comp.theory

Liste des Groupes Pages :12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334
Date Sujet#  Auteur
18 May 24 ii  `* Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts17olcott
18 May 24 ii   +- Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts1Richard Damon
19 May 24 ii   `* Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts15Mikko
19 May 24 ii    `* Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts14olcott
19 May 24 ii     `* Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts13Mikko
19 May 24 ii      `* Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts12olcott
19 May 24 ii       +* Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts3Richard Damon
19 May 24 ii       i`* Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts --- Admitted Liar2olcott
19 May 24 ii       i `- Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts --- Olcott is an Admitted Liar1Richard Damon
20 May 24 ii       `* Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts8Mikko
20 May 24 ii        `* Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts7olcott
21 May 24 ii         +- Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts1Richard Damon
21 May 24 ii         `* Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts5Mikko
21 May 24 ii          +* Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts2immibis
21 May 24 ii          i`- Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts1Mikko
21 May 24 ii          `* Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts2olcott
22 May 24 ii           `- Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts1Richard Damon
17 May 24 i`* Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts10olcott
17 May 24 i +* Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts8olcott
18 May 24 i i+- Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts1Richard Damon
18 May 24 i i+* Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts2Mikko
18 May 24 i ii`- Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts1olcott
18 May 24 i i+- Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts1joes
18 May 24 i i`* Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts3Mikko
18 May 24 i i `* Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts2olcott
18 May 24 i i  `- Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts1Richard Damon
18 May 24 i `- Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts1Richard Damon
18 May 24 `- Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts1immibis
11 May 24 * Termination analyzer defined74olcott
11 May 24 +* Re: Termination analyzer defined17olcott
11 May 24 i`* Re: Termination analyzer defined16Richard Damon
11 May 24 i `* Re: Termination analyzer defined15olcott
11 May 24 i  `* Re: Termination analyzer defined14Richard Damon
11 May 24 i   +* Re: Termination analyzer defined7olcott
11 May 24 i   i`* Re: Termination analyzer defined6Richard Damon
11 May 24 i   i +* Re: Termination analyzer defined2olcott
11 May 24 i   i i`- Re: Termination analyzer defined1Richard Damon
11 May 24 i   i `* Re: Termination analyzer defined3olcott
11 May 24 i   i  +- Re: Termination analyzer defined1olcott
11 May 24 i   i  `- Re: Termination analyzer defined1Richard Damon
11 May 24 i   `* Re: Termination analyzer defined6olcott
11 May 24 i    `* Re: Termination analyzer defined5Richard Damon
11 May 24 i     +* Re: Termination analyzer defined2olcott
11 May 24 i     i`- Re: Termination analyzer defined1Richard Damon
11 May 24 i     `* Re: Termination analyzer defined2olcott
11 May 24 i      `- Re: Termination analyzer defined1Richard Damon
11 May 24 +* Re: Termination analyzer defined9Richard Damon
11 May 24 i`* Re: Termination analyzer defined8olcott
11 May 24 i `* Re: Termination analyzer defined7Richard Damon
11 May 24 i  `* Re: Termination analyzer defined6olcott
11 May 24 i   `* Re: Termination analyzer defined5Richard Damon
11 May 24 i    `* Re: Termination analyzer defined4olcott
11 May 24 i     `* Re: Termination analyzer defined3Richard Damon
11 May 24 i      `* Re: Termination analyzer defined2olcott
11 May 24 i       `- Re: Termination analyzer defined1Richard Damon
11 May 24 +* Re: Termination analyzer defined3Fred. Zwarts
11 May 24 i`* Re: Termination analyzer defined2olcott
11 May 24 i `- Re: Termination analyzer defined1Richard Damon
11 May 24 +* Re: Termination analyzer defined43Mikko
11 May 24 i`* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!42olcott
11 May 24 i +- Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!1Richard Damon
12 May 24 i `* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!40Mikko
12 May 24 i  `* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!39olcott
12 May 24 i   +* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!37Mikko
12 May 24 i   i`* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!36olcott
12 May 24 i   i +- Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!1Richard Damon
13 May 24 i   i `* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!34Mikko
13 May 24 i   i  +* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!20olcott
14 May 24 i   i  i`* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!19Mikko
14 May 24 i   i  i `* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!18olcott
15 May 24 i   i  i  `* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!17Mikko
15 May 24 i   i  i   `* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!16olcott
16 May 24 i   i  i    +- Re: Termination analyzer defined ---OLCOTT IS WRONG !!!1Richard Damon
16 May 24 i   i  i    `* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!14Mikko
16 May 24 i   i  i     `* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!13olcott
17 May 24 i   i  i      +* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!9Mikko
17 May 24 i   i  i      i`* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!8olcott
18 May 24 i   i  i      i +- Re: Termination analyzer defined ---OLCOTT IS WRONG !!!1Richard Damon
18 May 24 i   i  i      i `* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!6Mikko
18 May 24 i   i  i      i  `* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!5olcott
18 May 24 i   i  i      i   +- Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!1Richard Damon
19 May 24 i   i  i      i   `* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!3Mikko
19 May 24 i   i  i      i    `* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!2olcott
19 May 24 i   i  i      i     `- Re: Termination analyzer defined ---OLCOTT IS A LIAR !!!1Richard Damon
18 May 24 i   i  i      `* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!3immibis
18 May 24 i   i  i       `* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!2olcott
18 May 24 i   i  i        `- Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!1Richard Damon
13 May 24 i   i  `* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!13Jeff Barnett
14 May 24 i   i   `* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!12Mikko
14 May 24 i   i    +- Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!1olcott
14 May 24 i   i    +* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!9olcott
15 May 24 i   i    i+- Re: Termination analyzer defined ---OLCOTT IS A LIAR !!!1Richard Damon
15 May 24 i   i    i`* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!7Mikko
15 May 24 i   i    i `* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!6olcott
16 May 24 i   i    i  +- Re: Termination analyzer defined ---OLCOTT IS WRONG !!!1Richard Damon
16 May 24 i   i    i  `* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!4Mikko
16 May 24 i   i    i   `* Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!3olcott
17 May 24 i   i    i    +- Re: Termination analyzer defined ---OLCOTT IS WRONG !!!1Richard Damon
17 May 24 i   i    i    `- Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!1Mikko
14 May 24 i   i    `- Re: Termination analyzer defined ---RICHARD IS WRONG !!!1Jeff Barnett
12 May 24 i   `- Re: Termination analyzer defined ---OLCOTT IS WRONG !!!1Richard Damon
13 May 24 `- Re: Termination analyzer defined1immibis
18 May 24 * â„™â‰ â„•â„™ proof5wij
18 May 24 `* Re: ℙ≠ℕℙ proof4immibis
18 May 24  `* Re: ℙ≠ℕℙ proof3wij
19 May 24   `* Re: ℙ≠ℕℙ proof2immibis
19 May 24    `- Re: ℙ≠ℕℙ proof1wij
17 May 24 * How do I quote the past post of usenet?5wij
17 May 24 +- Re: How do I quote the past post of usenet?1olcott
18 May 24 +* Re: How do I quote the past post of usenet?2immibis
18 May 24 i`- Re: How do I quote the past post of usenet?1olcott
18 May 24 `- Re: How do I quote the past post of usenet?1Mikko
11 May 24 * What is the complexity classification of sat(..) ?9wij
13 May 24 +* Re: What is the complexity classification of sat(..) ?5immibis
13 May 24 i`* Re: What is the complexity classification of sat(..) ?4wij
13 May 24 i +* Re: What is the complexity classification of sat(..) ?2immibis
14 May 24 i i`- Re: What is the complexity classification of sat(..) ?1immibis
17 May 24 i `- Re: What is the complexity classification of sat(..) ?1wij
16 May 24 `* Re: What is the complexity classification of sat(..) ?3Jeff Barnett
16 May 24  `* Re: What is the complexity classification of sat(..) ?2wij
16 May 24   `- Re: What is the complexity classification of sat(..) ?1Ben Bacarisse
12 May 24 * A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed41olcott
12 May 24 +- Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed1Richard Damon
12 May 24 +* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed19olcott
12 May 24 i`* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed18Richard Damon
13 May 24 i `* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed17olcott
13 May 24 i  `* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed16Richard Damon
13 May 24 i   +* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed6olcott
13 May 24 i   i`* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed5Richard Damon
13 May 24 i   i `* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed4olcott
13 May 24 i   i  `* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed3Richard Damon
13 May 24 i   i   `* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed2olcott
14 May 24 i   i    `- Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed1Richard Damon
13 May 24 i   `* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed9olcott
13 May 24 i    +* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed5Richard Damon
13 May 24 i    i`* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed4olcott
13 May 24 i    i `* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed3Richard Damon
13 May 24 i    i  `* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed2olcott
14 May 24 i    i   `- Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed1Richard Damon
13 May 24 i    `* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed3joes
13 May 24 i     `* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed2olcott
14 May 24 i      `- Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed1Richard Damon
13 May 24 +* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed2Mikko
13 May 24 i`- Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed1olcott
13 May 24 `* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed18Fred. Zwarts
13 May 24  `* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed17olcott
13 May 24   +* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed9Fred. Zwarts
13 May 24   i`* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed8olcott
13 May 24   i +* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed6Fred. Zwarts
13 May 24   i i`* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed5olcott
13 May 24   i i `* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed4Fred. Zwarts
13 May 24   i i  `* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed3olcott
13 May 24   i i   `* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed2Fred. Zwarts
13 May 24   i i    `- Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed1olcott
14 May 24   i `- Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed1Richard Damon
13 May 24   +* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed6immibis
14 May 24   i`* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed5olcott
14 May 24   i +- Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed1Richard Damon
14 May 24   i `* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed3immibis
14 May 24   i  `* Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed +++2olcott
14 May 24   i   `- Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self *is* allowed +++1Richard Damon
14 May 24   `- Re: A computable function that reports on the behavior of its actual self is not allowed1Richard Damon
12 May 24 * Original halting problem proof review2joes
13 May 24 `- Re: Original halting problem proof review1Mikko
10 May 24 * Re: Linz's proofs and other undecidable decision problems [LP as basis] [Mike Terry]16olcott
11 May 24 `* Re: Linz's proofs and other undecidable decision problems [LP as basis] [Mike Terry]15Mikko
11 May 24  `* Re: Linz's proofs and other undecidable decision problems [LP as basis] [Mike Terry]14olcott
11 May 24   +* Re: Linz's proofs and other undecidable decision problems [LP as basis] [Mike Terry]2Mike Terry
11 May 24   i`- Re: Linz's proofs and other undecidable decision problems [LP as basis] [Mike Terry](apology)1olcott
11 May 24   +* Re: Linz's proofs and other undecidable decision problems [LP as basis] [Mike Terry]5Richard Damon
11 May 24   i`* Re: Linz's proofs and other undecidable decision problems [LP as basis] [Mike Terry]4olcott
11 May 24   i +* Re: Linz's proofs and other undecidable decision problems [LP as basis] [Mike Terry]2olcott
12 May 24   i i`- Re: Linz's proofs and other undecidable decision problems [LP as basis] [Mike Terry]1Richard Damon
12 May 24   i `- Re: Linz's proofs and other undecidable decision problems [LP as basis] [Mike Terry]1Richard Damon
12 May 24   `* Re: Linz's proofs and other undecidable decision problems [LP as basis] [Mike Terry]6olcott
12 May 24    +* Re: Linz's proofs and other undecidable decision problems [LP as basis] [Mike Terry]4Mikko
12 May 24    i`* Re: Linz's proofs and other undecidable decision problems [LP as basis] [Mike Terry]3olcott
12 May 24    i +- Re: Linz's proofs and other undecidable decision problems [LP as basis] [Mike Terry]1Richard Damon
13 May 24    i `- Re: Linz's proofs and other undecidable decision problems [LP as basis] [Mike Terry]1Mikko
12 May 24    `- Re: Linz's proofs and other undecidable decision problems [LP as basis] [Mike Terry]1Richard Damon
12 May 24 * Re: Linz's proofs and other undecidable decision problems [LP as basis] [Mike Terry]2olcott
12 May 24 `- Re: Linz's proofs and other undecidable decision problems [LP as basis] [Mike Terry]1Richard Damon
11 May 24 * Unconventional termination analyzer D correctly reports halt status of HP input2olcott
12 May 24 `- Re: Unconventional termination analyzer D correctly reports halt status of HP input1Richard Damon
11 May 24 * Unconventional termination analyzer H correctly reports halt status of HP input2olcott
12 May 24 `- Re: Unconventional termination analyzer H correctly reports halt status of HP input1Richard Damon
18 Apr 24 * Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2277olcott
18 Apr 24 +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2220Richard Damon
18 Apr 24 i`* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2219olcott
19 Apr 24 i `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2218Richard Damon
19 Apr 24 i  `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2217olcott
19 Apr 24 i   `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2216Richard Damon
19 Apr 24 i    +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V227olcott
19 Apr 24 i    i+* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V25Richard Damon
19 Apr 24 i    ii`* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V24olcott
19 Apr 24 i    ii `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V23Richard Damon
19 Apr 24 i    ii  `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V22olcott
20 Apr 24 i    ii   `- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V21Richard Damon
20 Apr 24 i    i`* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--21olcott
20 Apr 24 i    i +- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--1Richard Damon
21 Apr 24 i    i `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--19olcott
21 Apr 24 i    i  +- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--1Richard Damon
21 Apr 24 i    i  +- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--1Richard Damon
22 Apr 24 i    i  `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--16Mikko
22 Apr 24 i    i   +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--4olcott
23 Apr 24 i    i   i`* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--3Richard Damon
23 Apr 24 i    i   i `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--2olcott
24 Apr 24 i    i   i  `- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--1Richard Damon
23 Apr 24 i    i   `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--11olcott
26 Apr 24 i    i    `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--10olcott
26 Apr 24 i    i     +- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--1Richard Damon
26 Apr 24 i    i     +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--7Ross Finlayson
26 Apr 24 i    i     i`* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--6olcott
26 Apr 24 i    i     i `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--5Richard Damon
26 Apr 24 i    i     i  `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--4Ross Finlayson
26 Apr 24 i    i     i   `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--3olcott
26 Apr 24 i    i     i    `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--2Richard Damon
26 Apr 24 i    i     i     `- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--1Ross Finlayson
27 Apr 24 i    i     `- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Mendelson--1olcott
19 Apr 24 i    +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V22olcott
20 Apr 24 i    i`- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V21Richard Damon
19 Apr 24 i    `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Tarski Proof--186olcott
20 Apr 24 i     +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Tarski Proof--3Richard Damon
20 Apr 24 i     i`* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Tarski Proof--2olcott
20 Apr 24 i     i `- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Tarski Proof--1Richard Damon
20 Apr 24 i     `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Tarski Proof--182olcott
20 Apr 24 i      +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Tarski Proof--3Richard Damon
21 Apr 24 i      i`* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Tarski Proof--2olcott
21 Apr 24 i      i `- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Tarski Proof--1Richard Damon
21 Apr 24 i      `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Tarski Proof--178olcott
22 Apr 24 i       `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --Tarski Proof--177olcott
24 Apr 24 i        `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--176olcott
25 Apr 24 i         +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--171Richard Damon
25 Apr 24 i         i`* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--170olcott
25 Apr 24 i         i +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--10Richard Damon
25 Apr 24 i         i i`* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--9olcott
25 Apr 24 i         i i `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--8Richard Damon
25 Apr 24 i         i i  `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--7olcott
25 Apr 24 i         i i   `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--6Richard Damon
25 Apr 24 i         i i    +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--2olcott
25 Apr 24 i         i i    i`- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--1Richard Damon
25 Apr 24 i         i i    +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--2olcott
25 Apr 24 i         i i    i`- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--1Richard Damon
25 Apr 24 i         i i    `- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--1Ross Finlayson
25 Apr 24 i         i `* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--159olcott
26 Apr 24 i         i  +- Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--1Richard Damon
26 Apr 24 i         i  +* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--139olcott
26 Apr 24 i         i  i`* Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --H(D,D)--138Richard Damon
26 Apr 24 i         i  i `* D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does137olcott
26 Apr 24 i         i  i  +- Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does1Richard Damon

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal