Never any actual rebuttal to HHH(DD)==0 Since 10/13/2022 Re: Never any actual rebuttal to HHH(DD)==0 Since 10/13/2022 Re: Never any actual rebuttal to HHH(DD)==0 Since 10/13/2022 Re: Never any actual rebuttal to HHH(DD)==0 Since 10/13/2022 Re: Never any actual rebuttal to HHH(DD)==0 Since 10/13/2022 Re: Never any actual rebuttal to HHH(DD)==0 Since 10/13/2022 Re: Never any actual rebuttal to HHH(DD)==0 Since 10/13/2022 Re: Never any actual rebuttal to HHH(DD)==0 Since 10/13/2022 Re: Never any actual rebuttal to HHH(DD)==0 Since 10/13/2022 Re: Never any actual rebuttal to HHH(DD)==0 Since 10/13/2022 Re: Never any actual rebuttal to HHH(DD)==0 Since 10/13/2022 Re: Never any actual rebuttal to HHH(DD)==0 Since 10/13/2022 Re: Never any actual rebuttal to HHH(DD)==0 Since 10/13/2022 Re: Never any actual rebuttal to HHH(DD)==0 Since 10/13/2022 Re: Never any actual rebuttal to HHH(DD)==0 Since 10/13/2022 Re: Never any actual rebuttal to HHH(DD)==0 Since 10/13/2022 Re: Never any actual rebuttal to HHH(DD)==0 Since 10/13/2022 Re: Never any actual rebuttal to HHH(DD)==0 Since 10/13/2022 Re: Never any actual rebuttal to HHH(DD)==0 Since 10/13/2022 Re: Never any actual rebuttal to HHH(DD)==0 Since 10/13/2022 H(D) as simple as it gets Re: H(D) as simple as it gets Re: H(D) as simple as it gets Re: H(D) as simple as it gets Re: H(D) as simple as it gets Re: H(D) as simple as it gets Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years dbush is now dishonored in his deceit Re: dbush is now dishonored in his deceit Re: dbush is now dishonored in his deceit olcott tries to hide the evidence that he admitted the input to HHH(DD) is halting Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit