comp.theory

Liste des Groupes Pages :12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334
Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 Oct 25 +- Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years1Bonita Montero
25 Oct 25 +* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years2dbush
25 Oct 25 i`- Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years1Richard Heathfield
25 Oct 25 +* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years64dart200
25 Oct 25 i+- Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years1olcott
26 Oct 25 i`* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years62olcott
27 Oct 25 i `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years61Kaz Kylheku
27 Oct 25 i  +* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years55olcott
27 Oct 25 i  i+- Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years1dbush
27 Oct 25 i  i+- Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years1Chris M. Thomasson
27 Oct 25 i  i`* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years52Kaz Kylheku
27 Oct 25 i  i `* A dishonest dodge is all that Kaz has51olcott
27 Oct 25 i  i  +* Re: A dishonest dodge is all that Kaz has41dbush
27 Oct 25 i  i  i+* Re: A dishonest dodge is all that Kaz has2olcott
27 Oct 25 i  i  ii`- Re: A dishonest dodge is all that Kaz has1dbush
27 Oct 25 i  i  i`* Re: A dishonest dodge is all that Kaz has38Kaz Kylheku
27 Oct 25 i  i  i `* Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit37olcott
27 Oct 25 i  i  i  +* Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit5Kaz Kylheku
27 Oct 25 i  i  i  i+- Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit1olcott
27 Oct 25 i  i  i  i`* Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit3Kaz Kylheku
27 Oct 25 i  i  i  i `* Kaz proves his deceit by dodging this simple point --- Is Kaz just a Liar ???2olcott
27 Oct 25 i  i  i  i  `- Re: Kaz proves his deceit by dodging this simple point --- Is Kaz just a Liar ???1Kaz Kylheku
27 Oct 25 i  i  i  `* Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit31André G. Isaak
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   +* Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit26olcott
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   i+- Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit1Chris M. Thomasson
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   i+* Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit14dbush
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   ii`* Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit13olcott
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   ii `* Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit12dbush
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   ii  +* Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit5olcott
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   ii  i`* olcott tries to hide the evidence that he admitted the input to HHH(DD) is halting4dbush
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   ii  i +* dbush is now dishonored in his deceit2olcott
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   ii  i i`- olcott tries to hide the evidence that he admitted the input to HHH(DD) is halting1dbush
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   ii  i `- dbush proves his deceit by dodging this simple point1olcott
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   ii  `* Can someone from comp.lang.c or comp.lang.c++ help out here?6olcott
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   ii   `* olcott tries to hide the evidence that he admitted the input to HHH(DD) is halting5dbush
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   ii    `* dbush proves is deceit by dodging this simple point4olcott
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   ii     `* olcott tries to hide the evidence that he admitted the input to HHH(DD) is halting3dbush
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   ii      `* dbush proves his deceit by dodging this simple point --- dbush is a bot?2olcott
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   ii       `- olcott tries to hide the evidence that he admitted the input to HHH(DD) is halting1dbush
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   i`* Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit10Kaz Kylheku
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   i +* Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit4olcott
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   i i+- Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit1dbush
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   i i`* Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit2Kaz Kylheku
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   i i `- Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit1Chris M. Thomasson
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   i `* Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit5Tristan Wibberley
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   i  `* Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit4olcott
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   i   `* Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit3Tristan Wibberley
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   i    +- Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit1olcott
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   i    `- Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit1Chris M. Thomasson
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   +* Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit2Janis Papanagnou
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   i`- Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit1olcott
27 Oct 25 i  i  i   `* Re: Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit2Dan Cross
27 Oct 25 i  i  i    `- I am only in these groups because I have been cheated out of a fair review.1olcott
27 Oct 25 i  i  `* Re: A dishonest dodge is all that Kaz has9Kaz Kylheku
27 Oct 25 i  i   `* Re: A dishonest dodge is all that Kaz has --- Now dishonored in his deceit8olcott
27 Oct 25 i  i    +* Re: A dishonest dodge is all that Kaz has --- Now dishonored in his deceit5dbush
27 Oct 25 i  i    i`* dbush is now dishonored in his deceit4olcott
27 Oct 25 i  i    i `* Re: dbush is now dishonored in his deceit3dbush
27 Oct 25 i  i    i  `* Re: dbush is now dishonored in his deceit2olcott
27 Oct 25 i  i    i   `- olcott tries to hide the evidence that he admitted the input to HHH(DD) is halting1dbush
27 Oct 25 i  i    `* Re: A dishonest dodge is all that Kaz has --- Now dishonored in his deceit2Kaz Kylheku
27 Oct 25 i  i     `- Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit1olcott
27 Oct 25 i  `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years5Mike Terry
27 Oct 25 i   `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years4olcott
27 Oct 25 i    `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years3Kaz Kylheku
27 Oct 25 i     `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years2olcott
27 Oct 25 i      `- Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years1Kaz Kylheku
26 Oct 25 +- Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years1Mikko Levanto
27 Oct 25 +* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years85Bonita Montero
27 Oct 25 i`* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years84olcott
27 Oct 25 i `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years83Bonita Montero
27 Oct 25 i  `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years82olcott
27 Oct 25 i   +* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years2Bonita Montero
27 Oct 25 i   i`- Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years1olcott
27 Oct 25 i   +* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years78Kaz Kylheku
27 Oct 25 i   i`* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years77olcott
27 Oct 25 i   i `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years76Kaz Kylheku
27 Oct 25 i   i  `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years75olcott
27 Oct 25 i   i   `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years74dbush
27 Oct 25 i   i    `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years73olcott
27 Oct 25 i   i     `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years72dbush
27 Oct 25 i   i      `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years71olcott
27 Oct 25 i   i       `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years70dbush
27 Oct 25 i   i        +* PO Meltdown?60Kaz Kylheku
27 Oct 25 i   i        i+* Re: PO Meltdown?52dbush
27 Oct 25 i   i        ii`* Re: PO Meltdown?51Kaz Kylheku
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii `* Re: PO Meltdown?50Kaz Kylheku
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  +* Kaz is a damned liar3olcott
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  i`* Re: Kaz is a damned liar2Kaz Kylheku
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  i `- Re: Kaz is a damned liar1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  +- Kaz is a damned liar1olcott
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  +* Re: PO Meltdown?42Mike Terry
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  i+* D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line31olcott
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii+- Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line1dbush
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii`* Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line29olcott
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii +- Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line1dbush
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii `* Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line27Kaz Kylheku
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii  +* Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line21olcott
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii  i+* Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line15Kaz Kylheku
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii  ii`* Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line14Mike Terry
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii  ii +- Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line1olcott
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii  ii +* Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line9Kaz Kylheku
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii  ii i+- Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line1Mike Terry
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii  ii i`* Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line7olcott
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii  ii i +- Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line1dbush
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii  ii i `* Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line5Kaz Kylheku
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii  ii i  `* Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line4olcott
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii  ii i   +* Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line2Kaz Kylheku
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii  ii i   i`- Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line1olcott
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii  ii i   `- Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line1dbush
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii  ii `* Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line3Chris M. Thomasson
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii  ii  `* Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line2Kaz Kylheku
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii  ii   `- Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii  i`* Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line5joes
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii  i `* Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line4olcott
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii  i  +- Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line1Chris M. Thomasson
3 Nov 25 i   i        ii  ii  i  `* Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line2joes
3 Nov 25 i   i        ii  ii  i   `- Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line1olcott
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii  `* Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line5dbush
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii   `* Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line4olcott
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii    +* Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line2Kaz Kylheku
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii    i`- Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii    `- Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line1dbush
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  i+* Re: PO Meltdown?8Kaz Kylheku
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii+- Re: PO Meltdown?1wij
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii`* Re: PO Meltdown?6olcott
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii `* Re: PO Meltdown?5Kaz Kylheku
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii  `* D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line4olcott
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii   `* Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line3Kaz Kylheku
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii    `* Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line2olcott
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  ii     `- Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line1Kaz Kylheku
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  i`* D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line2olcott
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  i `- Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii  `* D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line3olcott
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii   +- Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Oct 25 i   i        ii   `- Re: D simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own first line1dbush
27 Oct 25 i   i        i`* Kaz insists on dodging this point only because he knows it is irrefutable7olcott
28 Oct 25 i   i        i `* Re: Kaz insists on dodging this point only because he knows it is irrefutable6Kaz Kylheku
28 Oct 25 i   i        i  `* Re: Kaz insists on dodging this point only because he knows it is irrefutable5olcott
28 Oct 25 i   i        i   +- Re: Kaz insists on dodging this point only because he knows it is irrefutable1dbush
28 Oct 25 i   i        i   `* Re: Kaz insists on dodging this point only because he knows it is irrefutable3Kaz Kylheku
28 Oct 25 i   i        i    `* Re: Kaz insists on dodging this point only because he knows it is irrefutable +++2olcott
28 Oct 25 i   i        i     `- Re: Kaz insists on dodging this point only because he knows it is irrefutable +++1dbush
28 Oct 25 i   i        `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years9olcott
28 Oct 25 i   i         `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years8dbush
28 Oct 25 i   i          `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years7olcott
28 Oct 25 i   i           +- Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Oct 25 i   i           `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years5Kaz Kylheku
28 Oct 25 i   i            +* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years3olcott
28 Oct 25 i   i            i+- Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years1dbush
28 Oct 25 i   i            i`- Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Oct 25 i   i            `- Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years1dbush
27 Oct 25 i   `- Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years1tTh
27 Oct 25 +* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years44Mikko
27 Oct 25 i`* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years43olcott
27 Oct 25 i +* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years2Kaz Kylheku
27 Oct 25 i i`- Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years1olcott
27 Oct 25 i +- Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years1tTh
27 Oct 25 i +* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years2Kaz Kylheku
27 Oct 25 i i`- Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years1olcott
28 Oct 25 i `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years37Mikko
28 Oct 25 i  +* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years25Richard Heathfield
28 Oct 25 i  i+* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years23olcott
29 Oct 25 i  ii`* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years22Mikko
29 Oct 25 i  ii `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years21olcott
29 Oct 25 i  ii  +- Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years1Chris M. Thomasson
30 Oct 25 i  ii  `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years19Mikko
30 Oct 25 i  ii   `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years18olcott
31 Oct 25 i  ii    `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years17Mikko
31 Oct 25 i  ii     `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years16olcott
31 Oct 25 i  ii      +- Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years1dbush
1 Nov 25 i  ii      `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years14Mikko
1 Nov 25 i  ii       `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years13olcott
1 Nov 25 i  ii        +* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years9dbush
1 Nov 25 i  ii        i`* understand this simple C ? --- counter-factual assumptions8olcott
1 Nov 25 i  ii        i `* Re: understand this simple C ? --- counter-factual assumptions7dbush
1 Nov 25 i  ii        i  `* Re: understand this simple C ? --- counter-factual assumptions6olcott
1 Nov 25 i  ii        i   `* Re: understand this simple C ? --- counter-factual assumptions5dbush
1 Nov 25 i  ii        i    `* Re: understand this simple C ? --- counter-factual assumptions4olcott
1 Nov 25 i  ii        i     `* Re: understand this simple C ? --- counter-factual assumptions3dbush
1 Nov 25 i  ii        i      `* Re: understand this simple C ? --- counter-factual assumptions2olcott
1 Nov 25 i  ii        i       `- Re: understand this simple C ? --- counter-factual assumptions1dbush
2 Nov 25 i  ii        `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years3Mikko
4 Nov 25 i  ii         `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years2olcott
4 Nov 25 i  ii          `- Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years1Mikko
29 Oct 25 i  i`- Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years1Mikko
28 Oct 25 i  `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years11olcott
29 Oct 25 i   `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years10Mikko
29 Oct 25 i    `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years9olcott
29 Oct 25 i     +- Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years1Chris M. Thomasson
30 Oct 25 i     `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years7Mikko
30 Oct 25 i      `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years6olcott
31 Oct 25 i       `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years5Mikko
31 Oct 25 i        `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years4olcott
31 Oct 25 i         +- Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years1Chris M. Thomasson
1 Nov 25 i         `* Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years2Mikko
1 Nov 25 i          `- Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years1olcott
28 Oct 25 `- Re: No human has been able to understand this simple C in three years1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Oct 25 * Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error26olcott
27 Oct 25 +* Re: Claude AI understands this rebuttal of XXX --- Category Error2Mikko
27 Oct 25 i`- Re: Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error1olcott
28 Oct 25 `* Re: Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error23joes
28 Oct 25  +* Re: Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error3olcott
29 Oct 25  i`* Re: Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error2Chris M. Thomasson
30 Oct 25  i `- Re: Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error1Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25  `* Re: Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error19Mikko
29 Oct 25   `* Re: Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error18olcott
29 Oct 25    +- Re: Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error1Chris M. Thomasson
30 Oct 25    `* Re: Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error16Mikko
30 Oct 25     `* Re: Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error15olcott
31 Oct 25      +* Re: Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error12Mikko
31 Oct 25      i`* Re: Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error11olcott
1 Nov 25      i `* Re: Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error10Mikko
1 Nov 25      i  `* Re: Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error9olcott
2 Nov 25      i   `* Re: Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error8Mikko
4 Nov 25      i    `* Re: Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error7olcott
4 Nov 25      i     +* Re: Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error5Tristan Wibberley
4 Nov 25      i     i+* Re: Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error2Kaz Kylheku
4 Nov 25      i     ii`- Re: Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error1Tristan Wibberley
4 Nov 25      i     i`* Re: Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error2olcott
4 Nov 25      i     i `- Re: Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error1Kaz Kylheku
4 Nov 25      i     `- Re: Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error1Mikko
3 Nov 25      `* Re: Claude AI understands this rebuttal of Ben --- Category Error2joes
3 Nov 25       `- Semantic properties of finite string inputs1olcott
28 Oct 25 * HHH(DD) is just this in a sense...61Chris M. Thomasson
28 Oct 25 `* Re: HHH(DD) is just this in a sense...60wij
28 Oct 25  `* H(D) as simple as it gets59olcott
28 Oct 25   `* Re: H(D) as simple as it gets58wij
28 Oct 25    `* Re: H(D) as simple as it gets57olcott
28 Oct 25     `* Re: H(D) as simple as it gets56wij
28 Oct 25      `* Re: H(D) as simple as it gets55wij
28 Oct 25       `* Re: H(D) as simple as it gets54olcott
28 Oct 25        `* Re: H(D) as simple as it gets53wij
28 Oct 25         `* Re: H(D) as simple as it gets52olcott
28 Oct 25          +* Re: H(D) as simple as it gets50wij
28 Oct 25          i`* Re: H(D) as simple as it gets49olcott
28 Oct 25          i +* Re: H(D) as simple as it gets47Kaz Kylheku
28 Oct 25          i i`* Re: H(D) as simple as it gets46olcott
28 Oct 25          i i `* Re: H(D) as simple as it gets45Kaz Kylheku
28 Oct 25          i i  `* Re: H(D) as simple as it gets44olcott
29 Oct 25          i i   +- Re: H(D) as simple as it gets1Chris M. Thomasson
29 Oct 25          i i   +- Re: H(D) as simple as it gets1Chris M. Thomasson
31 Oct 25          i i   `* Re: H(D) as simple as it gets41Tristan Wibberley
31 Oct 25          i i    `* Re: H(D) as simple as it gets40olcott
31 Oct 25          i i     `* Re: H(D) as simple as it gets39Kaz Kylheku
1 Nov 25          i i      +* Re: H(D) as simple as it gets13olcott
1 Nov 25          i i      i+* Re: H(D) as simple as it gets9Kaz Kylheku
1 Nov 25          i i      ii+* Re: H(D) as simple as it gets6olcott
1 Nov 25          i i      iii`* Re: H(D) as simple as it gets5Kaz Kylheku
1 Nov 25          i i      iii `* Re: H(D) as simple as it gets4olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal