comp.theory

Liste des Groupes Pages :1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132
Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Jul 24 `- Re: Ben's agreement that D must be aborted by H --- Better words now.1Richard Damon
8 Jul 24 * Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure83Richard Damon
8 Jul 24 `* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure82olcott
8 Jul 24  `* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure81Richard Damon
8 Jul 24   `* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure80olcott
8 Jul 24    `* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure79olcott
8 Jul 24     +* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure7Richard Damon
8 Jul 24     i`* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure6olcott
8 Jul 24     i `* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure5Richard Damon
8 Jul 24     i  `* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure4olcott
9 Jul 24     i   `* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure3Richard Damon
9 Jul 24     i    `* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure2olcott
9 Jul 24     i     `- Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure1Richard Damon
9 Jul 24     `* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure71olcott
9 Jul 24      `* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure70Richard Damon
9 Jul 24       `* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure69olcott
9 Jul 24        `* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure68Richard Damon
9 Jul 24         +* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- Richard contradicts himself6olcott
9 Jul 24         i`* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- Richard contradicts himself5Richard Damon
9 Jul 24         i `* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- Richard contradicts himself4olcott
9 Jul 24         i  `* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- Olcott lies as he POOPs himself3Richard Damon
9 Jul 24         i   `* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- Richard caught in contradiction2olcott
9 Jul 24         i    `- Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- Olcott shows his stupidity.1Richard Damon
9 Jul 24         +* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- Richard caught in inescapable contradiction5olcott
9 Jul 24         i`* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- Olcott caught in inescapable contradiction4Richard Damon
9 Jul 24         i `* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- Richard caught in inescapable contradiction3olcott
9 Jul 24         i  +- Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- Olcott caught in inescapable lie1Richard Damon
9 Jul 24         i  `- Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- Olcott caught in inescapable contradiction1Richard Damon
9 Jul 24         +* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- Richard contradicts himself right here3olcott
9 Jul 24         i`* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- Olcott doesn't understand about formal systems and meta2Richard Damon
9 Jul 24         i `- Shut the Fuck Up Richard Damon and olcott1Mild Shock
10 Jul 24         +* Richard contradicts himself about infinite proofs2olcott
10 Jul 24         i`- Re: Olcott doesn't understand meta-systems1Richard Damon
10 Jul 24         `* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure51olcott
11 Jul 24          +* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure11Richard Damon
11 Jul 24          i`* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure10olcott
11 Jul 24          i `* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure9Richard Damon
11 Jul 24          i  `* Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge8olcott
11 Jul 24          i   `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge7Richard Damon
11 Jul 24          i    `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge6olcott
11 Jul 24          i     `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge5Richard Damon
11 Jul 24          i      `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge4olcott
11 Jul 24          i       `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge3Richard Damon
11 Jul 24          i        `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge2olcott
12 Jul 24          i         `- Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge, but do define Truth!1Richard Damon
11 Jul 24          `* Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure39Mikko
11 Jul 24           `* Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Richard is proved wrong38olcott
12 Jul 24            +- Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Olcott is proved a liar1Richard Damon
15 Jul 24            `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Richard is proved wrong36Mikko
15 Jul 24             `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Richard is proved wrong35olcott
16 Jul 24              +* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Olcott is proved wrong33Richard Damon
16 Jul 24              i`* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Olcott is proved wrong32olcott
16 Jul 24              i `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Olcott is proved wrong31Richard Damon
16 Jul 24              i  `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Richard can't pay attention to his won words30olcott
17 Jul 24              i   `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- OLCOTT can't pay attention to words29Richard Damon
17 Jul 24              i    `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Hand in the cookie jar28olcott
17 Jul 24              i     +- Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Olcott's Hand in the cookie jar1Richard Damon
17 Jul 24              i     +* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Hand in the cookie jar --- pants on fire6olcott
17 Jul 24              i     i+* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Hand in the cookie jar --- pants on fire3Richard Damon
17 Jul 24              i     ii`* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Hand in the cookie jar --- pants on fire2olcott
17 Jul 24              i     ii `- Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Hand in the cookie jar --- pants on fire1Richard Damon
17 Jul 24              i     i`* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Hand in the cookie jar --- pants on fire2olcott
18 Jul 24              i     i `- Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Hand in the cookie jar --- pants on fire, is Olcott1Richard Damon
18 Jul 24              i     `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Hand in the cookie jar --- bald faced liar20olcott
18 Jul 24              i      `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge Peter Olcott's Hand in the cookie jar --- bald faced liar19Richard Damon
18 Jul 24              i       `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Honest confusion ?18olcott
18 Jul 24              i        `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Honest confusion ?17Richard Damon
18 Jul 24              i         `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Honest confusion ?16olcott
18 Jul 24              i          `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Honest confusion ?15Richard Damon
18 Jul 24              i           `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Honest confusion ?14olcott
18 Jul 24              i            `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Honest confusion ?13Richard Damon
18 Jul 24              i             `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Honest confusion ?12olcott
18 Jul 24              i              `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Honest confusion ?11Richard Damon
18 Jul 24              i               `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Honest confusion ?10olcott
18 Jul 24              i                `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Honest confusion ?9Richard Damon
18 Jul 24              i                 `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Honest confusion ?8olcott
18 Jul 24              i                  `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Honest confusion ?7Richard Damon
18 Jul 24              i                   `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Honest confusion ?6olcott
18 Jul 24              i                    `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Honest confusion ?5Richard Damon
18 Jul 24              i                     `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Honest confusion ?4olcott
19 Jul 24              i                      `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Honest confusion ?3Richard Damon
19 Jul 24              i                       `* Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Honest confusion ?2olcott
19 Jul 24              i                        `- Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Honest confusion ?1Richard Damon
16 Jul 24              `- Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Richard is proved wrong1Mikko
7 Jul 24 * Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters133olcott
7 Jul 24 +* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters3Richard Damon
9 Jul 24 i`* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters2olcott
10 Jul 24 i `- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters1Richard Damon
8 Jul 24 `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters129Mikko
8 Jul 24  `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters128olcott
9 Jul 24   +* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters46Richard Damon
9 Jul 24   i`* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees45olcott
9 Jul 24   i +* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees40Richard Damon
9 Jul 24   i i`* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees39olcott
9 Jul 24   i i `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees38Richard Damon
9 Jul 24   i i  +* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees12olcott
9 Jul 24   i i  i`* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees11Richard Damon
9 Jul 24   i i  i `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees10olcott
9 Jul 24   i i  i  `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees9Richard Damon
9 Jul 24   i i  i   `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees8olcott
9 Jul 24   i i  i    `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees to something different.7Richard Damon
9 Jul 24   i i  i     `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben proves that he agrees to my meanings6olcott
9 Jul 24   i i  i      `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben proves that he agrees to my meanings5Richard Damon
9 Jul 24   i i  i       `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben proves that he agrees to my meanings4olcott
9 Jul 24   i i  i        `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben proves that he agrees to my meanings3Richard Damon
9 Jul 24   i i  i         `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben proves that he agrees to my meanings2olcott
10 Jul 24   i i  i          `- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben proves that he agrees to my meanings1Richard Damon
9 Jul 24   i i  +* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees15olcott
9 Jul 24   i i  i`* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees14Richard Damon
9 Jul 24   i i  i +* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees4olcott
9 Jul 24   i i  i i`* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees3Richard Damon
9 Jul 24   i i  i i `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees2olcott
9 Jul 24   i i  i i  `- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees1Richard Damon
9 Jul 24   i i  i `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees9Mikko
9 Jul 24   i i  i  `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees8Richard Damon
10 Jul 24   i i  i   `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees7Mikko
10 Jul 24   i i  i    +* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees2Richard Damon
11 Jul 24   i i  i    i`- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees1Mikko
10 Jul 24   i i  i    `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees4olcott
11 Jul 24   i i  i     +- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees1Richard Damon
11 Jul 24   i i  i     `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees2Mikko
11 Jul 24   i i  i      `- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees1olcott
9 Jul 24   i i  `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees (typo corrected)10olcott
9 Jul 24   i i   `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees (typo corrected)9Richard Damon
9 Jul 24   i i    `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees (typo corrected)8olcott
9 Jul 24   i i     `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees (typo corrected)7Richard Damon
9 Jul 24   i i      +* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees (typo corrected)2olcott
9 Jul 24   i i      i`- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees (typo corrected)1Richard Damon
9 Jul 24   i i      `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees (typo corrected)4olcott
9 Jul 24   i i       `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees (typo corrected)3Richard Damon
9 Jul 24   i i        `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees (typo corrected)2olcott
10 Jul 24   i i         `- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees (typo corrected)1Richard Damon
9 Jul 24   i `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees4Mikko
9 Jul 24   i  `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees3olcott
10 Jul 24   i   +- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees1Richard Damon
10 Jul 24   i   `- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees1Mikko
9 Jul 24   `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters81Mikko
9 Jul 24    `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters80olcott
9 Jul 24     +* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters77Fred. Zwarts
9 Jul 24     i`* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters76olcott
9 Jul 24     i +* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters74Fred. Zwarts
9 Jul 24     i i`* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters73olcott
9 Jul 24     i i +* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters68Fred. Zwarts
9 Jul 24     i i i`* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters67olcott
9 Jul 24     i i i +- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters1joes
9 Jul 24     i i i +* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters64Fred. Zwarts
9 Jul 24     i i i i+* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters61olcott
10 Jul 24     i i i ii+* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters31joes
10 Jul 24     i i i iii`* DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt30olcott
10 Jul 24     i i i iii `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt29joes
10 Jul 24     i i i iii  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt28olcott
11 Jul 24     i i i iii   `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt27Richard Damon
11 Jul 24     i i i iii    `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt26olcott
11 Jul 24     i i i iii     `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt, thinks olcott, but it does.25Richard Damon
11 Jul 24     i i i iii      `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt, thinks olcott, but it does.24olcott
11 Jul 24     i i i iii       `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt, thinks olcott, but it does.23Richard Damon
11 Jul 24     i i i iii        `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt22olcott
11 Jul 24     i i i iii         `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt21Richard Damon
11 Jul 24     i i i iii          `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt20olcott
12 Jul 24     i i i iii           `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt19Richard Damon
12 Jul 24     i i i iii            `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt18olcott
12 Jul 24     i i i iii             `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt17Richard Damon
12 Jul 24     i i i iii              `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt16olcott
12 Jul 24     i i i iii               +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt10joes
12 Jul 24     i i i iii               i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt9olcott
12 Jul 24     i i i iii               i +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt4Fred. Zwarts
12 Jul 24     i i i iii               i i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt3olcott
12 Jul 24     i i i iii               i i +- Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt1Fred. Zwarts
13 Jul 24     i i i iii               i i `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt1Mikko
13 Jul 24     i i i iii               i +- Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt1Richard Damon
14 Jul 24     i i i iii               i `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt3joes
14 Jul 24     i i i iii               i  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt2olcott
14 Jul 24     i i i iii               i   `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt1Richard Damon
12 Jul 24     i i i iii               `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt Because HHH that correctly simulates does not Halt5Richard Damon
12 Jul 24     i i i iii                `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt4olcott
12 Jul 24     i i i iii                 +- Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt1Fred. Zwarts
12 Jul 24     i i i iii                 +- Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt1joes
13 Jul 24     i i i iii                 `- Re: DDD correctly but partially emulated by HHH cannot possibly be seen to halt by HHH, but do halt1Richard Damon
10 Jul 24     i i i ii`* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters29Fred. Zwarts
10 Jul 24     i i i ii `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters28olcott
10 Jul 24     i i i ii  `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters27Fred. Zwarts
10 Jul 24     i i i ii   `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters26olcott
10 Jul 24     i i i ii    `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters25Fred. Zwarts
10 Jul 24     i i i ii     `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters24olcott
10 Jul 24     i i i ii      +* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters3Fred. Zwarts
10 Jul 24     i i i ii      i`* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters2olcott
10 Jul 24     i i i ii      i `- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters1Fred. Zwarts
11 Jul 24     i i i ii      `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters20Mikko
11 Jul 24     i i i ii       `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters19olcott
12 Jul 24     i i i ii        +- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters1Richard Damon
12 Jul 24     i i i ii        +* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters10Mikko
12 Jul 24     i i i ii        i`* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters9olcott
13 Jul 24     i i i ii        i `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters8Mikko
13 Jul 24     i i i ii        i  `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters7olcott
14 Jul 24     i i i ii        i   `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters6Mikko
14 Jul 24     i i i ii        i    `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters -- Professor Hehner5olcott
14 Jul 24     i i i ii        i     +- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters -- Professor Hehner1Richard Damon
15 Jul 24     i i i ii        i     `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters -- Professor Hehner3Mikko
15 Jul 24     i i i ii        i      `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters -- Professor Hehner2olcott
16 Jul 24     i i i ii        i       `- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters -- Professor Hehner1Mikko
12 Jul 24     i i i ii        `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters7Fred. Zwarts
12 Jul 24     i i i ii         `* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters6olcott
12 Jul 24     i i i ii          +* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters4Fred. Zwarts
12 Jul 24     i i i ii          i`* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters3olcott
12 Jul 24     i i i ii          i +- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters1joes
12 Jul 24     i i i ii          i `- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters1Fred. Zwarts
12 Jul 24     i i i ii          `- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters1joes
9 Jul 24     i i i i+- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters ---clarification1olcott
9 Jul 24     i i i i`- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- one more freaking time1olcott
10 Jul 24     i i i `- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters1Richard Damon
9 Jul 24     i i +* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters3joes
9 Jul 24     i i i`* Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters2olcott
9 Jul 24     i i i `- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters1olcott
10 Jul 24     i i `- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters1Richard Damon
10 Jul 24     i `- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters1Richard Damon
10 Jul 24     +- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters1Richard Damon
10 Jul 24     `- Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters1Mikko
13 Jul 24 * Re: What is the correct halt status for HHH(DDD) ?14Richard Damon
13 Jul 24 +* Re: What is the correct halt status for HHH(DDD) ?11olcott
13 Jul 24 i+* Re: What is the correct halt status for HHH(DDD) ?7Richard Damon
13 Jul 24 ii`* Re: What is the correct halt status for HHH(DDD) ? --- Tautology6olcott
13 Jul 24 ii `* Re: What is the correct halt status for HHH(DDD) ? --- Tautology5Richard Damon
13 Jul 24 ii  `* Re: What is the correct halt status for HHH(DDD) ? --- Tautology4olcott
13 Jul 24 ii   `* Re: What is the correct halt status for HHH(DDD) ? --- Tautology3Richard Damon
13 Jul 24 ii    `* Re: What is the correct halt status for HHH(DDD) ? --- Tautology2olcott
13 Jul 24 ii     `- Re: What is the correct halt status for HHH(DDD) ? --- Tautology1Richard Damon
14 Jul 24 i`* Re: What is the correct halt status for HHH(DDD) ?3Mikko
14 Jul 24 i `* Re: What is the correct halt status for HHH(DDD) ?2olcott
15 Jul 24 i  `- Re: What is the correct halt status for HHH(DDD) ?1Mikko
13 Jul 24 `* Re: What is the correct halt status for HHH(DDD) ?2olcott
13 Jul 24  `- Re: What is the correct halt status for HHH(DDD) ?1Richard Damon
13 Jul 24 * Who here understands that the last paragraph is Necessarily True? --- AKA a Tautology2olcott
13 Jul 24 `- Re: Who here understands that the last paragraph is Necessarily True? --- AKA a Tautology1Richard Damon
10 Jul 24 * DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt11olcott
10 Jul 24 +* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt5Richard Damon
10 Jul 24 i`* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt4olcott
10 Jul 24 i `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt3Richard Damon
10 Jul 24 i  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt ---Eternal-September-Failure2olcott
11 Jul 24 i   `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt ---Eternal-September-Failure1Richard Damon
10 Jul 24 `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt5Mikko
10 Jul 24  `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt4olcott
11 Jul 24   `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt3Mikko
11 Jul 24    `* Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt2olcott
12 Jul 24     `- Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly halt1Mikko
9 Jul 24 o Why examine the halting problem using the x86 language?1olcott
2 Jul 24 * Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?162olcott
2 Jul 24 +* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?9Richard Damon
2 Jul 24 i`* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?8olcott
2 Jul 24 i `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?7Richard Damon
2 Jul 24 i  `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?6olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal