comp.theory

Liste des GroupesPages :12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334
Date Sujet#  Auteur
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i  `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down33olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i   `* Re: Olcott is simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down32Richard Damon
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i    `* Re: Olcott is simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down31olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     +* Re: Olcott is simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down29Richard Damon
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i`* DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD28olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i `* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD27Richard Damon
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i  `* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD26olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i   `* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD25olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i    `* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD24Richard Damon
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i     +* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD3olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i     i+- Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD1Richard Damon
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i     i`- Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD1immibis
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i     `* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD20olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i      `* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD19Richard Damon
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i       `* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD18olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i        `* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD17Richard Damon
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i         `* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD16olcott
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i          `* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD15Richard Damon
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i           `* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD14olcott
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i            `* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD13Richard Damon
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i             `* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD12olcott
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i              `* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD11Richard Damon
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i               `* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD10olcott
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i                `* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD9Richard Damon
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i                 `* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD8olcott
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i                  +* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD4Fred. Zwarts
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i                  i`* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD3olcott
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i                  i +- Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD1Fred. Zwarts
4 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i                  i `- Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD1Richard Damon
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i                  `* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD3Richard Damon
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i                   `* Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD2olcott
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     i                    `- Re: DD correctly simulated by HH cannot possible halt --- Try to prove otherwise --- x86 DD1Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   i     `- Re: Olcott is simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   i   `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     i   `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i     `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down9Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i      `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down8olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i       +- Re: Olcott is simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1Richard Damon
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i       `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down6Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i        `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down5olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i         +* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down3Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i         i`* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down2olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i         i `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   i         `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1Richard Damon
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i i   `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1immibis
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i +- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1immibis
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down2joes
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   i  `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i   `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down9Mikko
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i    `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down8olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i     +- Re: Olcott is simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1Richard Damon
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i     `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down6Mikko
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i      `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down5olcott
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i       +* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down2Mikko
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i       i`- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1olcott
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i       +- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1Fred. Zwarts
4 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i       `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1Richard Damon
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1immibis
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1Fred. Zwarts
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i +* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down50Wasell
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i`* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down49olcott
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i +* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down47Richard Damon
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i`* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down46olcott
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down45Richard Damon
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i  `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down --- canonical44olcott
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   +* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down --- canonical42Richard Damon
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i`* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down --- canonical41olcott
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down --- canonical40Richard Damon
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i  `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down --- canonical39olcott
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i   `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down --- canonical38Richard Damon
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i    `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down --- canonical37olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     +* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down --- canonical27Richard Damon
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i`* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down --- canonical26olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i +- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down --- canonical1Richard Damon
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---24joes
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i  +* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---13olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i  i+- Re: Olcott is simply wrong ---1Richard Damon
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i  i`* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---11Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i  i `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---10olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i  i  +* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---8Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i  i  i`* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---7olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i  i  i `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---6Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i  i  i  `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---5olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i  i  i   +- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---1Richard Damon
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i  i  i   `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---3Fred. Zwarts
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i  i  i    `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---2olcott
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i  i  i     `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---1Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i  i  `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---1Richard Damon
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i  +* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---9olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i  i`* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---8joes
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i  i `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---7olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i  i  +- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---1Richard Damon
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i  i  `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---5Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i  i   `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---4olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i  i    `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---3Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i  i     `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---2olcott
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i  i      `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---1Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     i  `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---1Alan Mackenzie
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i     `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down --- canonical9Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i      `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down --- canonical8olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i       `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down --- canonical7Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i        `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down --- canonical6olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i         +* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down --- canonical3Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i         i`* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down --- canonical2olcott
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i         i `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down --- canonical1Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i         +- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down --- canonical1Richard Damon
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   i         `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down --- canonical1immibis
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i   `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down --- canonical1immibis
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1immibis
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i +* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down16Fred. Zwarts
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i`* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down15olcott
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i +* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down12Fred. Zwarts
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i`* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down11olcott
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i +- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1Richard Damon
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i +* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down5Fred. Zwarts
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i`* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down4olcott
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i +- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1Richard Damon
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i +- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1immibis
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i i `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1joes
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i +- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1immibis
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down3joes
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i  +- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1olcott
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i i  `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1immibis
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i +- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1Richard Damon
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i i `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1joes
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down3joes
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i  `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down2olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           i   `- Re: Two dozen people were simply right --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1joes
1 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i i           `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down1immibis
31 May 24 i     i  i i       i `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise8Mikko
31 May 24 i     i  i i       i  `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise7olcott
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i   `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise6Mikko
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i    `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise5olcott
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i     `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise4Mikko
3 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i      `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise3olcott
4 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i       `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise2Mikko
4 Jun 24 i     i  i i       i        `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise1olcott
31 May 24 i     i  i i       `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise2Mikko
31 May 24 i     i  i i        `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise1olcott
30 May 24 i     i  i `- Re: H is an incorrect x86 emulator1immibis
30 May 24 i     i  +- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong1immibis
1 Jun 24 i     i  `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong26Mikko
1 Jun 24 i     i   `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong -- Only basis for rebuttal in the last 3 years25olcott
1 Jun 24 i     i    +* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong -- Only basis for rebuttal in the last 3 years10Fred. Zwarts
1 Jun 24 i     i    i`* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong -- Only basis for rebuttal in the last 3 years9olcott
1 Jun 24 i     i    i +- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong -- Only basis for rebuttal in the last 3 years1Fred. Zwarts
1 Jun 24 i     i    i +- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong -- Only basis for rebuttal in the last 3 years1immibis
1 Jun 24 i     i    i `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong -- Only basis for rebuttal in the last 3 years6joes
1 Jun 24 i     i    i  `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong -- Only basis for rebuttal in the last 3 years5olcott
1 Jun 24 i     i    i   +- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong -- Only basis for rebuttal in the last 3 years1Richard Damon
1 Jun 24 i     i    i   +- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong -- Only basis for rebuttal in the last 3 years1immibis
2 Jun 24 i     i    i   `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong -- Only basis for rebuttal in the last 3 years2Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 24 i     i    i    `- Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong -- Only basis for rebuttal in the last 3 years1immibis
2 Jun 24 i     i    `* Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong -- Only basis for rebuttal in the last 3 years14Mikko
2 Jun 24 i     i     `* Re: Deciders are ONLY accountable for their actual inputs ---13olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i      +* Re: Deciders are ONLY accountable for their actual inputs ---8Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 24 i     i      i`* Re: Deciders are ONLY accountable for their actual inputs ---7olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i      i +* Re: Deciders are ONLY accountable for their actual inputs ---5Fred. Zwarts
2 Jun 24 i     i      i i+* Re: Deciders are ONLY accountable for their actual inputs ---3olcott
2 Jun 24 i     i      i ii+- Re: Deciders are ONLY accountable for their actual inputs ---1Richard Damon
2 Jun 24 i     i      i ii`- Re: Deciders are ONLY accountable for their actual inputs ---1immibis
2 Jun 24 i     i      i i`- Re: Deciders are ONLY accountable for their actual inputs ---1immibis
2 Jun 24 i     i      i `- Re: Deciders are ONLY accountable for their actual inputs ---1Richard Damon
3 Jun 24 i     i      `* Re: Deciders are ONLY accountable for their actual inputs ---4Mikko
3 Jun 24 i     i       `* Re: Deciders are ONLY accountable for their actual inputs ---3olcott
3 Jun 24 i     i        +- Re: Deciders are ONLY accountable for their actual inputs ---1Mikko
3 Jun 24 i     i        `- Re: Deciders are ONLY accountable for their actual inputs ---1Fred. Zwarts
30 May 24 i     `- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets1Richard Damon
30 May 24 +* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders38olcott
30 May 24 i+* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders9Mike Terry
30 May 24 ii`* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders8olcott
30 May 24 ii `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders7Mike Terry
30 May 24 ii  `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders6olcott
30 May 24 ii   +* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders4Mike Terry
30 May 24 ii   i+* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- Try to prove otherwise2olcott
30 May 24 ii   ii`- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- Try to prove otherwise1immibis
31 May 24 ii   i`- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- Mike Terry1olcott
31 May 24 ii   `- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders1Richard Damon
30 May 24 i+* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders27Fred. Zwarts
30 May 24 ii+* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders2olcott
30 May 24 iii`- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders1Fred. Zwarts
30 May 24 ii`* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders24olcott
30 May 24 ii `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders23Fred. Zwarts
30 May 24 ii  `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders22olcott
30 May 24 ii   `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders21Fred. Zwarts
30 May 24 ii    `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders20olcott
30 May 24 ii     +* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders3Fred. Zwarts
30 May 24 ii     i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders2olcott
30 May 24 ii     i `- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders1immibis
31 May 24 ii     +* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders8André G. Isaak
31 May 24 ii     i+* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders2olcott
31 May 24 ii     ii`- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders1Richard Damon
31 May 24 ii     i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders5Jeff Barnett
31 May 24 ii     i `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders4André G. Isaak
31 May 24 ii     i  `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders3olcott
31 May 24 ii     i   +- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders1immibis
31 May 24 ii     i   `- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders1Richard Damon
31 May 24 ii     +* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders5André G. Isaak
31 May 24 ii     i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders4olcott
31 May 24 ii     i +* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders2Fred. Zwarts
31 May 24 ii     i i`- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders1olcott
31 May 24 ii     i `- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders1Richard Damon
1 Jun 24 ii     `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders3joes
1 Jun 24 ii      `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders2olcott
1 Jun 24 ii       `- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders1Richard Damon
31 May 24 i`- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets --- deciders1Richard Damon
31 May 24 `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets14Mikko
31 May 24  `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets13olcott
1 Jun 24   `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets12Mikko
1 Jun 24    `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets11olcott
1 Jun 24     +- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets1Richard Damon
1 Jun 24     +* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets6joes
1 Jun 24     i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets5olcott
1 Jun 24     i +- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets1Richard Damon
1 Jun 24     i +- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets1immibis
2 Jun 24     i `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets2joes
2 Jun 24     i  `- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets1olcott
2 Jun 24     `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets3Mikko
2 Jun 24      `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets2olcott
3 Jun 24       `- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets1Mikko
30 May 24 * Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt67joes
31 May 24 `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt66olcott
31 May 24  +- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt1Richard Damon
31 May 24  +* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt60Fred. Zwarts
31 May 24  i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt59olcott
31 May 24  i +* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt30Fred. Zwarts
31 May 24  i i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt29olcott
31 May 24  i i +* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt23Fred. Zwarts
31 May 24  i i i+* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt3olcott
31 May 24  i i ii+- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt1immibis
31 May 24  i i ii`- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt1Fred. Zwarts
31 May 24  i i i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt19olcott
31 May 24  i i i +* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt17Fred. Zwarts
31 May 24  i i i i`* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt16olcott
31 May 24  i i i i +* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt13Fred. Zwarts
31 May 24  i i i i i+* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt --- Mike Terry11olcott
1 Jun 24  i i i i ii`* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt --- Mike Terry10Fred. Zwarts
1 Jun 24  i i i i ii `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt --- Mike Terry9olcott
1 Jun 24  i i i i ii  +- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt --- Mike Terry1Richard Damon
2 Jun 24  i i i i ii  `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt --- Mike Terry7Mikko
2 Jun 24  i i i i ii   `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt --- Mike Terry6olcott
2 Jun 24  i i i i ii    +- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt --- Mike Terry1Richard Damon
3 Jun 24  i i i i ii    `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt --- Mike Terry4Mikko
3 Jun 24  i i i i ii     `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt --- Mike Terry3olcott
3 Jun 24  i i i i ii      `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt --- Mike Terry2Mikko
3 Jun 24  i i i i ii       `- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt --- Mike Terry1olcott
1 Jun 24  i i i i i`- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt1immibis
1 Jun 24  i i i i `* Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt2immibis
1 Jun 24  i i i i  `- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt1Richard Damon
1 Jun 24  i i i `- Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt1immibis

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal