comp.theory

Liste des GroupesPages :12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334
Date Sujet#  Auteur
30 Oct 24            i`* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---11Richard Damon
30 Oct 24            i `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---10olcott
30 Oct 24            i  `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---9Richard Damon
30 Oct 24            i   `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---8olcott
31 Oct 24            i    `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---7Richard Damon
31 Oct 24            i     `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---repeat until understood6olcott
31 Oct 24            i      `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---repeat until understood5Richard Damon
31 Oct 24            i       +* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---repeat until understood2olcott
31 Oct 24            i       i`- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---repeat until understood1Richard Damon
31 Oct 24            i       `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---repeat until understood2olcott
1 Nov 24            i        `- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---repeat until understood1Richard Damon
29 Oct 24            `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- TYPO90olcott
29 Oct 24             +- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- TYPO1joes
30 Oct 24             `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- TYPO88Richard Damon
30 Oct 24              `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- TYPO87olcott
31 Oct 24               `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- TYPO86Richard Damon
31 Oct 24                `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- TYPO85Mike Terry
31 Oct 24                 +* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---2olcott
31 Oct 24                 i`- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---1Richard Damon
31 Oct 24                 `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- TYPO82Mikko
31 Oct 24                  `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- TYPO81olcott
1 Nov 24                   +- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- TYPO1Richard Damon
1 Nov 24                   `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- TYPO79Mikko
1 Nov 24                    `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- TYPO78olcott
2 Nov 24                     +* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- TYPO5Richard Damon
2 Nov 24                     i`* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- TYPO4olcott
2 Nov 24                     i `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- TYPO3Richard Damon
2 Nov 24                     i  `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- equivocation?2olcott
2 Nov 24                     i   `- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- equivocation?1Richard Damon
2 Nov 24                     `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- TYPO72Mikko
2 Nov 24                      `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis71olcott
2 Nov 24                       +* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis3joes
2 Nov 24                       i+- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis1olcott
3 Nov 24                       i`- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis1Mikko
2 Nov 24                       +* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis20Richard Damon
2 Nov 24                       i`* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- EQUIVOCATION19olcott
2 Nov 24                       i `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- EQUIVOCATION18Richard Damon
2 Nov 24                       i  `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- EQUIVOCATION17olcott
3 Nov 24                       i   `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- EQUIVOCATION16Richard Damon
3 Nov 24                       i    `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- EQUIVOCATION15olcott
3 Nov 24                       i     `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- EQUIVOCATION14Richard Damon
3 Nov 24                       i      `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- EQUIVOCATION13olcott
3 Nov 24                       i       `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- EQUIVOCATION12Richard Damon
3 Nov 24                       i        `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- EQUIVOCATION11olcott
3 Nov 24                       i         +* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- EQUIVOCATION3Richard Damon
3 Nov 24                       i         i`* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- EQUIVOCATION2olcott
3 Nov 24                       i         i `- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- EQUIVOCATION1Richard Damon
3 Nov 24                       i         `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- EQUIVOCATION7joes
3 Nov 24                       i          `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- EQUIVOCATION6olcott
3 Nov 24                       i           +- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- EQUIVOCATION1wij
3 Nov 24                       i           +- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- EQUIVOCATION1Richard Damon
4 Nov 24                       i           `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- EQUIVOCATION3joes
4 Nov 24                       i            `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- EQUIVOCATION2olcott
4 Nov 24                       i             `- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- EQUIVOCATION1Richard Damon
3 Nov 24                       `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis47Mikko
3 Nov 24                        `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis46olcott
3 Nov 24                         +- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis1Richard Damon
5 Nov 24                         `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis44Mikko
5 Nov 24                          `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis43olcott
6 Nov 24                           +- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis1Richard Damon
6 Nov 24                           `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis41Mikko
6 Nov 24                            `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis40olcott
7 Nov 24                             +- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis1Richard Damon
7 Nov 24                             `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis38Mikko
7 Nov 24                              `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis37olcott
8 Nov 24                               +* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis14Richard Damon
8 Nov 24                               i`* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- INFALLIBLY CORRECT REASONING13olcott
8 Nov 24                               i +* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- INFALLIBLY CORRECT REASONING5joes
8 Nov 24                               i i`* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- INFALLIBLY CORRECT REASONING4olcott
8 Nov 24                               i i `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- INFALLIBLY CORRECT REASONING3joes
8 Nov 24                               i i  `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- INFALLIBLY CORRECT REASONING2olcott
9 Nov 24                               i i   `- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- INFALLIBLY CORRECT REASONING1Richard Damon
8 Nov 24                               i `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- INFALLIBLY CORRECT REASONING7Richard Damon
8 Nov 24                               i  `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- INFALLIBLY CORRECT REASONING6olcott
8 Nov 24                               i   `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- INFALLIBLY CORRECT REASONING5Richard Damon
9 Nov 24                               i    `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- INFALLIBLY CORRECT REASONING4olcott
9 Nov 24                               i     `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- INFALLIBLY CORRECT REASONING3Richard Damon
9 Nov 24                               i      `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- INFALLIBLY CORRECT REASONING2olcott
9 Nov 24                               i       `- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- INFALLIBLY CORRECT REASONING1Richard Damon
8 Nov 24                               `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis22Mikko
8 Nov 24                                `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis21olcott
9 Nov 24                                 `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis20Mikko
9 Nov 24                                  `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis19olcott
9 Nov 24                                   +- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis1Richard Damon
11 Nov 24                                   `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis17Mikko
11 Nov 24                                    `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis16olcott
11 Nov 24                                     +- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis1Richard Damon
11 Nov 24                                     +- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis1joes
12 Nov 24                                     `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis13Mikko
13 Nov 24                                      `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis12olcott
13 Nov 24                                       +- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis1Richard Damon
13 Nov 24                                       +* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis3joes
14 Nov 24                                       i`* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis2olcott
14 Nov 24                                       i `- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis1Richard Damon
13 Nov 24                                       `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis7Mikko
14 Nov 24                                        `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis6olcott
14 Nov 24                                         +- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis1Richard Damon
14 Nov 24                                         `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis4Mikko
15 Nov 24                                          `* Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis3olcott
15 Nov 24                                           +- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis1Richard Damon
15 Nov 24                                           `- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis1Mikko
10 Nov 24 * Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work27olcott
10 Nov 24 +* Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work14Richard Damon
10 Nov 24 i`* Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work13olcott
11 Nov 24 i +* Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work11joes
11 Nov 24 i i`* Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work10olcott
11 Nov 24 i i `* Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work9Richard Damon
11 Nov 24 i i  `* Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work8olcott
11 Nov 24 i i   `* Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work7Richard Damon
11 Nov 24 i i    `* Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work6olcott
11 Nov 24 i i     `* Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work5Richard Damon
11 Nov 24 i i      `* Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work4olcott
11 Nov 24 i i       `* Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work3Richard Damon
11 Nov 24 i i        `* Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work2olcott
11 Nov 24 i i         `- Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work1Richard Damon
11 Nov 24 i `- Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work1Richard Damon
11 Nov 24 +* Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work4Mikko
11 Nov 24 i`* Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work3olcott
11 Nov 24 i +- Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work1Richard Damon
12 Nov 24 i `- Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work1Mikko
11 Nov 24 `* Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work8Mikko
11 Nov 24  +* Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work4wij
11 Nov 24  i`* Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work3wij
11 Nov 24  i +- Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work1wij
12 Nov 24  i `- Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work1Mikko
11 Nov 24  `* Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work3olcott
11 Nov 24   +- Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work1Richard Damon
12 Nov 24   `- Re: Philosophy of Computation: Three seem to agree how emulating termination analyzers are supposed to work1Mikko
6 Nov 24 * Why it is lie (about olcott did)?5wij
7 Nov 24 `* Re: Why it is lie (about olcott did)?4Richard Damon
7 Nov 24  +* Re: Why it is lie (about olcott did)?2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Nov 24  i`- Re: Why it is lie (about olcott did)?1Richard Damon
7 Nov 24  `- Re: Why it is lie (about olcott did)?1wij
18 Oct 24 * A state transition diagram proves ...142olcott
18 Oct 24 `* Re: A state transition diagram proves ...141Richard Damon
18 Oct 24  `* Re: A state transition diagram proves ...140olcott
18 Oct 24   `* Re: A state transition diagram proves ...139Richard Damon
18 Oct 24    `* Re: A state transition diagram proves ...138olcott
18 Oct 24     `* Re: A state transition diagram proves ...137Richard Damon
18 Oct 24      `* Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS136olcott
18 Oct 24       +* Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS24joes
18 Oct 24       i`* Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS23olcott
18 Oct 24       i +- Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS -- I only wanted to cross post this key break through once.1olcott
18 Oct 24       i +* Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS14joes
18 Oct 24       i i`* Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS13olcott
18 Oct 24       i i `* Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS12joes
18 Oct 24       i i  `* Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS11olcott
18 Oct 24       i i   `* Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS10Alan Mackenzie
18 Oct 24       i i    `* Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS9olcott
18 Oct 24       i i     `* Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS8joes
18 Oct 24       i i      `* Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS7olcott
18 Oct 24       i i       +- Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS1olcott
19 Oct 24       i i       `* Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS5joes
19 Oct 24       i i        `* Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS4olcott
19 Oct 24       i i         `* Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS3Richard Damon
19 Oct 24       i i          `* Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS2olcott
19 Oct 24       i i           `- Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS1Richard Damon
19 Oct 24       i `* Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS7Richard Damon
19 Oct 24       i  `* Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS6olcott
19 Oct 24       i   `* Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS5Richard Damon
19 Oct 24       i    `* Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS4olcott
19 Oct 24       i     `* Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS3Richard Damon
19 Oct 24       i      `* Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS2olcott
19 Oct 24       i       `- Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS1Richard Damon
19 Oct 24       `* Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS111Richard Damon
19 Oct 24        +- Re: A state transition diagram proves ... GOOD PROGRESS1olcott
19 Oct 24        `* THREE DIFFERENT QUESTIONS109olcott
19 Oct 24         `* Re: THREE DIFFERENT QUESTIONS108Richard Damon
19 Oct 24          `* Re: THREE DIFFERENT QUESTIONS107olcott
19 Oct 24           `* Re: THREE DIFFERENT QUESTIONS106Richard Damon
19 Oct 24            `* Re: THREE DIFFERENT QUESTIONS105olcott
19 Oct 24             `* Re: THREE DIFFERENT QUESTIONS104Richard Damon
20 Oct 24              `* Re: THREE DIFFERENT QUESTIONS103olcott
20 Oct 24               `* Re: THREE DIFFERENT QUESTIONS102Richard Damon
20 Oct 24                `* I have always been correct about emulating termination analyzers --- PROOF101olcott
20 Oct 24                 +* Re: I have always been correct about emulating termination analyzers --- PROOF99Richard Damon
20 Oct 24                 i`* Re: I have always been correct about emulating termination analyzers --- PROOF98olcott
20 Oct 24                 i +* Re: I have always been correct about emulating termination analyzers --- PROOF10Richard Damon
20 Oct 24                 i i+* Re: I have always been correct about emulating termination analyzers --- PROOF2olcott
20 Oct 24                 i ii`- Re: I have always been incorrect about emulating termination analyzers --- PROOF1Richard Damon
20 Oct 24                 i i+* Re: I have always been correct about emulating termination analyzers --- PROOF2olcott
20 Oct 24                 i ii`- Re: I have always been incorrect about emulating termination analyzers --- PROOF1Richard Damon
20 Oct 24                 i i`* Deriving X from the finite set of FooBar preserving operations --- membership algorithm for X in L5olcott
21 Oct 24                 i i +- Re: Deriving X from the finite set of FooBar preserving operations --- membership algorithm for X in L1Richard Damon
21 Oct 24                 i i `* Re: Deriving X from the finite set of FooBar preserving operations --- membership algorithm for X in L3Richard Damon
21 Oct 24                 i i  `* Re: Deriving X from the finite set of FooBar preserving operations --- membership algorithm for X in L2olcott
21 Oct 24                 i i   `- Re: Deriving X from the finite set of FooBar preserving operations --- membership algorithm for X in L1Richard Damon
21 Oct 24                 i `* Re: I have always been correct about emulating termination analyzers --- PROOF87Mikko
21 Oct 24                 i  `* Re: I have always been correct about emulating termination analyzers --- PROOF86olcott
22 Oct 24                 i   `* Re: I have always been correct about emulating termination analyzers --- PROOF85Mikko
22 Oct 24                 i    `* Re: I have always been correct about emulating termination analyzers --- PROOF84olcott
23 Oct 24                 i     `* Re: I have always been correct about emulating termination analyzers --- PROOF83Mikko
23 Oct 24                 i      `* Peano Axioms anchored in First Grade Arithmetic on ASCII Digit String pairs82olcott
24 Oct 24                 i       +- Re: Peano Axioms anchored in First Grade Arithmetic on ASCII Digit String pairs1Richard Damon
24 Oct 24                 i       `* Re: Peano Axioms anchored in First Grade Arithmetic on ASCII Digit String pairs80Mikko
24 Oct 24                 i        `* Re: Peano Axioms anchored in First Grade Arithmetic on ASCII Digit String pairs79olcott
25 Oct 24                 i         +* Re: Peano Axioms anchored in First Grade Arithmetic on ASCII Digit String pairs5Richard Damon
25 Oct 24                 i         i`* Re: Peano Axioms anchored in First Grade Arithmetic on ASCII Digit String pairs4olcott
25 Oct 24                 i         i `* Re: Peano Axioms anchored in First Grade Arithmetic on ASCII Digit String pairs3Richard Damon
25 Oct 24                 i         i  `* Re: Peano Axioms anchored in First Grade Arithmetic on ASCII Digit String pairs2olcott
25 Oct 24                 i         i   `- Re: Peano Axioms anchored in First Grade Arithmetic on ASCII Digit String pairs1Richard Damon
25 Oct 24                 i         `* Re: Peano Axioms anchored in First Grade Arithmetic on ASCII Digit String pairs73Mikko
25 Oct 24                 i          `* Re: Peano Axioms anchored in First Grade Arithmetic on ASCII Digit String pairs72olcott
25 Oct 24                 i           +* Re: Peano Axioms anchored in First Grade Arithmetic on ASCII Digit String pairs36Richard Damon
25 Oct 24                 i           i`* Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers35olcott
26 Oct 24                 i           i `* Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers34Richard Damon
26 Oct 24                 i           i  `* Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers33olcott
26 Oct 24                 i           i   +* Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers30Richard Damon
26 Oct 24                 i           i   i`* Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers29olcott
26 Oct 24                 i           i   i +- Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers1Richard Damon
27 Oct 24                 i           i   i `* Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers27Mikko
27 Oct 24                 i           i   i  +* Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers2joes
28 Oct 24                 i           i   i  i`- Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers1Mikko
27 Oct 24                 i           i   i  `* Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers24olcott
27 Oct 24                 i           i   i   +- Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers1Richard Damon
28 Oct 24                 i           i   i   `* Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers22Mikko
28 Oct 24                 i           i   i    `* Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers21olcott
29 Oct 24                 i           i   i     +* Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers5Richard Damon
29 Oct 24                 i           i   i     i`* Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers4olcott
29 Oct 24                 i           i   i     i +* Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers2André G. Isaak
29 Oct 24                 i           i   i     i i`- Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers1olcott
29 Oct 24                 i           i   i     i `- Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers1Richard Damon
29 Oct 24                 i           i   i     `* Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers15Mikko
29 Oct 24                 i           i   i      `* Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers14olcott
30 Oct 24                 i           i   i       +- Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers1Richard Damon
30 Oct 24                 i           i   i       `* Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers12Mikko
30 Oct 24                 i           i   i        `* Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers11olcott
31 Oct 24                 i           i   i         +- Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers1Richard Damon
31 Oct 24                 i           i   i         `* Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers9Mikko
31 Oct 24                 i           i   i          `* Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers8olcott
31 Oct 24                 i           i   i           +* Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers3joes
31 Oct 24                 i           i   i           i`* Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers2olcott
1 Nov 24                 i           i   i           i `- Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers1Richard Damon
1 Nov 24                 i           i   i           +- Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers1Richard Damon
1 Nov 24                 i           i   i           `* Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers3Mikko
1 Nov 24                 i           i   i            `* Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers2olcott
2 Nov 24                 i           i   i             `- Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers1Richard Damon
26 Oct 24                 i           i   `* Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers2joes
26 Oct 24                 i           i    `- Re: Gödel's actual proof and deriving all of the digits of the actual Gödel numbers1olcott
26 Oct 24                 i           `* Re: Peano Axioms anchored in First Grade Arithmetic on ASCII Digit String pairs35Mikko
26 Oct 24                 i            `* Re: Peano Axioms anchored in First Grade Arithmetic on ASCII Digit String pairs34olcott
26 Oct 24                 i             +- Re: Peano Axioms anchored in First Grade Arithmetic on ASCII Digit String pairs1Richard Damon
27 Oct 24                 i             `* Re: Peano Axioms anchored in First Grade Arithmetic on ASCII Digit String pairs32Mikko
27 Oct 24                 i              `* Re: Peano Axioms anchored in First Grade Arithmetic on ASCII Digit String pairs31olcott
27 Oct 24                 i               +- Re: Peano Axioms anchored in First Grade Arithmetic on ASCII Digit String pairs1Richard Damon
30 Oct 24                 i               `* Re: Peano Axioms anchored in First Grade Arithmetic on ASCII Digit String pairs29Mikko
30 Oct 24                 i                `* Re: Peano Axioms anchored in First Grade Arithmetic on ASCII Digit String pairs28olcott
31 Oct 24                 i                 +- Re: Peano Axioms anchored in First Grade Arithmetic on ASCII Digit String pairs1Richard Damon
31 Oct 24                 i                 `* Re: Peano Axioms anchored in First Grade Arithmetic on ASCII Digit String pairs26Mikko
31 Oct 24                 i                  `* Re: Peano Axioms anchored in First Grade Arithmetic on ASCII Digit String pairs25olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal