comp.theory

Liste des Groupes Pages :123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233
Date Sujet#  Auteur
29 Oct 25         i      iii `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS7Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25         i      iii  `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS6dart200
29 Oct 25         i      iii   `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS5Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25         i      iii    `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS4dart200
29 Oct 25         i      iii     `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS3Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25         i      iii      `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS2dart200
29 Oct 25         i      iii       `- Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS1Chris M. Thomasson
30 Oct 25         i      ii`* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS62dart200
30 Oct 25         i      ii +* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS --- gist understood44olcott
30 Oct 25         i      ii i`* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS --- gist understood43dart200
30 Oct 25         i      ii i +* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS --- gist understood2olcott
30 Oct 25         i      ii i i`- Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS --- gist understood1Kaz Kylheku
31 Oct 25         i      ii i +* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS --- gist understood33dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii i i`* wow richard is /still/ a retard32dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii i i +* Re: wow richard is /still/ a retard16dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii i i i`* philosophy matters in practice15dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii i i i `* richard the lying retard14dart200
2 Nov 25         i      ii i i i  +* Re: richard the lying chatbot4dart200
2 Nov 25         i      ii i i i  i+- Re: richard the lying chatbot1olcott
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i i  i`* Re: richard the lying chatbot2dart200
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i i  i `- Re: richard the lying chatbot1dart200
2 Nov 25         i      ii i i i  `* Re: richard the lying retard9Tristan Wibberley
2 Nov 25         i      ii i i i   +* Re: richard the lying retard3olcott
2 Nov 25         i      ii i i i   i`* Re: richard the lying retard2Kaz Kylheku
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i i   i `- Re: richard the lying retard1dart200
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i i   +* Re: richard the lying retard4dart200
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i i   i`* Re: richard the lying retard3Tristan Wibberley
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i i   i +- Re: richard the lying retard1olcott
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i i   i `- Re: richard the lying retard1dart200
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i i   `- Re: richard the lying retard1dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii i i `* Re: wow richard is /still/ a retard15Kaz Kylheku
1 Nov 25         i      ii i i  `* literal nonsene14dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii i i   `* Re: literal nonsene13Kaz Kylheku
1 Nov 25         i      ii i i    `* Re: literal nonsene12dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii i i     `* Re: literal nonsene11Kaz Kylheku
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i      `* Re: literal nonsene10dart200
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i       +- Re: literal nonsene1Chris M. Thomasson
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i       +* Re: literal nonsene3Kaz Kylheku
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i       i`* Re: literal nonsene2dart200
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i       i `- Re: literal nonsene1Tristan Wibberley
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i       `* Re: literal nonsene5Tristan Wibberley
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i        `* Re: literal nonsene4dart200
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i         +- Re: literal nonsene1Tristan Wibberley
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i         `* Re: literal nonsene2Tristan Wibberley
3 Nov 25         i      ii i i          `- Re: literal nonsene1dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii i `* wow richard is a retard7dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii i  +* Re: wow richard is a retard --- Maybe his ADD is much worse than I thought5olcott
1 Nov 25         i      ii i  i`* if only polcott ...4dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii i  i `* Re: if only polcott ...3olcott
1 Nov 25         i      ii i  i  `* Re: if only polcott ...2dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii i  i   `- Re: if only polcott ...1olcott
1 Nov 25         i      ii i  `- Re: wow richard is a retard1dart200
30 Oct 25         i      ii `* wow richard is a retard17dart200
30 Oct 25         i      ii  +* Re: wow richard is a retard8Kaz Kylheku
30 Oct 25         i      ii  i+* Re: wow richard is a retard5olcott
30 Oct 25         i      ii  ii`* Re: wow richard is a retard4Kaz Kylheku
30 Oct 25         i      ii  ii `* Re: wow richard is a retard3olcott
30 Oct 25         i      ii  ii  `* Re: wow richard is a retard2Kaz Kylheku
30 Oct 25         i      ii  ii   `- Re: wow richard is a retard1olcott
30 Oct 25         i      ii  i+- A self-reflecting UTM1olcott
30 Oct 25         i      ii  i`- Re: wow richard is a retard1dart200
31 Oct 25         i      ii  `* Re: wow fuck retarded richard8dart200
31 Oct 25         i      ii   +* Re: wow fuck retarded richard2Kaz Kylheku
31 Oct 25         i      ii   i`- Re: wow fuck retarded richard1dart200
31 Oct 25         i      ii   +* Re: wow fuck retarded richard3Chris M. Thomasson
1 Nov 25         i      ii   i`* sorry polcott2dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii   i `- Re: sorry polcott1olcott
1 Nov 25         i      ii   `* wow turing dunks on retarded richard2dart200
1 Nov 25         i      ii    `- Re: wow turing dunks on retarded richard1dart200
29 Oct 25         i      i`* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS8Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25         i      i `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS7dart200
29 Oct 25         i      i  `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS6Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25         i      i   `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS5dart200
29 Oct 25         i      i    `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS4Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25         i      i     `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS3dart200
29 Oct 25         i      i      `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS2Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25         i      i       `- Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS1dart200
29 Oct 25         i      `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS9Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25         i       `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS8dart200
29 Oct 25         i        +* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS3olcott
29 Oct 25         i        i`* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS2Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25         i        i `- Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS1dart200
29 Oct 25         i        `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS4Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25         i         `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS3dart200
29 Oct 25         i          `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS2Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25         i           `- Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS1dart200
29 Oct 25         `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS22dart200
29 Oct 25          +- Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS1dart200
29 Oct 25          `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS20Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25           +* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS16dart200
29 Oct 25           i`* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS15Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25           i `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS14dart200
29 Oct 25           i  +* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS6olcott
29 Oct 25           i  i+* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS4dart200
29 Oct 25           i  ii+- Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS1Chris M. Thomasson
30 Oct 25           i  ii`* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS2dart200
30 Oct 25           i  ii `- Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS1dart200
29 Oct 25           i  i`- Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS1Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25           i  +- Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS1Chris M. Thomasson
30 Oct 25           i  `* Three Reviewers best ignored and some good ones6olcott
30 Oct 25           i   `* Re: Three Reviewers best ignored and some good ones5wij
30 Oct 25           i    +* Re: Three Reviewers best ignored and some good ones2wij
30 Oct 25           i    i`- Re: Three Reviewers best ignored and some good ones1Chris M. Thomasson
30 Oct 25           i    `* Re: Three Reviewers best ignored and some good ones2olcott
30 Oct 25           i     `- Re: Three Reviewers best ignored and some good ones1Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25           `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS3Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25            `* Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS2dart200
29 Oct 25             `- Re: I WANT TO COMPUTE SEMANTIC FACTS ABOUT COMPUTATIONS1Chris M. Thomasson
18 Oct 25 * Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance48Mikko
18 Oct 25 `* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance47olcott
19 Oct 25  +* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance44Mikko
19 Oct 25  i`* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance43olcott
20 Oct 25  i `* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance42Mikko
20 Oct 25  i  `* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance41olcott
20 Oct 25  i   +* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance2Chris M. Thomasson
20 Oct 25  i   i`- Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance1Chris M. Thomasson
21 Oct 25  i   `* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance38Mikko
22 Oct 25  i    `* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance37olcott
22 Oct 25  i     +* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance26Mikko
22 Oct 25  i     i`* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance25olcott
23 Oct 25  i     i `* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance24Mikko
23 Oct 25  i     i  +* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance10olcott
23 Oct 25  i     i  i+* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance2dbush
24 Oct 25  i     i  ii`- Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance1Mikko
24 Oct 25  i     i  i`* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance7Mikko
24 Oct 25  i     i  i `* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance6olcott
24 Oct 25  i     i  i  +- Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance1dbush
25 Oct 25  i     i  i  `* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance4Mikko
25 Oct 25  i     i  i   `* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance3olcott
25 Oct 25  i     i  i    +- Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Oct 25  i     i  i    `- Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance1Mikko
23 Oct 25  i     i  `* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance13Chris M. Thomasson
24 Oct 25  i     i   `* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance12Mikko
24 Oct 25  i     i    +* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance3Richard Heathfield
24 Oct 25  i     i    i`* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance2olcott
24 Oct 25  i     i    i `- Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance1Chris M. Thomasson
24 Oct 25  i     i    +* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance7olcott
25 Oct 25  i     i    i`* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance6Mikko
25 Oct 25  i     i    i `* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance5olcott
25 Oct 25  i     i    i  +- Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Oct 25  i     i    i  +- Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance1Mikko Levanto
28 Oct 25  i     i    i  `* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance2joes
28 Oct 25  i     i    i   `- Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance1olcott
25 Oct 25  i     i    `- Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Oct 25  i     `* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance10joes
28 Oct 25  i      +* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance5olcott
28 Oct 25  i      i`* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance4joes
28 Oct 25  i      i `* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance3olcott
28 Oct 25  i      i  `* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance2joes
28 Oct 25  i      i   `- Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance1olcott
28 Oct 25  i      `* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance4Kaz Kylheku
28 Oct 25  i       `* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance3olcott
29 Oct 25  i        +- Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance1Chris M. Thomasson
3 Nov 25  i        `- Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance1joes
19 Oct 25  `* Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance2Tristan Wibberley
19 Oct 25   `- Re: Two hypothetical possibilities --- HP decision problem instance1olcott
2 Nov 25 * Re: Pink is still not a physical colour4Kaz Kylheku
3 Nov 25 +* Re: Pink is still not a physical colour2Richard Heathfield
3 Nov 25 i`- Re: Pink is still not a physical colour1Chris M. Thomasson
3 Nov 25 `- Re: Pink is still not a physical colour1Chris M. Thomasson
1 Nov 25 * Re: Pink is still not a physical colour5Chris M. Thomasson
2 Nov 25 +* Re: Pink is still not a physical colour3Chris M. Thomasson
2 Nov 25 i`* Re: Pink is still not a physical colour2Chris M. Thomasson
2 Nov 25 i `- Re: Pink is still not a physical colour1Chris M. Thomasson
3 Nov 25 `- Re: Pink is still not a physical colour1dart200
23 Oct 25 * hey polcott, you hear about AI psychosis???77dart200
23 Oct 25 `* Re: hey polcott, you hear about AI psychosis???76olcott
23 Oct 25  `* Re: hey polcott, you hear about AI psychosis???75Kaz Kylheku
24 Oct 25   `* "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---74olcott
24 Oct 25    +* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---65dbush
24 Oct 25    i`* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---64olcott
24 Oct 25    i +* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---58dbush
24 Oct 25    i i`* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---57olcott
24 Oct 25    i i `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---56dbush
24 Oct 25    i i  `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---55olcott
24 Oct 25    i i   +* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---5dbush
24 Oct 25    i i   i`* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---4olcott
24 Oct 25    i i   i `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---3dbush
24 Oct 25    i i   i  `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---2olcott
24 Oct 25    i i   i   `- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1dbush
26 Oct 25    i i   `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---49Mikko Levanto
26 Oct 25    i i    `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---48Tristan Wibberley
27 Oct 25    i i     `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---47Mikko
27 Oct 25    i i      `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---46olcott
27 Oct 25    i i       +* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---3Alan Mackenzie
27 Oct 25    i i       i`* HHH(DD) is very obviously correct to reject its input2olcott
27 Oct 25    i i       i `- Re: HHH(DD) is very obviously correct to reject its input1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Oct 25    i i       `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---42Mikko
28 Oct 25    i i        `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---41olcott
29 Oct 25    i i         `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---40Mikko
29 Oct 25    i i          `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---39olcott
29 Oct 25    i i           +* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---25Kaz Kylheku
29 Oct 25    i i           i`* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---24olcott
29 Oct 25    i i           i +* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---2Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25    i i           i i`- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1Chris M. Thomasson
30 Oct 25    i i           i +* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---20Kaz Kylheku
30 Oct 25    i i           i i`* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---19olcott
30 Oct 25    i i           i i +* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---12Kaz Kylheku
30 Oct 25    i i           i i i`* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---11olcott
30 Oct 25    i i           i i i +- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1dbush
30 Oct 25    i i           i i i `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---9Kaz Kylheku
30 Oct 25    i i           i i i  `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---8olcott
30 Oct 25    i i           i i i   `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---7Kaz Kylheku
30 Oct 25    i i           i i i    `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---6olcott
30 Oct 25    i i           i i i     +- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1dbush
30 Oct 25    i i           i i i     `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---4Kaz Kylheku
30 Oct 25    i i           i i i      `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---3olcott
30 Oct 25    i i           i i i       `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---2Kaz Kylheku
30 Oct 25    i i           i i i        `- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1Kaz Kylheku
30 Oct 25    i i           i i +- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1Chris M. Thomasson
30 Oct 25    i i           i i `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---5joes
30 Oct 25    i i           i i  `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---4olcott
30 Oct 25    i i           i i   `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---3joes
30 Oct 25    i i           i i    `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---2olcott
30 Oct 25    i i           i i     `- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1Kaz Kylheku
30 Oct 25    i i           i `- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1Chris M. Thomasson
30 Oct 25    i i           `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---13Mikko
30 Oct 25    i i            `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---12olcott
31 Oct 25    i i             `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---11Mikko
31 Oct 25    i i              `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---10olcott
1 Nov 25    i i               `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---9Mikko
1 Nov 25    i i                `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---8olcott
1 Nov 25    i i                 +* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---6Kaz Kylheku
1 Nov 25    i i                 i`* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---5olcott
1 Nov 25    i i                 i +- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1dbush
1 Nov 25    i i                 i `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---3Kaz Kylheku
1 Nov 25    i i                 i  `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---2olcott
2 Nov 25    i i                 i   `- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1Kaz Kylheku
2 Nov 25    i i                 `- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1Mikko
24 Oct 25    i `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---5Kaz Kylheku
24 Oct 25    i  `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---4olcott
24 Oct 25    i   `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---3Kaz Kylheku
24 Oct 25    i    `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---2olcott
24 Oct 25    i     `- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1Kaz Kylheku
24 Oct 25    `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---8Kaz Kylheku
24 Oct 25     `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---7olcott
24 Oct 25      `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---6Kaz Kylheku
24 Oct 25       `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---5olcott
24 Oct 25        +- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1dbush
24 Oct 25        `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---3Kaz Kylheku
24 Oct 25         `* Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---2olcott
24 Oct 25          `- Re: "there will still be a nested simulation tower" Kaz ---1Kaz Kylheku
26 Oct 25 * I've written the code which shows HHH's DDD simulation halts.32Kaz Kylheku
26 Oct 25 +* Re: I've written the code which shows HHH's DDD simulation halts. --- that was the wrong question4olcott
26 Oct 25 i+* Re: I've written the code which shows HHH's DDD simulation halts. --- that was the wrong question2Tristan Wibberley
26 Oct 25 ii`- Re: I've written the code which shows HHH's DDD simulation halts. --- that was the wrong question1Tristan Wibberley
26 Oct 25 i`- Re: I've written the code which shows HHH's DDD simulation halts. --- that was the wrong question1Kaz Kylheku
26 Oct 25 +* Re: I've written the code which shows HHH's DDD simulation halts.26Kaz Kylheku
26 Oct 25 i+* Proof that Kaz Kylheku is incorrect14olcott
26 Oct 25 ii`* Re: Proof that Kaz Kylheku is incorrect13Kaz Kylheku

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal